Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017_09_19 Town Board Meeting Packet TOWN OF MAMARONECK TOWN BOARD AGENDA TUESDAY SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 THE TOWN BOARD WILL CONVENE-AT 5:00PM, IN CONFERENCE ROOM A TO DISCUSS: 1. Review-Zoning Petition -Gjoko Spa & Salon 176 Myrtle Boulevard 2. Consideration -Special Permit Requirement- Cambium 3. Consideration - LMC-TV- Funding of Proposed New Headquarters 4. Consideration- Lease of Electric Vehicles 5. Discussion - Right of Way Encroachments 6. New Business 7. Request for Executive Session 6:00PM CALL TO ORDER-COURTROOM SUPERVISOR'S REPORT CITIZEN COMMENTS BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS 1. Fire Claims 2. Other Fire Department Business AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK 1. Set Public Hearing - Establish No Parking Zone at 1298 Palmer Avenue 2. Consideration -Special Permit Requirement- Cambium 3. Authorization -Transfer of Funds-Repairs-Senior Center 4. Authorization - Lease Agreement-Nissan Electric Vehicles 5. Salary Authorization - Highway Department 6. Consideration of Certiorari REPORTS OF THE COUNCIL TOWN CLERK'S REPORT NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETINGS-October 4, 2017 & October 18, 2017 Any physically handicapped person needing special assistance in order to attend the meeting should contact the Town Administrator's office at 381-7810. TOWN BOARD MEETING WORKSESSION AGENDA TUESDAY, SEPTEMBER 19, 2017 5:00PM -CONFERENCE ROOM A 1. Review-Zoning Petition-Gjoko Spa & Salon 176 Myrtle Boulevard (No Attachment-Zoning Petition previously distributed to the Town Board on August 23, 2017). 2. Consideration-Special Permit Requirement-Cambium (See Attachment). 3. Consideration-LMC-TV-Funding of Proposed New Headquarters (See Attachment). 4. Consideration-Lease of Electric Vehicles (See Attachment). 5. Discussion-Right of Way Encroachments (No Attachment). 6. New Business 7. Request for Executive Session WORKSESSION ITEM 1 c. r11Z A It 1^ n T N & David J.Cooper Z Jody T.Cross. S T E I N M E T Z Katelyn E.Ciolino. Michael J.Cunningham. Marsha Rubin Goldstein Helen Collier Mauch. September 5, 2017 Zachary R.Mintz. Daniel M.Richmond Kate Roberts Brad K.Schwartz RECEIVED Lisa F.Smith. Via Hand Delivery David S.Steinmetz. Supervisor Saligson, and Members of the Edward P.Teyber Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck SEP Michael D.Zarin .Also admitted in D.C. Town Center .Also admitted in CT Also admitted in N) 740 W. Boston Post Road TOWN OF MAMARONECK Court Room SUPERVISOR'S OFFICE Mamaroneck,NY 10543 Re: Gjoko Spa & Salon/Petition for a Zoning Text Amendment 176 Myrtle Blvd., Town of Mamaroneck,NY Section 1, Block 133,Parcel 642 (the "Property") Dear Supervisor Saligson and Members of the Town Board: As you know, this firm represents Gjoko Shkreli (the "Applicant"), the owner of the above Property, in connection with his proposal to modify the Town's Zoning Code in order to permit the development of a limited number of dwelling units, including Fair and Affordable Housing, on top of first-floor commercial uses on Myrtle Boulevard. We are submitting the enclosed Petition for a Zoning Text Amendment ("Petition") to commence the review of the Applicant's proposal. We respectfully request that you place this Petition on your Board's September 19t1i Regular Agenda to commence the review process pursuant to Article XIII of the Town Zoning Code. The Applicant is proposing to amend the Town's B-R District regulations by creating a new "Mixed Business-FAH Residential" Use along Myrtle Boulevard ("Text Amendment"). The Text Amendment would permit the addition of no more than nine (9) new residential units along Myrtle Boulevard, of which at least one-third (1/3) must comply with the Town's Fair and Affordable Housing regulations. These units must be located on top of a ground floor commercial use. As set forth in detail in the Petition, the Applicant submits that the Petition would facilitate several important planning and housing policies recently adopted by your Board in connection with rezoning Myrtle Boulevard into the new B-R District. This includes encouraging "new development [that] has the opportunity to create a mixed-use environment including residential with moderately scaled buildings that enhance the character of the Town," as well as "expand opportunities for affordable housing within the community." (See Proposed B-R and Tel:(914)682-7800 81 Main Street,Suite 415 www.zarin-steinmetz.com Fax:(914)683-5490 White Plains,New York 10601 Supervisor Seligson and Members of the Town Board September 