HomeMy WebLinkAbout2019_02_06 Town Board Meeting Packet ti0 p
W Int
S n
FOUNDED lE.I
TOWN OF MAMARONECK
TOWN BOARD AGENDA
Wednesday, February 6, 2019
TOWN CENTER COURTROOM
5:00PM THE TOWN BOARD WILL CONVENE IN CONFERENCE ROOM D TO
DISCUSS:
1. Discussion- Development BLD Diner Site
2. Parking Permits/Parking Enforcement
3. Discussion-Comprehensive Plan
4. Discussion-2019 Capital Projects
5. Update - DeLancey Cemetery
6. Review-Amendment to Town Ethics Law
7. New Business
Request for Executive Session
8:00PM CALL TO ORDER— COURTROOM
Supervisor's Report
Citizen Comments
Board of Fire Commissioners
1. Fire Claims
2. Other Fire Department Business
Affairs of Town of Mamaroneck
1. Adoption-2019 Capital Project Schedule
2. Adoption- Bond Resolutions -2019 Capital Projects
3. Set Public Hearings -Water Improvements Bonds
4. Authorization- Closure &Accompanying Transfers -Various Capital Projects
5. Authorization-Transfer of Funds - Concession Equipment- Hommocks Ice Rink
6. Set Public Hearing -Amendment to Town Ethics Law
7. Authorization- I ntermunicipal Agreement- County of Westchester- Organic Waste
8. Salary Authorization - Town Clerk's Office
9. Consideration of Certiorari
Report of Minutes
Reports of the Council
Town Clerk's Report
Next Regularly Scheduled Meeting - February 20, 2019
Meeting Adjournment
Any physically handicapped person needing special assistance in order to attend the meeting should
call the Town Administrator's office at 381-7810.
2399 Boston Post Rd Residential
Mamaroneck/Larchmont, NY
Zoning, Planning Review, and
Impact Analysis Memorandum
Richard F. Hein, Architect PC
132 Larchmont Ave., Suite #6
Larchmont, NY 10538
CONTENTS
CONTEXTUAL OVERVIEW 1
Site context
Current zoning
Relevant review boards
Table: Relevant zoning districts 2
REZONING STRATEGY 3
Foundations for justifying rezoning
Map: Proximity between high- and low-intensity districts
Rezoning strategies
Strategy Alternative 1: Propose site-specific zoning controls
Strategy Alternative 2: Rezone the conjoined parcel to B-MUB 5
Strategy Alternative 3: Rezone the conjoined parcel to R-TA
Note on strategies 2 and 3
PLANNING REVIEW STRATEGY 6
Map: Potential "stream or ditch" on site
Images: Naturally screening tall buildings
Submission and notification procedure 9
Preempting opposition
RETAIL IMPACT ANALYSIS 10
Table: Estimated retail impact 11
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY 12
Green building
Flood resilience
Natural systems
SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS 13
CONTEXTUAL OVERVIEW Relevant review boards
Site context The Planning board is charged with reviewing
The parcels in question are located around 2399
plans "taking into account the environment,
Boston Post Rd. and are under the authority of neighboring properties, traffic and parking."
the Town of Mamaroneck. The site is located at The Zoning Board of Appeals "has jurisdiction
the gateway of both the Village of Larchmont and over residential special use permits and
the City of New Rochelle. The train station at New variances; and interprets the zoning code."2
Rochelle is roughly 1.3 miles to the southwest of
the site. One of Larchmont's two commercial The Board of Architectural Review reviews
downtowns is about 0.7 miles to the northeast, "exterior plans or modifications to all structures
while the other, surrounding the train station, is except one or two family houses."3
about a mile to the north of the site.
Thus, the intermediary location of the site
suggests that it is best read as a halfway point
between Larchmont and New Rochelle.
Furthermore, being located on the Town of
Mamaroneck's southwest arm, which divides
Larchmont and New Rochelle by only about 500
ft at its narrowest point on Boston Post Road, the
site can be positioned as a gateway into the
neighboring communities.
Current zoning
A table on the following page summarizes the
relevant dimensional controls for the zoning
districts controlling this site as well as parcels
housing five- to eight-story multi-unit buildings.
The parcels are currently zoned SB-R (Service
Business - Residential) and R-6 (residential with
6,000-sf lots).
Among the "apartment towers" of interest, R-TA
covers the larger, more iconic towers; B-R covers
one six-story building on Myrtle Rd.; and B-MUB
covers The Cambium. SB-R generates more of
an auto-oriented built environment with little
concern for non-motorized movement. In short,
the existing zoning is a poor predictor of
resulting built form; a disconnect exists
between zoning district and the resulting building
types.
http://www.townofmamaroneck.org/316/Planning-Board
2 http://www.townofmamaroneck.org/326/Zoning-Board-of-Appeals
3 http://www.townofmamaroneck.org/303/Board-of-Architectural-Review
Richard F Hein,Architect PC 1 of 13
Min Lot Min Front Yard Side Yard Rear Yard Max Height Max Lot
District Frontage
Size(sf) g (ft)
[two req.a (ft) (ft) (ft) Coverage
(ft) for corner lots] g
6000 sf Min 8 ft+ 2.5 stories.
R-6 per unit 60 ft 30 ft other 10 ft Min 25 ft 35 ft
1.5"per ft of
bldg height,
min 5 ft OR
1500 sf Min 15 ft,3"
R-TA per unit 150 ft 15 ft 1 per foot 6 stories, 70
of bldg per ft bldg ft 20%
length, min height
10ftfrom
street
Nonres use:
None, but
min 4' if
provided,or
Nonres 10' plus
nonres: use:0. evergreens if nonres:2 nonres:
none abutting stories/30 ft 50%
SB-R and 150 ft Res or
B-MUB res: residential 20 ft
combo res/ res combo: res/combo:
10,000 4 stories/44
sf min biz use: 15 Res or ft 70%
ft combo: 10
ft,or5ftif
lot adjoins
driveway or
pkg lot
Additional requirements
R-TA:Minimum courts regulated by§240-55. Minimum usable open space 200 sf per dwelling unit.
SB-R:Multifamily housing is a "special use"requiring Planning Board approval.
SB-R and B-MUB:Parking in front of building allowed only if front yard setback is 75 ft.
B-MUB:§240-47 E(8)has detailed design requirements.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 2 of 13
REZONING STRATEGY
38-R
Foundations for justifying rezoning R-7.5 '
Chapter 240 (Zoning) of the Town of Mamaroneck
code articulates that the purpose of zoning is "To
protect the character and the social and ', ,m, B-R/
economic stability of all parts of the Town and to ,f` /
ensure that all developments shall be orderly and s= •SLI,'�
beneficial" (§ 240-2-c). The project partners
recognize that the commercial activity on this Ft-1,2„,
stretch of Boston Post Road is failing, suggesting
that rezoning can allow for different uses (in
���
this case, high-end residential) to help spur `,�
the revitalization of a moribund, mundane, and
unmemorable stretch of Boston Post Road. \.• \
Rezoning out of R-6 (§240-22) is crucial because
one of the principal uses defined for the district ‘`; Project
t R4.5 Sib
are "one-family dwellings," with no multi-unit 1' /
development allowed by right other than in the ' 4----
Two-Family Residential (R-2F) district and above. ._ R-10
However, over a dozen R-6 parcels within a 500-
ft radius of the site are home to two or three --
separate households within a single building. A
high degree of existing nonconformity means Parcels in green are residential-zoned parcels
that the existing R-6 zoning is a poor abutting higher-intensity zoning districts. The
reflection of existing household types in the ones in the north, near the existing large
apartment buildings, are especially suitable for
vicinity of the site. pointing to as precedent for the proximity being
proposed for the Boston Post site.
With rezoning attempts, it is usually useful to
identify other places in the jurisdiction where
abutting zoning districts reflect the future
juxtaposition being proposed. In the cluster of
multi-unit buildings just north of Larchmont
station, SB-R and R-TA both abut R-7.5, which is
slightly more exclusionary than R-6 because it
mandates a larger minimum lot size. Precedent
exists, then, in the Town of Mamaroneck for the
proposed zoning end-result proposed.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 3 of 13
Rezoning strategies This approach is grounded on the warrant that
Strategy Alternative 1: Propose site-specific these existing buildings do not pose a detriment
zoning controls. to the health, safety, or general welfare of the
Requesting rezoning generally can occur through inhabitants or other citizens of the town.
seeking out a special permit process with the Warranting this next approach is an assumption
Zoning Board of Appeals or, if the local that potentially nonconforming buildout of the
jurisdiction insists on it, pursuing a Planned Unit model apartment buildings is acceptable in terms
Development (PUD). of health, safety, and general welfare, the main
ambits of zoning identified by the landmark
An attorney would have to be consulted for the Euclid v. Ambler(1926)case. It would be also
applicability of this next point, but Cherokee wise to identify persistently nonconforming
Triangle Assoc'n v. Louisville Metro (2017) features of reference buildings which currently are
articulates the underlying logic of site-specific
"deficient" by being nonconforming to the
zoning changes; Judge Brian C. Edwards of the adopted zoning code.
Kentucky Court of Appeals ruled that "[I]ocal
planning bodies are not required to shoehorn Here is a list of the relevant comparable
every proposed deviation from the zoning properties:
ordinance into a specifically enumerated land use • The cluster of"apartment towers" near
control." Other jurisdictions within New York Larchmont station.
State, specifically the City of Ithaca and the Town • A 6-story building at roughly 2103 Boston Post
of Union, fall in line with with this sentiment as • The Chatsworth Ave school is set back about
well. In Union, PUDs are "floating zones" that can 25 ft, and though it's only 3 stories (but
be applied to any parcel where the developer probably about 45 ft) high, it's a good example
for measuring articulations and projections
wants to deviate from the prescribed zoning while • 1939 Palmer Ave, 5 stories
keeping "in harmony" with relevant land use • Park Plaza (-.4 East Ave), 5.5-6 stories
plans. Ithaca allows parcels to adopt Planned • 1875 Palmer, 7 stories
Unit Development designation upon approval • 5-story building at 24-51 Boston Post Rd
from Common Council and in exchange for
community benefits. In the case of this site,
proposed streetscape changes (which would
likely have to be approved by New York
Department of Transportation for interventions on
Boston Post Rd. and by the Town for •
interventions on Deane PI.) could be positioned
as community benefits in exchange for "deviation . -
-frottfrom the zoning ordinance." + } j
Whether a PUD or special permit is pursued, a ' , . :
first step to achieving a solid and defendable 44�y:: ` W
rezoning proposal would be to measure directly
the typically zoning-controlled dimensions for
comparable buildings. These would include the
roughly ten notable apartment towers in the Town
of Mamaroneck and the additional half-dozen in
the Village of Larchmont. This way, a site-specific
zoning code reflects existing local precedent.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC -of 13
Strategy Alternative 2: Rezone the conjoined Note on strategies 2 and 3:
parcel to B-MUB. To preempt arguments that these strategies
This alternative approximates the PUD approach would construe "spot zoning": zoning of a single
because the regulations are so lax for the B-MUB parcel into a different district than its surrounding
zoning district. Unlike R-6 or R TA, there are no parcels is not necessarily illegal so long as the
`proportional' controls to determine the number decision has a rational basis to be treated
of units (i.e., no requirements dictated on a per— differently. In short, the act of rezoning must not
parcel-square-foot basis), and a special permit be capricious or unreasonable. Returning to the
could be pursued to exceed the four-story limit, opening gambit of this document, an argument
as is the case with The Cambium. Again, it's can be made that this corner marks a gateway
possible that the Town will request community into and out of the Village of Larchmont and the
benefits in return for exceeding the heigh limit. City of New Rochelle, and especially if combined
The Cambium, for instance, has eight one with a streetscape improvement plan and
bedroom and two two-bedroom units reserved potentially an overlay district that enables PUD
for workforce households making 80% of the development, the action may be justifiable as a
Westchester County median income.4 e "comprehensive plan" guiding the spatial
Strategy Alternative 3: Rezone the conjoined application and distribution of zoning districts.
parcel to R-TA. There's some limited precedent within the Town
By the current zoning regulations, this would for single parcels with unique zoning too: there's
allow 60 units to be built on the 2.07-acre site, a single SB-R zoned parcel near the Thruway by
which is made up of tax parcels 5-5-463 (0.05 ac, Wood St.
2425-23 Boston Post), -446 (0.94 ac, 2417
Boston Post), -433 (0.79 ac, 2399 Boston Post), Indeed, the infusion of residential on the site
-409 (0.14 ac, 6 Deane), and -405 (0.15 ac, 10 replicates the cluster of zoning districts that
Deane). happens near the Larchmont train station on the
Mamaroneck side and is reflective of a revitalized
commercial node as an ultimate goal. However,
for retail revitalization to be a realistic aim,
i streetscape design must be a vital consideration
to this gateway. Consider the proximity of
^+� buildings to the street at the commercial center at
the Boston Post/Larchmont intersection; this
alur: enclosure makes ground-level businesses more
,.r f"1 ! viable than where 2399 Boston Post is located.
011.186
4 http://www.townofmamaroneck.org/429/The-Cambium-Workforce-Housing-Rentals
5 I spent some time trying to dig up old planning board or zoning appeals meetings to see the process by which the Cambium was
approved,but minutes don't go back further than 2015.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 5 of 13
PLANNING REVIEW STRATEGY Environmental quality: The Planning Board review
The outline for Site Plan Review by the Planning is in part "to preserve to the maximum extent
Board is given in Chapter 177 of the Town code. possible wetlands" under "Special
§ 274-a gives the Planning Board "approval Requirements," which should be relatively
authority for all site plan applications," pursuant straightforward given the replacement of
to a number of standards. impermeable parking areas with green space.
However, Westchester County's assessment map
Safe and adequate traffic access and #505 suggests that a "stream or
modifications to roads: these are addressed with ditch" (highlighted in the image below) may run
the new curb cuts and which can also be through the project site, so the development
addressed through a street redesign. team should be careful with that and be clear on
Traffic: Despite its relative distance to the train whether it is an underground channelized body of
station, it might still be worthwhile to position water and whether it will pose any barriers to the
this project as transit-oriented. The 0060 bus project.
to New Rochelle station picks up right across the
street at the Boston Post/Winans intersection ST -- --ROAD- - - --
(this could be priority for crosswalk installation in �•. .r
the streetscape strategy). The nearest stop - �\ \\\'�,
leading to Larchmont station is a bit further up �%, .\ \\\�t, ` a
Boston Post, 3 minutes walking, at Lorenzen, ; -1\w�\ `�\ ��
which is a bit closer than the other nearest stop ,'�'\\i \\, '� Ys ,g9
Boston Post and Dillon. The bus bringing back to s K\� \ .N 0,..
the site from New Rochelle station (also the 0060) \` \ {a+
:C,° ‘ i':6 7
also drops off either at Dillon or Lorenzen. Wei\ \'1\ �. p 8Q
could suggest having a bus pull-out in front of the ` ;�\ ,
building as well as a ridesharing (e.g. Lyft or2 ¢ \ice \V# i/ 0
Uber) pickup/drop-off point to strengthen the me+ \'. \,',,\
definition of the project as transit-oriented. fit. \
Safetyand access for people walkingbyorthe /r `--
P pto " / \. 40,,
--,
site: Any streetscape plan should include
sidewalks and meaningful foot connection to and Trees: To remove trees above 6 inches in
from the entrance of the building. Mindfulness to diameter and 4 feet in height, their removal needs
this component helps to reassert intentions to to be justified.
revitalize adjacent retail.
Circulation and parking(already addressed in
project design);
Richard F Hein,Architect PC 6 of 13
Screening and landscaping: Chapter 178, "Site and trees blocking the view of the Cambium from
Plan Review of Residential Development," needs the New England Thruway are a perfect example
to be followed because "70% or more of" of this in action.
preexisting buildings will be removed. This
chapter specifies the need for screening and Justify that impact on infrastructure won't be
unbearable to the Town. Specifically, refuge and
landscaping "to minimize, to the extent practical,
sewage systems need to be able to handle the
the impact on the peace, comfort or repose of
amount reasonably anticipated to be generated.
reasonable persons of normal sensitivities."
For future investigations, it will be worthwhile to
Illustrations are on the following page.
determine whether development impact in
Concerns about building height might be Mamaroneck is measured as average costs or
especially voiced from the neighbors to the south marginal costs, as impact of infill on infrastructure
and east of the project site. However, tall is less than a one-to-one increase. Municipalities
buildings are easier to hide close up than farther frequently charge on an average-cost or per-unit
away. As precedent, consider the tall buildings at basis, which fails to acknowledge that the
Charles St and W 39th St in Baltimore, which are marginal cost of building a new unit where
well obscured from street immediately behind the infrastructure already exists is actually far lower
buildings. From that low-rise street, trees hide up than outward infrastructure expansion. For
to about the 5th story in the slits between example, a manual on growth management by
buildings, and 3-story houses hide some the American Planning Association pointed out
buildings completely from view. Thus, from the that doubling population density in an already-
street, the 8-story building proposed for the urbanized area does not require doubling the
Boston Post site would be well obscured by diameter of water pipes; rather, increasing by the
existing houses. square root of 2 (i.e., increasing by approximately
40% instead of 100%) should be sufficient. This
Another good example of this principle is on
illustrates how infill development is more cost-
Palmer Ave in Larchmont itself; along much of
Palmer parallel to The Cambium, the building
effective than if the same population were spread
isn't at all visible from the middle of the street.
out across lower densities.6
From the entrance to the strip mall at 2005 Location and dimension of buildings: "The
Palmer(Palmer Plaza), only its upper three stories location, arrangement, size and design of the
are visible, and depending on one's position, the buildings and structures shall be comparable to
two-story strip mall obscures The Cambium each other and with the parcel as a whole." Since
entirely. this is a single-building project (except potential
Quick sketch estimates suggest that, if the secondary structures such as a shed), this can be
building were approximately 85 ft tall, then just
justified with a comparison study with massing
and articulation to other apartment buildings in
the first layer of houses on Locust Terrace would
the `postal city' of Larchmont
block views of the top floor up to 300 ft away
from the building (though it would be visible from
the backyard unless a 30' barrier were erected at
the property line). Understory trees might get up
to that height in some time, though, and would
function as a seasonal barrier. In fact, the fence
6 Nelson,A.,Duncan,J., Mullen,C.,&Bishop,K.(1995).Growth management principles and practices.Chicago, III. ;Washington
D.C.:Planners Press,American Planning Association.
