HomeMy WebLinkAbout2003_05_07 Town Board Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD
OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK AND THE BOARD OF FIRE
COMMISSIONERS HELD ON MAY 7, 2003 AT 8:15 PM IN THE
COURT ROOM OF THE TOWN CENTER, 740 W. BOSTON POST
ROAD, MAMARONECK, NEW YORK
PRESENT:
Supervisor Valerie M. O'Keeffe
Councilwoman Phyllis Wittner
Councilwoman Judith A. Myers
Councilman Ernest C. Odierna
Councilwoman Nancy Seligson
ALSO PRESENT:
Stephen V. Altieri, Town Administrator
William Maker, Jr., Town Attorney
Patricia A. Samela, Deputy Town Clerk
ABSENT:
Patricia A. DiCioccio, Town Clerk
PUBLIC HEARINGS - Continuation of Hardship Application Hearing - Melron Associates
- Repeal No Parking Law Huguenot Drive
- Moratorium Hardship Application -Village Square Shopping Center
PUBLIC HEARINGS TAKEN OUT OF ORDER
2. Repeal No Parking Law Huguenot Drive
The Supervisor explained this public hearing was adjourned from the Town Board meeting of
April 22. An error in the posted public notice caused this hearing to be repealed.
On motion of Councilwoman Myers, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson, the hearing was
declared open.
Mr. Maker explained the purpose of this public hearing was to repeal the existing law limiting
parking on Huguenot Drive.
Originally, a public hearing was to be held on May 7, 2003, to consider a parking ordinance
for Huguenot Drive. The ordinance to be considered would prohibit parking on Huguenot
Drive between 8:00 and 10:00 AM - Monday through Friday except on holidays.
Unfortunately, the notice was published incorrectly.
The Town Attorney advised the error in the notice was substantial. Therefore, the hearing
scheduled for May 7 cannot be held as planned. Residents on Huguenot Drive, Normandy
Road and Barnard Road have been notified of this matter.
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, it was
RESOLVED, that Town Board does hereby repeal the existing
law limiting parking on Huguenot Drive.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
May 7, 2003
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board finds that the adoption of
the proposed local law will constitute a Type II action under
the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQRA); and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby declares itself to be
lead agency with respect to the proposed action.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
AUTHORIZATION -AMEND MEETING DATE FOR TOWN BOARD MEETING
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the regular meeting of the Town Board
scheduled for May 21 will be held on May 28, 2003 in the
Court Room of the Town Center, 740 West Boston Post Road,
Mamaroneck at 8:15 PM.
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board does hereby set the date
for public hearing on "No Parking - Huguenot Drive" Law for
May 28, 2003 at 8:15 PM in the Court Room of the Town
Center; and
BE IT FURTHER,
RESOLVED, that the Town Clerk be authorized to publish the
notice of said hearing in a newspaper appointed as an official
source, and that notice be so posted.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
CONTINUATION OF HARDSHIP APPLICATION HEARING -VILLAGE SQUARE SHOPPING
CENTER
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson, the hearing was
declared reopened.
Paul Bergins, attorney representing Village Square Shopping Center in its application for a
hardship exemption. This exemption would enable the shopping center to lease a now
2
May 7, 2003
vacant store to a new tenant. This area has been operating for over 20 years. It is anchored
by a Trader Joe's with various businesses integrated under one roof. The Dry Cleaner's
vacated the space in June 2002. The landlord has lost 5% of his income stream which
constitutes a hardship. The landlord had identified a tenant and a letter of intent has been
executed and a copy given to Mr. Altieri. The new tenant is Subway. The only work to the
existing space would be to the interior. No changes would be made to the perimeter, square
footage or the footprint of the store front. Replacement of one tenant for another would not
have an effect on the Boston Post Road corridor, therefore an exemption should be granted.
Mr. Maker explained if an exemption were to be granted to KRT Properties Holdings, who
plan to lease the property to Subway, the applicant, in order to open a Subway at this
location, would have to apply for a zoning variance.
Mr. Bergin was aware of the need to appear before the Zoning Board.
The Supervisor asked if anyone wished to comment.
Councilwoman Myers asked if this new business would generate the same volume of traffic
as the dry cleaner who previously occupied the space. Could any research be provided
regarding this.
Mr. Bergin stated the traffic pattern would be different from that of the dry cleaning business.
The hours of operation were not the same and there was an abundance of parking.