5,2017 Page 2 SB-R Zoning Text and Map Amendments Zoning Report ("Zoning Report"), May 31, 2012, at 1). Both goals would be accomplished by the Text Amendment by fostering a limited amount of mixed-use redevelopment along one of the Town's commercial corridors. In addition, the proposed nine (9)-unit limit on total density would allow such redevelopment without significantly increasing the demand on existing community resources, such as available parking spaces. The reason the Applicant is submitting a Petition to amend the B-R District regulations in this manner is because the current bulk and dimensional requirements of the B-R District do not permit the development of any new residential units along Myrtle Boulevard. This is primarily due to the 70% floor area ratio limit for buildings supporting "a combination of business and residential use[s]." (See Town Zoning Code § 240-45(C)). It is our understanding that all of the buildings along Myrtle Boulevard already exceed this 70% limit. In addition, the B-R District regulations require a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. Several of the lots included in the B-R District on Myrtle Boulevard with sufficient space to potentially add residential uses on top of a first-floor commercial use do not meet the 10,000-square foot minimum lot area requirement. Accordingly, the current language of the B-R District zoning does not facilitate the addition of any affordable housing units or other mixed-use residential development on Myrtle Boulevard. The Applicant's proposed Text Amendment would address these bulk and dimensional restrictions on new residential development along Myrtle Boulevard. Petitioner's proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Use" would increase the allowable floor area ratio to 250% for buildings along Myrtle Boulevard supporting a mix of business and multi-family uses, provided that, at least one-third (1/3) of the residential units built comply with the Town's FAH Regulations. The Proposed Text Amendment would also ease lot area regulations for the Mixed Business-FAH Use. Again, in order to protect against the proliferation of residential development on Myrtle Boulevard and prevent any undue strain on existing community resources, the Text Amendment contains language limiting the applicability of the Mixed Business-FAH Use such that no more than nine (9) residential units would be permitted to be developed under this proposed use. In the event that your Board adopts the Text Amendment, the Applicant would pursue a site development application to add nine (9) residential units on top of its existing commercial use at the Property, Gjoko Spa and Salon (the "Salon"). These units would be distributed among three (3) new floors on top of the Salon, and would provide at least three (3) Fair and Affordable Housing units for the community. As set forth in the Petition, the Applicant submits that this redevelopment would be accomplished in an appropriate manner, consistent with the surrounding neighborhood character. The zoning amendment review process, which entails referrals to the Town and County Planning Boards, as well as compliance with the New York State Environmental Quality Supervisor Seligson and Members of the Town Board September 5,2017 Page 3 Review Act ("SEQRA"), will afford the Town, its staff and its professionals the opportunity to evaluate whether the Text Amendment is consistent with the Town's planning goal to facilitate the development of mixed-uses and affordable housing along Myrtle Boulevard. We anticipate that the review of the Applicant's proposed residential development of the Property will also be incorporated into the "Action" evaluated under SEQRA in connection with this Petition. This will provide the Town Board and Planning Board to weigh the Applicant's proposal in relation to neighboring land uses, and identify measures to cushion any potential adverse effects upon the neighborhood, including limited parking resources. The Applicant and its Development Team look forward to commencing this review, and reviewing the annexed materials with your Board in September. In the meantime, please feel free to contact us with any questions. Respectfully submitted, ZA' I.• : EINMETZ By: .