HomeMy WebLinkAboutReappraisal of the 1961 Comprehensive Recreation Survey 7/1/1971 21
JULY 1971
REAPPRAISAL OF THE
1961 COMPREHENSIVE RECREATION SURVEY
Town of Mamaroneck
Village of Larchmont
Village of Mamaroneck
PREPARED BY
06, (2) -614-ezteit—
DEPARTMENT OF
PARKS, RECREATION, AND CONSERVATION
Page 1 Second paragraph should be corrected to read:
In addtion to the .recreation Commission there e;n.sts
a Park District and a Conservation Advisory Coomi ttee.
The Park District .s el:clusive of the Village of
Mamaroneck and Larchmont, The Conservation Advisory
Committee is town-wide.
Page 7 Secondparagraph under section 5 Programs and Serr.ces
- Town of Mamaroneck should be corrected to read:
The Park District is responsible for maintenance of
Memorial Park (10 acres), and a few additional green
areas, for a total of 13 acres.
Page 21 Recommendation number 39 and 140 should be corrected
to read:
The Cargill property was sold to the School District
for the new Central School construction The School
District did not acquire the Elkind property.
Page 22 Recommendation number 46 should be corrected to read:
Five acres of the Premium River Marsh area has been
purchased by the Town. At Dillon Park the Town is
in the process of acquiring an additional eight acres
through condemnation.
Page 23 Recommendation number 53 should be corrected to read:
Area acquired but not developed as an active area.
Through the subdivision regulation land was received
from the developer of Baldwin Estates. This land
was developed by the Town for a tot lot.
Page 26 Second paragraph should be corrected to read:
There is no one pattern of organization and admini-
stration considered to be an ideal format for all
situations.
DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION
COUNTY OFFICE BUILDING, WHITE PLAINS, NEW YORK 10601 914-949-1300
BOARD MEMBERS
Charles E. Pound William L. Foley
Commissioner Deputy Commissioner Wallace C. Doud, Chairman
Mrs. John C. Batchelor
Lloyd D. Jones
Mrs. Glenn D. Loucks
Richard H. Pough
William P. Turnesa
David L. Munich
ex officio-Robert A. Dennison
Peter Q. Eschweiler
July 1, 1971
Honorable Christine K. Helwig, Supervisor
Town of Mamaroneck
Honorable Arthur C. Phillips, Mayor
Village of Mamaroneck
Honorable Leo Goldsmith, Mayor
Village of Larchmont
Dear Supervisor Helwig, Mayor Phillips and Mayor Goldsmith:
It is my pleasure to transmit herewith the study reappraising
the Comprehensive Recreation Survey made by our department in 1961
for the Town of Mamaroneck and the Villages of Namaroneck and Larchmont.
The findings and recommendations are presented after careful
appraisal of the communities' needs, reeourcos and potential,. We
are confident that this document, along with the original 1961 s,vdy,
will provide the guidelines for the growth and development of an
effective park and recreation system for your community*
Tie are grateful for the assistance that you and other
community officials provided in completing this task, and if we
can be of further help in the implementation of the recomriendations
feel free to call upon us.
Sincerely,
Charles E. P60,-
Commissioner ,aridCommissioner
R-g
CONTENTS
Letter of Transmittal
Purpose of Study and Study Emphasis
Existing Public Recreation, Park and Conservation Agencies . . . . 1
Managing Authority 1
Personnel 3
Budget and Finance 3
Budget Analysis 6r
Programs and Services 7
Relationships 8
Areas and Facilities 10
Population 11
Tax Structure 12
Action on Recommendations from the 1961 Recreation Study 14
Administrative Patterns 26
Recommendations 32
Appendix A - Legislative Authorization for Conservation
Advisory Commission 36
Appendix B - Sample Resolution to Establish a Mamaroneck
Park and Recreation Commission and Mamaroneck
Department of Parks, Recreation and Conser-
vation 37
Appendix C - State Comptroller's Opinion for Merged Park
and Recreation Commissions 42
Appendix D - Resolution 46
PURPOSE OF STUDY
To reappraise the Comprehensive Recreation Survey made by the
Westchester County Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation
in 1961 for the Town of Mamaroneck and the Villages of Mamaroneck
and Larchmont.
STUDY EMPHASIS
An evaluation of the significance of actions taken by the respective
political jurisdictions subsequent to the 1961 Survey has indicated
to us that the thrust of this study must be primarily addressed to
organizational and administrative patterns. This thinking is
reinforced by the fact that the vast majority of the 1961 recommend-
ations remain valid and not acted upon. The implementation of these
recommendations depend upon a sound organizational and administrative
structure.
THE EXISTING PUBLIC RECREATION, PARK AND CONSERVATION AGENCIES
I. Managing Authority
A. Town of Mamaroneck
The Recreation Commission of the Town of Mamaroneck was established
in May 1954 by resolution of the Town Board. The five member commission
is charged with the responsibility of operating the recreation program
under the provisions of Article 13 of the General Municipal Law. Among
the Commission's duties are:
1. Adopting the amending rules of procedure and policies
deemed necessary to implement the work of the Commission.
2. Selection of the Superintendent of Recreation.
3. Appointment of all employees.
4. Approving and recommending an annual budget.
5. Authorizing expenditures.
6. Submitting an annual report of activities.
7. Planning for future recreation needs.
8. Providing the citizens of the town with a wholesome
and broad variety of recreation opportunities.
In addition to the Recreation Commission there exists a Park
District and a Conservation Advisory Committee, both exclusive of
the Villages of Mamaroneck and Larchmont.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
In August of 1968, the Village Board of Trustees by resolution
established the present Recreation and Parks Department and Recreation
and Parks Commission. This Department and Commission replaced the
Recreation Council established in 1957. The present Commission consists
of nine members.
Among the Commission's duties are:
1. To consult with and advise the Superintendent of Recreation
and Parks on the establishment and operation of recreation
and parks programs.
2. To recommend to the Board of Trustees long range plans for
parks and recreation facilities and programs.
3. To review and make recommendations with respect to the budget
for operations and capital projects submitted to it by the
Superintendent prior to his submission of such budget to the
Village Manager.
4. To approve all matters having to do with the regulation and
use of the parks and recreation facilities and, subject to
the approval of the Board of Trustees, to adopt ordinances
regulating the fees and charges to be paid for the use of
any such facilities.
In addition to the Department of Recreation and Parks there exists two
separate divisions, one for the Beach and the other for the Marina and
Docks.
C. Village of Larchmont
In April 1960, the Board of Trustees of the Village of Larchmont
appointed a Park and Recreation Advisory Committee of five people to
advise the Village Board on recreation matters. The five member committee
replaced a committee of nineteen which had been established in 1936 when
the program was first initiated. The Village Park facilities and main—
tenance are handled by the Department of Public Works.
2.
2. Personnel
A. Town of Mamaroneck
A Superintendent of Recreation was first appointed by the Town
Recreation Commission in June 1956 and he continues to be the only full
time professional member of the staff. The Park District consists of
one foreman and five staff members. The Conservation Advisory Committee
hires one full time conservation ranger.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
A Superintendent of Recreation and Parks was first appointed by
the Village in 1967. The Superintendent is assisted by a Senior
Recreation Leader initially employed in August of 1957. The Park staff
consists of one foreman and six staff members. The Beach at Harbor
Island is supervised by a full time person who has additional duties
during the off season. The Marina and Docks are supervised by a full
time person with an assistant.
