Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2010_11_17 Town Board Minutes November 17, 2010 MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING AND WORK SESSION OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,2010, BEGINNING AT S:OOPM IN CONFERENCE ROOM A AND CONTINUING AT 8:15 PM IN THE COURT ROOM OF THE TOWN,740 W. BOSTON POST ROAD, MAMARONECK, NEW YORK PRESENT: Supervisor Valerie M.O'Keeffe Councilwoman Phyllis Wittner Councilman Ernest C.Odierna Councilwoman Nancy Seligson Councilman David J. Fishman ALSO PRESENT: Christina Battalia,Town Clerk Stephen V.Altieri,Town Administrator William Maker,Jr.,Town Attorney CALL TO ORDER-WORK SESSION Tony Siligato,Town Comptroller was in attendance. On motion of Supervisor O'Keeffe,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson the Work Session was unanimously opened at S:OOPM. 2011 Capital Project plan The Board reviewed a memo prepared by Mr.Altieri outlining the various capital projects. The memo described eight categories of projects including a breakdown of financing. It is being recommended that the Town Board push back the entire capital project schedule by one year with the exception of projects listed in Mr.Altieri's memo to the Board. The Board discussed the need to address the Ice Rink Project. Mr.Altieri suggested the plans be finalized in 2011,with anticipated borrowing in 2012.The Board would like to revisit the Ice Rink Project in February of 2011. ADDED ITEM Marie Venezia, Executive Director of the Sheldrake Environmental Center and Board Member,Carol Casazza,gave a presentation to the Town Board. They are asking the Board to maintain the current funding of$4,750.00 for the year 2011. Ms.Venezia gave the Board a full report of the Center's financing,demonstrating justification for retaining support.The Board thanked Ms.Venzia and those involved in the Sheldrake Environmental Center for their hard work and continued stewardship. On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson the Board unanimously agreed to enter into Executive Session to discuss employment history of a particular persons. EXECUTIVE SESSION Employment History of Particular Persons On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Supervisor O'Keeffe,the Board unanimously agreed to reenter Work Session. 1 November 17, 2010 CALL TO ORDER The regular meeting of the Town Board was called to order by Supervisor O'Keeffe at 8:40 PM, she then pointed out the location of exits. PUBLIC HEARING — "Parking Regulation—France Place&Rochelle Road" Law The following Notice of Public Hearing is entered into the record as follows: NOTICE OF PUBLIC HEARING PLEASE TAKE NOTICE,that a Public Hearing will be held by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck on Wednesday, November 17,2010 at 8:15 PM or as soon thereafter as is possible in the Court Room of the Town Center,740 W. Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, New York to consider the adoption of a Local Law entitled "Parking Regulation—France Place&Rochelle Road" Law. Purpose: At the September 2010 meeting of the Traffic Committee residents of France Place and Rochelle Road addressed the Committee regarding issues of commuter parking on their streets. The Traffic Committee is recommending prohibiting parking Monday — Friday between 10:00 AM - 11:00 AM on France Place and a portion of Rochelle Road. The full text of this Local Law may be examined and copies obtained at the Town Clerk's office during regular hours, Monday- Friday,8:30 AM to 4:30 PM, In June,July and August until 4:00 PM at 740 W. Boston Post Road Mamaroneck, New York PLEASE TAKE FURTHER NOTICE that at the Public Hearing all persons interested will be given an opportunity to be heard and that all persons are invited to submit written comments at or prior thereto. BY ORDER OF THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK CHRISTINA BATTALIA TOWN CLERK Published: November 6,2010 On motion of Councilwoman Seligson,seconded by Councilman Fishman,the Public Hearing was unanimously opened. Supervisor O'Keeffe asked if anyone wished to comment on the proposed Local Law. Kate Jarrett,of 10 Rochelle Road addressed the Board. She is in favor of the no parking regulation but would request that it be extended to include the entire length of Rochelle Road. It was noted that Ms. Jarrett gave a letter to the Town Board during the last meeting. Ms.Jarrett's letter is hereby entered into the record, as was a letter from Sandra and Edmond Wu of 13 Rochelle Road. Also entered into the record was a photo of commuter parking on Rochelle Road. Councilman Fishman emphasized the need for a more concerted and rational policy that does not just push parking to another street. Councilwoman Seligson commented that the Board suggested bringing the issue back to the Traffic Committee for their further review and possible broader plan. Heather Conner, l Rochelle Road addressed the Board.She reiterated her support of this regulation, emphasizing that addressing this on a need-to basis is not a bad thing. 