See also: Blais, P.(2010).Perverse cities:Hidden subsidies, wonky policy,and urban sprawl.Vancouver:UBC Press.]
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 7 of 13
w
_ • ^ _., `._-L rt'- } . _
t %
. i ..L
�. 1
-L. a ., 1 I
5E.
, . z.....
...
[i,t._
-
_ .,,,,
„ 00 3-
_ , _
_ 4 ';'..-.•• '
1
Proximity to tall buildings, as in this example from Charles St and W 39th St in Baltimore, is
usually enough to obscure them out of sight, especially along narrow streets with two-and three-
story buildings. Vegetation can mitigate the rest, albeit on a more so seasonal basis. Below, the
other side of the thruway in Larchmont illustrates how even a two-story building matches the
perceived height of an eight-story building like The Cambium.At bottom, trees and fences screen
the majority of the building's mass.
los
Ali. 5
1.
_ .
- il -
..Y - .-
$�
1 s • ...ray
1` f 3"3 Y # 4 m 11 ! „
1
lit' '151? ibr--s ” - 4 -, -- . _,++ r .#'' ,
t. • ,4 .'1. '-• !Q } -.y. .I - :41#.•''g ift-i-f• -
aft i,
4.3'i: l'YP - • 1 �. -y M
i
•
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 8 of 13
Final points considered by the Planning Board Preempting opposition
are fire protection; regrading; staging (which It is certainly possible that 8 stories might be
shouldn't be an issue given the size of the site); opposed as out of place, which is why project
drainage; and "impact" on adjacent land use leaders should be ready to demonstrate that (a)
(measured as "noise, glare, unsightliness, or the building reflects precedent elsewhere in
other objectionable features"), which are Larchmont; (b) the project is ultimately transit-
addressed through the screening and streetscape oriented, especially if bus access is part of the
strategies.
streetscape strategy; and (c)that it is part of a
Submission and notification procedure broader private-sector(and, if the Town pursues
Site Plan Review has three steps: A it, public-private) initiative to support revitalizing
presubmission conference, a full site plan the moribund retail on this stretch of Boston
application within six months, and public Post.
hearings where the planning board will publicly
On this final point, it would be worthwhile to
deliberate on the site plans and delegate to the
stress that this eight-story building is a first step
Architectural or Appeals boards as needed.
in a "comprehensive plan" to make the adjacent
Also note that the applicant needs to comply with retail more viable by right-sizing the amount of
notification procedures in Chapter 144 of the space dedicated to free-flowing traffic and
Town Code. making on-street parking more visible.
"Comprehensive plan" here means "pursuant to
an articulated local government strategy;" it
might be helpful for the developer to champion
having this node designated as a "Larchmont
Gateway Overlay District" through the adoption
of a map (maps have been sufficient in courts for
qualifying as a "comprehensive plan," whereas
mid-century federal programs used to pay for
bona fide comprehensive plans that were rarely
implemented, but which were required to secure
urban renewal funding). Moreover, first-step
buildings are inevitably out of place until further
redevelopment happens.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 9 of 13
RETAIL IMPACT ANALYSIS It is difficult to estimate what percent of this
This section begins estimating the impact on money is spent locally, but local businesses in
local retail in the Larchmont area. The 2017 Larchmont have been on the rise, contributing to
consumer expenditures report by the Bureau of lowering storefront vacancy from 12% to 5%
Labor Statistics,'released in September 2018, since 2016, suggesting that a large number of
suggested that the average American household new residential units would have a tremendously
spends of their before-tax income 4.6% on food positive effect if their local dollars were
awayfrom home, 2.5% on apparelrecirculated.8
and services,
3.5% on personal care, and 4.3% on Studies from within this decade suggested that
entertainment. These categories (total 14.9% of $100 spent locally in Portland led to $58
household spending) seem to typify the local additional dollars in the local economy, $52 in
businesses at the Larchmont commercial nodes. Salt Lake City, and $32 in both New Orleans and
The nationwide average household income was San Francisco.9 The table that follows estimates
$73,573 according to the 2017 BLS estimate. The the impact of local spending conservatively using
median household income in the Village of about$30 as in the San Francisco example, since
Larchmont, according to the 2013-2017 affluent households may also be likely to travel to
American Community Survey 5-year estimates, New York City, elsewhere in Westchester County,
was$198,661, or 2.7 times above the national or in Connecticut for spending.
mean, while the mean household income The table on the next page presents different
(skewed by high earners) was $313,586, or 4.3 scenarios for households' local spending and
times the national average. Because of the wide estimates the corresponding impact.
distance between median and mean, this analysis
will proceed assuming that the new residents of
the proposed building make$200,000 in annual
income per household (still 2.7 times above the
national average).
Similarly to the relationship between population
density and infrastructure impact, we know from
macroeconomic principles that as household
income increases, spending does not increase
linearly. For this analysis, then, assume that the
median household in Larchmont spends not 2.7
times more than the average household, but the
square root of 2.7, or 1.6 times more at 23.8% on
food, apparel, services, and entertainment. This
amounts to$47,600. If spending habits are
comparable to the average national household,
however, then households would spend $22,800
per year on these categories.
7 Bureau of Labor Statistics. "Consumer Expenditures-2017."https://www.bls.gov/news.release/cesan.nr0.htm
8 Rom,Gabriel. "Larchmont sees a revival in its business district,challenges remain." The Journal News.June 11,2018.https://
www.lohud.com/story/news/local/westchester/2018/06/11/larchmont-downtown-revitalized/678218002/
9 Institute for Local Self-Reliance."Key Studies:Why Local Matters."https://ilsr.org/key-studies-why-local-matters
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 10 of 13
Single Household
Est.annual income S200,000
Spending on services,entertainment,etc.as a percent of income:
11 4% 23.8%
$22.800 $47,600
Percent of this
fraction spent locally Local Spending Local Impact(1.3x) Local Spending Local Impact(1.3x)
10% $2,280 $2,964 .
. $4,760 $6,188
20% $4,560 $5,928 $9,520 $12,376
30% $6,840 $8,892 $14,280 $18,564
40% $9,120 $11,856 $19,040 $24,752
50% $11,400 $14,820 $23,800 $30,940
60 H. ,. . olds
Est.total income $13,000,000
Spending on services,entertainment,etc.as a percent of income:
11.4% 23.8%
$1,482,000 $3,094,000
Percent of this
fraction spent locally Local Spending Local Impact(1.3x) Local Spending Local Impact(1.34
10% I $148,200 , $192,660
$309,400 $402,220
20% $296,400 $385,320 $618,800 $804,440
30% $444,600 $577,980 $928,200 $1,206,660
40% $592,800 $770,640 $1,237,600 $1,608,880
50% $741,000 $963,300 $1,547,000 $2,011,100
Richard F. Hein,Architect PC 11 of 13
ENVIRONMENTAL STRATEGY • Tactfully siting building to increase access to
The project site's unique location on the water natural light and prevent interior over lighting;
•
gives the development team a rare opportunity to Keeping fenestration dimensions and window
have a positive environmental effect on the to wall ratios moderate, which should both
Larchmont/Mamaroneck coastline. In tandem,
prevent energy loss through windows and
the team is committed to exploring green building reduce impact of adding light to nighttime
strategies to keep the building's short- and long- skies; and
term carbon footprint low. • Installing energy-efficient appliances and
water-efficient fixtures (e.g., ones compliant
As an infill project, the new population added to with EPA Water Sense standards).
this existing urban area will have a lower per-
capita impact on physical infrastructure and Flood resilience
natural systems than new construction on Given the project site and its potential
Greenfield sites. Not to mention, of course, that susceptibility to water intrusion, especially in light
replacing the extensive pervious surfaces of the forthcoming impact of global climate
currently on the site, and which extend 300 ft change, the team is exploring incorporated flood
away from Boston Post Rd, will improve the resilience strategies pioneered elsewhere in the
quality of stormwater runoff into the Premium northeast. Potential options include:
River. Furthermore, the transit strategy and the
site's proximity to existing local-trade-area
• Designing green space to be water absorbent,
including considering landscape strategies
commercial nodes means it will be easier for
incoming households to maintain low levels of
such as berms, floodable fields, bioswales,
detention ponds, rain gardens to reduce water
vehicle miles traveled.
going into Town sewers, and pervious
Green building pavement." Designs should also help prevent
We are willing to explore and consider the erosion of soil and sediment adjacent to
feasibility of the following green building marshlands, which in turn should help prevent
strategies10, including and going beyond the New land subsidence. From a financial point of
York State Energy Conservation Code: view, these kinds of strategies may help to
keep insurance costs lower than they might
• Directing downspouts away from sewer otherwise be.
connections to prevent surcharging, coupled • Residential areas should be built above base
with rooftop rainwater harvesting for landscape flood elevation (the height expected to be
irrigation; reached during 100-year floods, which are
• Heat pumps (as appropriate)for space heating becoming increasingly frequent due to climate
and water heating, and keeping heating change). Basement flooding protections may
equipment within the building envelope to include building with flood damage-resistant
prevent energy loss; materials. Wet- and dry-floodprofing strategies
• On-site energy generation, including solar will be considered to prepare for potential
power; water emergencies. Municipal policy
precedents from Boston12 are relevant here.
10 References:City and Town of Ithaca Green Building Policy(April 25,2018)and City of Boston E+Building Program.
City of Boston, Moakley Park plans and strategies:"Discover Moakley"boards.Sept 29,2018.Also see:City of Toronto.2017.
"Wet Weather Flow Master Plan."and Waggoner&Ball Architects,"Greater New Orleans Urban Water Plan"
12 Boynton,Adria and Boston Planning&Development Agency.August 2016."Retrofitting Boston Buildings for Flooding: Potential
Strategies."
Richard F Hein,Architect PC 12 of 13
Natural systems SUMMARY OF RECOMMENDATIONS
The development team believes that this project
should offer positive benefits for the natural
• Position the site as a halfway point between
Larchmont and New Rochelle, acting as a
ecosystems abutting it. Increasing the pervious
gateway into the neighboring communities.
and green coverage of the site will give the area's
plants and wildlife a chunk of newly accessible • Existing zoning is a poor predictor of resulting
land. In this part of the country, with natural built form, so rezoning efforts will be strong if
corridors being so fragmented, any small they can draw on dimensions of precedent
contribution of natural land will have a positive buildings.
impact.
• Rezoning can allow for different uses (in this
We are willing to allocate resources as feasible case, high-end residential) to help spur the
toward assisting in restoration of the coastal revitalization of a moribund, mundane, and
marshland. Higher quality water, after all, will unmemorable stretch of Boston Post Road.
improve the quality of life both for future residents This argument might be more effective is the
and current neighbors, and improving water effort is put forth as part of a broader plan,
circulation at the edge of the city is beneficial for whether articulated from the private
wildlife. developer's side or from the city's side as an
adopted Larchmont Gateway Overlay District.
Additionally, the team is interested in entering into
an access agreement to the coastal marshlands • The Town may request some units to be held
with the Town of Mamaroneck; this will give the as affordable or workforce housing in
Town one more access option to the Premium exchange for the approving a larger project.
River in addition to Lorenzen Park and Willow
• The streetscape redesign component can turn
Park.
the building into a bona fide transit-oriented
project.
• Despite its height, visual impact of the building
will be minimal.
• Because this is an infill project, infrastructure
costs will be less per housing unit than if this
were a greenfield, expansionary project.
• Depending on how much incoming households
spend on local services, food, entertainment,
and personal care, the local impact has the
potential to reach over$1 million annually.
• Contemporary environmental design strategies
can ensure that the building has a net positive
effect on the natural systems adjacent to the
site.
Richard F.Hein,Architect PC 13 of 13
Town of Mamaroneck
O , p Office of the Town Clerk, Town Center
w ® m 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY
10543-3353
•FOUNDED 1661
Christina Battalia, RMC, CMC TEL:914/381-7870
Mamaroneck Town Clerk FAX:914/381-7813
CBattalia@townofmamaroneckNY.org
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 29, 2019
TO: Town Board
FROM: Christina Battalia
SUBJECT: Parking Lot Fees 2019—2020
At this time I ask that you review the Parking Lot fees in preparation of our upcoming
renewals. I have attached a survey of other municipalities in the area as well as a
schedule of our fees over the last few years.
Christina
i
T.O.M. PARKING FEES SCHEDULE
TYPE/ LOCATION 2013-
2018/2019 2017/2018 2016/2017 2015/2016 2014/2015 2014 2012/2013 2011/2012
COMUTER Lot A(formerly Lot 1)-Myrtle&Vine
DAYTIME-237 spaces $725.00 $725.00 $700.00 $675.00 $650.00 $650.00 $650.00 $625.00
'METER'/pay station-90 meter spaces $80.00 $80.00 $75.00 $70.00 $65.00 $65.00 $65.00 $60.00
plus.60 per hr plus.60 per hr plus.60 per hr plus.55 per hr
AREA BUSINESS
Lot B(formerly Lot 3) -Myrtle&N Chatsworth $575.00 $575.00 $550.00 $525.00 $500.00 $500.00 $500.00 $475.00
24 HOUR PARKING
Lot B(formerly Lot 3)-Myrtle&N Chatsworth $825.00 $825.00 $800.00 $775.00 $750.00 $750.00 $750.00 $725.00
Lot D(formerly Lot 5)- 5 spaces along Myrtle near Madison $825.00 $825.00
Lot E(formerly Lot 6)- 6 spaces at beginning of Vine Street $825.00 $825.00
24 HOUR-SENIOR
Lots B, D,E(formerly 3,5,6) $675.00 $675.00 $625.00 $575.00 $525.00 $475.00 $475.00 $425.00
OVERNIGHT
Lot C (formerly Lot 4) - Coughlin Ins Lot $450.00 $450.00 $425.00 $400.00 $375.00 $375.00 $375.00 $350.00
Community commuter Annual 24 Hr Res Pro-rated refunds?
$874.00 (both res & non Res
City of Rye due to MTA rules) $900 NO
range from $470.00-
City of White Plains range from$630.00- 1,025.00 $630.00 yes
Hartsdale Parking District $825 res(uninc TOG) yes-annual only
range from $1,000 ( res& non
Town of Eastchester Res) 1,600(res only by lottery) no
$750, resident only(semi
annual is"hardship based") only if returned by
T/V of Harrison CURRENLY A MORATORIUM 6/30
Town of Mamaroneck $725.00 $825 sen$675 no
Village of Mamaroneck $525.00 res$900 non-resident $575.00
Village of Larchmont $695 res$1,800 non res yes
Village of Pelham $700 res$1,250 non res yes
$874.00 res/non res/$7.00 a 24 Hr. $900
T/V Scarsdale day Meter (no res req.) Overnight $480.00
SCOPE OF SERVICES
What follows is an overview of the approach and methodology that the Consultant Team will
utilize in completing the tasks outlined below. It is likely that this scope will be fine-tuned, based
upon further communication with the Town Board, Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee
and Town Administrator.
PHASE I: BACKGROUND REVIEW & COMMUNITY ENGAGEMENT
Review of Base Studies & Existing Reports
The Consultant Team will review existing studies and reports including:
• 1986 Master Plan for the Boston Post Road and Palmer Avenue Corridors
• 1986 Town of Mamaroneck/Village of Larchmont Local Waterfront Revitalization Plan
and updated LWRP ( 2019)
• 2004 Town of Mamaroneck Hazard Mitigation Plan
• 2014 Town of Mamaroneck Sustainability Plan
• Recent rezoning's (BR and SBR zones)
Community Engagement
Highland Planning will lead the public engagement process.
Task 1: Kick-off and Ongoing Coordination
Highland Planning will attend a kick-off meeting with the Town and Consultant Team to clarify the
scope of work, project objectives, roles and schedule. Highland will participate in ongoing
management and coordination with the team and Comprehensive Plan Steering Committee
(CPSC), including bi-weekly phone calls, or as needed. Highland will participate in up to three (3)
CPSC meetings throughout the course of the project.
Engagement Methods & Deliverables
• CPSC Kick-off Meeting
Task 2: Awareness Campaign and Community Engagement Plan
The first phase of community engagement and outreach will focus on developing a detailed
engagement plan and building awareness in the community about the comprehensive planning
process. The initial phase will include the following subtasks:
1 DRAFT 2/1/19
• Pre-engagement Stakeholder Interviews: Highland will interview eight to ten (8 to 10)
key stakeholders prior to writing and finalizing a stakeholder engagement plan. The
purpose of the interviews is to build awareness among key stakeholders, learn more about
issues and opportunities, seek guidance on effective ways to reach residents, identify
potential partners in outreach events, and lay the groundwork for future outreach. Highland
will use feedback obtained through pre-engagement interviews to inform the objectives
and methods in the Community Engagement Plan. Pre-engagement interviews are
typically no more than 20-30 minutes and can be conducted by phone or in person.
• Community Engagement Plan: Highland will develop a detailed outreach and
engagement plan that identifies key stakeholders and potential impacts, engagement
objectives, methods, roles, and engagement sequencing within the overall project
schedule. Supporting materials for the engagement will likely include meeting flyers,
development of event invitations (Instagram, Facebook, Twitter, Mail Chimp),
contributions to the project blog and e-newsletter. Highland will prepare a Communications
Plan that clarifies messaging, identifies roles, describes how the stakeholder contact
database will be maintained, and outlines protocols for ongoing updates about the plan.