C. Village of Larchmont
The Village does not employ any full time personnel. Assistance
in supervision and program planning is offered by the Superintendent of
the Town of Mamaroneck Recreation Commission.
3. Budget and Finance
A. Town of Mamaroneck
The Town of Mamaroneck Recreation budget shows an estimated
expenditure of $158,304 for 1971 and an estimated revenue of $78,881
for a net operating cost of $79,423. This represents a gross per capita
3.
1/
cost of $5.07 . The Park District budget shows an estimated expenditure
?/
of $83,146, representing a gross per capita cost of $6.39 . The Con-
servation Advisory Committee budget shows an estimated expenditure of
2/
$23,460, representing a gross per capita cost of $1.80 . Combined
estimated expenditure by Town of Mamaroneck for Parka and Recreation:
Recreation Commission $158,304
Park District 83,146
Conservation Advisory
Committee __a 2
$264,910
1/
This represents a gross per capita cost of $8.48 . The Park District
has a total bonded indebtedness of $24,000 to be entirely paid off by 1974.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
The Village of Mamaroneck Recreation and Parks Department budget
shows an estimated expenditure of $192,177 for 1970-71, and estimated
revenues of $14,700 for a net operating cost of $177,477. This repre-
sents a•gross per capita cost of $10.16.
In addition to this, there is an estimated expenditure of $73,872
for Marina and Docks and an estimated revenue of $70,000 for a net
operating cost of $3,872, and gross per capita cost of $3.91.
Combined estimated expenditure by the Village of Mamaroneck for
Parks and Recreation purposes:
Dept. of Parks & Recreation $192,177
Beach 26,353
Marina & DocksT2E1
266,049
This represents a gross per capita cost of $14.07.
1 Population for this figure includes Town of Mamaroneck
(unincorporated) , the Village of Larchmont and that portion of
the Village of Mamaroneck in the Town of Mamaroneck.
2 Population for this figure includes Town of Mamaroneck
(unincorporated) .
4.
C. Village of Larchmont
The Village of Larchmont Park and Recreation Advisory Committee
budget shows an estimated expenditure of $24,705 for 1970-71 and an
estimated revenue of $8,200 for a net operating cost of $16,505. This
represents a gross per capita cost of $3.43.
In addition, the Department of Public Works spends $33,550 for park
services. This represents a gross per capita cost of $4.66.
Combined estimated expenditure by the Village of Larchmont for Park
and Recreation services:
Park & Recreation Advisory Com. $24,705
Public Works 0
58,255
This represents a gross per capita cost of $8.09.
The following is a combined estimated expenditure by the Town of
Mamaroneck, Village of Larchmont and Village of Mamaroneck for Park,
Recreation and Conservation services:
Town of Mamaroneck
Recreation Commission $158,304
Park District 83,146
Cons. Adv. Com. 23,460
Village of Mamaroneck
Dept. of Parks & Rec. 192,177
Beach 26,353
Marina & Docks 47,519
Village of Larchmont
Park & Rec. Advisory Com. 24,705
Public Works 33,550
$589,214
This represents a gross per capita cost for the Town of Mamaroneck
(unincorporated), Village of Larchmont and Village of Mamaroneck of
$15.06.
5.
4. Budget Analysis
A. Gross Budget
The total gross budget for the Town of Mamaroneck, Village of
Larchmont and the Village of Mamaroneck is $375,186 . Comparing this
w
figure to the 1971 Westchester County Budget and Salary Study , you
find only four municipalities with higher gross budgets .
B. Total Salaries
The total Salaries including part time personnel budgeted for the
Town of Mamaroneck Recreation Commission, the Village of Larchmont Park
and Recreation Advisory Committee, and the Village of Mamaroneck Department
of Parks and Recreation, is $288,194. Comparing this figure to the 1971
Westchester County Budget and Salary Study, we find only three municipal—
ities with higher total salaries (New Rochelle, White Plains and Yonkers) .
The tables below show acomparison of population, per capita cost
for total salaries and per capita cost for gross budgets for Mamaroneck
J
(Town and Villages) , Mt. Vernon, New Rochelle, White Plains, and Yonkers .
3 This figure does not include the following:
Town of Mamaroneck
Park District $ 83,146
Cons. Advisory Com. 23,460
Village of Mamaroneck
Beach 26,353
Marina & Docks 47,519
Village of Larchmont
Public Works 0
214,028
4 Public Park & Recreation 1971 Budget and Salary Study for
Cities, Towns, and Villages of Westchester County
5 Cities of Mt. Vernon, New Rochelle, White Plains and Yonkers
6 Figures for Mt. Vernon and New Rochells include Recreation Services
only. Figures for White Plains and Yonkers include Recreation and Park
Services.
6.
B. Total Salaries (continued)
Per Capita Cost Per Capita Cost
Community Population Total Salaries Gross Budget
Mamaroneck (Town 39,114 7.37 9.59
and Village)
White Plains 49,573 7.59 10.82
Mt. Vernon 72,302 3.75 5.21
New Rochelle 74,697 5.06 6.48
Yonkers 204,789 6.24 7.08
5. Programs and Services
A. Town of Mamaroneck
A year round program of activities is offered by the Town Recreation
Commission for both children and adults. Program areas include:
1. Five playgounds
2. Two pre-schools
3. Music School
4. Art Workshop
5. Program for retarded and brain injured children
6. Athletics
7. Aquatics (sailing, swimming year round)
The Park District is responsible for maintenance of Memorial Park
((g acres), and a few additional green areas, for a total off., acres.
The Conservation Advisory Committee maintains the Hommocks and Sheldrake
Trails. In addition, the Ranger acts as a specialist for the school district.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
A year round program of activities is offered by the Village of Mamaroneck
Department of Parks and Recreation for all ages. Program areas include:
1. Day Camp (pre-kindergarten thru 7th grade)
2. Performing Arts (drama, dance, art and music)
3. Athletics
4. Aquatics (sailing, swimming)
5. Senior Citizens
7.
Activities at the Beach include public swimming as well as a
competitive swimming team. The services at the Marina and Docks include
maintenance of the facility and operation of a public launching ramp.
C. Village of Larchmont
The Village of Larchmont, not having a full time Superintendent of
Recreation, does not have a continuous on-going recreation program.
Program areas include:
1. Seven-week summer playground program at Flint Park
2. Special events (bicycle race, family picnic,
fishing contest, kite flying contest)
3. Financial support to athletic leagues
4. Tennis and paddle tennis courts
6. Relationships
A. Town of Mamaroneck
Programs offered by the Town Recreation Commission serve the Unincor-
porated Town, Village of Larchmont, and Village of Mamaroneck. The only
exception to the above is the portion of Mamaroneck Village in the Tann
of Rye which pays double for use of the swimming pool.
The Town Recreation Commission is very dependent upon the Board of
Education for use of recreation facilities. The Town has a formal agreement
with the Board of Education for the use of the Hommocks School Pool, and in
this case the Town owns the land around the school and the Board of Education
owns the land the school is built on. The Town Recreation Commission has use
of the pool outside of school hours, paying 1/3 of the maintenance cost of
the pool and the Board of Education 2/3.
8.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
Programs offered by the Village Department of Parks and Recreation
are available to Larchmont and the Unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck,
with the exception of Harbor Island and the Summer Day Camp. A good
working relationship exists with the Rye Neck Board of Education for the
use of school facilities. For 1971 the Rye Neck Board of Education has
charged the Village a fee of $15 per three hours for use of indoor
facil.ties.