2 November 17, 2010 Councilman Odierna stated he would not vote in favor of this Law and said it should be brought back to the Traffic Committee for a comprehensive plan. On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilman Odierna,the Public Hearing was unanimously closed. On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson,it was unanimously RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board finds that the adoption of the proposed local law"Parking Regulation—France Place&Rochelle Road"is hereby declared to be a Type II Action,with no impact under the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act(SEQRA)and requiring no further action. On motion of Councilman Fishman,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson,the following Local Law was approved: Local Law No. 9-2010 This Local Law shall be known as the "Restricted Parking on France Place and the full length of Rochelle Road" Law BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck Section 1—Purpose: France Place and Rochelle Road are in the vicinity of the Larchmont Train Station. The Town Board finds that they are being used for parking by commuters to the detriment of the residents. This law seeks to remedy the problem by prohibiting parking on France Place and a portion of Rochelle Road on the days and at the times when commuters are most likely to park there. Section 2—Restriction on Parking on France Place and a portion of Rochelle Road: No motor vehicle shall be parked on either side of France Place between the hours of 10:00 AM and 11:00 AM (prevailing time) on Mondays, Tuesdays, Wednesdays, Thursdays and Fridays of each week. No motor vehicle shall be parked on either side of Rochelle Road between the hours of 2:00 PM and 3:00 PM (prevailing time) on Monday,Tuesdays, Wednesdays,Thursdays and Fridays of each week. This law shall not apply on holidays. Section 3—Sign(s)to be Erected and Painting to be Done: An appropriate sign or signs shall be erected on and/or striping shall be painted on the surfaces of France Place and Rochelle Road indicating the area where and the times when parking is prohibited by this law. Section 4—Severability: Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such declaration of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any other provisions of this Local Law, which may be implemented without the invalid or unconstitutional provisions. Section 5—Effective Date: This Local Law shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State. The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Fishman Aye Seligson Aye Odierna NAY Wittner Aye O'Keeffe Aye 3 November 17, 2010 ADJOURNED PUBLIC HEARING—"Amendment of Off-street Parking in Residential Districts" Law On motion of Councilwoman Seligson,seconded by Councilwoman Wittner,the Public Hearing was reconvened. Mr. Maker explained the Local Law. Arthur Wexler,Chairman of the Zoning Board of Appeals addressed the Board. Mr.Wexler stated he has concerns with this regulation in its current sate,specifically Section 240-79 B (iii). Mr.Wexler is concerned with driveways which face a garage that has been converted into a permanent room. Mr. Wexler also thinks the Board should review/amend section §240-79 E., which states" Parking areas shall be laid out so that vehicles will not be required to back into the public highway when leaving the parking area". Supervisor O'Keeffe stated that more work need to be done with respect to this amendment,therefore; On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilman Fishman,it was unanimously RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby adjourn the Public Hearing on the"Amendment of Off-street Parking in Residential Districts" Law until December 15, 2010. ADJOURNED PUBLIC HEARING—"Amendment to the Tree Law regarding lot size" On motion of Councilman Fishman,seconded by Councilwoman Wittner,it was unanimously RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby adjourn the Public hearing on the"Amendment to the Tree Law regarding lot size" until December 15,2010. TAKEN OUT OF ORDER AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN 1. DISCUSSION—2011 TOWN BUDGET The Town Administrator and Town Comptroller gave a power point presentation of the 2011 Tentative Budget. Re: 2011 Preliminary Town Budget Dear Supervisor and Members of the Town Board: Transmitted herewith is the Town of Mamaroneck-'s Preliminary Budget for the upcoming fiscal year that begins January 1,2011. The budget plan presented here represents the Town's estimates for the revenues and expenses needed to provide the many municipal services of the Town government. Over the last six weeks the Town Board has had the opportunity to review the budget, meet with department managers to review their individual estimates and develop a financial plan that represents their vision for the Town government in the coming year. This version of the budget will be the subject of a public hearing scheduled on Tuesday, November 30,2010. Pursuant to the New York State Town Law, the Town Board must adopt a budget no later than December 20. 