Councilwoman Seligson said the moratorium was put into place to have a consultant help
the Town Board review the uses of the area on the Boston Post Road and to determine if
there might be some appropriate uses more conducive to our community.
Councilman Odierna agreed. He said the intent of the Board was not to impede development.
He then asked what the hours of operation would be.
Mr. Bergins said from 10:00 AM to 9:00 PM.
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board finds that the adoption of
the proposed local law will constitute a Type II action under
the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQRA); and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby declares itself to be
lead agency with respect to the proposed action.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Wittner, the following
resolution was adopted:
WHEREAS, the Town Board finds that (1) the proposed use
for the empty space in the Village Square Shopping Center
will not require any change to the exterior of the building
(other than signage), (2) the Village Square Shopping Center
is a fully developed parcel of land and (3) the applicant would
sustain an unnecessary hardship if the proposed tenant
3
May 7, 2003
decided not to enter into a lease with the applicant because
of the moratorium.
NOW THEREFORE, on motion of Councilman Odierna,
seconded by Councilwoman Wittner it is
RESOLVED, that KRT Properties Holdings LLC be exempted
from the moratorium imposed by Local Law No. 3-203 with
respect to its Store #10 at the Village Square Shopping
Center which is more particularly described in the
correspondence from its attorney, Paul B. Bergins, dated May
1, 2003; and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the grant of this exemption shall not be
construed by the applicant, the Planning Board, the Board of
Appeals, the Board of Architectural Review or any other
board, agency, committee, commission or department of the
Town of Mamaroneck as an endorsement by the Town Board
of any application that KRT Properties Holdings LLC or its
tenant or proposed tenant may make in connection with Store
#10 at the Village Square Shopping Center for any type of
permit, a variance, the interpretation of the zoning code or
site plan approval.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
CONTINUATION OF HARDSHIP APPLICATION HEARING - MELRON ASSOCIATES
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Myers, the hearing was
declared reopened.
Mr. Maker explained this application was similar to the one which just occurred. Melron owns
the property on the south side of the Boston Post. They have two signed leases which were
executed prior to the moratorium going into effect. The intention of the owner is to demolish
the existing building and replace it with two new commercial uses; Duane Reed and
Commerce Bank.
The Supervisor stated that the Board had enough information before them from the
presentation made by Mr. Noto at the last public hearing and felt the Board could continue
the hearing.
Councilwoman Wittner suggested waiting for an interim report from the Town Consultant.
Councilwoman Myers concurred with Councilwoman Wittner. She noticed Mr. Noto said the
owner's of the building were aware of the traffic problem and safety issues.
Councilwoman Seligson said the applicant deserves the exemption.
Mike Dandry, reporter for the "Soundview News", said the last public hearing made mention
of the area being used as mixed use.
The Supervisor said they were waiting for the report from the consultant. She then asked the
Attorney to explain the definition of mixed use.
4
May 7, 2003
The Supervisor asked if anyone wished to speak either for or against this issue.
There was no one.
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Wittner, the hearing was
declared closed.
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson, it was
unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Town Board finds that the adoption of
the proposed local law will constitute a Type II action under
the New York State Environmental Quality Review Act
(SEQRA); and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Board hereby declares itself to be
lead agency with respect to the proposed action.
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Wittner the following
resolution was adopted.
WHEREAS, the applicant represented to the Town Board that
(1) it has executed leases with its tenants prior to the
effective date of the moratorium imposed by Local Law No.
3-2003 and (2) it and its tenants are willing to co-operate with
the appropriate boards, agencies, committees, commissions
and departments of the Town of Mamaroneck to improve (a)
safety along the property's frontage on the Boston Post
Road, (b) the architecture of the buildings to be built upon the
property and (3) the landscaping/screening around and on
the property; and
WHEREAS; the Town Board finds that (1) the proposed uses
for the property will eliminate the historical use of the
property as an eating establishment and hence eliminate the
odors associated with cooking and the refuse from an eating
establishment that have emanated from the property and at
times have been a nuisance to the residents of the homes
that are in the vicinity of the property and (2) the proposed
tenants appear to be fiscally sound and (3) the applicant
would sustain an unnecessary hardship if the proposed
tenant decided not to enter into a least with the applicant
because of the moratorium
NOW THEREFORE, on motion of Councilman Odierna,
seconded by Councilwoman Wittner, it is
RESOLVED, that Melron Amusement Corporation be
exempted from the moratorium imposed by Local Law No. 3-
2003 with respect to the property known as 1265 Boston Post
Road for the uses described in the correspondence from its
attorney, Paul J. Noto, dated March 31, 2003 and April 24,
2003; and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the grant of this exemption shall not be
construed by the applicant, the Planning Board, the Board of
5
May 7, 2003
Board of Appeals, the Board of Architectural Review or any
other board, agency, committee, commission or department
of the Town of Mamaroneck as an endorsement by the Town
Board of any application that Melron Amusement Corporation
or its tenants or proposed tenants may make in connection
with 1265 Boston Post Road for any type of permit, variance,
the interpretation of the zoning code or site approval.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS
The meeting was called to order by Commissioner O'Keeffe at 9:00 PM on motion of
Commissioner Wittner, seconded by Commissioner Myers.