C. Village of Larchmont
Programs offered by the Village of Larchmont are open to the Village
of Mamaroneck and the Unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck with the exception
of the Summer Day Camp.
The Town of Mamaroneck Recreation Commission pays the salary of the
Director of the Summer Day Camp, half the salary of the Assistant, and
pays for the supplies used by the Summer Day Camp.
The Village of Larchmont has a fee differential for the use of its
tennis and paddle tennis courts:
Resident Non—Resident
Tennis:
Child 3.50 7.50
One person 10.00 25.00
Couple 15.00 37.50
Paddle Tennis:
Family 25.00 35.00
9.
7. Facilities
A. Town of Mamaroneck
Facility Ownership Acres Type of Facility
Pool School Pool
Hommocks:Grounds Town 17 5 tennis courts; parking
area; playing fields,
conservation area
Cargell School 11 Little League Field;
playfield; 3 tennis courts
Murray Ave. School School 2.5
Memorial Park Park Dist. 10 3 tennis courts; playground
Premium River March Vill. of Larch- 5 Undeveloped
mont and Town
Mamaroneck Ave. School School
Baldwin Town .25
Sheldrake Trails Town 53 Trails
Total acres owned by Town Recreation Commission, Park District and Conser-
vation Advisory Committee is 85.25 acres.
B. Village of Mamaroneck
Facility Ownership Acres Type of Facility
Barry & Jefferson Playgr. Village .5 Playground
Columbus Park Village 6 Basketball; playground
Florence Park Village 8.9 Tot Lot; park area
Harbor Island Park Village 39 Beach; Marina; tennis courts;
open fields; basketball
Rockland Ave. Nature Trail Village 1 Trails (not maintained)
Stanley Ave. Park Village 1.5 Playgr.,ballfields;basketball
Ward Ave. River Walk Village 3 Not developed
Warren Ave. Park Village 2 Playground; open fields;
nature trail
Bellows School School 2
Daniel Warren School School 2.5
Rye Neck High School School
Total acres owned by the Village of Mamaroneck Department of Parks and Recreation
is 61.9 acres.
10.
C. Village of Larchmont
Facility Ownership Acres Type of Facility
Flint Park Village 27 All purpose room;ballfields;
paddle tennis; tennis courts;
playground.
Woodbine Park Village 2 Basketball; playground;
Little League Field
Fountain Park Private Society 1
Kane Park Village 2 Playground
Village Park Village 2 Grass area
Addison Park Village .75 Grass area
Vanderburgh Park Village 2 Playground; horseshoe pits
Pine Brook Park Village 3 Playground
Lorenzen Park Village 2 ballfield
Premium River Marsh Village 2
Total acres owned by the Village of Larchmont and used for Park and
Recreation is 40.8 acres.
8. Population
Census data which shows the population trends of the Study Area appears
in the following table:
1960 1970 1975
Municipality Census Census Projection
Town of Mamaroneck 11,763 13,002 13,100
(unincorporated)
Village of Larchmont 6,789 7,203 7,300
Village of Mamaroneck 10,555 11,038
Town of Mamaroneck
Town of Rye 7,118 7,871
Total 17,673 18,909 21,300
Total Towns & Villages 36,225 39,114
Total Town of Mamaroneck 29,107 31,243
11.
The theoretical population capacity under present zoning of the three
municipalities is listed below:
Town of Mamaroneck 15,360
Village of Larchmont 8,220
Village of Mamaroneck 22,550
9. Tax Structure
The 1970 town budget shows the following tax structure for the
Unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck, Village of Larchmont, and Village
of Mamaroneck (in Mamaroneck Town) .
A. Unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck
School Tax $ 59.02 per $1000
Park Town Highway & Districts 25.20 per $1000
Judicial and County 18.22 per $1000
County Sewer Tax 2.11 per $1000
General Town Tax 1.35 per $1000
Total Tax Levy $ 105.90 per $1000
B. Village of Larchmont
School Tax $ 59.02 per $1000
Village Tax 36.90 per $1000
Judicial and County 18.22 per $1000
County Sewer Tax 2.67 per $1000
General Town Tax 1.35 per $1000
Total Tax Levy $ 118.16 per $1000
12.
C. Village of Mamaroneck (In Town of Mamaroneck)
School Tax $ 59.02 per $1000
Village Tax 29.06 per $1000
Judicial and County 18.22 per $1000
County Sewer Tax 2.11 per $1000
General Town Tax 1.35 per $1000
$ 109.76 per $1000
Forty-eight cents• (48¢) of the $1.35 General Town Tax goes
for Town Recreational services. The following table shows the
actual assessment in dollars by the Town for Recreation:
Unincorporated Town $ 32,743.59
Village of Mamaroneck 24,319.41
Larchmont 18,252.90
13.
ACTION ON RECOMMENDATIONS FROM THE
1961 RECREATION STUDY
1961 RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
I. The Village of Larchmont, Village of I. No action. There have been no
Mamaroneck and the unincorporated Town discussions on this matter of any
of Mamaroneck jointly establish a official significance. From time
combined Park and Recreation Commission. to time the matter was referred
to by the various Commissions/
Committees. However, the
proposal was given no further
study or investigation.
2. The Village of Larchmont and Village of 2. The Village of Mamaroneck did
Mamaroneck each establish recreation establish a Recreation and Parks
commissions, then join the unincorporated Commission in 1968, but not as
Town of Mamaroneck to establish a joint provided in Section 243 of the
Recreation Commission . General Municipal Law. The action
was by local ordinance and the
duties and powers of this Com-
mission are only advisory in
nature, which is quite different
from those powers if established
under Section #243. The Village
of Larchmont has taken no action
on establishing a commission.
3. The Commission consists of no more than 3. No action.
nine members, each political subdivision
to appoint three.
14.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
4. Commission members be appointed 4. No action.
for three years.
5. Commission membership should be 5. No action.
limited to no more than three
consecutive terms.
6. Commission powers and duties to be 6. No action.
consistent with all statutes per—
taining to Parks, Recreation and
Conservation.
7. Prior to the establishment of the 7. No action.
Commission, the elected boards of
each municipality shall informally
agree on use of facilities, person—
nel and finance. Each municipality
shall then pass an ordinance to
finalize the agreement.
8. Mamaroneck Park and Recreation 8. No action.
Commission (Schematic Chart).
9 . Joint Commission membership to 9. No action.
include all local commission members
and will function in sane manner as
a municipal recreation commission.
10. An executive committee of six members to 10. No action.
be established. The executive committee
would exercise all authority of the joint
recreation commission.
15.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
11. The joint recreation commission 11. No action
shall determine its total budget
request and set forth amounts
charged to each community. If
proportionate share is not approp-
riated the commission may reduce
expenditures attributable to the
community or terminate the
agreement.
12. A fiscal officer of one of the com- 12. No action
munities be appointed custodian of funds.
13. A municipality may withdraw at the 13. No action
close of the fiscal year. When such
discontinuance occurs, the commission
shall distribute all money remaining
to the participating political sub-
divisions.
14. Joint Recreation Commission 14. No action
(Schematic Chart).
15. The municipalities and School 15. Joint planning between the Town and
Boards act jointly on issues and Villages has occurred on several
decisions in recreation planning. occasions. For the most part, the
planning has been in connection with
the development of major facilities
as indicated below. There has not
been any type of continuing planning
process which involves other areas
16.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
15. ( Continued ) 15. ( Continued)
besides major facilities.
The Town and Larchmont coordinated plans in
two recent studies by outside consultants
on the Hommacks Area and Premium River
Studies.