4 November 17, 2010 After having had the opportunity over these past weeks, l believe that you will agree that this budget has by far been one of the most difficult budgets to prepare. Difficult in that the economic conditions that have plagued local governments since 2008 have not improved. For the third consecutive year there has been no growth in major non-property tax revenues. Compounding the problem of funding municipal services is the continued downward trend in our total taxable assessments. Expectations for our services and how to budget for them are vastly different than in the private sector. In the private sector, when demand for goods and services decrease companies contract. They reduce personnel and operating expenses to meet their needs for continued profitability. This is not a preferred solution for the private sector however they do have this as an alternative. Local government does not necessarily have this as an option unless there is a conscious decision to change the level of service to the community. You may recall that in our presentation last year we spoke of the demand upon local government to provide virtually unlimited services particularly for our public safety and public works departments. That mission does not change during tough economic times. In fact we actually see in some cases a greater demand for municipal services. Therefore the 2011 Preliminary Town Budget assumes the continuation of all current municipal services. As we will explain later cost reductions and personnel adjustments may have a limited impact upon service delivery. Probably the most frustrating aspect of preparing this budget is that it is driven exclusively by factors outside of the Town's control. Overall the operating expenses under the control of the Town are down for the coming year. Where the Town could not control costs, nearly all of those costs are up and up significantly. On the following pages we will present the highlights of the 2011 budget and those factors that have driven the need for a property tax increase in the coming year. First here are the highlights of the budget. 2011 Preliminary Town Budget at a Glance 2010 2011 Change Appropriation $514,46 s $29,992,052 $30,506,512 1.7% Non-Property $212,04 Tax Revenue $8,696,515 $8,908,562 2.4% Reserve $1,849,400 $820,000 ($1'029' (55%) Application 400) Property Tax ,$1331,8 $19,446,137 $20,777,950 6.8% Levy 13 Taxable $152,721,69 $150,621,95 ($2,099, (1.4% Assessments 5 0 745) ) The increase in appropriations proposed for the coming year, which will be discussed later, are almost entirely the result of increases in mandated costs to the Town,specifically pension contributions, worker's compensation insurance and health insurance. Non tax revenues are projected to continue a trend of poor performance and for that reason the proposed increase is very small. This budget includes a proposal for a substantial decrease in the application of surplus funds to the budget. Multiple years of poor revenue performance has impacted our bottom line and reduced our ability to recover lost surplus funds. Therefore for 2011 we propose to re-position our surplus applications to maintain our strong financial condition with surplus levels adequate to meet unscheduled events. Also by decreasing our surplus applications now, we are better situated for 2012 and 2013 should economic performance remain flat. The next schedule represents the expected property tax impact upon residents of the Villages of Larchmont and Mamaroneck and those living in the unincorporated area of the Town. 5 November 17, 2010 Before reviewing the tax impact we want to clarify the allocation of Town services among the various areas of the Town. Residents living in the Villages of Larchmont and Mamaroneck receive a number of services from the Town government including emergency medical service, certain property assessment services, recreation services and most recently the services of the newly consolidated Senior and Community Services Program and Section 8 Housing Voucher Program. In addition the Town serves as the collecting agent and guarantor of the property taxes collected on behalf of Westchester County and Mamaroneck Union Free School District. The decisions relating to the Town assuming responsibility for providing emergency medical services,Senior Citizen and Housing Services are the result of successful service consolidation efforts between the Town and the Villages of Mamaroneck and Larchmont. By consolidating services and apportioning the expenses over a larger tax base the municipalities improved the efficiency of service delivery and a provided a greater value to the residents. Residents living in the unincorporated Town receive all of the services provided to the Villages as well as other essential services including those of the Fire Department, Police Department, Highway Services,Sanitation Services and Building Department Services. Impact Upon Unincorporated Area Properties 2010 2011 Change Property Tax Rate $266.02 $282.70 $16.68 Town Property Taxes' $5,320.40 $5,655.20 $334.80 6.2% Impact Upon Properties in the Villages of Mamaroneck and Larchmont 2010 2011 Change Property Tax Rate $17.35 $22.66 $5.31 Town Property Taxes in Villages3 $347.00 $453.20 $106.20 30% Revenue Discussion By now it is becoming a repetitive comment at budget time but the Town will again experience poor performance from its non-property tax revenues. For 2011 we estimate that the increase in these revenues will be only$212,000 and most of that increase results from departmental income where fee increases have been proposed. For the Town one third of our non-property tax revenue is made up of mortgage tax,sales tax, and investment earnings. With the economy continuing to struggle through what has been characterized as a weak recovery we have estimated that none of these revenues will increase in 2011. When revenues perform poorly there is a greater dependence on the property tax but also serves to drain reserves. For 2011 the following table illustrates the funding streams to the Town Budget. In years of better revenue performance the ratio of property tax funding to non-tax revenues and surplus is lower. During the years of positive economic performance property tax funding for the budget has been as