• Awareness Campaign. In conjunction with the Engagement Plan, Highland will develop
a strategy to build awareness about the Comprehensive Plan among community
members. The objectives of the awareness campaign will be: (1) to share information
about the purpose of the Comprehensive Plan, intended outcomes, and timeline of the
project; (2) communicate how community input will be used in the development of the
Plan; and (3) share information about how and when community members can get
involved at various stages throughout the process. Methods used in the awareness
campaign may include press releases, social media posts, radio/news spots, information
shared on the Town's website, and flyers posted in popular locations (schools, libraries,
recreation centers, local diners, Starbucks, etc.). We will also leverage existing
organizations in the Town which are able to include information about the project in their
newsletters, e-blasts, and other communication to their members and constituents.
Engagement Methods & Deliverables
• Pre-engagement interviews and key takeaways
• Engagement Plan & Communications Plan
• Press release
• Project Kick-off Flyer (hard copy and social media format)
• Public input.com set-up and social media support'
' Publiclnput.com is a comprehensive online engagement platform which allows local government agencies to
leverage their existing social media following by providing manual and automatic syncs with social media platforms.
The tool focuses on lowering barriers to entry by using targeted outreach to underrepresented populations via social
and other media advertisers, allows for communication on social media in over 100 languages, and allows residents
to give project feedback(comment)directly on the platform. All online data from social media or polling/surveys
regarding a project/service/issue are integrated in order to quantify and qualify the overall voice analysis of
stakeholders.
2 DRAFT 2/1/19
Task 3: Issue Identification and Community Visioning
Although the process of identifying key issues that are most important to the Town starts with the
pre-engagement interviews, Highland will broaden the discussion to explore issues and
opportunities throughout the community, building from smaller groups to larger groups and
offering opportunities for community members to engage online and through social media. This
will include individual and small group stakeholder meetings focused on specific topics, such as
Parks and Recreation, Housing or Transportation.
A community vision is a key part of any Comprehensive Plan. Likewise, policies, actions and
implementing regulations, in a Comprehensive Plan should reflect the community's vision. The
visioning process is an important way to build excitement and momentum around the planning
process—and ultimately to work towards consensus and buy-in from the community. To that end,
this scope includes a significant engagement process focused on visioning and development of
opportunities. The Public Engagement Plan will identify specific methods of engaging the
community for this task. Experience tells us that that an effective visioning process includes a mix
of engagement techniques, building from smaller groups to larger groups and offering
opportunities for community members to engage online and through social media. Door-to-door
outreach, online surveys, interviews, pop-up events and public workshops are effective ways to
solicit feedback about the community's values and vision for the future.
We will use the results of the visioning process to develop a vision statement and a thematic
framework for draft goals and objectives that will ultimately become the text of the Comprehensive
Plan document.
Engagement Methods and Deliverables:
• CPSC meeting
• Individual and small group stakeholder meetings/topic-based meetings (meeting design,
invitations, coordination, facilitation and summary)
• Pop-ups held at existing events/locations in the community (pop-up design. Pop-ups will
be staffed by Town representatives.
• Online survey (Publicinput.com or SurveyMonkey) (survey design, administration,
analysis & summary)
• Public Visioning Workshop (meeting outline, agenda, facilitation, and summary)
• Ongoing social media support and comment response protocols (for
Facebook/I nstag ram/Twitter)
Task 4: Public Review and Feedback on Draft Plan
The drafting and review phase of the process typically involves multiple meetings with the CPSC
to review and revise specific policy language. This task will also include a final public
meeting/open house to share the draft vision and recommendations with the community and seek
feedback.
Engagement Methods and Deliverables:
• CPSC meeting
3 DRAFT 2/1/19
• Public Meeting/Open House (meeting outline, agenda, facilitation, and summary)
Task 5: Final Comprehensive Plan
Documenting the engagement process is an important way to demonstrate transparency and
accountability. It is also critical to document engagement to help ensure that the plan achieves
broad-based support for ongoing and future implementation. To that end, Highland will prepare a
summary of public engagement efforts to be included as a section/chapter in the final
Comprehensive Plan document. The summary will describe the objectives of the engagement
process and methods used throughout. In addition, the summary will identify the various
stakeholder groups involved, how they were involved, how community input influenced the
content of the Plan (i.e. the vision, priorities, goals and policy framework) and how input received
from the community was incorporated into the Plan itself.
Deliverables:
• Public Engagement Summary
PHASE II: DRAFTING THE PLAN
Concurrently with Phase I of the project, as the Town of Mamaroneck's Comprehensive Plan
goals are identified and the public weighs in on their vision and priorities for the Town, the
Consultant Team will begin drafting the Comprehensive Plan document.
Introduction & Process
An introduction to the Comprehensive Plan will outline the purposes of the document,the process
that was undertaken to prepare the Comprehensive Plan and the history of planning in the Town
of Mamaroneck. A summary of the community engagement results will be included in this
Chapter.
Demographics and Growth Trends Chapter
The Consultant Team, led by F&A, will review Mamaroneck's demographic characteristics,
including population composition and change, using data from the 2010 U.S. Census, American
Community Survey and other sources. F&A will identify key issues resulting from demographic
trends.
Land Use & Zoning Chapter
The ultimate purpose of the Comprehensive Plan is to allow for the orderly growth and
development of the community. The Land Use and Zoning Chapter will set forth the
recommendations and policies that direct the future development of the Town.
4 DRAFT 2/1/19
As a top priority, the Consultant Team, led by F&A, will review the Town's zoning code, focusing
on the Floor to Area Ratio (FAR) for single family homes, the effectiveness of the 2016 Site Plan
Review of Residential Development requirements, and integration of "green infrastructure"
techniques into the Town's design guidelines. With respect to the FAR issue, the central area of
the Town will be targeted.
In addition, F&A will analyze storefront vacancies in commercial strips along US Route 1 ( Boston
Post Road) with an eye toward amending zoning to permit "internet proof' commercial, retail and
service uses, including a review of the local permitting process for same.
F&A will prepare a map identifying areas for potential future development. More specifically,
areas for potential future redevelopment and infill development, multi-family residential
development and commercial and industrial development will be identified. New development will
be focused on areas that have, or will have, the necessary water and sewer capacity. Strategies
and policies to implement any future development will be outlined, including the potential use of
overlay zones, incentive zones and other zoning or Town code amendments, etc. As part of this
Chapter, the Town's current home occupation requirements will be reviewed and updates for the
21st century proposed based upon "best practices" and local circumstances. A matrix identifying
the short, medium and long-term activities necessary to implement the future development vision
will be developed and the responsible Town agency or department(s) identified.
In order to focus on the FAR issue for single family homes, priority will be given for development
of standards in advance of completion of the Comprehensive Plan.
Mobility Chapter
The Town of Mamaroneck s served by a combination of State, County and local roadways as well
as train and bus service. Transportation and Infrastructure are essential for the continued vitality
of the Town. The Consultant Team led by PDE, will take a "hard look" at transportation within the
Town and the future planning for changes.
Transportation
Various actors are influencing the transportation world, resulting in a change in automobile use,
increasing the use of automobiles for some while reducing the use of automobiles for others. Some
areas of Mamaroneck have seen an increase in traffic, such as around schools, which have been
the result of various factors such as higher enrollments, less bus use, less walking, etc. as some
parents feel it is safer to drive their children. However, many of the schools in the area were not
meant to handle the volume of private vehicles in a short time. Traffic calming on the streets
surrounding the schools will be addressed.
On the other hand, there are some areas where there has been a reduction in private automobile
use. For example, Millennials have tended lately to rely less on private automobiles and more on
5 DRAFT 2/1/19
other uses such as walking, bicycling and transit, as well as ride-share programs such as Uber
and Lyft. Thus, concepts such as "Complete Streets", factoring pedestrians and bicyclists, and
Transit-Oriented Developments will be included. The possibility of Transit Oriented Development,
taking into consideration the distance to the train stations,will also be considered. PDE will review
the potential for "Complete Streets", providing the ability for bicyclists and pedestrians, not just
automobiles,to travel through the area. The potential for future biking paths, as well as pedestrian
paths, both within the Town and connecting with the surrounding areas, will be reviewed and
recommendations made. Bike-share programs that are starting to appear in different municipalities
in the County will be considered. The potential of autonomous vehicles will also be discussed.
PDE will review the Town Consultant (B&L) Report on this item and expand on it as necessary.
One of the key issues affecting the Town's vitality is the limited availability of parking and the
current parking constraints. There is a high demand for on-street parking, while spaces are
limited. PDE will perform a detailed review of the parking conditions and make the necessary
recommendations. The use of residential streets for long term parking for commuters is an issue.
Parking management and regulations will also be key and the team will make the appropriate
recommendations to the Town.
Infrastructure
A large amount of the Town infrastructure is getting old and starting to fail. The Town infrastructure
will be reviewed with Town representatives to determine such items as available capacity and life
expectancy. Incorporating new green infrastructure techniques and efficient energy methodology
will be included.
The Town's current regulations to limit flooding impacts will be reviewed. PDE will make additional
recommendations to be applied to the potential new land uses to help prevent or reduce flooding
impacts. Mitigation will be proposed such as possibly raising first floor elevations,the requirement
of green infrastructure on any new project, and other appropriate storm water management
techniques.
Traffic and infrastructure engineering services that would be performed for the Town as part of
this Plan include:
• Review of traffic around the schools, including Murray Avenue School, Central School and
Hommocks School, for traffic mitigation including traffic calming and relief of traffic
congestion.
• Perform traffic and pedestrian counts, conduct field observations, and perform Level of
Service capacity analyses to determine recommendations to improve traffic flow at the
following key intersections:
1. Palmer Avenue and Weaver Street
2. Myrtle Boulevard and Weaver Street
3. Hommocks Road/Weaver Street and Boston Post Road
4. Forest Avenue and Weaver Street
6 DRAFT 2/1/19
5. Forest Avenue and Murray Avenue
• Discuss opportunities for better circulation of bicycle and pedestrian traffic through the
Town to improve existing modes of travel and to promote more walkability and bicycle use
in the unincorporated Town, including modifications to signage and striping as well as
infrastructure and other obstacles, thus developing a more specific "Complete Streets"
program.
• Review and expand upon the Town Consultant (B&L) Report on impacts of long term
commuter parking on residential streets on a global basis. A suitable radius from the
Larchmont Train Station will be established. PDE will confirm all existing parking
regulations within that radius and make recommendations on changes that will balance
residential and commuter parking in these areas. This analysis will be done on a priority
basis in advance of completion of the Comprehensive Plan.
• Evaluate the Town's municipal parking lots to determine if any are viable for re-
development.
• The Town infrastructure will be reviewed with Town representatives to determine such items
as available capacity and life expectancy.
• New green infrastructure techniques and efficient energy methodology will be included.
• The Town's current regulations to limit flooding impacts will be reviewed and
recommendations will be made to be applied to the potential new land uses to help prevent
or reduce flooding impacts
Parks and Recreation Chapter
The Town of Mamaroneck has an active Parks and Recreation Department that prides itself on
its many and varied programs ranging from toddlers to senior citizens. The assessment of
community needs is the first priority to determine local trends and needs, based upon information
collected as part of the community engagement phase. Based upon the assessment of community
needs, demographic trends and identified goals and objectives, the Consultant Team, led by F&A,
will develop a set of recommendations for new facilities and programs. Special focus will be on
the Town's aging population and their evolving needs beyond conventional senior activities.
Options for additional active and passive recreation, as well as open space, will be explored
including potential acquisition of property(s), if feasible.
Housing Needs Chapter
In communities across the County there is a present and growing concern that senior citizens,
young people, police, firefighters, EMS volunteers/first responders, teachers, municipal
employees, tradespeople and teachers, among others, can no longer afford to live in Westchester.
This trend has the potential to result in a loss of population diversity, and a reduction in available
services, and is particularly acute in the Town of Mamaroneck. .
Building upon the County's current efforts to assess housing need on both a County wide and
municipal basis, the Consultant Team, led by F&A, will prepare the Housing Chapter that will
present a plan for the Town to preserve and increase the diversity of its housing stock, focusing
7 DRAFT 2/1/19
on identifying parcels in the B-R and SBR zones and possibly others as potential sites for
affordable housing. Building upon the County's efforts and the demographics chapter, the
Housing Chapter will include a summary of the existing housing stock mix and discuss "what has
worked"to create and maintain this housing stock mix. As F&A is currently assisting in preparing
the Housing Needs Assessment and Plan for Westchester County and has done so for Rockland
County, the City of Yonkers and Mount Vernon, that experience will be brought to bear on this
assignment. Using the County collected data as a base, F&A will ascertain its applicability to the
Town, and interface with the County in this regard. Challenges to providing affordable housing
will be discussed, including: limited availability of land for housing development, the cost of land,
constrained lands, land and housing costs, infrastructure and regional factors. Goals, objectives
and policy considerations will be proposed to preserve and increase housing diversity in the Town.
The Housing Chapter will identify suitable locations for future housing which will be coordinated
with the future land use plan in the Land Use and Zoning Chapter.
Implementation Chapter
The Consultant Team firmly believes that a Plan without identified steps for implementation will
by definition be unsuccessful. A matrix identifying the short, medium and long-term activities
necessary to implement the future development vision will be provided and the responsible
agency or departments identified.
Although not required in the RFQ, as an optional extra, we can prepare the actual language for
the Town code, zoning text and zoning map amendments proposed in the Land Use and Zoning
Chapter above. This language could then be adopted by the Town Board either in conjunction
with the Comprehensive Plan or separately. The fee to prepare the Town code, zoning text and
map amendments would be dependent on the recommendations of the Comprehensive Plan and
would be discussed with, and agreed upon by, the Town Board prior to commencement of this
extra task. Note: inclusion of the Town code, zoning code and map amendments in the adoption
of the Comprehensive Plan will have implications on the SEQR review as outlined below [F&A
TO DISCUSS WITH TOWN ADMINISTRATOR].
PHASE III: STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW (SEQR)
Subsequent to the finalization of the draft Comprehensive Plan the Consultant Team, led by F&A,
will work closely with the Town to determine what environmental review actions will be necessary
for the adoption of the Plan. Two options are proposed:
Adoption of Comprehensive Plan without Zoning Code and Map Amendments2
2 It is assumed, if the FAR analysis is"fast tracked" in advance of completion of the Comprehensive Plan,
that the Town will conduct its own SEQR review for this task.
8 DRAFT 2/1/19
If the Town chooses to adopt the Comprehensive Plan, without any accompanying zoning code
or map amendments, or any other legislative changes, the Town may be able to adopt the
Comprehensive Plan utilizing only a Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF) with addenda.
In this scenario, the adoption of the Comprehensive Plan would have no potentially significant
adverse impacts and the Town could adopt the Plan with a Negative Declaration, ending the
SEQR process. The zoning code and map amendments would have to undergo a subsequent
and separate SEQR analysis prior to adoption.
As part of this process the Consultant Team will prepare the following documents:
• Full Environmental Assessment Form (FEAF): Parts I, II & Ill
• Addenda for Part III
As part of the overall SEQR process, the Consultant Team will review additional documents that
are prepared by Town staff and/or Town Attorney including any other resolutions or notices
necessary. This scenario includes one (1) public meeting/hearing before the Lead Agency.
Adoption of Comprehensive Plan with Zoning Code and Map Amendments
(Optional)
If the Town chooses to adopt the Comprehensive Plan witla the accompanying zoning code and
map amendments, the Town will likely have to undergo a more detailed SEQR review. Based on
our prior experience, and depending upon the nature of the amendments, the adoption of zoning
text and map amendments may trigger the need for a full Generic Environmental Impact
Statement (GEIS). In this scenario both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning text and map
amendments would be examined as part of one coordinated SEQR process. A build-out analysis
comparing "no change"to "zoning amendment implementation"would be developed to determine
what the impacts of the proposed changes may be on the potential growth of the Town. This is
the scenario chosen by the Village of Port Chester and Town of North Salem in the Plans we
prepared for these municipalities.
As part of this process our Team will prepare the following documents:
• Long-Form Environmental Assessment Form (EAF)
• Scoping Document
• Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement (DGEIS)
• Final Generic Environmental Impact Statement (FGEIS)
• Environmental Findings (in concert with the Town Attorney or Special SEQR
Counsel)
As part of the overall SEQR process, we will review additional documents that are prepared by
Town staff and/or Town Attorney including any other resolutions or notices necessary. This
scenario includes three (3) public meetings/hearings before the Lead Agency.
9 DRAFT 2/1/19
The fee to prepare the SEQR documentation for both the Comprehensive Plan and the zoning
text and map amendments would be dependent on the specific amendments to be adopted and
would be discussed with, and agreed upon by, the Town Board prior to commencement of this
extra task.
DELIVERABLES
Based upon the Scope of Services outlined above, the Consultant Team will prepare the following
deliverables:
• Community Engagement Plan & Documentation
• Draft Comprehensive Plan
• Final Comprehensive Plan
• Draft Town Code, Zoning Text and Map Amendments (optional extra) [Discuss
with the Town]
• SEQR Documentation (optional as outlined) [Discuss with the Town]
Draft Chapters of the Plan establishing the goals, objectives and policies will be prepared
following the completion of the Community Engagement activities. It is anticipated that the Town
will provide one (1) round of review/feedback on the proposed goals, objectives and policies,
which will then be revised. Once finalized, the Draft Comprehensive Plan will be compiled for
review by the public. If authorized, we will also prepare the draft Town Code, Zoning Text and
Map Amendments at this time. [Discuss with the Town]
Based upon the feedback from the public, the final draft of the Comprehensive Plan will be
prepared and submitted to the Town Board for adoption. At this time SEQR will commence and
the required documentation will be prepared, based upon the options outlined above.