The Town and UFSD #1 jointly planned the
development of the new Central School on
the former site of Cargill Park. While
the town gave up its park land, the new
school has provided for play fields and
indoor facilities used quite extensively
by the Recreation Commission. Further,
there was a joint effort in the planning,
development and operation of facilities in
connection with the construction of the new
Middle School on the Hommacks site. In
addition to the indoor facilities of the
school being available for recreation use,
Recreation gained use of the indoor-outdoor
pool at times when it is not used for the
education program. Also, the outdoor
facilities of the Hommacks area lends
itself to recreation use.
16. That full time personnel be 16. The Town and Village of Mamaroneck employ
employed in accordance with New full-time personnel in accordance with
York State Civil Service requirements. requirements. Both have a Superintendent.
17.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
17. That a central file index of 17. No action on Volunteers.
potential volunteers be established
and that training be provided.
18. That the recreation program be 18. Considerable change is noted
broadened to include all age groups in program development within.
and variety of interests.
19. That the per capita expenditure for 19. The per capita expenditures for the
the Parks and Recreation operating three municipalities are as follows:
budget be increased to a minimum of Town of Mamaroneck - $5.06. This
$5.50 and that a minimum of 70% of does not include Park District
the funds be expended for leadership. 79,423 and Conservation Advisory
Committee 23,460.
Village of Mamaroneck - $10.20.
This does not include Beach 26,353
and Marina and Docks 47,519.
Village of Larchmont - $3.46. This
does not include money spent by
Public Works 33,550.
20. That the Town Board, Village Boards, 20. No action on joint meetings of
Planning Boards and Recreation official boards.
Commission meet quarterly to exchange
views and problems, to effect better
coordination.
18.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
21. That the Town Board, School Boards 21. No action on continuing meetings
and Park and Recreation Commission with school boards. Only as
establish a coordinating committee occasions arise.
to discuss joint action on planning
and operations.
22. That a Recreation Agency Citizens 22. No action.
Council be established to coordinate
the recreation efforts of the public,
private and voluntary recreation
agencies.
23. That each municipality include a 23. No general action. Only as
member of the Board of Education on situations arise.
any board responsible for recreation;
also that the Superintendent of Rec-
reation be invited to participate in
school board meetings relating to
recreation.
24. Acquire remnant parcel of Saxon Woods 24. No action of acquiring Saxon
Park between the NYS Thruway entrance Woods parcel.
and Raleigh Road.
25. Expand Warren Avenue Playground. 25. Area was not expanded. However, a
new tennis court has been constructed.
26. Improve the stream banks south of 26. A continuing clean-up program has been
Warren Avenue Playground. instituted in the Warren Avenue site.
19.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
27. Prepare a master plan for the 27. Action has been taken on the
development of Florence Street development of the Florence Street
Park. site. Planning Associates have been
retained to develop a Master Plan
and seek Federal or State Funding
on its development.
28. Facilities at Florence Street 28. Warren School facilities are
Park should supplement those utilized at present.
at Daniel Warren School.
29. Provide additional facilities 29. The school was extended out onto the
at F.E. Bellows School. former playfield reducing available
play area. However, a tot lot area
was installed.
30. Improve the grounds and facilities 30. No action. Barry Avenue.
at the Barry Avenue school.
31. Provide play facilities in the 31. No action. Harbor Lawn.
Harbor Lawn area.
32. Prepare a plan for the ultimate 32. Village Dump has been closed but
development of the Village Dump. there have been no proposals or
discussions on its use as 'a rec-
reation site.
33. Acquire the small amount of 33. No action. Guion Creek.
remaining shorefront land on
Guion Creek and develop a
portion for active recreation.
20.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
34. Remove automobile parking at 34. No action on the recommendation.
Columbus Park at the corner of However, a basketball court has
Van Ranst Place and Station Plaza. been constructed and is lighted
for night use.
'35. Protect Sheldrake River from 35. No action.
encroachment.
36. Provide additional open areas and 36. No action.
play space within the area desig—
nated for redevelopment.
37. Require land for recreation 37. Apartment complexes have been
purposes from developers of developed in this area and three tot
apartment buildings. lots were provided by the developers.
38. Improve Fenimore Park. 38. Playground equipment has been added
and the basketball court has been
enlarged.
39. Remove the Town garage from Cargill 39. The Cargill property was sold to the
40.
Park and expand recreation School District who also purchased
facilities. the Elkind property for the new
Central School construction.
40. Acquire the Elkind property for
Approximately 8 acres are available
future school expansion.
for outdoor recreation use. A Little
League baseball field was constructed
and play apparatus has been provided.
The school is one of the summer
playground locations.
21.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
41. Acquire the County surplus lands 41. The County Surplus lands were
between the railroad and the acquired and are part of the
Thruway, west of Rockland Avenue. Town's Nature Conservancy.
42. Acquire the land of St. John's 42. No action.
Convalescent Home lying between
Greacen Point Road and Orienta
Avenue.
43. Apply the provisions of the Open 43. No action.
Space Act to preserve large open
areas.
44. Acquire a portion of the West- 44. No action.
chester Day School for use as an
open space park.
45. Prepare a plan and program for 45. Plan has been developed.
land-fill operations at the (See Premium River Study) .
Lorenzen Street Dump.
46. Install additional play apparatus 46. Dillon Park was owned by a
at Dillon Park. developer and is no longer available
as a recreation site.
47. Improve the playing field and 47. No action.
facilities at Woodbine Park.
48. Expand existing parks whenever 48. No action on existing Larchmont
the opportunity is presented. parks.
22.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
49. Take steps to preserve Larchmont 49. Some of the Nursery area has been
Nurseries as an undeveloped subdivided. No action for park use.
wooded area.
50. Acquire the County lands 50. This area was acquired in 1962 and
adjacent to Station Park. is fully developed. Includes play
apparatus, tennis courts, walks,
toilet building, open field.
51. Acquire the County-owned right-of- 51. This area was acquired and is
way of the proposed Cross County part of the Sheldrake Trails.
Parkway.
52. Maintain Murray Avenue School 52. Continues to be used as local
site as a local play area. play area.
53. Develop a portion of the Cross 53. Area acquired but not developed
County Parkway with recreation as an active area. A tot lot and
facilities. small play area was developed by
developer of Baldwin Estates.
54. The Village of Larchmont acquire 54. No action.
vacant lands abutting Flint Park.
57. Relocate the American Legion cost 55. No action.
#347 to enable proper development
of Flint Park.
56. The Town of Mamaroneck and the Village 56. No action as a "single public
of Larchmont prepare a detailed plan facility."
for the ultimate development of Flint
Park - Hommocks.
23.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
57. Town of Mamaroneck acquire the 57. This area was acquired.
6.8 acre parcel held by Agrion
Company.
58. Provide an ultimate development 58. No master plan was developed.
plan for Harbor Island Park after There is some discussion
considering the future needs of regarding covering 4 tennis
the community. courts with an air structure
for winter use.
59. Preserve the major undeveloped 59. No action.
lands within the three municipal-
ities including Otter Creek,
St. John's Home, and Larchmont
Nursery.
60. Acquire Surplus County lands as 60. County properties identified
they are offered for sale. in a, b, and c, were acquired
by the Town. No action on the
Mamaroneck River Parkway.
61. Village of Mamaroneck prepare a 61. No action.
detailed plan for the development
of Mamaroneck River Park and take
advantage of this natural feature
and existing publicly owned lands.
62. Explore the idea of a special park 62. No action.
district and develop Larchmont
Reservoir for recreation purposes.