low as 62%. In 2010 surplus applied to the Town Budget accounted for 6%of the total funding and non-property tax revenues accounted for 29%. Within the nine budget funds that make up the Town Budget it is the Townwide Fund which experiences the greatest impact when revenues do not perform well hence the larger percentage tax increase. By statute the Town must account for its share of the mortgage tax and investment earnings in the Townwide Fund. Additionally we must account for revenues from fines and summonses in the Townwide Fund even though the Police and Building Departments are budgeted in another fund. For 2011 we estimate that non-tax revenue will total$8,908,562 for all budget funds. We mentioned before the three major revenue sources;mortgage tax, investment income and ' Calculation of property taxes is based upon a property with an average assessment of$20,000 2 Property tax rate is a combined tax rate that includes the Townwide tax rate and Ambulance District tax rate both of which are levied upon all properties in the Town of Mamaroneck 3 Calculation of property taxes is based upon a property with an average assessment of$20,000 6 November 17, 2010 sales tax. To provide some idea of the magnitude of the changes in these revenues;in 2008 the Town earned just over$500,000 in investment income. In 2009 income from this source dropped to$132,000 and as of this date we have earned just$106,000. The story is the same for both mortgage tax and sales tax. In 2008 the Town's mortgage tax revenue was$1.33 million which dropped to$797,000 in 2009 and as of this date stands at $457,000. By year end we estimate our mortgage tax revenue to be$900,000 and have budgeted this amount for 2011. With the decline in the real estate market we have also planned for a decline in revenues from building and land use permits. Our projections for this revenue have dropped from a high of$250,000 in 2008 to$173,000 in 2011. Sales tax has been only slightly better than the other major revenues in its performance over the past several years. Revenue from sales tax dropped from$1.5 million in 2008 to$1.3 million in 2009 and as of this date the Town has received just over$1 million in sales tax. If consumer spending over the holiday is up from last year we should reach our 2010 forecast of $1.27 million. For 2011 we project our rental income from the leasing of property and space at the Town Center to be$265,000. About 50%of this revenue is derived from the lease agreement between the Town and the Town of Mamaroneck Housing Authority for its use of the land at Boston Post Road and Hammocks Road for the Hammocks Park Apartments. With respect to State and Federal Aid we do not expect any dramatic changes however that can change based upon the future actions of the New York State Legislature and the Congress. Altogether the Town will receive$830,000 in aid. Two of the biggest categories of aid include $154,000 in the form of per capita state aid and$549,000 in federal aid for the operation of the Section 8 Housing Voucher Program. In addition the Town receives from New York State $65,000 to help fund road improvements and$62,000 to offset expenses for the senior citizen nutrition and transportation program. One of the largest departmental revenue streams is for Recreation programs and facilities. We have had the good fortune of having Recreation Programming that is popular year after year. This is evidenced not only by the revenue earned but by the number of participants. However as we look forward to reducing the use of property taxes for funding services Recreation Programming is one area where the use of fees to finance operations is common. Through a combination of expense reductions and fee increases the Recreation Department will fund 98%of its operating expenses through earned revenue. This ratio is up from 83%in 2010. Revenues expected to total$2.19 million will offset$2.22 million in expenses. With the reduction in expenses the Town's Recreation Commission has been able to develop a fee structure that remains affordable to the community and does not impact program quality. Other revenues of note for 2011: ➢ Ambulance charges $725,000 ➢ Penalties on late Property Tax Payments $450,000 ➢ Inter fund Transfers $405,500 ➢ Parking Permit and Meter Revenue $350,000 ➢ Water Revenue from Westchester Joint Waterworks $269,000 We want to touch upon the application of unreserved funds or surplus funds as a funding source to the budget. Earlier in this letter we referenced the fact that over time if revenues do not perform adequately there is an impact upon available surpluses. The Town does not create surpluses with phantom expenses. Our surpluses are derived from expense savings and conservative revenue estimates. We have learned in this current economic environment that even the most conservative revenue estimates can be imperfect. As illustrated in the earlier pie chart surplus funds as a percentage of total budget financing will drop from 6%to 3%in 2011. In 2010 the Town's application of surplus to the budget was reduced by$200,000. For this coming year we propose to reduce the application of fund balance by just over$1 million to $820,000 for all budget funds. Certainly this recommendation has had a dramatic impact upon the adjustment to the various tax rates for each fund however in the current environment there is nothing that gives us a sufficient level of confidence to believe that other revenues will improve significantly over the next year or two. This being the case we are unsure of how quickly we can restore the Town's surplus funds to more acceptable levels. 