Present were the following members of the Commission:
Commissioner: Valerie M. O'Keeffe
Commissioner: Phyllis Wittner
Commissioner: Judith A. Myers
Commissioner: Ernest C. Odierna
Commissioner: Nancy Seligson
1. Fire Claims:
Commissioner Myers presented fire claims for authorization of payment, thereafter on
Commissioner Myers' motion, seconded by Commissioner Wittner, it was
RESOLVED, that this Commission hereby authorizes payment
of the following Fire Department claims as approved by the
Fire Chief and audited by the Comptroller's Office as
amended:
AAA Emergency $ 315.00
AAA Emergency 1,026.00
AAA Emergency 660.00
AAA Emergency 221.62
AAA Emergency 377.40
AAA Emergency 222.50
Atlantic Westchester Inc. 535.86
AT&T 123.19
Con Edison 4.12
Fire Academy FSA 280.00
Ikon 9.42
Inter-State Diagnostic 558.50
IOS 352.27
Nextel 201.51
Nextel 1.90
Nextel 162.19
Poland Spring Water 71.51
Redwood Nursery 590.45
T.C.D. 580.00
Town of Mamaroneck Professional Fire Fighters 204.36
Tri-City Auto Parts 57.24
United Water New Rochelle 212.99
Vail Chevrolet 201.96
Verizon 398.95
Westchester Elevator 720.00
6
May 7, 2003
TOTAL $8,088.94
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
Commissioner Wittner made mention of the Rescue Technician's basic course to be held at
the Fire Training Center in Valhalla. The schedule is as follows: Thursday, May 22; Tuesday,
May 27; Wednesday ,June 4; and Thursday, June 5 from 7:00 to 10:00 PM; Saturday, June 7
and June 21 from 8:00 AM to 4:00 PM.
Commissioner Odierna asked Mr. Altieri about the scheduled emergency preparedness drill.
Mr. Altieri said the drill was tentatively scheduled for May 17 in Town parking lot#1 on Myrtle
Boulevard. Apparatus will be set up and those involved will take part in the exercise. A
series of sirens will be devised to go off at intervals of 15 to 20 seconds as a warning to let
residents know where to go and what to do. All three municipalities will be involved: Village
of Larchmont, Village of Mamaroneck, and the Town of Mamaroneck.
There being no further business to come before the Commission, on motion of
Commissioner Wittner, seconded by Commissioner Seligson, the Commission unanimously
adjourned at 9:05 PM.
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
1. Tree Permit Appeal - 18 Salem Drive
The Supervisor introduced Ron Carpaneto, Director of Buildings and Administration and
Elizabeth Paul, Environmental Coordinator. Mr. Carpaneto and Ms. Paul are also members of
the Tree Commission.
Liz Paul stated Mr. & Mrs. Brabant of 18 Salem Drive applied for a permit on March 27, 2003
to remove 18 trees from their property. The property was heavily wooded and the Brabant's
have been clearing out smaller trees and brush from the lot since they purchased it. They
plan to tear down the existing house and construct a new home and possibly a swimming
pool at a later date. They would like to have more sunlight and lawn area.
Liz and Ron stated they inspected the trees on April 2 and recommended of the 18 trees in
the application, eight (8) of the trees be removed and ten (10) of the trees be saved. Two (2)
of the "saved" trees may eventually interfere with the construction of a pool, and the
applicant was asked to apply for a permit to remove these two trees when plans for the pool
are submitted to the Town. The trees approved for removal were dead, diseased or in the
footprint of the proposed house. The trees to be saved are either providing screening
between the properties or were not significantly interfering with the use of the property
(according to the opinion of Ron and Liz). In addition letters were received from four of the
neighbors who support the Tree Preservation Commission's decision to allow the removal of
only 8 of the trees. The applicant, however, wishes to appeal the decision and would like to
ask the Town Board for permission to remove more of the trees.