//� 147,. id Cooper Kate Roberts Enols. Cc (via electronic mail w/attachments): Stephen Altieri, Town Administrator William Maker, Esq., Town Attorney John H. Landi, Building Inspector Gjoko Shkreli Edmond A. Gemmola, R.A., A.I.A. JMC, Inc. TOWN OF MAMARONECK: BOARD OF TRUSTEES WESTCHESTER COUNTY: STATE OF NEW YORK x In the Application of: GJOKO SHKRELI/ 176 MYRTLE BLVD. : VERIFIED PETITION • For an Amendment to the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck Pursuant to Article XIII • of the Mamaroneck Zoning Code x Petitioner GJOKO SHRKELI ("Petitioner"), by his attorneys Zarin & Steinmetz, respectfully petitions the Town Board of Trustees ("Town Board") of the Town of Mamaroneck, New York("Mamaroneck") as follows: Summary of Petition 1. This is a Petition seeking an amendment to the Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance creating a"Mixed Business-FAH Residential"Use in the Myrtle Boulevard section of the Town's B-R District ("Text Amendment," a copy of which is annexed hereto as Exhibit "A"). The Text Amendment would permit the addition of no more than nine (9) new residential units to be developed along Myrtle Boulevard,of which at least one-third(1/3)must comply with the Town's Fair and Affordable Housing("FAH")regulations. 2. The proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Residential" Use would be consistent with the existing permitted uses in the B-R District along Myrtle Boulevard. As the Town Board will recall, Myrtle Boulevard was recently rezoned into the new B-R District. The Town Board included both commercial and multi-family housing, or a combination thereof, as principally permitted uses in the B-R District. (See Town Zoning Code § 240-30). 3. Prior to the rezoning, Myrtle Boulevard was located within the B District. The B District did not permit residential uses. The purpose of the B-R District rezoning was to encourage "new development [that] has the opportunity to create a mixed-use environment including residential with moderately scaled buildings that enhance the character of the Town." The Town Board also sought to "expand opportunities for affordable housing within the community." (See Proposed B-R and SB-R Zoning Text and Map Amendments Zoning Report ("Zoning Report"), May 31, 2012, at 1). 4. At the time, the Town Board's professional planning consultants, BFJ Planning ("BFJ"), determined that the addition of up to twenty(20) residential units would be appropriate in this area. (See Draft Generic Environmental Impact Statement Town of Mamaroneck Proposed B and SB Zoning Text and Map Amendments("DGEIS"), October 3, 2012, at 41). 5. Unfortunately, as currently written, the bulk and dimensional requirements of the B-R District do not permit the development of any new residential units along Myrtle Boulevard. This is primarily due to the 70%floor area ratio limit for buildings supporting"a combination of business and residential use[s]." (See Town Zoning Code § 240-45(C)). Upon information and belief, all of the buildings along Myrtle Boulevard already exceed this 70% limit. 6. The B-R District regulations also require a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. Several of the five(5) lots included in the B-R District on Myrtle Boulevard with sufficient space to potentially add residential uses no top of a first floor commercial use do not meet the 10,000- square foot minimum lot area requirement. 7. Accordingly,the current language of the B-R District zoning does not facilitate the addition of any affordable housing units on Myrtle Boulevard. 8. The proposed Text Amendment would address these bulk and dimensional restrictions on new residential development along Myrtle Boulevard, without significantly increasing the demand on existing community resources, such as available parking spaces. 2 Petitioner's proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Use" would increase the allowable floor area ratio to 250% for buildings along Myrtle Boulevard supporting a mix of business and multi-family uses, provided that, at least one-third (1/3) of the residential units built comply with the Town's FAH Regulations. 9. The Proposed Text Amendment would also ease lot area regulations for the Mixed Business-FAH Use. In order to protect against the proliferation of residential development on Myrtle Boulevard and prevent any undue strain on existing community resources, the Text Amendment contains language limiting the applicability of the Mixed Business-FAH Use such that no more than nine (9) residential units would be permitted to be developed under this proposed use. 10. Given the Town's previous planning analysis and adopted polices set forth above, Petitioner respectfully submits that adopting the Text Amendment would facilitate the Town's initiative to bring affordable housing units to a portion of the Town that the Town Board has already determined is suitable for such use. (See Business(B)and Service Business(SB)Zoning Text and Map Amendments SEQRA Findings Statement ("Findings Statement"), adopted May 8, 2013,at 6("The Master Plan identifies the properties located within the B district along Myrtle Blvd. . . .as `suitable for high density residential, office or commercial use or a combination of such uses.") see also DGEIS, at 1 ("The Town Board considers the best way to advance fair and affordable housing is to provide zoning regulations that will allow for such development.")). 