7 November 17, 2010 Our current surplus levels are considered adequate to withstand unanticipated expenses that may occur during the budget year. This was confirmed by both our private auditors as well as Moody's Investor Service. Moody's recently confirmed the Town's AAA bond rating however in their published comments they noted the reductions in surplus in each of the funds and warned that any inefficient use of surplus could negatively change the Town's financial position. We agree with that analysis. It was for that reason we thought it best to reduce the Town's application of surplus to the 2011 Budget. As a result of the uncertainty in the economy over the last three years we think that a more specific benchmark be established for surplus levels going forward. Surplus levels equal to 12%of expenditures should be a minimum target in the future. By severely reducing our use of surplus now during these uncertain times we believe that the Town is in a better position to control tax adjustments in the future as we have in the past. Finally we want to touch upon the topic of the property tax levy and the subject of taxable assessments. For the 2011 Town Budget tax rates were calculated on a total taxable assessed valuation of$150.6 million, a reduction of$2.03 million from last year The continued reduction in our taxable assessments contribute to the overall tax rate increase. Since 2008 taxable assessments have dropped by over$5 million. For 20111.1%of the tax rate adjustment is attributable to the reduction in assessments. The 2011 Tentative Budget submitted in October called for a total tax levy of$20,934,855. That number has since been reduced and the proposed tax levy in the Preliminary Budget is$20,777,950. The proposed tax levy is$1.3 million higher than in 2010. In 2011 we will begin a property revaluation that will be based upon market value. While revaluation will not improve revenue performance or provide additional revenue, it will insure a more equitable apportionment of property taxes. Also with new assessment data the Town is in a better position to more vigorously defend tax appeals. Expenditure Discussion The Preliminary Town Budget proposes total appropriations of$30,506,512, an increase of $514,460 over 2010. In the Tentative Budget proposed in October the total expenditure increase was$671,365. As stated in the beginning of this letter the budget as proposed continues all of the services currently provided by the Town government. However with reductions in staffing levels and other expenses there will be some minor impacts upon some services in terms of times for processing certain administrative functions and response for some Highway Department related functions. Below is a chart that outlines the changes in each category of expenses. 2010 2011 Change Salaries $12,897,182 $12,605,905 ($291,277) Employee Benefits $6,376,655 $7,169,400 $792,745 Equipment $246,800 $191,000 ($55,800) Contractual Expenses $8,336,475 $8,266,770 ($69,705) Interfund Transfers $476,000 $530,500 $54,500 Debt Service $1,658,940 $1,742,937 $83,997 Total $29,992,052 $30,506,512 $514,460 Salaries/Personnel For the coming year we have reduced our salary expenditures by over$290,000. This has been accomplished through a reduction of seven full time budgeted positions. This is in addition to the two full time positions removed in the 2010 budget. In some cases full time positions eliminated for 2011 will be substituted with part time employees in order to maintain efficiencies in various departments. Also we will be initiating employee sharing between departments. Full time employees will be assigned to multiple departments and learn multiple jobs in an effort to hold down salary expenses and take advantage of those members of the staff with specific experience in various department operations. Some of our salary savings has also been accomplished through a retirement incentive plan. Four senior employees will take advantage of a plan offered by the Town this year. With the staff reductions and the corresponding reductions in benefit cost this allowed for a savings of 8 November 17, 2010 $481,000. Savings will also be realized in future years with total savings reaching$2.5 million over five years. The Town's labor contracts are in place for 2011 with Office employees, Highway Department employees and Firefighters. We are currently working on a renewal agreement with the Town's Police officers whose contract expires on December 31,2010. Employee Benefits By now it is common knowledge that employee benefits are a major driver of expense increases in municipal budgets and unfortunately the Town is in the same position. While staff adjustments and new labor contract provisions help in reducing our exposure to these expenses total benefit costs for the Town are still expected to increase by$792,745 in 2011. Below is a chart that outlines the various changes in employee benefits: Benefit Type 2010 2011 Change Police/Fire Pension $925,000 $1,160,000 $235,000 Employees Pension $575,000 $875,000 $300,000 Worker's Comp. $415,000 $522,000 $107,000 FICA/Medicare $993,500 $999,050 $5,550 Medical Insurance $3,126,550 $3,257,000 $130,450 Other Expenses $341,605 $356,350 $14,745 Total $6,376,655 $7,169,400 $792,745 Of the total benefits listed a full 50%are mandated upon the Town by the State and