The Supervisor asked what criteria the Tree Commission used to either grant or deny a tree
permit.
The Attorney then read the following section from the Town Code:
207-4. Criteria for removal of trees.
7
May 7, 2003
A. Permits for the removal of trees may be granted under the following
circumstances:
(1) If the presence of trees would cause hardship or endanger the public
or the person or property of the owner.
(2) On property to be occupied by buildings or structures, within a
distance of ten (10) feet around the perimeter of such building or
structure, depending upon tree species and conditions to be
determined by the Tree Preservation Commission.
(3) If the trees substantially interfere with a permitted use of the property,
and the removal of the trees shall be performed in a selective manner.
(4) If the property shall have an approved cut or fill of land deemed by the
Tree Preservation Commission to be injurious or dangerous to the
trees.
(5) Where the trees to be removed are dead or so substantially diseased
that, in the opinion of the Tree Commission, the tree constitutes a
potential danger.
Mr. Maker then read the purpose clause of the law - Section 201-1 into the record:
The destruction or damage to shade, ornamental and evergreen trees and plants and the
indiscriminate and excessive cutting of these trees in subdivisions and on private property
causes barren and unsightly conditions, creates increased surface drainage problems,
increases municipal costs to control drainage, impairs the stability and value of improved
and unimproved real property and causes deterioration to the community which adversely
affects the health, safety, environment, ecosystems and general welfare of the inhabitants of
the Town of Mamaroneck. This chapter seeks to correct these conditions.
Lori and Michael Brabant, 18 Salem Drive, appeared before the Board. They are currently
living on the property. They purchased said property last August with the intent of tearing
down the existing house and building a new house next spring. Many trees were in poor
condition and had not been cared for. They would like to clear an area to have a place for
their three children to play. They would like to remove an additional 10 trees.
A lengthy discussion followed between the Brabants and the Town Board on which trees
should be kept and which should be removed.
The Board requested additional information from an arborist to chart the condition of the
trees. They would also like a plan submitted with dimensions to show the actual open space.
This matter is deferred to the May 28 Board meeting pending submission of the report by the
Brabants.
The Supervisor then read the following letters into the record:
Dear Mr. Carpaneto:
We are in receipt of your letter dated April 4, 2003 concerning the tree removal
permits for 18 Salem Road, Scarsdale, NY. We have also reviewed a copy of the
plan dated March 27, 2003 for the proposed Brabant Residence and the
Landscape Concept Plan.
We reside at 4 Split Tree Road and our property is adjacent to 18 Salem Road.
We have a great deal of concern that the original plan to cut down 18 trees will
ruin the natural beauty of the neighborhood and greatly reduce the privacy that
we have all come to enjoy in our Murdock Woods Neighborhood.
With the proposed new construction of a 6,000-8,000 square foot home, it is
imperative that the trees remain in place that border our properties. One of the
gems about our neighborhood is that no matter what room or view you look out
of in our house or others, we are surrounded by tall old trees and indigenous
rock. The mature trees on the border of our property provide shade and a
natural wall of privacy. With the height and width of the proposed house, it is
crucial to maintain these trees to preserve our privacy. Additionally, with the
8
May 7, 2003
slope of the back yard, we have concert about erosion control and large
amounts of runoff that could cause serious drainage and back-up problems for
the house. However, we understand the Town of Mamaroneck will hire a third
party engineer to ensure this does not become a problem.
We agree with the Statement of Findings of the Mamaroneck Tree Preservation
Commission ad their approval to remove eight(8) trees. However, if the Board
should modify the approval, we understand we will be given written notification
and the opportunity to address any changes.
We thank you for your consideration. Please notify us if and when this will be
on the agenda for the Town Board meeting.
Sincerely
Lisa and Randolph Siegel
4 Split Tree Road
Scarsdale, NY
Dear Mr. Carpaneto:
We understand that the Tree Preservation Commission has issued a permit for
the removal of eight trees at 18 Salem Drive.
We are in favor of the permit as issued.
Sincerely,
Alan 1. Annex
6 Salem Drive
Scarsdale, NY
Dear Ron:
We understand that an appeal hearing is scheduled for tomorrow night, Wednesday,
May 7, 2003. We wanted to note for the record that we are supportive of the issuance
of a permit for the removal of the one tree closest to our property line. The Brabant's
have indicated that they would be replacing such tree with foliage that would provide
more appropriate screening at a lower level.