11. Accordingly, adopting the Text Amendment would permit the Town to provide an identified community-wide benefit to its residents. 12. In the event that the Town adopts the Text Amendment, Petitioner would pursue a proposal to develop a Mixed Business-FAH Use building on its property along Myrtle Boulevard. 3 Petitioner is the owner of the one-story commercial building on the property located at 176 Myrtle Boulevard, identified on the Mamaroneck Tax Map as Block 33, Lot 642 ("Subject Property"). The existing one-story commercial building is occupied by Gjoko Spa & Salon (the "Salon"), also owned by Petitioner. Petitioner would develop a total of nine (9) residential units on three (3)floors above the Salon, consisting of six(6)market rate units and three (3)affordable housing units. (the"Project"). 13. The zoning amendment review process, which entails (a) filing this Petition with the Town Board, (b) referral to the Planning Board, (c) referral to the Westchester County Planning Department, (d) New York State Environmental Quality Review Act ("SEQRA") review,and (e)a public hearing, will afford the Town Board and Planning Board the opportunity to weigh the Project in relation to neighboring land uses and cushion any adverse effects by the imposition of conditions designed to mitigate them. 14. The review process will establish that the Subject Property is an appropriate location for the Project. The Subject Property is located in the Myrtle Boulevard B-R District, which was specifically identified by BFJ as "suitable for high density residential, office or commercial use or a combination of such uses." (See DGEIS at 42 (citing Master Plan at 20)). 15. For the reasons set forth below, therefore, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Town Board (a) accept this Petition, and commence the requisite environmental, planning and legislative review procedures to implement the Zoning Text Amendment annexed hereto as Exhibit"A,"and (b)permit the Planning Board to simultaneously review a Site Plan Application for the Project, authorizing the redevelopment of the Subject Property (collectively, these two actions are referred to as the"Action"). 4 The Petitioner 16. Petitioner has also operated a business in the Town of Mamaroneck along Myrtle Boulevard for thirty-two (32) years. 17. Petitioner has owned the Subject Property for twenty(20) years. 18. Petitioner has operated the Salon on the Project Site for eighteen (18) years. 19. As a long-time businessman operating business on Myrtle Boulevard in the Town, Petitioner realizes the lack of affordable housing available in Mamaroneck. In designing the Project, Petitioner made a conscious choice to address this void by incorporating several affordable housing units into his design plan. The Proposed Zoning Text Amendment 20. The proposed Text Amendment would amend Sections 240-30, 240-45, and 240- 78 of the Town Zoning Code. Section 24q-30 sets forth the permitted uses in the B-R District, 240-45 sets forth the bulk and dimensional requirements of the B-R District,and 240-78 sets forth the parking requirements. 21. The amendment to Section 240-30 would set forth a new permitted use in the B-R District, the "Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use." The intent of the Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use is to introduce transit-oriented housing, including FAH housing, along Myrtle Boulevard in the B-R District without overburdening existing municipal resources in the neighborhood. (See Exhibit"A"). 22. The Mixed Business-FAH Residential use would require that there be a commercial use on to the first floor, and multi-family residential use on the upper floors. The Text Amendment would also require that at least one-third (1/3) of the residential units comply with the Town's FAH regulations. 5 23. To ensure that the number of new residential units permitted would be limited,the Zoning Text Amendment would only authorize the development of nine (9) total units in a building with frontage on Myrtle Boulevard. This density is well below the number of units initially identifed by the Town when it created the B-R District. Again, the 9-unit limitation is intended to avoid impacting existing community resources in the Myrtle Boulevard neighborhood. 