24.
RECOMMENDATIONS ACTION
63. Purchase the reservoir lands 63. No action.
from the Village of Larchmont.
64. Prepare a comprehensive plan 64. No action.
for the development of reservoir
properties.
65. Amend subdivision regulations 65. Town has requirements.
to provide maximum donation of
recreation space.
I
25.
ADMINISTRATIVE PATTERNS
Recreation and Parks are generally accepted throughout the county as an
essential function of government. We therefore find many local governments
assuming responsibility for organization and administration of recreation and
parks in accordance with the existing enabling acts.
I.
There is one pattern of organization and administration considered to be
an ideal format for all situations. Local conditions differ in each municipality
and therefore become governing factors in all judgments. The selection of any
one administrative pattern is dependent upon several factors. Among these are:
a) The legal powers of the municipality
b) The type of local municipal government
c) The relationship of municipalities, schools,
voluntary and private agencies interested
in recreation and parks
d) The ownership and control of recreation and
park facilities
e) The existing recreation and park program
f) The ability of the people to pay for the service
g) The ownership and control of lands set aside
for parks, recreation and open space
h) The projected growth and development of the community
The more common arrangements for organization and administrative patterns are:
a) Municipal program administered by:
1. Municipal Recreation Commission or Board
2. Municipal Recreation Department with
Advisory Committee or Board
3. Municipal Park and Recreation Department
b) Program administered by an independent agency supported by
two or more municipalities
c) Program administered by a School District
26.
ADMINISTRATIVE PATTERNS FOR MAMARONECK
The selection of an appropriate pattern of organization and administration
for the administration of park and recreation services in the Town of Mamaroneck
is complex due to the multiplicity of municipalities and other districts.
Within the Town of Mamaroneck are two incorporated Villages, (Larchmont and
Mamaroneck), all of the Mamaroneck School District, and part of Quaker Ridge
School District, which extends beyond the town limits into the Town and Village
of Scarsdale. Also, the Village of Mamaroneck is not entirely within the Town
of Mamaroneck; a portion of the Village is in the Town of Rye. This portion of
the Village is in the Rye Neck School District, which also serves a portion of
the City of Rye. The three municipalities are presently maintaining and
operating separate park and recreation systems. The following is a list of
separate bodies providing Park and Recreation services to the people of Mamaroneck.
Town of Mamaroneck
1. Recreation Commission
2. Park District
3. Conservation Advisory Committee
Village of Mamaroneck
4. Department of Recreation and Parks
5. Division of Beaches
6. Division of Marina and Docks
Village of Larchmont
7. Park and Recreation Advisory Committee
8. Department of Public Works
The Mamaroneck School District provides facilities for part of the local
programs, as does the Rye Neck School District.
The Town of Mamaroneck and the Village of Mamaroneck employ a full time
Superintendent of Recreation to conduct year-round programs. The Village of
Larchmont operates a summer part-time program.
27.
In viewing these consideration; with other factors previously mentioned,
two main patterns for the administration of recreation are possible, each with
distinct advantages and disadvantages.
ALTERNATE: (A)
THREE MUNICIPALITIES OPERATING SEPARATE PROGRAMS
The advantage of this pattern of organization is as follows:
1. Community identity is maintained and the control and management of
facilities becomes the final decision of the local municipality.
The disadvantages of this pattern of organization are as follows:
1. Three municipalities operating independent and separate programs in
a limited area of service results in lack of good overall planning,
higher costs of operations, overlap of programs and services, and s.
duplication of facilities.
2. In the area of program administration there are at present two
department heads responsible for this function. Each has similar
duties of preparing budgets, controlling budget expenditures,
preparing records and reports, meeting with Commissions, recruiting
staff, supervising staff, preparing publicity, promoting the program,
planning the program, evaluating the program, planning future
facilities needs and conducting research regarding local needs.
These administrative responsibilities could well be consolidated
and placed under the jurisdiction of one administrator, permitting
more time for programs. Indications are that the area of service
is much too small to warrant two top administrators.
3. The above factors, in practice, contribute to an unnecessary overall
expenditure of funds. Whether it be in actual dollars and cents,
consumption of time, or duplication of effort, the return is not as
great as it would be under a coordinated function.
28.
4. The Villages of Mamaroneck and Larchmont have provided some basic
recreation facilities. However, the unincorporated town area is
without appropriate and adequate facilities. Additional land and
facilities are needed in all communities and perhaps more so in
the unincorporated town area. Independent action will be a costly
affair and create a double taxation problem for the Villages in any
town development. In this regard the double taxation problem is
bound to be a hindrance to the development of necessary areas and
facilities.
5. The future development of existing open areas cannot be accomplished
efficiently under the three municipality pattern. With each community
striving to meet its own needs, duplication of facility development is
inevitable. With joint planning and operation, consideration can be
given to a greater variety of facilities, making possible a broader
program.
6. Under present conditions, a full time year-round department of
recreation is unlikely in the Village of Larchmont. Professional
guidance and services are provided by the Town on a part-time basis
at various times throught the year. However, to meet the future needs
of the community and to insure proper planning, the services of pro-
fessional personnel will be required on a continuing basis. This is
not possible under the present plan of operation due to costs and other
involvements.
7. The use of school facilities becomes difficult and is at a disadvantage
under this pattern of organization. At present, one school district
USFD #1, Town of Mamaroneck, is related to three municipalities in use
of school facilities for recreation. This becomes a practical problem
of policy, application and scheduling in their relationship with the
29.
three municipalities. Questions as to priorities, reciprocal arrangements,
quality of leadership and responsibility for equipment are some of the
problems which arise with three public agencies requesting services.
ALTERNATE: (B)
A JOINT PROGRAM INCLUDING THE VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK, VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT
AND UNINCORPORATED AREA OF TOWN.
The advantages of this pattern of organization are as follows:
1. With one administrative head the duplicating and overlapping of
program activities is reduced to a minimum through coordination.
One person taking inventory and appraising program offerings is
more effective in establishing an overall community recreation
program enlisting the cooperation of all public, private and
voluntary agencies.
2. In eliminating duplication of effort, the time and funds otherwise
devoted to this duplication become available for new and expanded
programs in other areas of interest.
3. The development of future facilities becomes the responsibility of
one administrative body and thereby prevents the unnecessary dupli-
cation. In addition, with a larger governmental unit involved in
an integrated plan of development, the construction of major
recreation areas becomes more realistic. Needed facilities which
would otherwise be out of the question for small communities due to
the economics of the situation, now become a possibility.
4.v One administrative body would require the professional services of
one Superintendent of Recreation and Parks to administer the program.
This one person would be responsible for executing policy, preparing
the budget, planning and supervising the program, recruiting and
training the staff, promoting and publicizing the department,
preparing records and reports, and conducting special studies related
30.
to recreation in the community. One person to do the total
administrative job instead of two or possibly three would provide
more time to be devoted to program leadership by other staff.
This would be a more efficient use of manpower.
5. With the consolidation of administrative duties and the coordinated
development of facilities, there is bound to be a greater return
for the expenditure of funds.
6. By including the Village of Larchmont in this plan, the professional
services and guidance of a full time Superintendent of Recreation
and Parks are provided to the Village. The Village can benefit from
these services to improve and extend the on-going recreation programs
and services and development of facilities.
7. Finally, the working relationship of one municipal agency with the
two school districts which have an important role in the total
community recreation program is much smoother, with the probability
of fewer problems and closer cooperation. The schools have many of
the required facilities and leadership essential in establishing a
sound program. The stronger the relationship and the greater the
cooperation, the better will be the final result.