Please also note that we do not take any position either for or against their
request to remove additional trees. We trust the judgment of the Town Board to
listen to their position and to take such action they deem appropriate for the
neighborhood.
Sincerely,
Alan 1. Annex
Dear Mr. Carpaneto:
We have lived in Murdock Woods for over thirty years. What makes this area
special is the number of old trees that exist in the neighborhood. We
understand that the Tree Preservation Commission has approved a permit for
the removal of 8 trees at 18 Salem Drive. We have also heard that the
homeowner has appealed such permit and is asking to take down 18 trees. This
is on top of approximately 50 trees that were less than 6 inches that have
already been removed from the property.
9
May 7, 2003
We respect the determination of the Commission to approve what is best for the
neighborhood and favor the permit as it has been approved. We hope that our
views will be passed onto the Town Board when it makes its determination.
Sincerely,
Joan Haywood
5 Salem Drive
Dear Mr. Carpaneto:
We have lived in the Murdock section of Mamaroneck for over ten years. We
understand that the Tree Preservation Commission has approved a permit for
the removal of 8 trees at 18 Salem Drive and that the new homeowner is
appealing and asking to take down 18 trees. We assume you are aware that
they have already taken down numerous smaller trees and have taken away the
forest appearance that had existed in our neighborhood for many years.
We respect the determination of the Commission to approve the removal of the
appropriate trees and therefore favor the permit as it has been approved.
Please make sure the Town Board is aware of our views when it makes its
determination.
Sincerely,
Stephen & Paula Warhaftig
6 Split Tree Road
2. Authorization - Telecommunications Agreement - Bridgecom Incorporated
This item was deferred.
3. Authorization - Street Light Survey/Audit
Mr. Altieri explained to the Board that he explored the possibility of conducting a street light
survey of the Unincorporated Town. The survey was intended to identify the location and
type of each and every street light in the Unincorporated Area The survey could be used for
future planning as well as street light maintenance.
The Town had canvassed three different firms to conduct the survey; however, none
responded positively to the request. We have, however, spoken to the firm of Cost Control
Associates of Queensbury, New York. Originally, our contact with the firm was to discuss an
energy audit of the entire Town. However, in order to be eligible for their energy audit
program, expenditures for gas and electric must exceed $1,000,000. Cost Control Associates
does provide a street light survey/audit program. Cost Control Associates will conduct a
survey of all Town street lights identifying the location and type of each street light. Using
the survey data, they will determine whether we are being overcharged for either usage of
existing street lights, or for streetlights that no longer exist.
Under the terms of the agreement with Cost Control Associates, they would receive a fee
equal to 45% of any savings realized as a result of the audit. If no savings are realized, there
is no fee paid to Cost Control Associates.
On motion of Councilwoman Myers, seconded by Councilman Odierna, it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board does hereby authorize the
agreement between the Town and Cost Control Associates to
conduct a survey of all Town street lights identifying the
location and type of each street light they would receive a fee
10
May 7, 2003
equal to 45% of any savings realized as a result of the audit;
and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Administrator is hereby authorized
to execute said agreement on behalf of the Town.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
4. Authorization - Organic Waste Agreement Westchester County
The Administrator explained this is a renewal agreement with the County of Westchester for
the disposal of organic waste. This organic waste agreement covers The Town's
arrangement with the County of Westchester for the transportation of our fall leaves. The
Larchmont Mamaroneck Joint Sanitation Commission has a separate organic waste
agreement for the disposal of other organic waste.
On the motion of seconded by Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson
it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board finds the placement of
fallen leaves collected from the streets of the Town of
Mamaroneck during the autumn on the asphalt area at the
southern end of the Hommocks School and Town Ice Rink
parking lot followed by the regular removal of such leaves
therefrom shortly after their placement to be a minor,
temporary use of land that has a negligible and no permanent
effect on the environment within the meaning of section 92-8
(A) (19) of the Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that based upon the foregoing finding, the
above-described action is a Type II action within the meaning
of the State Environmental Quality Review Act; and
BE IT FURTHER
RESOLVED, that the Town Administrator hereby is authorized
to enter into the Organic Yard Waste Transfer Station 1 MA
(2003-2008 Program) in behalf of the Town of Mamaroneck.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
5. Engineering Services - Hommocks Ice Rink
This item was deferred.