10 DRAFT 2/1/19
t
-Fp Town of Mamaroneck
m Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
FOLF DED'`61 TEL: 914/381-7810
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FAX: 914/381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckNY.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Adoption 2019 Capital Project Schedule
Date: February 1, 2019
During the preparation of the 2019 Town Budget, the Board reviewed a series of
proposed capital projects. The details of each project were presented in a report
to the Town Board dated November 11, 2018. From that presentation, the
Town Board selected those projects to be pursued in 2019.
Attached is a schedule of projects that were approved by the Town Board. The
schedule provides the project number and capital account number as well as the
source(s) of financing. The approval of the project schedule at this time permits
the staff to pursue further design and engineering and/or the preparation of bid
specifications. The Town Board will have the opportunity to consider these
projects again when contracts are to be awarded. The following is a summary of
the proposed 2019 Capital Project Plan and the breakdown of funding sources:
Total Proposed Expenditures: $10,327,400
Bond Financing: 7,171,900
Interfund Transfers: 925,500
Grants/Miscellaneous: 2,230,000
ACTION REQUESTED: THAT THE TOWN BOARD ADOPT THE 2019
CAPITAL PROJECTS PLAN AND FUNDING SCHEDULE AS PRESENTED IN
THE ATTACHED SPREADSHEET.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
M
FY2019 TOWN OF MAMARONECK-CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET& FUNDING SCHEDULE (ADOPTED 2/6/2019)
TOWN APPROVED GRANTS/ APPROPRIATED
PROJ. PROJECT EXPENDITURE BOARD FUNDING BANS/BONDS LOCAL SOURCE INTERFUND REVENUE
# PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET A/C# RESOLUTION SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT TRANSFER* A/C#
2019-02 POLICE VEHICLES $76,205.00 H.3120.0400.2019.02 2019 BGT TSF FR PART TN $76,205.00 H.0000.5032.2019.02
* (2)marked vehicles'38,102
2019-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIPMENT $424,000.00 H.5110.0400.2019.06 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $424,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.06
10 wheel dump truck/spreader-$260,000
Heavy duty utility truck-$70,000
(2)heavy duty claw-$50,000
Light duty pickup truck-$30,000
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$14,000
2019-04 ROADS,SIDEWALKS&CURBS $568,000.00 H.5110.0400.2019.04 2019 BGT TSF FR HWY $85,000.00 H.0000.5033.2019.04
• Paving various roads-$552,000 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $483,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.04
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$16,000
2019-62 WAVERLY AVENUE BRIDGE IMP. $1,999,200.00 H.5120.0400.2019.62 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $124,200.00 H.0000.5700.2019.62
+ Estimated project cost-$1,995,000 2/6/2019 NYS GRANT
$1,750,000.00 H.0000.3999.2019.62
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$4,200 2/6/2019 MISC/ESCROW $125,000.00 H.0000.2770.2019.62
2019-63 HILLSIDE AVENUE BRIDGE IMP. $207,000.00 H.5120.0400.2019.63 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $207,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.63
• Estimated project cost-$200,000
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$7,000
2019-64 SIDEWALK EXT-E HICKORY GROVE DR $186,300.00 H.5110.0400.2019.64 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $186,300.00 H.0000.5700.2019.64
* Estimated project cost-$180,000
Cont./Bond costs 33%-$6,300
FY2019 TOWN OF MAMARONECK-CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET& FUNDING SCHEDULE (ADOPTED 2/6/2019)
TOWN APPROVED GRANTS/ APPROPRIATED
PROJ. PROJECT EXPENDITURE BOARD FUNDING BANS/BONDS LOCAL SOURCE INTERFUND REVENUE
# PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET A/C# RESOLUTION SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT TRANSFER* A/C#
2018-61 TRAFFIC SIGNAL IMPROVEMENTS $1,116,000.00 H.3310.0400.2018.61 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $866,000.00 H.0000.5700.2018.61
* Madison&New Jefferson traffic signal& 4/18/2018 MISC $250,000.00 H.0000.2770.2018.61
• boulevard improvements-$1,087,000
Cont./Bond costs 35%-$29,000
2019-29 FIRE HQ LOWER LEVEL RENOVATION $1,450,000.00 H.3410.0400.2019.29 BANS/BONDS $1,450,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.29
• Estimated project cost-$1,400,000 (PENDING REFERENDUM)
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$50,000
2017-29 FIRE HQ APPARATUS FLOOR ADDTL $310,500.00 H.3410.0400.2017.29 BANS/BONDS $310,500.00 H.0000.5700.2017.29
• Estimated project cost-$300,000 (PENDING REFERENDUM)
• Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$10,500
2019-58 SENIOR CENTER IMPROVEMENTS $190,000.00 H.6772.0400.2019.58 2/6/2019 TSF FR GEN TN $160,000.00 H.0000.5031.2019.58
Construct outdoor deck-$40,000 2/6/2019 TSF FR CAP PROJ#2015-47 $30,000.00 H.0000.2705.2019.58
Main program/lunch room restoration-$150,000 (Effective 12/31/2018)
2019-24 ICE RINK IMPROVEMENTS $308,000.00 H.7265.0400.2019.24 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $233,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.24
Phase 1-Design for ice rink locker room&showers-$300,000 2/6/2019 TRUST FUND $75,000.00 H.0000.5041.2019.24
Preliminary estimates-$1,050,000
Coot./Bond costs 3.5%-$8,000
20190 SHELDRAKE IMPROVEMENTS $50,000.00 H.7150.0400.2019.40 2/6/2019 TSF FR GEN TN $50,000.00 H.0000.5031.2019.40
Monroe camp repairs-$50,000
2019-14 TOWN CENTER BUILDING IMPR. $21,985.00 H.1620.0400.2019.14 2019 BGT TSF FR GEN TN $21,985.00 H.0000.5031.2019.14
Drain repair&ductless HVAC-$21,985
A
FY2019 TOWN OF MAMARONECK-CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET& FUNDING SCHEDULE (ADOPTED 2/6/2019)
TOWN APPROVED GRANTS/ APPROPRIATED
PROJ. PROJECT EXPENDITURE BOARD FUNDING BANS/BONDS LOCAL SOURCE INTERFUND REVENUE
# PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET A/C# RESOLUTION SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT TRANSFER• A/C#
2019-65 STONE MASONRY REPAIRS $90,000.00 H.5110.0400.2019.65._ 2/6/2019 TSF FR GEN TN $90,000.00 H.0000.5031.2019.65
Larchmont Gardens archways-$20,000
Barker cemetery wall-$70,000
2019-66 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN $248,000.00 H.8010.0400.2019.66 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $248,000.00 H.0000.5700.2019.66
Estimated project cost-$240,000
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$8,000
1346-12 NEW KENILWORTH WATER TANK $798,500.00 H.8340.0400.1346.12 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $798,500.00 H.0000.5700.1346.12
Estimated project cost-$773,500
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$25,000
1348-12 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE('18 PAVING) $129,000.00 H.8340.0400.1348.12 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $129,000.00 H.0000.5700.1348.12
Estimated project cost-$125,000
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$4,000
1352-12 RYE LAKE U.V.FACILITY $1,586,000.00 H.8340.0400.1352.12 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $1,586,000.00 H.0000.5700.1352.12
Estimated project cost-$1,536,000
Cont./Bond costs 3.5%-$50,000 I
2019-19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $227,400.00 H.1680.0400.2019.19 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $107,440.00 H.0000.5700.2019.19
• Town Clerk Online Parking Permit Waitlist-$8,900 2/6/2019 BANS/BONDS $18,960.00 H.0000.5700.2019.19
• Town Clerk Alarm Billing-$19,200 2019 BGT TSF FR GEN TN $50,030.00 H.0000.5031.2019.19
* Police Impact vCAD-$38,000 2019 BGT TSF FR PART TN $42,470.00 H.0000.5032.2019.19
• win 10 GPO-$9,800 2019 BGT TSF FR FIRE $8,500.00 H.0000.5034.2019.19
BONDS Office 2019&Windows 10-$61,200
BONDS Laserfiche Public Portal-$61,000
• Enterprise Encryption Software-$5,100
* Cameras(Fire)-$8,500
FY2019 TOWN OF MAMARONECK-CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET& FUNDING SCHEDULE (ADOPTED 2/6/2019)
TOWN APPROVED GRANTS/ APPROPRIATED
PROJ. PROJECT EXPENDITURE BOARD FUNDING BANS/BONDS LOCAL SOURCE INTER FUND REVENUE
# PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET A/C# RESOLUTION SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT TRANSFER* A/C#
• Rec Trac(Recreation)-$11,500
Cont/Bond costs 3.5%-$4,200
2019-20 COMPUTER HARDWARE&EQUIP. $276,810.00 H.1680.0400.2019.20 2019 BGT TSF FR GEN TN $187,985.00 H.0000.5031.2019.20
• Server incl.RecTrac 10.3 install-$68,000 2019 BGT TSF FR PART TN $68,325.00 H.0000.5032.2019.20
• Server(Court)-$15,700 2019 BGT TSF FR HWY $5,500.00 H.0000.5033.2019.20
• Highway Garage Switches-$5,500 2019 BGT TSF FR FIRE $15,000.00 H.0000.5034.2019.20
* Workstations(Rec,Court,Training)-$58,085
• Laptops-$18,000
* Access controls(Town Ctr)-$31,600
• Video displays(2 TC,1 SC,2 Rec)-$15,900
• Cameras(Recreation)-$6,500
* Police Mobile Tech-$16,000
* Police Palm Tech-$26,525
' Fire Mobile Tech-$15,000
2019-33 AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT $5,000.00 H.4189.0400.2019.33 2019 BGT TSF FR AMBUL $5,000.00 H.0000.5039.2019.33
(1)Toughbook replacement-$5,000
2019-59 LVAC BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $8,150.00 H.4191.0400.2019.59 2019 BGT TSF FR AMBUL $8,150.00 H.0000.5039.2019.59
Plymovent&Staircase repairs-$8,150
2019-67 PAGERS/COMMUNICATIONS EQUIPMENT $43,350.00 H.4189.0400.2019.67 2019 BGT TSF FR AMBUL $43,350.00 H.0000.5039.2019.67
Pagers&related equip(Ambul)-$43,350 $3,000.00 H.3120.0400.2019.67 2019 BGT TSF FR PART TN $3,000.00 H.0000.5032.2019.67
Pagers&related equip(Police)-$3,000
2019-68 MEMS BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $5,000.00 H.4190.0400.2019.68 2019 BGT TSF FR AMBUL $5,000.00 H.0000.5039.2019.68
Furniture replacements-$5,000
'* GRAND TOTALS: $10.327.400.0Q $7,171,900.00 $2,230,000.00 $925,500.00
i
FY2019 TOWN OF MAMARONECK-CAPITAL PROJECTS BUDGET& FUNDING SCHEDULE (ADOPTED 2/6/2019)
TOWN APPROVED GRANTS/ APPROPRIATED
PROJ. PROJECT EXPENDITURE BOARD FUNDING BANS/BONDS LOCAL SOURCE INTERFUND REVENUE
# PROJECT DESCRIPTION BUDGET A/C# RESOLUTION SOURCE AMOUNT AMOUNT TRANSFER* A/C#
TOTAL.FUNDING SOURCES APPROPRIATED INTERFUND TRANSFERS BY FUND
,
2019 2/6/2019
TOTAL BANS/BONDS(TOWN)2019: $5,411,400.00 PROJECT ADOPTED BDGT AMEND BDGT AMEND BDGT AMEND
TOTAL BANS/BONDS(FIRE)2019: $1,760,500.00 TOTALS BUDGET
•• GRAND TOTAL BANS/BONDS 2019: $7,171,900.00►TRANSF FR GEN TWN- $560,000.00 $260,000 $300,000 $0 $0
TRANSF FR PART TWN- , $190,000.00 $190,000 $0 $0 $0
•• TOTAL GRANTS/LOCAL SOURCE: S2 230 000a'*RANSF FR HIGHWAY- $90,500.00 $90,500 $0 $0 $0
TRANSF FR FIRE- - $23,500.00 $23,500 $0 $0 $0
•• TOTAL APPROP.TRANSFERS: S925.500.00 TRANSF FR AMBUL- $61,500.00 $61,500 $0 $0 $0
TRANSF FR WATER- $0 $0 $0 $0
•• TOTAL CAPITAL PROJECT FUNDING: $10.327.400.0Q $925.500 151.1.521 5300.000 1.4 I4
BOND FINANCING
INTERFUND TRANSFERS
GRANTS/M I SC
0
9 Town of Mamaroneck
w =F m Town Center
Vit' x 740 West Boston Post Road,Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL 914-381-7810
FAX 914-381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckny.org
www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Update-Restoration of DeLancey Burial Grounds
Date: February 1, 2019
Previously, I have informed the Board that the Mamaroneck Historical Society has
been working on a proposed restoration of the DeLancey Burial Grounds on Palmer
Avenue in the Village of Mamaroneck. The following is an update on the project as
a result of my meeting with the Society last week.
• Historical Society is currently conducting research of those buried at the site.
• Historical Society is proposing to reconstruct the retaining wall that borders
the burial grounds. The Town would provide scrap stone that is locate
behind the old court house. Historical Society will provide the labor for the
reconstruction of the wall.
• Historical Society has received a proposal for the cleaning, photographing
and restoration of the existing head stones (See Attached). The Society will
be conducting a fund raiser to finance the work proposed but is asking if the
Town would provide some funding for the project. One idea discussed was, if
the Society was not able to raise the entire amount of the contract, that the
Town would match the donations up to a maximum amount.
I indicated to the Society that I would be updating the Board on February 6 to
discuss the project. If necessary the Society would be willing to meet with the
Board.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
toPrinted on Recycled Paper
Burying Ground Preservation Group, Inc.
www.bgpg.org
P.O. Box 2492 Sag Harbor, NY 11963 631.287.6437 (0) 631.275.3374 (M)
December 15, 2018
To: Mamaroneck Historical Society
From: Burying Ground Preservation Group, Inc.
Project Proposal:
De Lancey Burying Ground, Mamaroneck, New York:
Survey, Clean, Record & Restore
Project Summary:
The proposed, multi-phase project addresses the urgent need to survey,
clean, record, and restore the De Lancey Burying Ground,
Mamaroneck, New York, in which eleven headstones, nine companion
footstones, and an unusual box tomb which are all of state and local
significance survive.
Nine of the stones require extensive restoration; the remaining twelve
need straightening to prevent future damage and loss.
The project will be undertaken in three phases over approximately four
months.
(Phase 1) Cleaning and Bio-growth Removal
(Phase II) Photographic Recording, Transcription, and Data Entry
(Phase III) Conservation Treatment and Repairs
•
•
Project Description & Budget:
Phase I
Cleaning, and Bio-growth removal
This phase involves:
(a) The gentle, non-abrasive removal of lichens and other bio-growth
(b)An application of a bio-degradable, anti-microbial agent that leaves
no residue or salts.
The effect of this application is increased over time but may need
repeating; by cleaning them first, the inscriptions on the stones become
easier to read, restore, or repair.
Fee: $600
110
Expenses: $250
P
Total Phase I $850
Phase H
Photographic recording & Data entry
This phase is quite time consuming in that it is a delicate process, and it
includes:
(a) Digital photography using a technique of reflecting the light that
greatly enhances the legibility of inscriptions; detailed condition
assessments for each stone
(b)A transcription of epitaphs wherever possible
0
(c)All photographs, inscriptions, condition assessments, and historical
research or documentation (if applicable) uploaded into
"BillionGraves.corn" or comparable website so that site features are
automatically mapped using the GPS coordinates tagged to the
photographs.
Fee: $1,200
Total Phase II: $1,200
Phase III
Conservation Treatment and Repairs
(a) Targeting nine individual markers (7 tablets, 1 footstone, and 1 box
tomb) with multiple breakage, loss of material, buried/submerged
components, delamination and displacement.
MTreatments and Repairs include:
Removal of failed repairs
Repair of damaged sections, structural pinning, and/or application
of structural adhesives for thin set bonding
Insertion of aesthetic fills
Resetting at grade
(b) Targeting the remaining twelve (12) stones that are leaning or tilted
for preventative repair
Joel Snodgrass, a materials conservator and graduate of Columbia
University's Division for Historic Preservation, has extensive experience
in the conservation treatment of historic burying grounds and will
undertake conservation treatments and direct stone repairs.
Fees & Expenses:
/ •
•
Conservation Treatments: $5,750*
Repairs : $2,200
Total Phase III $7,950
Total Project $10,000
*Estimate includes labor, materials and travel associated with observed
conditions. In the event that additional procedures and time are required
due to unforeseen conditions, client will be notified for consideration
and approval prior to proceeding.
The project may serve as a prototype for future surveys of
III
Mamaroneck's Colonial-era burying grounds.
The compact size of the De Lancey Burying Ground and the opportunity
to demonstrate "best practices" in stone conservation make it an ideal
candidate to serve in this capacity.
Please contact us at your convenience if you wish to discuss this
proposal or schedule the work.
Best regards,
Zach Studenroth
Principal
Burying Ground Preservation Group
• l
•
S O 9
-+ 9
° , ° Town of Mamaroneck -
F m County of Westchester
n
" 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
• F OUNDED l661 •
COUNSEL TEL: 914/381-7815
FAX: 914/381-7809
WMakerk@TownofMamaroneckNY.org
MEMORANDUM
To: Stephen V. Altieri,Town Administrator
Christina Battalia,Town Clerk
From: William Maker,Jr.,Attorney for the Town
Subject: Local law regarding the Ethics Law
Date: January 25,2019
I attach a proposed law which, if enacted, will change the definition of "employee" in
the Code of Ethics. The Purpose clause of the proposed law explains the reason for the
change.