The main disadvantage of this pattern of organization is the loss
of individual community identity.
31.
RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDATION #I
THAT THE VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT, THE PORTION OF THE VILLAGE OF
MAMARONECK IN THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, AND THE UNINCORPORATED TOWN OF
MAMARONECK, JOINTLY ESTABLISH, BY RESOLUTION, A COMBINED MAMARONECK
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION.
As stated earlier in the report the administration
pattern for park and recreation services in the Town
of Mamaroneck is complex due to the multiplicity of
municipalities and other districts. The Consultant
Team feels the Village of Mamaroneck in the Town of
Mamaroneck and the unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck
should jointly establish a combined Mamaroneck Park
and Recreation Commission. However, an agreement
should be made with the portion of the Village of
Mamaroneck in the Town of Rye to provide them with
recreational services,
—OR,
RECOMMENDATION (ALTERNATE FOR NO. I)
THAT THE VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT, THE PORTION OF THE VILLAGE OF
MAMARONECK, IN THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, AND THE UNINCORPORATED TOWN
OF MAMARONECK, JOINTLY ESTABLISH, BY RESOLUTION, A COMBINED MAMARONECK
PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION WITH THE EXCEPTION OF THE BEACH AND
MARINA FACILITIES AT HARBOR ISLAND REMAINING UNDER THE CONTROL OF THE
VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK.
32.
With this recommendation the Consultant Team feels that the
control over the Beach and Marina facilities at Harbor Island
should remain with Mamaroneck Village. However, an agreement
should be made with the Town Department of Parks, Recreation
and Conservation assuring the Town Department of the use of
the above facilities.
RECOMMENDATION #2
THAT THE VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT, THE PORTION OF THE VILLAGE OF
MAMARONECK, IN THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, AND THE UNINCORPORATED TOWN
OF MAMARONECK ESTABLISH THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS,
RECREATION AND CONSERVATION.
RECOMMENDATION #3
ESTABLISH UNDER ARTICLE 12F TO THE GENERAL MUNICIPAL LAW THE
TOWN OF MAMARONECK CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMISSION. THE SUPERINTENDENT
OF THE DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION HE AN EX—OFFICIO
MEMBER OF THE COMMISSION. (SEE APPENDIX A).
RECOMMENDATION #4
SCHEMATIC CHART FOR THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS,
RECREATION AND CONSERVATION.
33.
Mamaroneck Town
Board
r
Conservation Mamaroneck Department of Parks, Mamaroneck Parka
and
Advisory Commission Recreation and Conservation Recreation Comm.
Superintendent- of Parks, Recreation and
Conservation
Assistant Superintendent of Parks,
Recreation and Conservation
.
Supervisor of Recreation Supervisor of Parks
34.
RECOMMENDATION #5
ABOLISH THE FOLLOWING BODIES PRESENTLY PROVIDING PARK AND
RECREATIONAL SERVICES TO THE PEOPLE OF MAMARONECK:
TOWN OF MAMARONECK
RECREATION COMMISSION
UNINCORPORATED TOWN PARK DISTRICT
TOWN CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
VILLAGE OF MAMARONECK
DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS
RECREATION AND PARK COMMISSION
VILLAGE OF LARCHMONT
PARK AND RECREATION ADVISORY COMMITTEE
AND TO TRANSFER THE DUTIES AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF THE ABOVE BODIES TO
THE MAMARONECK DEPARTMENT OF PARKS, RECREATION AND CONSERVATION, THE
MAMARONECK PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSION AND THE CONSERVATION ADVISORY
COMMISSION.
RECOMMENDATION #6
FCRMATION OF AN AD HOC CITIZENS COMMITTh1 WITH REPRESENTATION FROM
EACH MUNICIPALITY TO FINALIZE THE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR IMPLEMENTATION.
35.
APPENDIX A
LEGISLATIVE AUTHORIZATION FOR CONSERVATION ADVISORY COMMISSION
Add Article 12F, General Municipal Law, repeals 64-B Town Law, to
authorize city, town or village to create conservation advisory council
for promotion, development, management and protection of natural
resources, including research into land area, coordination of activities
of unofficial bodies organized therefor, and to cooperate with other
bodies in area of community planning and to describe requests which may
be made of conservation department including preparation of certain
reports and description of work, technical and research work assistance,
and description of areas requiring particular attention.
Law Chapter 901 of the Laws of 1970.
Some suggested programs include:
Identification and preservation of functional open spaces in the
community, parks and recreation work, pesticide and chemical control,
clean-up and litter control campaigns, shade tree planting and
replacement, control of visual pollution, landscaping and other types
of community improvement projects, etc.
36.
APPENDIX B
Sample resolution to establish a Mamaroneck Park and Recreation
Commission and Mamaroneck Department of Parks, Recreation and
Conservation.
Section I — Establishment of a Park and Recreation Commission
and Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation
a) There is hereby established a Park and Recreation Commission
for the Town of Mamaroneck; hereinafter called the Commission.
b) There is hereby established a Department of Parks,
Recreation and Conservation for the Town of Mamaroneck.
c) There is hereby abolished the following bodies
presently providing Park and Recreation services:
In the Town of Mamaroneck
1. Recreation Commission
2. Unincorporated Town Park District
3. Town Conservation Advisory Committee
In the Village of Mamaroneck
4. Department of Recreation and Parks
5. Recreation and Park Commission
In the Village of Larchmont
6. Park and Recreation Advisory Committee
And all their duties and its duties and responsibilities are delegated to the
Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation, the Park and Recreation
Commission or the Conservation Advisory Commission.
37.
Section 2 - Appointment of Superintendent
The Department of Parks, Recreation and Conservation shall
be administered by a Superintendent who shall be appointed
by, and responsible to, the Town Board. He shall be
appointed in the manner provided by the Civil Service Law
of the State of New York.
Section 3 - Appointment of Recreation and Park Commission
The Park and Recreation Commission of the Town of Mamaroneck
shall consist of nine (9) members who shall be residents of
the Town and who shall be appointed by the Town Board for a
term of three (3) years, each term to expire at the end of
the Town's official year. Except that of the first appointed,
three (3) shall be appointed to serve for three years; .three (3)
shall be appointed to serve for two (2) years; and three (3)
shall be appointed to serve for one (1) year. No member may
serve more than three consecutive terms, or nine years con-
secutively, but shall beeligible for reappointment after the
lapse of at least one year from the expiration of his last term.
Appointed to the Commission shall be two (2) representatives
from the unincorporated Town of Mamaroneck, two (2) representa-
tives from the Village of Larchmont, two (2) representatives
from the Village of Mamaroneck (that portion in the Town of
Mamaroneck); one (1) shall be designated by the Board of
Education of the Mamaroneck School District, one (1) shall be
designated by the Conservation Advisory Commission, and one (1)
member at large.
The members of the Park and Recreation Commission shall
serve without compensation but shall be entitled to reimburse-
38.
ment for any monies expended in the performance of their
duties. The Commission shall elect, from its own members,
a chairman and a vice-chairman, for a term of two years,
and may from time to time name such other officers as it
deems necessary, except that the first chairman shall be
appointed by the Town Board. No member shall serve more
than two (2) two (2) year terms as chairman or vice-
chairman. Any vacancy on the Commission shall be filled
for the unexpired term in the same manner in which the
original appointment was made.