11
May 7, 2003
6. Referral - Town Planning Board - Boards/Commissions Legislation
Mr. Maker explained now that Local Law No. 12 of 2003 has been enacted, it is appropriate to
introduce an amendment thereto which will add the Board of Appeals and the Planning Board
to the Boards covered by that law. A referral must be made to the Planning Board for the
proposed amendment to that local law for a report as required by section 240-92 B of the
Mamaroneck Code.
On motion of Councilwoman Wittner, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson, it was
RESOLVED, that the Town Board does hereby authorize a
referral be made to the Planning Board for the proposed
amendment to Local Law No. 12-2003 for a report as required
by section 240-92 B of the Mamaroneck Code.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
7. Salary Authorization - Recreation
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Seligson, it was
RESOLVED, that as provided for in the 2003 Town Budget the
Town Board does hereby authorize the payment of salary to
the following:
Francine Brill, Office Aide, Recreation Department, $10/hour,
effective retroactive to 4/28/03.
Kathleen Thompson, Assistant Instructor, Spring Hockey Program,
$6/hour, effective retroactive to 4/5/03.
The above resolution was put to a roll call vote:
Seligson - Aye
Odierna - Aye
Myers - Aye
Wittner - Aye
O'Keeffe - Aye
ADDED ITEM - Authorization -Amend Meeting Dates for Town Board Meetings
On motion of Supervisor O'Keeffe, seconded by Councilwoman Wittner, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the regular meetings of the Town Board
scheduled for June 4 and June 18 will be held on June 11 and
June 25, respectively, in the Court Room of the Town Center,
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck at 8:15 PM.
SUPERVISOR REPORTS
12
May 7, 2003
The Supervisor attended the Community Counseling Services meeting held today facilitated
by Dr. Levy and Louise Cohen, one of the Town prosecutors. The purpose of this meeting
was to bring together officials from municipal government, law enforcement,judiciary and
schools to review the Drug and Alcohol Awareness Program. On May 2 she attended an
awards breakfast held at the Crowne Plaza in White Plains sponsored by Search for Change,
Inc. Four awards were presented, one of which was to Kathy Kopa, director of Community
Services and the Larch mont/Mamaroneck Public Housing advocate. Congratulations to Ms.
Koppa.
NO WRITTEN COMMUNICATIONS
REPORTS OF COUNCIL
Councilman Odierna asked the Administrator what the status was of the Bridge on Brookside
Drive.
Mr. Altieri said at this point the bridge has been inspected and the recommendation is to
replace it. Requests for proposals will be sent out to contractors at the end of the week and
the inspection of all the bridges between Briar Close and Hickory Grove Drive is being
completed.
Councilman Odierna attended the Harbor Island Planning Commission on May 3. He made
mention of the Memorial Day parade to be held May 22 at 6:45 PM. This past weekend there
was an ice cream social held at the Sheldrake Environmental Center at the reservoir. It was
well attended.
Councilwoman Myers spoke about the LMC/TV's Video Awards which will be held at the
Emelin Theater on May 22 after the parade and there's still time to enter a video.
Councilwoman Seligson said the Larchmont Fun Run was held at the same time as the ice
cream social. She attended the Fun Run. It was a great event. There was a Greenway Trail
meeting last week which was very positive. Westchester County has promised to participate
in a substantial way to provide technical expertise and financial assistance to improving the
existing trails in the area.
Councilwoman Wittner was invited with two presenters from the Long Island Sound
Watershed Intermunicipal Council (LISWIC) to discuss the concept of a storm water utility
district with the Supervisor of Eastchester. It was a very interesting discussion.
Councilwoman Seligson chaired a Long Island Sound study meeting. Last night
Councilwoman Wittner attended a storm water district presentation in the Village of Pelham.
Deputy Town Clerk, Pat Samela reminded residents that the deadline for submitting parking
permit applications is May 12. She strongly advised they be sent in as soon as possible, as
the Town Clerk's office has a waiting list of over 70 people.
Councilwoman Wittner stated that those residents who received an enhanced STAR program
must apply every year. Deadline is May 16. For further information you may call the
Assessor's office at 381-7820.
ADJOURNMENT
The Supervisor said the next scheduled meetings would be May 28 and June 11, 2003.
On motion of Councilman Odierna, seconded by Councilwoman Wittner the meeting was
adjourned at 10:45 PM into Executive Session to discuss employment history.
Submitted by
Patricia A. DiCioccio, Town Clerk
13
May 7, 2003
\\CLERKSERVER\SERVER\Documents\M i nutes\2003m i nfl05-07-03x.doc
14