,
The change itself is simple. The words "probationary or permanent" have been inserted
into the existing definition. They can be found in the second line. No other edits or
deletions are made to the current definition
If the Town Board considers the proposal ready for a public hearing, it can set the date
for such a hearing at one of its upcoming meetings.
(-117\4\
4111.
tit Printed on Recycled Paper
Local Law No. -2019
This local law shall be known as the "Elimination of Seasonal Employees from the List of
Employees Required to Make the Certification Mandated by the Code of Ethics" Law.
BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck
Section 1 -Purpose:
Currently, section 17-6 B. of the Town Code requires each employee to certify annually that he/she
has read the Town's Code of Ethics and has not knowingly or willfully violated that Code. The
Town hires a number of seasonal employees who work for limited periods of time during the
year. Examples include persons employed to work at the ice rink, the summer camps and the
pool.
The Town Board continues to maintain that it is important for employees who work all year long,
whether in a full or part-time capacity, to make the certification mandated by the Code of Ethics,
but finds it unnecessary for seasonal employees to do so.
This local law exempts seasonal employees from the certification requirement by modifying the
definition of"employee" to include only full-time employees.
Section 2-Amendment of a current section of the Mamaroneck Code:
Section 17-4 of the Code of the Town of Mamaroneck hereby is amended by deleting the definition
of EMPLOYEE and substituting the following definition of EMPLOYEE in its place:
EMPLOYEE
Each officer, volunteer or employee of the Town of Mamaroneck, whether paid or unpaid,
whether elected or appointed,whether serving in a full-time,probationary or permanent part-time
or advisory capacity. Volunteers whose responsibilities do not give rise to possible violations of
these rules shall not be considered "employees" for the purpose of this article. The Town Board
shall determine which volunteers shall be considered "employees"for this purpose.
Section 3-Severability:
Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such declaration of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any
other provisions of this Local Law, which may be implemented without the invalid or
unconstitutional provisions.
Section 4—Effective Date:
This Local Law shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.
January 25,2019
Town of Mamaroneck
From: Tony Siligato-Town Comptroller ipl
ai
Re: Fire Claims
Date: 02/06/2019
The following Town of Mamaroneck Fire Department dalms have been certified by Chief Joseph Russo
and submitted to the Comptroller's Office for payment:
YEClDDS DESCRIPTION
AAA Emergency Supply Co. Annual POSI Testing on Scott Paks,parts for Scott Pak repairs $ 3,022.10
AAA Emergency Supply Co. Mobile ball cut truck rental 1 250.00
AM Emergency Supply Co. NFPA Bourke EYE Shield,Scott AIR Pak repair labor charge,Air Pak repairs $ 1,567.37
Amazon.Com Cold cups,black bonded chair-Department Secretary $ 255.20
Amazon.Com Bogen Tb8 tile bridge for Cell,Welton Surround Free Hanging,Carol Sound,Emile 400V $ 796.76
Byram Mason Supply Corp Rock Salt 501b bag $ 65.00
Cablevision Cable Services for 1/23/19-2/22/19 $ 210.55
CIT Xerox Copier Contract 1/22/19 $ 296.68
Fire-End&Croker Corp. Gf6shield 6"
98.61
Hecker,James IAFF Peer Support Training 1/10-1/11/19 $ 250.00
Home Depot Wood for Rescue Drill $ 175.89
Home Depot Wood for sign 1 136.38
Hubbinette-Cowell Assodates,Inc Enhanced Cancer Care Volunteer Firefighter Insurance-44 Eligible Volunteer FFS @$137 s 6,028.00
New England Uniform Co.LLC Officers Collar Brass 1 345.00
Ready Refresh by Nestle Water Cooler Rental 12/19/18-1/18/19 $ 122.96
R.G Brewer Inc Flag repair 1 21.58
Seagrave Fire Apparatus,LLc Rental of 1999 Seagrave Rearmount Aerial ladder 2/1/19 1 7,500.00
Sound Shore Pest Control Exterminating Services on 12/28/18 $ 65.00
Tortorella,Paul Officer Meeting refreshments $ 161.86
Town of Mam'k Fire Dept. Bailout Training refreshments 12/29/18 r, 44.52
Town of Mam'k Fire Dept. Special Ice Drill food 1/5/19 446.74
UnlFlrst Corporation Cleaning Supplies 1/11,1/18/19 $ 287.36
UniFirst Corporation Cleaning Supplies 1/25/19
., 125.40
United Overhead Door Corp. Furnish&program 5 remotes 5 940.00
Verizon Fire HQ Svc 1/10/19-2/9/19 $ 248.61
Villa Marla Pizza Food for Fast&Rescue Drill 1/28/19 $ 64.37
Villa Marla Pizza Food for January Dept.Drill 1/15/19$156.16,Food for Fast Drill 1/23/19$40.76 $ 196.92
Westech Elevator Services,Inc. Maintenance for months of January&February 2019 $ 350.00
$ -
R
Total: $ 24,072.86
TOWN OF MAMARONECK FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE
CHIEF .1c1". .° Headquarters
C205 WEAVER STREET
LARCH MONT,NEW YORK 10538
WEAVER 834-2100 EMERGENCY
834-2101-NON EMERGENCY
834-2438 CHIEF'S OFFICE
STREET 834-0922-FAX
ZiaitimingolA
WWW.TMFD.ORG
To: Board of Fire Commissioners
From: Chief Joseph Russo
Date: February 1, 2019
Re: Fire Report for the Month of January 2019
The following report outlines response to calls made during the month of January. It summarizes the
nature, the number of personnel responding and the total time spent.
I have also attached a report showing a further breakdown of these alarms.
Alarm Type Number
Generals 23
Minors 22
Stills 2
Out of Town (Mutual Aid) 4
EMS 45
Drills 4
TOTAL 100
Total number of personnel responding: 725
Total time working: 47 hours and 08 minutes
Respectfully Submitted,
Chief Josep Russo
Incident Type Count Report
Date Range: From 1/1/2019 To 1/31/2019
Selected Station(s); All
Incident
Tvne Description Count
Station: EMS
311 -Medical assist,assist EMS crew 1 1.04%
321 -EMS call,excluding vehicle accident with injury 43 44.79%
Total-Rescue&Emergency Medical Service Incidents 44 97.78%
554-Assist invalid 1 1.04%
Total-Service Call 1 2.22%
Total for Station 45 46.88%
Station: HO
113 -Cooking fire,confined to container 2 2.08%
118-Trash or rubbish fire,contained 1 1.04%
131 -Passenger vehicle fire 1 1.04%
132-Road freight or transport vehicle fire 1 1.04%
Total-Fires 5 10.42%
321F-EMS call,excluding vehicle accident with injury 1 1.04%
322F-Vehicle accident with injuries 2 2.08%
324F-Motor vehicle accident with no injuries 1 1.04%
331 -Lock-in(if lock out,use 511 ) 1 1.04%
353F-Removal of victim(s)from stalled elevator 1 1.04%
Total-Rescue&Emergency Medical Service Incidents 6 12.50%
412-Gas leak(natural gas or LPG) 1 1.04%
424-Carbon monoxide incident 1 1.04%
440-Electrical.wiring/equipment problem,other 1 1.04%
444-Power line down 1 1.04%
463-Vehicle accident,general cleanup 1 1.04%
Total-Hazardous Conditions(No fire) 5 10.42%
511 -Lock-out 2 2.08%
520-Water problem,other 1 1.04%
522-Water or steam leak 1 1.04%
542-Animal rescue 1 1.04%
555-Defective elevator,no occupants 1 1.04%
Total-Service Call 6 12.50%
622-No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 1 1.04%
671 -Hazmat release investigation w/no hazmat 1 1.04%
Total-Good Intent Call 2 4.17%
736-CO detector activation due to malfunction 2 2.08%
743 -Smoke detector activation,no fire-unintentional 11 11.46%
744-Detector activation,no fire-unintentional 4 4.17%
745-Alarm system sounded,no fire-unintentional 3 3.13%
746-Carbon monoxide detector activation,no CO 4 4.17%
Total-Fals Alarm&False Call 24 50.00%
Total for Station 48 50.00%
Page 1 of 2 Printed 02/04/2019 19:03:08
Incident
Tyne Description Count
Station: STIL
111 -Building fire 1 1.04%
Total-Fires 1 33.33%
321 -EMS call,excluding vehicle accident with injury 2 2.08%
Total-Rescue& Emergency Medical Service Incidents 2 66.67%
Total for Station 3 3.13%
96 100.00%
Page 2 of 2 Printed 02/04/2019 19:03:24
<,
O 9
O 9
o Town of Mamaroneck
W m Town Center
= n
740 West Boston Post Road,Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL 914-381-7810
FAX 914-381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckny.org
www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Adoption of Bond Resolutions- 2019 Capital Projects
Date: January 31, 2019
The 2019 Capital Project Schedule includes a requirement for bond financing for
some projects. Attached is a schedule prepared by the Comptroller that lists the
projects that require bond financing. There are twelve projects that in total require
bond financing of $5,411,400.
In order to proceed with the bond financing the Town Board must adopt the
bonding resolutions that have been prepared by our bond counsel. Rather than
copy the full text of each of the bond resolutions, I have provided a copy of the
cover page of the resolutions. The cover page lists the total amount of the bonds to
be issued for each project and the purpose of the project. The balance of the bond
resolution documents are identical and conform to the requirements of the New
York State Finance law.
Requested Action: That the Town Board adopt the schedule of bond
resolutions and the bond resolutions as provided for financing of the 2019
Capital Project Plan.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
tot Printed on Recycled Paper
•
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $248,000 BONDS OF
THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK,
TO PAY THE COST OF A COMPREHENSIVE MASTER PLAN, FOR SAID
TOWN.
WHEREAS, said capital project hereinafter described, as proposed, has been determined
to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have any significant adverse impact on
the environment; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing thereof; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The development of a Comprehensive Master Plan, including incidental
expenses in connection therewith, in and for the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost of$248,000.
Section 2. It is hereby determined that the plan for the financing of the aforesaid
maximum estimated cost is by the issuance of$248,000 bonds of said Town, hereby authorized
to be issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law.
Section 3. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the
aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 64 of paragraph a of
Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law. It is hereby further determined that the maximum
maturity of the bonds herein authorized will not exceed five years.
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE
7 REFERENDUM, THE ISSUANCE OF $424,000 BONDS OF THE TOWN OF
MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, TO PAY THE
COST OF THE PURCHASE OF VEHICLES AND EQUIPMENT FOR THE
HIGHWAY DEPARTMENT, FOR SAID TOWN.
WHEREAS, acquisition of the capital items hereinafter described, as proposed, has been
determined to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department
of Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality
Review Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have a significant adverse
effect on the environment; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital items; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The purchase of vehicles and equipment for the Highway Department,
each item of which is $30,000 or more, a class of objects or purposes, in and for the Town of
Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost
of$424,000, including incidental equipment and expenses in connection therewith.
Section 2. It is hereby determined that the plan for the financing of said class of
objects or purposes is by the issuance of the $424,000 of bonds of the Town hereby authorized to
be issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law.
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE
REFERENDUM, PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF TRAFFIC SIGNALS
AND RELATED ROAD IMPROVEMENTS AT MADISON AVENUE AND
NEW JEFFERSON STREET, IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK,
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, AT A MAXIMUM ESTIMATED
COST OF $1,116,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $866,000
SERIAL BONDS OF SAID TOWN TO PAY PART OF THE COST THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the capital project hereinafter described, as proposed, has been determined
to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment; NOW, THEREFORE,
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital project; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The purchase and installation of traffic signals and related road
improvements at Madison Avenue and New Jefferson Street, in and for the Town of
Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, including incidental improvements and expenses
in connection therewith, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost of$1,116,000.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is as
follows:
a) by the issuance of$866,000 serial bonds of said Town, hereby authorized to be
issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law; and
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $126,400 BONDS OF
THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK,
TO PAY PART OF COST OF THE PURCHASE AND INSTALLATION OF
COMPUTER SOFTWARE FOR VARIOUS DEPARTMENTS, IN AND FOR
SAID TOWN.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the financing of the object or purpose hereinafter
described, including compliance with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act,have been performed; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing thereof; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The purchase and installation of computer software for various
departments, in and for said Town, including incidental expenses, is hereby authorized at a
maximum estimated cost of$227,400.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is as
follows:
a) by the issuance of $126,400 serial bonds of said Town, hereby authorized to be
issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law; and
b) by the expenditure of$101,000 other monies hereby appropriated therefor.
Section 3. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the
aforesaid class of objects or purposes is five years, pursuant to subdivision 104 of paragraph a of
Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law. It is hereby further determined that the maximum
maturity of the bonds herein authorized will not exceed five years.
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE
REFERENDUM, THE RECONSTRUCTION OF EAST HICKORY GROVE
DRIVE SIDEWALKS, IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK,
WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, AT A MAXIMUM ESTIMATED
COST OF $186,300 AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $186,300
SERIAL BONDS OF SAID TOWN TO PAY THE COST THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the capital project hereinafter described, as proposed, has been determined
to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have a significant adverse impact on the
environment;NOW, THEREFORE,
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital project; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The reconstruction of sidewalks on East Hickory Grove Drive, in and for
the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, including incidental improvements
and expenses in connection therewith, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost of
$186,300.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is by
the issuance of$186,300 bonds of said Town, hereby authorized to be issued therefor pursuant to
the provisions of the Local Finance Law.
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE
REFERENDUM, THE COST OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF CERTAIN
BRIDGES, IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER
COUNTY, NEW YORK, AT A MAXIMUM ESTIMATED COST OF
$2,206,200 AND AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $331,200 SERIAL
BONDS OF SAID TOWN TO PAY PART OF THE COST THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the capital project hereinafter described, as proposed, has been determined
to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have any significant adverse impact on
the environment; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital project; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The reconstruction of certain bridges and in and for the Town of
Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, including incidental improvements and expenses
in connection therewith, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost of$2,206,200.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is as
follows:
a) by the issuance of$331,200 serial bonds of said Town, hereby authorized to be
issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law; and
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING, SUBJECT TO PERMISSIVE
REFERENDUM, THE COST OF THE RECONSTRUCTION OF VARIOUS
ROADS THROUGHOUT AND IN AND FOR THE TOWN OF
MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK, AT A
MAXIMUM ESTIMATED COST OF $568,000 AND AUTHORIZING THE
ISSUANCE OF $483,000 SERIAL BONDS OF SAID TOWN TO PAY PART
OF THE COST THEREOF.
WHEREAS, the capital project hereinafter described, as proposed, has been determined
to be a Type II Action pursuant to the regulations of the New York State Department of
Environmental Conservation promulgated pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review
Act, which regulations state that Type II Actions will not have any significant adverse impact on
the environment; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing of such capital project; NOW,
THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. The reconstruction of various roads throughout and in and for the Town of
Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, including drainage, sidewalks, curbs, gutters,
landscaping, grading or improving rights-of-way, as well as other incidental improvements and
expenses in connection therewith, is hereby authorized at a maximum estimated cost of
$568,000.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is as
follows:
BOND RESOLUTION DATED FEBRUARY 6, 2019.
A RESOLUTION AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF $233,000 BONDS OF
THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK,
TO PAY PART OF COST OF THE DESIGN, PLANNING AND OTHER
PRELIMINARY EXPENSES IN CONNECTION WITH ICE RINK
IMPROVEMENTS (PHASE I), IN AND FOR SAID TOWN.
WHEREAS, all conditions precedent to the financing of the object or purpose hereinafter
described, including compliance with the provisions of the State Environmental Quality Review
Act,have been performed; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to authorize the financing thereof; NOW, THEREFORE,
BE IT RESOLVED, by the affirmative vote of not less than two-thirds of the total
voting strength of the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. Preliminary planning and design expenses relating to ice rink
improvements (Phase I), in and for said Town, including incidental expenses, is hereby
authorized at a maximum estimated cost of$308,000.
Section 2. The plan for the financing of the aforesaid maximum estimated cost is as
follows:
a) by the issuance of$233,000 serial bonds of said Town, hereby authorized to be
issued therefor pursuant to the provisions of the Local Finance Law; and
b) by the expenditure of$75,000 other monies hereby appropriated therefor.
Section 3. It is hereby determined that the period of probable usefulness of the
aforesaid specific object or purpose is five years, pursuant to subdivision 62°d(2°d) of paragraph a
of Section 11.00 of the Local Finance Law. It is hereby further determined that the maximum
maturity of the bonds herein authorized will not exceed five years.
TOWN OF MAMARONECK
2017, 2018 &2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED WITH 2019 BANS OR SERIAL BONDS (TOWN & FIRE DISTRICT) /%
SOURCE OF FUNDING TOWN
PROCEEDS FEDERAL BONDS BUDGET
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT INTERFUND OF & TO BE ISSUED P.P.U. OPERATING
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTALS IN YEARS FUND
TOWN
• -- 2019-04 ROADS,SIDEWALKS&CURBS •/ $ 568,000.00 $ 85,000.00 $ 483,000.00 $ - $ - $ 568,000.00 $ 483,000.00 15 HIGHWAY
2019-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIP V $ 424,000.00 $ - $ 424,000.00 $ - `$ - $ 424,000.00 $ 424,000.00 15 HIGHWAY
2019-62 WAVERLY AVE BRIDGE IMP '✓ $ 1,999,200.00 $ - $ 124,200.00 $ 1,750,000.00 $ 125,000.00 $ 1,999,200.00 $ 124,200.00 20 GENERAL TOWNWIDE
2019-63 HILLSIDE AVE BRIDGE IMP V $ 207,000.00 $ - $ 207,000.00 $ - $ - $ 207,000.00 $ 207,000.00 20 GENERAL TOWNWIDE
-- 2019-64 SIDEWALK EXTENSION /— $ 186,300.00 $ - $ 186,300.00 $ - $ - $ 186,300.00 $ 186,300.00 10 HIGHWAY
(E.Hickory Grove Drive) _
2018-61 TRAFFIC SIGNAL&ROAD IMPROVEMENTS 14'$ 1,116,000.00 $ - $ 866,000.00 $ - $ 250,000.00 $ 1,116,000.00 $ 866,000.00 15 PART TOWN???