Section 4 - Definition
As used herein, the word "park" or "parks" shall mean and
include all public parks, beaches, reparian lands, play-
grounds, athletic fields, recreation centers, open spaces
and other areas used for park and recreation purposes,
beautification projects, including all buildings, structures,
equipment and appurtenances, as well as entrances and
approaches thereto, and streets, roads, parking places,
and bridges located in such park or parks, and such other
rights and appurtenances as the Town Board may have or
utilize for such park purposes, whether the same be under
the care and control of the Town by lease or otherwise,
provided only that the same be used for park and recreation
purposes or either of such purposes. The Town Board may
transfer related administrative functions into the Department
of Parks, Recreation and Conservation, when, in their judgment
such transfer is necessary and proper.
39.
Section 5 - Duties of Superintendent
The Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Conservation shall
be the administrative head of the Department of Parks, Recre-
ation and Conservation. He shall perform the duties required
of him under the direction of the Town Board and subject to all
the laws, controls, procedures, rules and regulations applicable
to other Town Departments. The Superintendent of Parks, Recre-
ation and Conservation shall attend all regular and special
meetings of the Commission and may participate fully in all
discussions. He shall have no vote on said commission.
Section 6 - Powers and Duties of Park and Recreation Commission
The Commission shall have the following powers and duties:
a) To consult with the Superintendent of Parks,
Recreation and Conservation on the establishment
and operation of recreation and park programs.
b) To recommend to the Town Board long range plans
for parks and recreation facilities and programs.
c) To review and make recommendations with respect
to the budget for operations and capital projects
submitted to it by the Superintendent prior to
his submission of such budget to the Town Board.
d) To approve all matters having to do with the
regulation and use of the pa rks and recreation
facilities and subject to the approval of the
Town Board, to adopt ordinances regulating the
use of such facilities and fixing the fees and
charges to be paid for the use of any such
facilities.
40.
Section 7 - Meetings of the Commission
The Commission shall regularly meet once each month at a
time and place set by said Commission for its regular
meeting. A quorum shall consist of five (5) members. The
Chairman or any three (3) members of the Commission may
call a special meeting of said Commission for such purposes
as are designated in said call. Notice of said special
meeting shall be given in writing to all members and to
the Superintendent of Parks, Recreation and Conservation
72 hours in advance of said special meeting. The Superin—
tendent of Parks, Recreation and Conservation shall attend
all regular and special meetings of the Commission and may
participate fully in all discussions. He shall have no
vote on said Commission. The Town Clerk shall be respon—
sible for giving notice of all regular and special
meetings of the Park and Recreation Commission.
41.
APPENDIX C
STATE COMPTROTJER'S OPINION FOR MERGED PARK AND RECREATION COMMISSIONS
DEPARTMENT OF AUDIT AND CONTROL
Albany
September 11, 1967
Mr. James Arles
Director of Programs & Services
County Office Building
White Plains, New York
Dear Mr. Arles:
This is in reply to your letter in which you ask for clarification of
our Opinion #67-436; that is, whether such opinion is contradictory to
or distinguishable from Opinion #66-1046. You also ask whether a
village or a town could, pursuant to the 1967 opinion, abolish an
existing park body or recreation body, and create a single "parks and
recreation commission."
Opinion #67-436 states that the power to maintain parks and park
facilities and the power to establish, maintain and operate recreational
facilities and projects can be consolidated or merged in one municipal
body or commission.
On the other hand, #66-1046 expresses the view that a town cannot
confer jurisidction over park functions merely by changing the name
of its "recreation commission" to read "park and recreation commission."
42.
We do not believe that the above two opinions are in conflict. The 1966
opinion means that merely changing the name would not appesr to be the
proper means of vesting additional duties and powers in an existing board
or body. Where the powers of'two separate boards or bodies are to be
vested in and exercised by a single board or body, such intention should
be clearly manifested, and, as suggested in the 1967 opinion, it would
also be desirable that the duties of the new body be spelled out in the
resolution or local law.
In Op. St. Compt. #59-291, we expressed the view that a village could
abolish an existing recreation commission and create, in its stead, a
recreation and park commission. This opinion, however, leaves
unanswered certain important questions. For example, where is the
authority for creating the new body, how many persons would be authorized
to be members of the commission and what would be their terms of office?
A village is specifically authorized to establish and abolish certain
boards or commissioners, including a board of park commissioners (Village
Law, 4-454) . This provision also authorizes the establishment of a single
municipal board having the powers, duties and responsibilities of two or
more of the specified boards. However, because a board of recreation
commissioners is not one of the board specified therein, Section 4-454 is
not authority for the establishment of a park and recreation commission.
Section 243 of the General Municipal Law authorizes a municipality to
establish a recreation commission. (See also Section 95 of the General
Municipal Law which contains a similar grant of power) . Section 242 of
the General Municipal Law provides that the power to establish and
maintain recreation projects and activities may be vested in a park board
or some other existing body.
43.
Where a village has a board of park commissioners, then such board could
be vested with control and jurisdiction over recreational projects and
facilities pursuant to Section 242. In such a case, it is our opinion
that the resolution, ordinance or local law, enjoining upon the park
commissioners the control and jurisdiction over recreation projects and
facilities, could also change the name of the commission to reflect its
true powers and functions. Such a board of commissioners would be
comprised of the members of the "original" board of park commissioners
and their term of office would continue to be governed by the provisions
of Section 4-454 of the Village Law.
Where a village has a recreation commission, it could, we believe, create
a park commission and appoint the members of the recreation commission to
it and combine the separate boards into a single commission. In such a
case the resolution, ordinance or local law could also designate the new
body as the parks and recreation commission or give it some other character—
istic name.
In the case of towns, problems similar to those just discussed with respect
to villages could also be involved, where the functions and powers to
maintain parks, and to establish and operate recreational facilities, are
consolidated or merged in one separate body or commission.
There are no specific provisions in the Town Law providing for park boards
or park commissioners, with the exception of park commissioners for town
park districts. A town is generally authorized to appoint such officers
and em.lo ees not s.ecificall• .rovided for b• law as it ma determine
necessary for the conduct of its affairs (Town Law, 20; Municipal Home Rule
Law, 10 (1) (a) (6) . Assuming that a town has, by proper action, established
a park commission or other similar body having control and jurisdiction over
44.
town parks, then, pursuant to Section 242 of the General Municipal Law, the
power to establish and maintain recreation projects and facilities could be
vested in the park commission. The resolution, ordinance or local law
delegating to the park commissioners the recreation duties could, we believe,
change the name of the commission to reflect its duties over town parks.
A town board could also, as discussed above for villages, create a park
commission or park board and appoint the members of an existing recreation
commission to it, and combine the separate boards into a single commission.
We trust that the above will be of assistance to you.
Very truly yours,
ARTHUR LEVITT
State Comptroller
By Paul A. Hughes
Associate Counsel
Berns/jz
45.
APPENDIX D
TOWN BOARD RESOLUTION
Extract from the Minutes of a regular meeting of the Town Board of the
Town of Mamaroneck, held March 18, 1970.
RESOLVED, that this board officially request
the Westchester County Department of Parks,
Recreation and Conservation to proceed with a
re-appraisal of the Comprehensive Recreation
Survey made in 1961 for the Town and Villages
of Larchmond and Mamaroneck at a cost of $600.,
said cost to be borne by each of the three
municipalities in the sum of $200.
The foregoing resolution was adopted by unanimous vote of the Board
with all members present voting "aye".