Federal government. For those expenditures where the Town has some discretion we have negotiated employee participation in these costs. Since 1997, the Town's collective bargaining agreements have provided for employee contributions to health insurance. By far it is the pension expense that is the main driver of the increase in employee benefit costs. For 2011 our pension contributions will increase by$535,000 to anew total of$2.0 million. The Town is mandated to offer the benefits of the pension plan to all Town employees. Effective January 1,2011 new employees will be covered by a new Tier V of the pension plan. This new tier will require employees to contribute 3%of their gross salary for their entire active career in New York State public service. Also under Tier V employees except police officers and firefighters may only bank up to an additional$15,000 in compensation towards their pensions. While these measures are expected to reduce overall pension expenses, the savings will be in the long term. Worker's Compensation Insurance and medical insurance are also expected to increase significantly in 2011. Worker's compensation costs have been driven up by two major factors; an increase in the weekly indemnity payout from$400 to$793 per week and a failure on the part of the State to institute a cap on permanent partial disabilities which was to be a part of the Worker's Compensation Reform Act. In an effort to limit our exposure for this type of insurance we are working with our carrier on the feasibility of self insuring for the indemnity portion of worker's compensation benefits. Since employee salaries are provided for in the budget there is no additional cost to the Town to self insure for indemnity. Hopefully this plan will result in a significant savings for the Town. Medical insurance costs for the Town are expected to increase by 13.4%. For the Town this means an expected cost of$3.2million in 2011. From what we have been advised the increase in costs is attributable to the increased costs of medical procedures and the first phases of the new Federal legislation on medical insurance. In the coming year dependent children up to the age of 26 may now remain on their parent's medical insurance plan. Up until now the maximum age for dependent children was 21. Looking at our day to day operating expenses including the categories of small equipment and contractual expenses you will find them to be generally at our below 2010 levels. When budget preparation began in June of this year department heads were directed to formulate budgets that reduced expenses by a minimum of 5%. We then evaluated the impact of the reductions and adjusted accordingly. It was important to make sure that the reductions were real and not require a budget adjustment in mid year. So for the second year in a row the 9 November 17, 2010 Town's departments have produced budgets with no increases where the Town had full discretion over expenses. One of the more significant reductions is for energy consumption. As a result of price reductions and improvements in energy efficiency our expenses for electricity,fuel oil, gasoline and natural gas will drop from$767,550 to$728,100. For the coming year we are exploring other measures to further reduce energy consumption. Another considerable expense for the Town is the defense of tax appeals filed by property owners. This year over 1,000 grievances were filed. While some of these grievances will be settled the process of defending the claims can be expensive. The 2011 Budget includes a $500,000 appropriation for the defense of the tax appeals and the refund of taxes. In terms of capital projects for the coming year we are only proposing two new projects for 2011. First is the replacement of two police vehicles at a cost of$50,000 and the second is an evaluation of the Town Center Building for future repairs and restoration. The evaluation is expected to cost roughly$100,000. Other capital projects that were approved in 2010 and for which financing has been secured will be completed in 2011. These include: ➢ Purchase of a new refuse collection truck $ 185,000 ➢ Purchase of a new rescue vehicle and fire pumper $1,050,000 ➢ Road Resurfacing/Sidewalk Improvements $ 565,000 ➢ Purchase of Hybrid Dump Truck $ 185,000 ➢ Renovations to the Senior Center $ 400,000 ➢ Construction of Sanitation Operations Building $ 962,0004 All other capital projects previously planned for 2011 will be deferred to 2012 or beyond. Aside from the expense savings, deferring the project will allow the Town to delay new debt expenses to 2013 when the Town will retire a number of older debt issues. Another project to be discussed as part of the budget is the property revaluation planned for next year. Costs for this are expected to range between$150 to$275 per parcel which means the total cost would be between$1.75 and$2.33 million. We expect to issue the request for proposal in about two months. The last expense of note is for debt service. This year the Town sold$3.2million of general obligation bonds with a twenty year maturity. We were very fortunate to sell the bonds for an average interest rate of 3.08%. For 2011 our interest expense will drop by$26,000 while our principle payments will rise by$110,000. Total debt expense next year will be$1.7million. The Town's total indebtedness is$16.0 million. This concludes our transmittal letter for the 2011 Preliminary Budget. Historically, the Town has produced budgets with modest