(Madison&New Jefferson)
2019-24 ICE RINK IMPROVEMENTS V $ 308,000.00 $ 75,000.00 $ 233,000.00 $ - $ - _$ 308,000.00H $ 233,000.00 5 GENERAL TOWNWIDE
(PHASE 1 -Design Rink locker room&showers)
--"2019-66 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN $ 248,000.00 $ - $ 248,000.00 $ - $ - $ 248,000.00 $ 248,000.00 5 GENERAL TOWNWIDE
1346-12 NEW KENILWORTH WATER STORAGE TANK $ 798,500.00 $ - $ 798,500.00 $ - $ - $ 798,500.00 $ 798,500.00 40 WATER
1348-12 WATER INFRASTRUCTURE(2018 PAVING) $ 129,000.00 $ - $ 129,000.00 $ 129,000.00 $ 129,000.00 40 WATER
1352-12 RYE LAKE U.V.FACILITY �$ 1,586,000.00 $ - $ 1,586,000.00 $ - $ - $ 1,586,000.00 $ 1,586,000.00 40 WATER
2019-19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $ 227,400.00 $ 101,000.00 $ 126,400.00 $ - $ - $ 227,400.00 $ 126,400.00 5 GEN&PART TOWN
TOTALS: $ 7,797,400.00 $ 261,000.00 $ 5,411,400.00 $ 1,750,000.00 $ 375,000.00 $ 7,797,400.00 $ 5,411,400.00
III
TOWN OF MAMARONECK
•
2017, 2018 &2019 CAPITAL PROJECTS TO BE FUNDED WITH 2019 BANS OR SERIAL BONDS (TOWN & FIRE DISTRICT)
SOURCE OF FUNDING TOWN
PROCEEDS FEDERAL BONDS BUDGET
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT INTERFUND OF & TO BE ISSUED P.P.U. OPERATING
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTALS IN YEARS FUND
FIRE
2019-29 FIRE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,450,000.00 $ - $ 1.450,000.00 $ - $ - $ 1,450,000.00 $ 1,450,000.00 25 FIRE DISTRICT
(Lower level renovation)
2017-29.FIRE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS $ 310,500.00 $ - $ 310,500.00 $ - $ - $ 310,500.00 $ 310,500.00 25 FIRE DISTRICT
(Apparatus floor additional work)
TOTALS: $ 1,760,500.00 $ - $ 1,760,500.00 $ - $ - $ 1,760,500.00 $ 1,760,500.00
411
1 •
6O 9
O 9
o Town of Mamaroneck
m Town Center
= n
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL 914-381-7810
FAX 914-381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckny.org
www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Order Calling a Public Hearing
Water System Improvements
Date: February 1, 2019
Within the 2019 Capital Project Plan are three projects regarding water system
improvements.
❖ Project # 1346-12 New Kenilworth Water Tank $ 798,500
❖ Project # 1348-12 Water Infrastructure- Paving 129,000
❖ Project # 1352-12 Rye Lake U. V. Facility 1,586,000
Total $2,513,500
Water system improvement projects are funded through the Town Water District,
which is a Special Improvement District pursuant to New York State Finance Law and
the General Municipal Law. Anytime funds are to be borrowed and charged against
a Special Improvement District, the Town Board must hold a mandatory public
hearing. In this case the proposed financing of the projects listed is through the
issuance of bonds.
Attached is an Order Calling a Public Hearing prepared by our bond counsel.
REQUESTED ACTION-THAT THE TOWN BOARD SET A PUBLIC HEARING FOR
FEBRUARY 20, 2019 ON THE QUESTION OF BORROWING $2,513,500 FOR
WATER SYSTEM IMPROVEMENTS
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
i� Printed on Recycled Paper
4
4131-9924-2010.01 43235-2-64
At a regular meeting of the Town Board of
the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester
County, New York, held at the Town
Hall, in Mamaroneck, New York on
February 6, 2019, at o'clock P.M.,
Prevailing Time.
PRESENT:
Supervisor
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
Councilman
In the Matter
of ORDER
The Increase and Improvement of the Facilities CALLING
of the Consolidated Water District, in the Town PUBLIC
of Mamaroneck, Westchester County, HEARING
New York
WHEREAS, the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, has caused to be prepared a map, plan and report, including an estimate of cost,
pursuant to Section 202-b of the Town Law, relating to the increase and improvement of the
facilities of the Consolidated Water District, in the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York (the "Consolidated Water District"), being the construction of a new Kenilworth
Water Storage Tank, reconstruction of the Rye Lake Ultra Violet facility and water infrastructure
p .7.
improvements related to the planned paving projects of the Town of Mamaroneck in 2018,
including incidental improvements and expenses in connection therewith, at a maximum
estimated cost of$2,513,500; and
WHEREAS, said capital projects have been determined to be Type II Actions pursuant to
the regulations of the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation promulgated
pursuant to the State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA"), the implementation of
which as proposed, it has been determined will not result in a significant environmental adverse
effect; and
WHEREAS, it is now desired to call a public hearing on the question of the increase and
improvement of the facilities of said Consolidated Water District, in the matter described above,
and to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof, concerning the same, in accordance with
the provisions of Section 202-b of the Town Law; NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY
ORDERED, by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County,
New York, as follows:
Section 1. A public hearing will be held in the Town Hall, in Mamaroneck ,
New York, in said Town, on March , 2019, at o'clock P.M., Prevailing Time,
on the question of the increase and improvement of the facilities of Consolidated Water District,
in the Town of Mamaroneck, Westchester County, New York, in the manner described in the
preambles hereof, and to hear all persons interested in the subject thereof, concerning the same,
and to take such action thereon as is required or authorized by law.
-2-
•
r
Section 2. The Town Clerk is hereby authorized and directed to cause a copy of the
Notice of Public Hearing hereinafter provided to be published once in the official newspaper, and
also to cause a copy thereof to be posted on the sign board of the Town, such publication and
posting to be made not less than ten, nor more than twenty, days before the date designated for
the hearing.
Section 3. The notice of public hearing shall be in substantially the form attached
hereto as Exhibit A and hereby made a part hereof.
Section 4. This Order shall take effect immediately.
-3-
0 9
9
Town of Mamaroneck
r
in Town Center
� •. x 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL 914-381-7810
FAX 914-381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckny.org
www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Close out and Transfers- Capital Projects
Date: February 4, 2019
Annually the Comptroller and I prepare schedules of the disposition of capital
projects. Attached are two schedules for your review. Schedule A is a listing of
those capital projects that are completed or for other reasons are to be closed out.
The schedule lists the project numbers, description, expenditures and remaining
balances or deficits. For those projects that have a surplus, the remaining funds
will either be transferred to the debt service fund if bonds were used for financing,
or returned to the surplus of the appropriate budget fund for projects that were
financed with budget appropriations. If a project was financed with both debt and
appropriations the remaining balance will only be returned to the surplus of the
fund if there is not outstanding debt.
In some cases there are projects that have deficits due to an over expenditure from
the original budget. For those projects, the Board is asked to consider a transfer of
funds to balance the project budget.
Schedule B is a listing of those projects that remain active however the expenditure
budgets must be amended to reflect additional funds required to complete the
projects.
SCHEDULE A — FINAL CLOSURE AND TRANSFER OF FUNDS FOR COMPLETED
CAPITAL PROJECTS
The projects listed in schedule A are complete. The final financials for these projects
is as follows:
Total Original Value of Projects to be closed: $12,830,786.00
Total Expenditures: 11,981,872.07
Total Available Funding for Projects 11,828,679.87
Total Additional Funding Required $ 153,192.20
On the bottom of the last page of the schedule is a breakdown of the budget
transfers by budget fund.
11Page
i4Printed on Recycled Paper
Overall, the Town largely operated within the original capital project budgets. A
review of the projects requiring additional funding reveals the Water District
required the most additional funding. This is in large part due to the required
project changes by the WJWW as their construction budgets changed or required
changes in the scope of the projects.
The next largest budget fund transfer is in the Highway Department. The original
budget for repaving in 2018 was $85,000. Ultimately the expenditure was
$428,326.00. Included in the 2018 paving project was paving associated with the
installation of a new gas main on Rocky Road, Lakeside Drive and Myrtle Blvd
between Lakeside Drive and Weaver Street. Since the paving contractor was in this
area of the Town, we added Falls Road, Windsor Lane and Harmon Drive to the
original list of streets to be paved. Each of these streets was in fair to poor
condition and the cost to pave them at another time would have been greater due
to mobilization costs. Con Edison is reimbursing the Town for a portion of the
paving and curb work on Rocky Road, Lakeside Drive and Myrtle Boulevard. Con
Edison's reimbursement totals $172,135.00. Therefore to cover the final costs of
the total paving project an additional $171,191 is required by a transfer of funds.
The transfers in the other funds are relatively small. An important point to note
here is that based upon the positive capital project performance in most projects
$804,640 is being transferred into the debt service fund. A portion of this funding
can be utilized in the preparation of the 2020 to defray future debt service costs.
SCHEDULE B BUDGET AMENDMENTS TO ACTIVE CAPITAL PROJECTS
This schedule reflects all of the capital budgets that remain active at this time. Of
the thirty seven active projects eight require budget amendments. There are also
three Water District projects that appear to be in deficit as of 12/31/18 however
funding for those projects is proposed in the 2019 serial bond sale.
Total Original Value of Active Capital Projects $15,399,967
Total Expenditures and Encumbrances- 12/31/18 8,725,420.08
Unexpected Budget Balance-12/31/18 6,674,546.92
On the last page of the schedule there is a breakdown of the total transfers
required to amend those projects currently over expended. On the chart the over
expended projects are color coded in red.
I did want the Board to have time to review the two tables. Regarding Schedule B,
I am preparing a supplementary memorandum discussing those projects that
require additional funding which will be distributed prior to meeting on Wednesday.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
21 Page
5c/A e..,; i()____
TOWN OF MAMARONECK CAPITAL PROJECTS CLOSED OUT PER R.O.B. DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE CLOSE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31, 2018
* * * *
SOURCE OF FUNDING FUND BALANCE PROJECT OPERATING CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT CLOSED REV OR EXP REV OR EXP
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS BUDGET BAL._ TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 (FUND) LINE ITEM LINE ITEM
24-6 POLICE HQ RENOVATION $ 1,193,375.00 $ 1,214,178.02 $ (20,803.02) $ 1,193,375.00 , $ 1,193,375.00 $ (20,803.02) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031
25-2 CONSTR OF WATER PLANT $ 1,220,000.00 $ 1,111,613.20 $ 108,386.80 $ 1,220,000.00 $ 1,220,000.00 $ 108,386.80 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
29-9 DRAINAGE IMP-BONNIE WAY $ 205,000.00 $ 8,869.01 $ 196,130.99 $ 205,000.00 $ 205,000.00 $ 196,130.99 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
29-10 DRAINAGE IMP-VARIOUS $ 102,000.00 $ 81,118.17 $ 20,881.83 $ 102,000.00 $ 102,000.00 $ 20,881.83 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2010-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 330,000.00 $ 285,507.15 $ 44,492.85 $ 330,000.00 $ 330,000.00 $ 44,492.85 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2011-14 TOWN CTR BUILDING IMPRV. $ 131,530.00 $ 127,249.24 $ 4,280.76 $ 1,530.14 $ 130,000.00 $ 131,530.14 $ 4,280.90 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2012-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 492,400.00 $ 453,648.32 $ 38,751.68 $ 167,400.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 492,400.00 $ 38,751.68 SW SW.0000.5040 H.9900.9904
2012-23 SANITARY SEWER PUMP ST. $ 65,000.00 $ 35,425.12 $ 29,574.88 $ 65,000.00 $ 65,000.00 $ 29,574.88 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2012-24 ICE RINK IMPROVEMENTS $ 471,550.00 $ 472,487.68 $ (937.68) $ 41,550.00 $ 430,000.00 $ 985.00 $ 472,535.00 $ 47.32 A A.0000.5040 H.9900.9901
2014-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 125,000.00 $ 131,011.58_$ (6,011.58) $ 27,909.00 $ 27,909.00 $ (103,102.58) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038
2014-31 REC FACILITIES(MEM PK) Y$ 42,000.00 $ 40,793.16 $ 1,206.84 $ 42,000.00 $ 42,000.00 $ 1,206.84 B B.0000.5040 H.9900.9902
2014-33 AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT $ 38,500.00 $ 37,610.09 $ 889.91 $ 6,000.00 $ 32,500.00 $ 38,500.00 $ 889.91 SM SM.0000.5040 H.9900.9909
2014-38 HWY/GARAGE BLDG.IMP. $ 166,000.00 $ 33,974.91 $ 132,025.09 $ 26,000.00 $ 140,000.00 $ 166,000.00 $ 132,025.09 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2015-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIP $ 459,995.00 $ 445,603.37 $ 14,391.63 $ 9,995.00 $ 450,000.00 $ 459,995.00 $ 14,391.63 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2015-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 1,027,300.00 $ 1,401,970.63 $ (374,670.63) $ 430,000.00 $ 597,300.00 $ 1,027,300.00 $ (374,670.63) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038
2015-40 SHELDRAKE IMPROVEMENTS $ 11,300.00 $ 8,466.00 $ 2,834.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 11,300.00 $ 2,834.00 A A.0000.5040 H.9900.9901
2015-47 NEW JEFFERSON PKG/RD IMP $ 183,150.00 $ 66,619.92 $ 116,530.08 $ 93,150.00 $ 93,150.00 $ 26,530.08 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
TOWN OF MAMARONECK CAPITAL PROJECTS CLOSED OUT PER R.O.B. DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE CLOSE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND - PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31, 2018
* * * *
SOURCE OF FUNDING FUND BALANCE PROJECT OPERATING CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT CLOSED REV OR EXP REV OR EXP
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS BUDGET BAL. TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 (FUND) LINE ITEM LINE ITEM
I
2015-49 STORM WATER DRAINAGE $ 72,450.00 $ 648.26 $ 71,801.74 $ 15,000.00 $ 57,450.00 $ 72,450.00 $ 71,801.74 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2016-04 ROADS,SIDEWALK&CURBS $ 1,021,668.00 $ 987,065.81 $ 34,602.19 $ 85,000.00 $ 768,500.00 $ 168,168.00 $ 1,021,668.00 $ 34,602.19 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2016-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIP $ 367,425.00 $ 360,450.92 $ 6,974.08 $ 367,425.00 $ 367,425.00 $ 6,974.08 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2016-22-PASSENGER BUS $ 52,565.00 $ 13,639.61 $ 38,925.39 $ 10,800.00 $ 10,800.00 $ (2,839.61) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031
2016-31 RECREATION FACILITY IMP $ 57,200.00 $ 60,974.46 $ (3,774.46) $ 15,800.00 $ 41,400.00 $ 57,200.00 $ (3,774.46) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031
2016-49 STORM WATER DRAINAGE $ 223,483.00 $ 229,283.49 $ (5,800.49) $ 135,483.00 $ 88,000.00 $ 223,483.00 $ (5,800.49) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031
2016-51 SEWER SYS EVALUATION $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,102,781.60 $ 97,218.40 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 1,200,000.00 $ 97,218.40 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2017-02 POLICE VEHICLES $ 70,000.00 $ 70,807.84 $ (807.84) $ 70,000.00 $ 70,000.00 $ (807.84) B 6.9900.9950 H.0000.5032
2017-04 ROADS,SIDEWALK&CURBS $ 860,000.00 $ 1,046,567.24 $ (186,567.24) $ 85,000.00 $ 775,000.00 $ 178,854.73 $ 1,038,854.73 $ (7,712.51) DB DB.9900.9950 H.0000.5033
2017-09_SANITATION VEHICLE $ 170,500.00 $ 153,150.66 $ 17,349.34 $ 170,500.00 $ 170,500.00 $ 17,349.34 DEBT SVC V.0000.5040 H.9900.9980
2017-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 1,741,850.00 $ 936,961.32 $ 804,888.68 $ 616,625.00 $ 616,625.00 $ (320,336.32) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038
2017-27 FIRE CHIEF VEHICLE $ 40,000.00 $ 41,137.68 $ (1,137.68) $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ (1,137.68) SF SF.9900.9950 H.0000.5034
2017-48 PARKING LOT IMP(VAC) $ 41,500.00 $ 51,124.61 $ (9,624.61) $ 41,500.00 $ 41,500.00 $ (9,624.61) SM SM.9900.9950 H.0000.5039
2017-57 RECORDS MANAGEMENT $ 46,245.00 $ 41,736.19 $ 4,508.81 $ 38,500.00 $ 7,745.00 $ 46,245.00 $ 4,508.81 A A.0000.5040 H.9900.9901
2018-03 AMBULANCE VEHICLE $ 40,000.00 $ 40,015.15 $ (15.15) $ 40,000.00 $ 40,000.00 $ (15.15) SM SM.9900.9950 H.0000.5039
2018-04 ROADS,SIDEWALK&CURBS $ 85,000.00 $ 428,326.28 $ (343,326.28) $ 85,000.00 $ 171,681.14 $ 256,681.14 $ (171,645.14) DB DB.9900.9950 H.0000.5033
TOWN OF MAMARONECK CAPITAL PROJECTS CLOSED OUT PER R.O.B. DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE CLOSE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND- PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31, 2018
* * * *
SOURCE OF FUNDING FUND BALANCE PROJECT OPERATING CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT CLOSED REV OR EXP REV OR EXP
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS BUDGET BAL. TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 (FUND) LINE ITEM LINE ITEM
2018-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIP $ 469,500.00 $ 453,683.11 $ 15,816.89 $ 134,500.00 $ 335,000.00 $ 469,500.00 $ 15,816.89 DB DB.0000.5040 H.9900.9940
2018-59 LVAC BLDG IMPROVEMENTS $ 7,300.00 $ 7,372.27 $ (72.27) $ 7,300.00 $ 7,300.00 $ (72.27) SM SM.9900.9950 H.0000.5039
TOTALS: $ 12,830,786.00 $ 11,981,872.07 $ 848,913.93 $ 2,103,983.14 $ 9,168,900.00 $ 35,654.00 $ 519,688.87 $ 11,828,226.01 $ (153,646.06)
35 TOTAL PROJECTS * Town Board action to be taken is to authorize the close out for each capital project listed above along with the necessary interfund transfers and
TO CLOSE Capital Project&Operating Fund Budget Amendments.