46.
this is the concensus of the whole Larchmont Village
AilL , '!� Committee with one exception, Mrs. Frederick Feuerbach,rwho maintainednthat
she would send in a minority report because she approves of the County
Report.
November 30, 1971
SUMMARY OF COMMENTS ON THE JULY 1971
REAPPRAISAL OF THE 1961 COtilPREHENSIVE
RECREATION SURVEY
1. At the outset it must be stated that the report
does not correctly represent the existing recreation
facilities in Larchmont.
To illustrate, the duties of the recreation committee
appearing on page 2 is much more than advisory. They fail
to take into consideration our recreation program and the
operation of the parks in Larchmont.
2. It must be pointed out that all the recreational
• personnel of Larchmont is voluntary. Whereas the recommendation
calls for paid personnel. This would increase our taxes.
3. On page 8 it is not true where they state we do
not have a continuous on-going recreational programa The
various atheletic tournaments, golf clinic and July 4th
family picnic for the entire Village is omitted. In
: addition, we supply and maintain the ball fields.
4. Question was raised what Larchmont gets for their '
contribution of $18, 252.92 towards the Town for recreation
(page 13) .
5. The actions on the recommendation from the 1961
•
study, particularly items one through fourteen appearing on
page 14 through 16, are all essentially the same recommendations,
to wit, the establishment of a joint park and recreation
commission for the three municipalities.
6. Throughout the report there are recommendations
that more land be acquired for parks. They fail to take
into consideration the existing parks in Larchmont and the
cost of such acquisition.
7. The survey recommends full time personnel be emp1 ed
who have bs,AG written civil service examinations. This is
not necessarily the best way to choose personnel, if in
fact full time paid personnel are to be utilized.
a
^ v. Y*
8. Some good recommendations of the survey are:
(a) A central file of volunteers
(b) Coordination of recreation programs
and use of facilities between the
three municipalities through joint
meetings of town and village recreational
committees.
CONCLUSION
By adoption of the July 1971 survey in total would -
be a detriment to Larchmont in that we would give more in -
facilities and services than we would receive.
•
MORTON L. PORTNOY
AMMOIli.. -As
•
October 28, 197i
Dear Ruth:
Here are some of my thoughts on the recreation survey.
1/ Contrary to what Mr. Pound states, I don't think this report was carefully
appraised. We are all aware now of th inaccurate statements contained in the
survey.
2/ A letter should be sent to Mr. Pound or whoever the proper authority is
stating our dissatisfaction and rejection of this survey..
3/ I am against the recommendation for the jointly established recreation com-
mission; for the selfish reason that I fell Larchmont stands to lose far more
than itcan gain from this commission.
4/ I would like to see the respective recreation representatives from the
two villagesand the Town meet formally (X) times a year instead of having
a jaint commission. I feel this would help eliminate overlap of programs, dup-
lication of activities and might help to solve some of the problems of each area.
5/ Eventually I would hope to see in Larchmont, being aware of financial draw
backs,' a Recreation Cow.uission with a paid Recreation Director.
6/ I feel that presently there are programs that could be started in Tarchmont
but wont be because subconsciously we on the Committee Inow that we the com-
mittee men will be responsible for organizing and running the programs. I think
volunteer help is essential but I believe that with a paid director who would
supervise programs the burden on the volunteer wouldn't be so taxing.
7/ I feel our program is good, but as good as any program is, there is room
for improvement. I must partly agree with the survey in that there does seem
to me to be some lack of continuity in our program especially during the Fall
and Winter months. I an sorry I can't be present tonight but I hope these
thoughts will give you some idea of my feelings.
John Feuerbach
1/H14,(0. /(TaLL2-64-,
f •
1 +
•
:`.e=0 - July 30, 1971
To - :ayor Leo Goldsmith, Jr. and Trustee Maurice Noyer
•
From - F. r. Kellog, Jr. and Ruth Green
Re: County Reap?raisal Of Recreation Survey Of July 1971
Dear Lao and Maury: '
. We have both studied the above Report and have decided that since there are
so many points of error and confusion, that the simplest way for us to comment is
to make marginal notes opposite every incorrect or misleading statement and then
to send you copies of these for you to insert in your own Report.
The comments represent unanimous agreement by Ruth and myself on each of the
points because we have both reviewed and incorporated each others views into the
comment and are solidly opposed to the general poor image that the Report gives
to Larchnont.
In substance what it tries to do is to take from those that have i.e.,
Larc mo nt, rich in Parks, and give to those who have not (i.e. the Town) admittedly
poor in Parks and we both fail to see any equity in this for the tax payers of the
Village whose money bought and paid for the fine equipment, courts, fields, and
other excellent facilities in all our Parks.
Tn finalizing our report, we wish to call to your attention the fact that
+L arc—o t Village with a population of little_ over 7,000 people and a mile square
provides the following facilities:
1) T7LINT PARK with a large playground with gi,antities of play equipment,
a wading pool used all summer long, 3 ball fields fully equipped, basket
ball court with 2 baskets, horseshoe pinching area, plus a play area,
benches end walks. A playhouse which is being used during seven weeks
in summer as a day camp and throughout the year, all kinds of civic groups
and organizations have access to it for meetings or parties. Also, we
..a�;
6 tennis courts and 2-paddle tennis courts, used year round.
0
4J — July 30, 1971 x } •
,:o - Nayor Leo Goldcith, Jr. and Trustee Maurice Moyer
•
Page Two •
2.) ?;CDDDINE PARK has a play area wail equipped and a ball field and a
basketball court. .
3.) PN:,MCCK PAR': has a well equipped play area and a ball playing area.
4.) VAND?R 7aGd PARK has a play area with many pieces of playground equipment,
walksa ar_d benches.
5.) RANE PAX has swings, play equipment, benches and walks.
6.) LOR ZEN PARK has a fully equipped ball field that is used exclusively
ki t<1-0 Gu,VE, S,g,rU G i972_ .
by the adult softball league that hopes by next spring to have 300 players.
When you stop to consider that Larchmont Village offers a great deal of varied
recreational activities to a great number of people, for example; some 400 children
in Little League uses our ball fields and over 200 adults use our ball fields in the
soft ball league and about 115 youngsters of Babe Ruth League who have the field
assigned to theL, you will appreciate how nany people we serve. ait_t_o -‹
�f�uu‘ ----21 � c.., G c 1-_,L-.," /1-0 PI' bt--L-Z_ d--e_c._ l•..,-e_ /Ytn
f----25,--u,-4-‘,-----21
�
The number of Larchmont Village people in t'ne esoft ball league is perhaps .less
than a third of Lard vont residents, the balance being people Coming from the To n
and even the Village of Mamaroneck. `,The same holds true for the Babe Ruth'tand Little
4. "-cv�c cf-=..,o...1- /c-...-=� t=c;076 cu Q T�osj v,Z_—_
League where Larchmont provides roC211i`S not only for its OY1, but for a large
number of Town residents as well. _
We know of no other surrounding community that offers so extensive or so
varied facilities as are found in Larchmont Parks., •
rL� Jt `�` Respectfully submitted,
E'er I L� ---:-----7-4-� �/C/ ~
,,, u,,,,,_,,,_ /
•�Ue,-..JZ- , F. Kellogg, J-. J ) ..: .. .
`�' or-t) X.v--rte--4—
C-'_ .'
-,_.. Ir F'JAI ./(__' ��--� IB'''--/-;)
L''�_-C.,�' / % �i�_-C i-'L/ .
. / "� (,t, v')`7 Mus. Y. a 7.,--a`.: G=een, Chairman
� Parks and _. creat'_cn -