tax increases and continued high levels of service. We have avoided large fluctuations in tax adjustments and adopted a policy of slow and steady wins the race and that policy has been highly successful for the Town of Mamaroneck. For 2011 however we for all practical purposes hit a wall made up of multiple years of poor revenue performance,further reductions in property assessments and a significant expense spike for mandated costs. To address these circumstances with the critical help of the department heads we held the line on operating expenses and proposed reductions in personnel. This budget also calls for a drastic reduction in the application of surplus to reduce the likelihood of tax rate spikes in the future and maintain our strong financial condition. In concluding this letter we want to give a special thanks to the department heads that helped formulate the budget. Their experience and creativity were invaluable in producing what has clearly been one of the most difficult budgets in recent memory. We also want to thank the Supervisor and Town Board for their work on the budget, their patience and enduring the many hours of work sessions. Sincerely, Stephen V.Altieri Town Administrator/Budget Officer 4 This is a joint project with the Village of Larchmont. The amount listed is the total cost of the project. The Town's share of the project is estimated at$306,000. Funding will also be provided by the Joint Sanitation Commission. 10 November 17, 2010 Mr.Siligato was asked by Supervisor O'Keeffe to state his recommended percentage for the Town Fund Balance. Mr.Siligato responded that 10-15%for the Townwide Fund and 12%for other funds,adding currently it is at 4%. Councilman Fishman,stated that the percentage of Town tax is small,adding it is the obligation of elected officials in this special time to limit our future growth.Councilman Fishman continued stating in 2008 the Police and Fire pension contribution was$770,000 compared to 2011 of$1,148,000. Councilwoman Seligson thanked Mr.Altieri, Mr. Siligato and all the staff for a great job in providing alternatives to lower the budget,adding it was an interesting process to dig into the budget in a deeper way. George Roniger,50 Stoneyside Drive,asked how the savings in sanitation of$477,000 is broken down by household. Mr.Altieri explained that$535.00 of the tax bill is for waste collection services,adding that depending on how much the solid waste function is financed through the sale of the bags, residents could save$125.00 to 525.00 dollars off their Town taxes; some of this being offset by the cost of the bags. BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS The meeting was called to order by Commissioner O'Keeffe then on motion of Commissioner Wittner, seconded by Commissioner Fishman,the Board of Fire Commissioners was unanimously declared open. Present were the following members of the Commission: Commissioner: Valerie M. O'Keeffe Commissioner: Phyllis Wittner Commissioner: Ernest C. Odierna Commissioner: Nancy Seligson Commissioner: David J. Fishman 1. FIRE CLAIMS Commissioner Odierna presented fire claims for authorization of payment,thereafter on Commissioner Odierna's motion,seconded by Commissioner Wittner,it was RESOLVED that this Commission hereby authorizes payment of the following Fire Department claims as approved by the Fire Chief and audited by the Comptroller's Office: AAA Emergency Supply Co Smith Warren Badges 816.00 AAA Emergency Supply Co Hydrotest&Repairs 73.00 AAA Emergency Supply Co Streamlight Litebox Repair 59.50 Brewer Hardware Building Supplies 63.85 Byram Mason &Building Supply Plastic Coated Hammer 49.90 Cablevision Cable TV for Oct. 114.73 Con Edison Gas for Oct. 387.31 Embassy Cleaners Uniform Cleaning 21.20 Fire End &Croker Super Hood-Ventilated PBI Blend Bronze 393.00 Flower Bar Memorial Wreath for J.Vandernoot's Funeral 135.00 G&K Services Inc. Building Supplies 101.56 Interstate Diagnostics Annual FD Physical Exams 9,047.50 Laundrylux Shipping and Handling on Inv#60728 12.50 Looseleaf Law Pub. Insert for EMS& Fire Personnel NYS Legal Guide 41.00 11 November 17, 2010 Minerva Cleaners Cleaning of RIT System External Harness 425.00 Food for PES Training Oakland Beach Deli 9/16,9/18,10/6,10/16,10/27 556.30 R&L Consulting CTG Trulink 4 Port KVM Switch 161.92 Superior Backf low Testing Testing for Backflow Prevention 145.00 Tri-City Auto Parts Permatex&Oil Dry 86.00 Verizon Wireless Cell Service 9/27-10/26 328.50 Villa Maria Pizza Food for Explorer Drill-11/13/10 66.00 Villa Maria Pizza Food for F.A.S.T. Drill-10/28/10 62.04 Washington Engine Co. Firefighter Training: Responding to Emergencies 200.00 Westech Elevator Service November Elevator Maintenance 175.00 Total: 13,521.81 The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Commissioner Fishman Aye Commissioner Seligson Aye Commissioner Odierna Aye Commissioner Wittner Aye Commissioner O'Keeffe Aye There being no further business to come before the Commission,on motion of Commissioner Fishman, seconded by Commissioner Seligson,the Commission unanimously adjourned and the Town Board reconvened. AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN 2. AUTHORIZATION—2011 AMBULANCE FEES On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson,it was RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby approve the 2011 Ambulance District Fee Schedule as follows: BLS Emergency $545 ALS I Emergency $675 ALS II Emergency $800 ALS Assessment $70 Mileage $13.50 per loaded mile The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Fishman Aye Seligson Aye Odierna Aye Wittner Aye O'Keeffe Aye 12 November 17, 2010 3. SET PUBLIC HEARING—LOCAL LAW DOG LICENSING On motion of Councilman Fishman,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson,it was unanimously RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby set the date for a Public Hearing on the"Dog Licensing" Law for November 30,2010 at 8:15 in the Court Room of the Town Center,and BE IT FURTHER, RESOLVED,that the Town Clerk is hereby authorized to publish the notice of said hearing in a newspaper appointed as an official newspaper,and that said notice, be posted. 