SUMMARY General Town: $ (25,827.45) Net Transfer-General Town to Capital
OF Part Town: $ 399.00 Net Transfer-Capital to Part Town
NET Highway: $ (163,540.76) Net Transfer-Highway to Capital
TRANSFERS Fire: $ (1,137.68) Net Transfer-Fire to Capital
Ambulance: $ (8,822.12) Net Transfer-Ambulance to Capital
Water: $ (759,357.85) Net Transfer-Water to Capital
Debt Service: $ 804,640.80 Net Transfer-Capital to Debt Service
$ (153,646.06) Grand Total of Net Fund Balance used to close capital projects listed above.
5 -cineJu-L-- 1 --'
TOWN OF MAMARONECK k. OPEN CAPITAL PROJECTS REQUIRING BUDGET AMENDMENTS 8 TRANSFERS PER R.O.B.DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND-PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31,2018
BUDGET AMENDMENT effective 12/30/2018
SOURCE OF FUNDING BALANCE SOURCE OF OPERATING CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT FUNDING/ INTERFUND TRANSFER INTERFUND TRANSFER
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS ENCUMBRANCES BUDGET BAL. TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 OPERATING FUND EXP LINE ITEM REV LINE ITEM
28-4 JUSTICE COURT EQUIPMENT $ 48,500.00 $ 38,748.20 $ - $ 9.751.80 $ 38,748.20 $ 38,748.20 $ -
2014-23 SANITARY SEWER PUMP ST. $ 35,500.00 $ 387.16 $ - $ 35,112.84 $ 35,500.00 $ 35,500.00 $ 35,112.84
2015-11 FIRE DIST APPARATUS $ 1,700,000.00 $ 739,204.24 $ 1,239,071.00 $ (278,275.24) $ 75,000.00 $ 1,625,000.00 $ 1,700,000.00 $ (278,275.24) SF SF.9900.9950 H.0000.5034.2015.11
2015-29 FIRE BLDG IMPROVEMENTS $ 363,000.00 $ 216,351.82 $ 146,648.18 $ 38,000.00 $ 325,000.00 $ 363,000.00 $ 146,648.18
2015-45 WEAVER ST SIDEWALK EXT $ 395,000.00 $ 47,640.00 $ 9,500.00 $ 337,860.00 $ - $ (57,140.00) B B.9900.9950 H.0000.5032.2015.45
2016-12 WATER-CAPITAL IMP. $ 1,347,200.00 $ 1,743,772.42 $ (396,572.42) $ 388,500.00 $ 958,700.00 $ 1,347,200.00 $ (396,572.42) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038.2016.12
2016-14 TOWN CTR BUILDING IMPRV. $ 371,250.00 $ 167,299.95 $ 57.42 $ 203,892.63 $ 371,250.00 $ 371,250.00 $ 203,892.63
2016-33 AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT $ 5,000.00 $ - $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
2016-39 CONSERVATION TRAILS $ 52,750.00 $ 20,023.00 $ 32,727.00 $ 52,750.00 $ 52,750.00 $ 32,727.00
2016-48 PARKING LOT TOWN CTR $ 597,120.00 $ 800,779.05 $ 46,448.85 $ (250,107.90) $ 447,120.00 $ 149,876.00 $ 596,996.00 $ (250,231.90) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031.2016.48
2017-06 HIGHWAY VEHICLES&EQUIP $ 580,000.00 $ 334,453.98 $ 236,462.88 $ 9,083.14 $ 195,000.00 $ 385,000.00 $ 580,000.00 $ 9,083.14
2017-14 TOWN CTR BUILDING IMPRV. $ 227,500.00 $ 2,397.01 $ 225,102.99 $ 227,500.00 $ 227,500.00 $ 225,102.99
2017-19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $ 149,533.00 $ 188,862.16 $ 12,428.31 $ (51,757.47) $ 149,533.00 $ 149,533.00 $ (51,757.47) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031.2017.19
2017-20 COMPUTER HARDWARE $ 126,000.00 $ 159,309.54 $ 2,860.00 $ (36,169.54) $ 126,000.00 $ 126,000.00 $ (36,169.54) A A.9900.9950 H.0000.5031.2017.20
2017-24 ICE RINK IMPROVEMENTS $ 105,064.00 $ 61,371.11 $ 43,692.89 $ 105,064.00 $ 105,064.00 $ 43,692.89
2017-29 FIRE BLDG IMPROVEMENTS $ 1,328,700.00 $ 1,380,037.55 $ 139,591.42 $ (190,928.97) $ 178,700.00 $ 1,150,000.00 $ 9,040.00 $ 1,337,740.00 $ (181,888.97) 2019 BONDS PENDING REFERENDUM IN 2019
2017-31 RECREATION FACILITY IMP $ 7,500.00 $ - $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00 $ 7,500.00
2017-33 AMBULANCE EQUIPMENT $ 19,250.00 $ 9,490.00 $ 9,760.00 $ 19,250.00 $ 19,250.00 $ 9,760.00
2017-38 HWY/GARAGE BLDG.IMP. $ 163,500.00 $ 13,417.34 $ 79,537.00 $ 70,545.66 $ 35,000.00 $ 72,500.00 $ 107,500.00 $ 14,545.66
2017-40 SHELDRAKE IMPROVEMENTS $ 5,000.00 $ - $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00 $ 5,000.00
TOWN OF MAMARONECK OPEN CAPITAL PROJECTS REQUIRING BUDGET AMENDMENTS&TRANSFERS PER R.O.B.DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND-PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31,2018
BUDGET AMENDMENT effective 12/30/2018
SOURCE OF FUNDING BALANCE SOURCE OF OPERATING I CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT FUNDING I INTERFUND TRANSFER INTERFUND TRANSFER
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS ENCUMBRANCES BUDGET BAL. TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 OPERATING FUND EXP LINE ITEM REV LINE ITEM
2017-53 GARDENS LAKE IMP. $ 61,050.00 $ 12,344.30 $ 48,705.70 $ 61,050.00 $ 61,050.00 $ 48,705.70
2017-54 PRYOR MANOR BRIDGE IMP. $ 275,000.00 $ 67,508.00 $ 207,492.00 $ 171,500.00 $ 103,500.00 _ $ 275,000.00 $ 207,492.00
2017-56 FIRE TURNOUT GEAR EQUIP $ 250,000.00 $ 201,637.71 $ 4.8,362.29 $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.00 $ 4.8,362.29
2017-58 SENIOR CTR IMPROVEMENTS $ 16,000.00 $ - $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00 $ 16,000.00
2018-02 POLICE VEHICLES $ 112,500.00 $ 9,858.37 $ 68,045.95 $ 34,595.68 $ 112,500.00 $ 112,500.00 $ 34,595.68
2018-14 TOWN CTR BUILDING IMPRV. $ 853,350.00 $ 53,770.65 $ 799,579.35 $ 68,350.00 $ 785,000.00 $ 853,350.00 $ 799,579.35
2018-19 COMPUTER SOFTWARE $ 85,255.00 $ 73,070.71 $ 5,883.50 $ 6,300.79 $ 85,255.00 $ 85,255.00 S. 6,300.79
2018-20 COMPUTER HARDWARE $ 227,045.00 $ 190,826.11 $ 35,000.00 $ 1,218.89 $ 227,045.00 $ 227,045.02 $ 1.218.89
2018-31 RECREATION FACILITY IMF $ 8?5222.^,0 $ 15,951.96
E 65,548.04 $ 81,500.00 8 81,500.00 $ 65,548.04
2018-48 PARKING LOT IMPROVEMENT $ 125,000.00 $ 1,377.27 $ 123,622.73 $ 125,000.00. $ 125,000.00 $ 123,622.73
2018-60 SANITARY SEWER IMP $ 2,795,000.00 $ 23,706.57 $ 2,771,293.43 $ 2,795,000.00 $ 2,795,000.00 $ 2,771,293.43
2018-61 TRAFFIC CONTROL DEVICES $ 250,000.00 $ - $ 250,000.00 $ 250,000.50 8 250,000.50 $ 250,000.50
1344-12 N BARRY PRESSURE REG $ 63,700.00 $ 65,314.60 $ 5,847.40 $ (7,462.00) $ 63,700.00 $ 63,700.00 $ (7,462.00) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038.1344.12
1
1345-12 MAMK AVE PRESSURE REG $ 63,700.00 $ 61,428.94 $ 19,379.06 $ (17,108.00) $ 63,700.00 $ 63,700.00 $ (17,108.00) SW SW.9900.9950 H.0000.5038.1345.12
1346-12 KENILWORTH WATER TANK $ 798,500.00 $ 24,504.27 $ 773,995.73 $ - $ (24,504.27) 2019 BONDS H.0000.5700.1346.12
1348-12 WATER INFRST 2018 PAVING $ 129,000.00 $ 91,731.14 $ 37,268.86 - $ - $ (91,731.14) 2019 BONDS H.0000.5700.1348.12
1352-12 RYE LAKE UV FACILITY $ 1,586,000.00 $ 8,732.16 I $ 1,577,267.84 $ - $ (8,732.16) 2019 BONDS H.0000.5700.1352.12
TOTALS: $ 15,399,967.00 $ 6,825,307.29 $ 1,900,112.79 $ 6,674,546.92 $ 2,330,897.00 $ 9,656,070.00 $ 188,624.20 $ 259,040.50 $ 12,434,631.70 $ 3,709,211.62
34 TOTAL OPEN PROJECTS AS OF 12/31/2018
TOWN OF MAMARONECK OPEN CAPITAL PROJECTS REQUIRING BUDGET AMENDMENTS 8 TRANSFERS PER R.O.B.DATED 2/6/2019/EFFECTIVE DATE OF 12/31/2018
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND-PROJECT LENGTH SCHEDULE
PROJECT INCEPTION THRU DEC 31,2018
BUDGET AMENDMENT effective 12/30/2018
SOURCE OF FUNDING BALANCE SOURCE OF OPERATING CAPITAL
PROJ. PROJECT PROJECT EXPENDITURES OUTSTANDING UNEXPENDED INTERFUND PROCEEDS OF FEDERAL& FUNDING (DEFICIT)AT FUNDING/ INTERFUND TRANSFER INTERFUND TRANSFER
# DESCRIPTION BUDGET &TRANSFERS ENCUMBRANCE BUDGET BAL. TRANSFERS OBLIGATIONS STATE AID OTHER TOTAL DEC.31,2018 OPERATING FUND EXP LINE ITEM REV LINE ITEM
* AGard action to be taken is to authorize the increase to the respective 2018 Town operating fund budgets&Capital projects listed above along with the necessary interfund transfers.
SUMMARY General Town: $(338,158.91) Net Transfer-General Town to Capital
OF
NET Part Town: $ (57,140.00) Net Transfer-Part Town to Capital
TRANSFERS
Fire: $(278,275.24) Net Transfer-Fire to Capital
Water: $(421,142.42) Net Transfer-Water to Capital
o 'Fp TOWN OF MAMARONECK
W ? Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
•FOUNDED 1661 •
TEL: 914/381-7810
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FAX: 914/381-7809
Saltieri@townofmamaroneckNY.org
www.townofrnamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor& Town Board
Re: Authorization —Transfer of Funds— Hommocks Ice Rink Concession
Date: January 31, 2019
The Recreation Department is in the midst of upgrading the kitchen equipment in the food
concession area of the ice rink. The kitchen equipment in the ice rink is the property of the
Town of Mamaroneck and it has been in place for some time.
Specifically, the gas convection oven with griddle and ice maker will be replaced. The total cost
for the replacement of both pieces of equipment is $8,022.00. The funding for this expense
would be from the Hommocks Ice Rink Trust Fund. Currently, the available funds in the trust
fund total $48,000.00.
REQUESTED ACTION: THAT THE TOWN BOARD APPROVE A TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE
AMOUNT OF $8,022.00 FROM THE HOMMOCKS ICE RINK TRUST FUND TO BUDGET ACCOUNT
A7265.2102 FOR THE PURCHASE OF KITCHEN EQUIPMENT FOR THE HOMMOCKS ICE RINK.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
BUDGET AMENDMENT -TRANSFER FROM TRUST FUND TO GENERAL FUND 2/6/2019 TOWN BOARD MEETING
GENERAL TOWN WIDE FUND (FUND A):
INCREASE BUDGET:
A.0000.5041 TRANSFERS FROM TRUST FUND $ 8,022.00
A.7265.2102 MISC EQUIPMENT $ 8,022.00
* (REPRESENTS USE OF ICE RINK TRUST FUND DONATIONS FOR PURCHASE OF KITCHEN EQUIPMENT
(GAS CONVECTION OVEN W/GRIDDLE&ICE MAKER FOR RINK CAFE)
(Requisitions from Supt. Of Recreation attached)
* TRUST A/C#T.0000.0109 (ICE RINK TRUST FUND) $ (8,022.00)
O 9
Town of Mamaroneck
, ,T, Town Center
x 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL 914-381-7810
FAX 914-381-7809
saltieri@townofmamaroneckny.org
www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Authorization- IMA- Westchester County
Organic Waste
Date: February 1, 2019
Attached is a proposed renewal agreement between the Town and Westchester
County in connection with the disposal of organic waste. For the Town, the
agreement applies almost exclusively to the disposal of fall leaves. There are times
when the agreement will apply to the disposal of organic waste such as branches
and trees that come from storm damage. The Joint Sanitation Commission has a
separate organic waste agreement with Westchester County for the organic waste
collected from homes between April and October. In addition the Commission's
agreement applies to organic waste brought by residents to the Maxwell Avenue
Recycling Center.
For the expiring agreement the disposal fee was $17.08 per ton. Using the formula
set forth in the agreement, for the adjustment of rates, the new fee for 2018/19 is
$17.35 per ton. All other terms of the agreement remain unchanged. The term of
the propose agreement is April 2018 through March of 2023. On average the Town
will collect between 3,500 and 4,500 tons of leaves each fall. Our disposal costs
under the County agreement are between $65,000 and $70,000 annually. In
addition, the Town pays a user fee of $20,000 for the use of the Moriarity Inc.
transfer station on Valley Place in the Town. This fee covers the roughly 1,950
truck trips into the Valley Place transfer station and the loading of trailers for the
disposal of leaves.
REQUESTED ACTION-THAT THE TOWN BOARD APPROVE THE AGREEMENT
BETWEEN THE TOWN AND WESTCHESTER COUNTY FOR THE DISPOSAL OF
ORGANIC WASTE AND THAT THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR BE AUTHORIZED
TO EXECUTE THE AGREEMENT.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
isPrinted on Recycled Paper
DISTRICT MEMBER IMA
AGREEMENT made this day of , 2019 by and between
THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, a municipal corporation of the State of
New York,having an office and place of business in the Michaelian Office
Building, 148 Martine Avenue, White Plains,New York 10601 (hereinafter
referred to as the "County"), acting on behalf of the Westchester County Refuse
Disposal District No. 1 (the"District")
and
The Town of Mamaroneck , a municipal
corporation of the State of New York having an office and principal place of
business at40 West Roston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10541
(hereinafter referred to as the "Municipality")
WHEREAS, in order to divert additional recyclable materials from the waste
' stream, the County has an Organic Yard Waste Management Program (the"Program")
with municipalities within the District; and
WHEREAS, the Municipality desires to participate in the Program.
NOW,THEREFORE, in consideration of the terms and conditions contained
herein, the parties agree as follows:
1. Municipality's Responsibilities:
(a)The Municipality shall collect organic yard waste within its boundaries and transport
same to the organic yard waste transfer site(the"Transfer Site") specified in Schedule
"A"which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. Organic yard waste shall be limited
to grass, leaves,brush and wood waste not to exceed three inches(3") in diameter by four
feet(4') in length.
(b)The Municipality, either individually or by agreement with another municipality
within the District,shall designate the Transfer Site for such purpose, subject to County
approval, and shall take any legally required action necessary to register or receive a
permit to operate the Transfer Site. The Municipality shall conduct such site-specific
environmental reviews as necessary to comply with the State Environmental Quality
Review Act("SEQRA") and its implementing regulations, coordinating such review with
the County as an involved agency. The Municipality shall include with this signed
Agreement evidence of its compliance with SEQRA, e.g., a Negative Declaration, a
Findings Statement or, in the case of a Type II action, the minutes or a Resolution of the
Municipality's governing board including a statement as to its Type II classification. In
the event that the Municipality and another municipality enter into an agreement to
jointly provide the Transfer Site, that agreement shall be appended to this Agreement.
(c)The Municipality shall negotiate in good faith with any other municipality within the
District that wishes to use the Transfer Site,but the Municipality shall not charge a fee
•
above the tip fee for garbage at the County's Resource Recovery Facility, as such tip fee
may be adjusted from time to time. The names of all municipalities using the Transfer
Site shall be included in Schedule"A".
(d) The Transfer Site shall be operated in accordance with Schedule"B"which is
attached hereto and made a part hereof.
2. County's Responsibilities: The County, either directly or through an agent, shall enter
into agreements with one or more contractors operating composting facilities for the
recycling of organic yard waste collected by the Municipality. The County shall also
arrange for transporting yard waste from the Transfer Site to the composting facilities and
shall pay for such transportation and disposal costs.
3. Term: The term of this Agreement shall commence on April 1, 2018 and terminate on
March 31, 2023, unless sooner terminated as hereinafter provided.
4. Payment: For the services to be rendered by the County pursuant to Paragraph"2"
above, the Municipality shall pay fees to the County in accordance with the fee schedule
set forth in Schedule"C"which is attached hereto and made a part hereof. If the
Municipality hosts the Transfer Site for use by itself and other municipalities within the
District, the Municipality shall be responsible for paying the County for the full quantity
of waste hauled from the Transfer Site. Payment shall be made within thirty(30) days of
receipt of a bill from the County,by check payable to "Refuse Disposal District No. 1 do
Westchester County Department of Environmental Facilities". Payment shall be mailed
or delivered to the Division of Solid Waste Management, Westchester County
Department of Environmental Facilities, 270 North Avenue,New Rochelle,New York
10801.
5. Reports: No later than March 1st of each year, the Municipality shall provide a report
setting forth the total tons or cubic yardage of organic yard waste collected from each
participating municipality using the Transfer Site during the preceding year.
6. Executory Clause: This Agreement shall be deemed executory only to the extent of
money duly appropriated and made available by the County for the performance of the
Program.
7. Indemnification & Defense: The Municipality agrees to procure and maintain
insurance naming the County as additional insured, as provided and described in
Schedule"D", entitled "Standard Insurance Provisions", which is attached hereto and
made a part hereof. In addition to, and not in limitation of the insurance provisions
contained in Schedule"D",the Municipality agrees:
(a)that except for the amount, if any, of damage contributed to, caused by or resulting
from the sole negligence of the County, the Municipality shall indemnify and hold
harmless the County, its officers, employees and agents from and against any and all
liability, damage, claims, demands, costs,judgments, fees, attorneys' fees or loss arising
directly or indirectly out of the errors, omissions or unlawful or negligent acts hereunder
by the Municipality or third parties under the direction or control of the Municipality; and
(b)to provide defense for and defend, at its sole expense, such claims, demands or causes
of action directly or indirectly arising out of this Agreement, as described in subsection
7(a)above, and to bear all other costs and expenses related thereto.
(c) In the event the Consultant does not provide the above defense and indemnification to
the County, and such refusal or denial to provide the above defense and indemnification
is found to be in breach of this provision, then the Consultant shall reimburse the
County's reasonable attorney's fees incurred in connection with the defense of any
action, and in connection with enforcing this provision of the Agreement.
8. Termination: This Agreement may be terminated at any time by mutual agreement of
the parties or upon thirty(30) days written notice by one party to the other party. In the
event that this Agreement is terminated prior to the expiration date set forth in Paragraph
3 above, all fees and payments owing to the County shall be immediately due and
payable by the Municipality.
9. Assignment& Subcontracting: Any purported delegation of duties or assignment of
rights under this Agreement without the prior express written consent of the County is
void. The Municipality shall not subcontract any part of its work or duties under this
Agreement without the written consent of the County. All subcontracts shall provide that
subcontractors are subject to all terms and conditions set forth in the contract documents.
All work performed by a subcontractor shall be deemed work performed by the
Municipality.
10. Compliance with Law: In executing their respective responsibilities under this
Agreement,the County and the Municipality shall comply with all applicable federal,
state and local laws,rules and regulations.
11. No Discrimination: The County and the Municipality shall not discriminate against
any person on the basis of race, creed, religion, color, gender, age,national origin,
ethnicity, alienage or citizenship status, disability, marital status, sexual orientation,
familial status, genetic predisposition or carrier status in the performance of this
Agreement.
12. Notices: All notices of any nature referred to in this Agreement shall be in writing
and sent by registered or certified mail postage pre-paid,to the respective addresses set
forth below or to such other addresses as the respective parties hereto may designate in
writing:
To the County:
Deputy Commissioner
Division of Solid Waste Management
Department of Environmental Facilities
270 North Avenue
New Rochelle, New York 10801
with a copy to:
County Attorney
Michaelian Office Building, Room 600
148 Martine Avenue
White Plains,New York 10601
To the Municipality: Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
Town of Mamaroneck
740 West Boston Post Road
Mamaroneck, NY 10543
or to such other addresses as either party may designate by notice.
13. No Agency: Nothing herein contained shall be construed to create a co-partnership
between the County and the Municipality or to constitute either party as the agent of the
other.
14. Entire Agreement: This Agreement and its attachments constitute the entire
Agreement between the parties with respect to the subject matter hereof and shall
supersede all previous negotiations, commitments and writings. It shall not be released,
discharged, changed or modified except by an instrument in writing signed by a duly
authorized representative of each of the parties.
15. Approval by the County Attorney: This Agreement shall not be enforceable until
executed on behalf of the parties and approved by the Office of the County Attorney.
16. Counterparts: This Agreement may be executed simultaneously in several
counterparts, each of which shall be an original and all of which shall constitute but one
and the same instrument.
17. Governing Law: This Agreement shall be construed and enforced in accordance with
the laws of the State of New York.
[Intentionally Left Blank]
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the County and the Municipality have caused this
Agreement to be executed.
THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
By
Vincent F. Kopicki, P.E.
Commissioner of Environmental Facilities
THE MUNICIPALITY TOWN OF MAMARONECK
By
Stephen V. Altieri, Town Administrator
Authorized by Act No. 87-2018 adopted by the Board of Legislators of the County of
Westchester on the 18th day of June, 2018.
Approved as to form and
manner of execution:
Assistant County Attorney
County of Westchester
S/Noe/DXF/111485/Organic Waste IMA District Member 2018-2023
MUNICIPALITY'S ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER)
On this day of FEBUARY 2019,before me personally came
STEPHEN V. ALTIERI , to me known, and known to me to be the
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR of THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK .
the municipal corporation described in and which executed the within instrument,who being by me duly
sworn did depose and say that he,the said TOWN ADMINISTRATOR resides at
WHITE PLAINS.NEW YORK and that he is TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
of said municipal corporation.
Notary Public County
CERTIFICATE OF AUTHORITY
(Municipality)
CHRISTINA BATTALIA
(Officer Other Than Officer Signing Contract)
certify that I am the TOWN CLERK OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK
(Title,Name of Municipality)
(the"Municipality")a corporation duly organized in good standing under the
LAWS OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK
(Law under which organized,e.g.,the New York Village Law,Town Law,General Municipal Law)
named in the foregoing agreement that STEPHEN V.ALTIERI
(Person executing agreement)
who signed said agreement on behalf of the Municipality was,at the time of execution
TOWN ADMINISTRATOR of the Municipality,
(Title of such person)
that said agreement was duly signed for on behalf of said Municipality by authority of its
TOWN BOARD
(Town Board,Village Board,City Council)
thereunto duly authorized,and that such authority is in full force and effect at the date hereof.
(Signature)
STATE OF NEW YORK )
) ss.:
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER)
On this day of FEBRUARY_ 2019, before me personally came
CHRISTINA BATTALIA whose signature appears above,to me
known, and know to be the TOWN CLERK _of THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK
(title)
The municipal corporation described in and which executed the above certificate,who being by me duly
sworn did depose and say that she,the said TOWN CLERK
resides at LARCHMONT,NEW YORK ,and that she is
the TOWN CLERK of said municipal corporation.
(title)
Notary Public County
SCHEDULE "A"
TRANSFER SITE LOCATION AND USERS
(to be completed by the Municipality)
SITE NAME & ADDRESS:
LIST OF CURRENT USERS:
Note: The Municipality shall conduct such site-specific environmental reviews as
necessary to comply with the State Environmental Quality Review Act("SEQRA") and
its implementing regulations, coordinating such review with the County as an involved
agency. The Municipality shall include with this signed Agreement evidence of its
compliance with SEQRA, e.g., a Negative Declaration, a Findings Statement or, in the
case of a Type II action, the minutes or a Resolution of the Municipality's governing
board including a statement as to its Type II classification. In the event that the
Municipality and another municipality enter into an agreement to jointly provide the
Transfer Site, that agreement shall be appended to this Agreement.
SCHEDULE "B"
YARD WASTE TRANSFER SITE
OPERATIONAL REQUIREMENTS
The Host Municipality must:
Provide a site that is at least 1/2 acre in size and provides adequate space for 110 cubic
yard trailers to enter, load and leave.
Register the site with the NYS Dept. of Environmental Conservation and conduct site
specific environmental reviews as necessary to comply with SEQRA; coordinate such
reviews with the County Dept. of Environmental Facilities as an"involved agency".
Provide a front end loader and qualified operator(The Loader must be able to reach 13
feet, 6 inches utilizing either municipally provided ramp or extended arms.)
Make site improvements necessary for this transfer station operation(i.e., a ramp for
loading the waste or a loader capable of reaching a height of 13' 6")
Staff the site with municipal personnel at all times between 7 a.m. and 3 p.m.
Operate the site in a"load and go"manner whereby staged yard waste is loaded directly
into provided trailers and trailers will immediately leave the site
Be responsible for any damage incurred to transfer trailers during loading
Prohibit and eliminate plastic bags and other contaminates within the organic yard waste
(All contaminants, which are any materials other than yard waste as specified herein, and
brown paper leaf bags,must be removed by the Municipality prior to loading. All costs
related to contaminated loads shall be the responsibility of the host municipality.)
Accept organic yard waste from other District municipalities (Other District
municipalities using the site would pay a tip fee to the host municipality as mutually
agreed upon,but less than the current garbage tip fee.)
Accept organic waste from landscapers (Host municipalities may charge landscapers a
fee for dumping.)
Keep adequate record of volumes delivered by other municipalities(Municipalities
wishing to utilize this program but not allow other District municipalities access may do
so at a payment equal to the tip fee for garbage.)
Any of these requirements may be modified for individual sites upon mutual agreement
of the County and the host municipality.
SCHEDULE "C"
FEES
In consideration of the services provided by the County, the Municipality shall pay the
County$17.35 per ton for the period from April 1, 2018 through December 31, 2018.
Effective January 1St of each year, the Municipality shall pay the County at a rate subject
to an annual adjustment factor equal to the percentage change in the All Items Consumer
Price Index for all Urban Consumers (1982-84=100)for the New York-Newark-Jersey
City,NY-NJ-Pa Metropolitan Statistical Area as published by the U.S. Department of
Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics ("CPI").
However, if a District host-municipality accepts organic yard waste from a non-District
municipality, it shall pay to the County a rate of$52.36 per ton for such non-District
waste, subject to an annual CPI adjustment, which amount represents the County's actual
disposal cost plus an administrative fee. To the extent that any non-District member joins
the District during the term of this IMA,that municipality shall be entitled to an
automatic rate adjustment to allow for the payment of the District rate. The County shall
arrange for the transport of the yard waste to composting facilities outside the County
Other District municipalities using the Transfer Site shall pay a tip fee to the host
municipality as mutually agreed upon, but in no event may it be higher than the
municipal tipping fee for the Resource Recovery Facility, as such fee may be adjusted
from time to time. Notwithstanding the above, if the Municipality excludes other
municipalities from using the Transfer Site or fails to negotiate in good faith with them
for such use, the Municipality shall pay the County at the rate per ton equal to the full
annual municipal tipping fee for the Resource Recovery Facility, as such fee may be
adjusted from time to time.
•
SCHEDULE "D"
STANDARD INSURANCE PROVISIONS
(Municipality)
1. Prior to commencing work, and throughout the term of the Agreement,
the Municipality shall obtain at its own cost and expense the required insurance as
delineated below from insurance companies licensed in the State of New York,
carrying a Best's financial rating of A or better. Municipality shall provide evidence
of such insurance to the County of Westchester("County"), either by providing a copy
of policies and/or certificates as may be required and approved by the Director of Risk
Management of the County("Director"). The policies or certificates thereof shall
provide that ten(10) days prior to cancellation or material change in the policy,
notices of same shall be given to the Director either by overnight mail or personal
delivery for all of the following stated insurance policies. All notices shall name the
Municipality and identify the Agreement.
If at any time any of the policies required herein shall be or become
unsatisfactory to the Director, as to form or substance, or if a company issuing any
such policy shall be or become unsatisfactory to the Director,the Municipality shall
upon notice to that effect from the County, promptly obtain a new policy, and submit
the policy or the certificate as requested by the Director to the Office of Risk
Management of the County for approval by the Director. Upon failure of the
Municipality to furnish, deliver and maintain such insurance,the Agreement, at the
election of the County,may be declared suspended, discontinued or terminated.
Failure of the Municipality to take out,maintain, or the taking out or
maintenance of any required insurance, shall not relieve the Municipality from any
liability under the Agreement,nor shall the insurance requirements be construed to
conflict with or otherwise limit the contractual obligations of the Municipality
concerning indemnification.
All property losses shall be made payable to the"County of
Westchester"and adjusted with the appropriate County personnel.
In the event that claims, for which the County may be liable, in excess of
the insured amounts provided herein are filed by reason of Municipality's negligent acts
or omissions under the Agreement or by virtue of the provisions of the labor law or other
statute or any other reason, the amount of excess of such claims or any portion thereof,
may be withheld from payment due or to become due the Municipality until such time as
the Municipality shall furnish such additional security covering such claims in form
satisfactory to the Director.
In the event of any loss,if the Municipality maintains broader coverage
and/or higher limits than the minimums identified herein, the County shall be entitled
to the broader coverage and/or higher limits maintained by the Municipality. Any
available insurance proceeds in excess of the specified minimum limits of insurance
and coverage shall be available to the County.
2 The Municipality shall provide proof of the following coverage(if
additional coverage is required for a specific agreement, those requirements will be
described in the Agreement):
a) Workers' Compensation and Employer's Liability. Certificate form C-105.2 or
State Fund Insurance Company form U-26.3 is required for proof of compliance
with the New York State Workers' Compensation Law. State Workers'
Compensation Board form DB-120.1 is required for proof of compliance with the
New York State Disability Benefits Law. Location of operation shall be "All
locations in Westchester County, New York."
Where an applicant claims to not be required to carry either a Workers'
Compensation Policy or Disability Benefits Policy, or both, the employer must
complete NYS form CE-200, available to download at: http://www.wcb.ny.gov.
If the employer is self-insured for Workers' Compensation, he/she should present
a certificate from the New York State Worker's Compensation Board evidencing
that fact (Either SI-12, Certificate of Workers' Compensation Self-Insurance, or
GSI-105.2, Certificate of Participation in Workers' Compensation Group Self-
Insurance).
b) Commercial General Liability Insurance with a combined single limit of
$1,000,000 (c.s.1) per occurrence and a $2,000,000 aggregate limit naming the
"County of Westchester" as an additional insured on a primary and non-
contributory basis. This insurance shall include the following coverages:
i. Premises- Operations.
ii. Broad Form Contractual.
iii. Independent Contractor and Sub-Contractor.
iv. Products and Completed Operations.
c) Commercial Umbrella/Excess Insurance: $2,000,000 each Occurrence
and Aggregate naming the"County of Westchester" as additional insured,
written on a"follow the form"basis.
NOTE: Additional insured status shall be provided by standard or other
endorsement that extends coverage to the County of Westchester for both on-
going and completed operations.
d) Automobile Liability Insurance with a minimum limit of liability per
occurrence of$1,000,000 for bodily injury and a minimum limit of$100,000
per occurrence for property damage or a combined single limit of$1,000,000
unless otherwise indicated in the contract specifications. This insurance shall
include for bodily injury and property damage the following coverages and
name the"County of Westchester" as additional insured:
(i) Owned automobiles.
(ii) Hired automobiles.
(iii) Non-owned automobiles.
3. All policies of the Municipality shall be endorsed to contain the
following clauses:
(a) Insurers shall have no right to recovery or subrogation against the
County(including its employees and other agents and agencies), it being the intention
of the parties that the insurance policies so effected shall protect both parties and be
primary coverage for any and all losses covered by the above-described insurance.
(b) The clause "other insurance provisions" in a policy in which the
County is named as an insured, shall not apply to the County.
(c) The insurance companies issuing the policy or policies shall have no
recourse against the County(including its agents and agencies as aforesaid) for
payment of any premiums or for assessments under any form of policy.
(d) Any and all deductibles in the above described insurance policies
shall be assumed by and be for the account of, and at the sole risk of, the Municipality.
? Town of Mamaroneck
Ips . -Fp Office of the Town Clerk, Town Center
I m 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY
� 10543-3353
•
FOUNDED 1661 •
Christina Battalia, RMC, CMC TEL:914/381-7870
Mamaroneck Town Clerk FAX:914/381-7813
CBattalia@townofmamaroneckNY.org
MEMORANDUM
DATE: January 25, 2019
TO: Town Board
FROM: Christina Battalia
SUBJECT: Salary Authorization—Part Time Position in Town Clerk's Office
I have been working with Steve and Connie on filling a part time position in the Town Clerk's
Office. I was seeking someone who could provide administrative functions, as well as provide
needed IT skills with respect to our permit and licensing functions. This position will offset
reduced hours of one of my Deputy Clerk's.
I have interviewed a candidate who has the qualifications and skills sets I am seeking, and I
believe her to be the right person for the position.
Allison May is a Mamaroneck resident who has worked in the past managing creative
communications, business development and marketing for such companies as Colgate-
Palmolive. She left the corporate world about ten years ago to raise her family. She is currently
very active in the Mamaroneck Avenue School PTA supporting public relations, electronic
communications, digital distributions, and as a volunteer coordinator. Allison holds a BS in
Business Administration from the University of Denver.
I believe Allison will be a wonderful asset to my Office and for the Town. With your approval,
Allison's start date would be February 14, at an hourly amount, consistent with the recently
approved part-time hourly rate range, of$30.00 per hour.
Christina