4. SALARY AUTHORIZATION Ambulance District On motion of Supervisor O'Keeffe,seconded by Councilwoman Wittner,it was RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby appoint Enrique Serrano as a paramedic with the Town of Mamaroneck Ambulance District effective November 16, 2010 at an hourly rate of$27.50. The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Fishman Aye Seligson Aye Odierna Aye Wittner Aye O'Keeffe Aye Recreation On motion of Councilman Fishman,seconded by Councilwoman Seligson,it was RESOLVED,that as provided for in the 2010 Town Budget the Town Board does hereby authorize the payment of salary to the following: Hommocks Pool Giani Brussich Lifeguard $9.75 per hour effective 11/11/2010 Mariella Puleo Alternate Key Attendant $8.25 per hour effective 11/11/2010 The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Fishman Aye Seligson Aye Odierna Aye Wittner Aye O'Keeffe Aye APPROVAL OF CERTIORARI On motion of Councilwoman Wittner,seconded by Councilman Fishman,it was 13 November 17, 2010 RESOLVED,that the Town Board does hereby approve the following Settlement of Certiorari as recommended by the Town Attorney: Fayette Avenue Realty Corp. 611 Fayette Avenue Mamaroneck, NY 10543 Block: 829 Lot: 215 Town of Mamaroneck/Village of Mamaroneck Year Current Assessment Reduced Assessment 2009 $24,000 $17,500 2010 $24,000 $17,500 The above resolution was put to a roll call vote: Fishman Aye Seligson Aye Odierna Aye Wittner Aye O'Keeffe Aye APPROVAL OF MINUTES—November 3, 2010 On motion of Councilman Fishman,seconded by Councilwoman Wittner,it was unanimously RESOLVED,that the Mamaroneck Town Board does hereby approve the Board Minutes from the meeting of November 3,2010. ORAL COMMUNICATIONS George Roniger, Larchmont Gardens'Civic Association,stated the Gardens' Lake looked good, noting whether the temporary fencing would stay longer. Mr. Roniger also asked that the light on the island be put back,or tuned on. Mr.Altieri stated that the fencing will remain until the plantings are more established. As for the light, Mr.Altieri will look into lighting on the island. Mr. Roniger asked that the Town include the Larchmont Gardens'Civic Association in any rededication plans. Finally,there was a question as to the bio-sensitivity in choosing the plantings around the lake, specifically if they will minimize phosphates and deter geese. Mr.Altieri answered that the plantings were chosen to deter geese,Councilwoman Wittner added that all the plantings chosen were native. Mr.Altieri stated the Town has received a grant to install catch basins. He added that these basins will remove hydrocarbons,as well as solid material. Mr. Roniger noted that the Village of Mamaroneck's Meeting was held on the previous evening. At that meeting,a presentation was given by the Army Corp of Engineers regarding flooding. Supervisor O'Keeffe noted that the Board was informed of the Village's Meeting too late to change the Town's Budget Meeting. Mr.Altieri and Supervisor O'Keeffe noted that Harrison is looking to sell a dredging device,adding the Town and Village are discussing this as a joint purchase. 14 November 17, 2010 WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS None SUPERVISOR'S REPORT Supervisor O'Keeffe told the audience of the work done by an Eagle Scout Adam Bernstein at the VFW Building. Adam created a wall of previous Commanders of the VFW. He worked incredibly hard getting donated materials from local businesses and created an amazing tribute to our Veterans. REPORT OF COUNCIL Due to the very late hour,Councilman Fishman gave his time to Councilwoman Seligson. Councilwoman Seligson attended the awards announcement ceremony for the Long Island Sound Study Futures Fund.The Town received a grant for$62,000 to retrofit several catch basins to remove garbage, grit and hydrocarbons. This is a great step forward as the Department of Environmental Conservation will soon be requiring municipalities to do this kind of work. Councilwoman Seligson emphasized that the Town was the only entity in Westchester County to receive a grant. Councilwoman Seligson noted her attendance at a number of Veterans' Day ceremonies,as well as many budget meetings. Councilwoman Wittner noted the many, many budget meetings she has attended. Councilwoman Wittner thanked Councilwoman Seligson for getting the grant for the Town, noting the help she received from David Goessl and Liz Paul. Councilman Odierna attended the Planning Board Meeting on November 10. The Recreation Commission will meet tomorrow,as well as the Board of Architectural Review,of which he will attend. ADJOURNMENT On motion of Supervisor O'Keeffe,seconded by Councilwoman Wittner the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 11:10 PM. Submitted by Christina Battalia,Town Clerk 15