24. Only a limited number of properties in the Village could take advantage of this new use in the B-R District. The property must meet specific area and bulk requirements, including that: (i)the minimum allowable lot area is 5,000 square feet,with no minimum building coverage; (ii)the minimum side yard setback is zero(0)feet; (iii)the minimum front yard setback is fifteen (15)feet,except that the Planning Board may reduce or waive this requirement; (iv)the minimum rear yard setback is zero(0)feet for the first floor, and twenty(20)feet for all other floors; (v)the maximum FAR is 250% (the floor area of any FAH dwelling unit not counted); and (vi) the maximum height of four(4) stories and 44 feet. 25. With respect to parking, the Text Amendment to Section 240-78 requires one (1) space per 200 square feet of floor space for the first-floor commercial use,and zero(0) spaces for the multifamily dwellings on the upper floors, provided an applicant making a proposal for a Mixed Business-FAH Residential use can demonstrate that there are sufficient spaces to accommodate the required twelve(12) spaces within 500 feet of the property. The Proposed Development 26. In conjunction with the Zoning Text Amendment, Petitioner proposes to redevelop the existing one(1)-story building at the Subject Property into a four(4)-story,mixed-use building. The mixed-use building would consist of the Salon on the first story, with three (3) additional 6 residential stories measuring approximately 44 feet, comprised of nine (9) units. Six (6) of these units would be market rate, and three(3)of the units would be affordable housing units. 27. The Subject Property is in an ideal location to meet the Town's objective of fostering new residential and mixed use development in a location that "would not result in significant increases in vehicular traffic." (See DGEIS, at 66). Myrtle Boulevard is"well-served by public transit,including one or more bus routes,and...within walking distance to the Larchmont train station." (Id.). The Larchmont Train station provides access to a commuter rail service,with service running to Grand Central Station in Manhattan and points North to Connecticut.(Id. at 63). The Westchester County Bee Line Bus System also provides routes within both the Town and regionally, "including employment centers, shopping centers, [and] parks and recreation facilities."(Id.). 28. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "B" is a Preliminary Site Layout Plan illustrating the initial details of the Project,prepared by Petitioner's Architects/Planners,Gemmola& Associates. Attached as Exhibit"C" hereto are floor plans and front elevations illustrating the general layout and architecture of the Proposed Development,also prepared by Gemmola&Associates. As these documents demonstrate, the addition of three residential stories on top of the existing Salon can be accomplished in an appropriate manner, consistent with the building facades of adjacent properties along Myrtle Boulevard. 29. Petitioner has also included various elements to ensure that the addition of three(3) residential stories on top of the Salon would not significantly impact viewsheds from buildings located in the immediate vicinity of the Subject Property. This includes providing a 20-foot setback for the three (3) residential stories to preserve light and air accessibility to the adjacent 7 properties at the rear of the Subject Property. It also includes incorporating a landscaped partial "green"roof to soften the view of the building from the higher vantage points. 30. Annexed hereto as Exhibit "D" is a Parking Study, prepared by Petitioner's engineering consultant, JMC, which demonstrates that there is ample parking in the WS Resident Parking Permit Areal available to support and accommodate the parking demands for the Proposed Development. In addition, the Parking Study demonstrates that to the extent there would ever be an insufficient amount of available parking spaces in the WS Resident Parking Permit Area, there is ample additional parking available on streets outside of the WS Resident Parking Permit Area, as well as in the Municipal Permit Parking Lots 3, 4 and 5. The Zoning Text Amendment And Proposed Development Are Consistent With Mamaroneck's Planning And Development Goals 31. The Zoning Text Amendment and Petitioner's Proposed Development would foster several inter-related planning initiatives regarding mixed-use development and affordable housing identified by the Town Board in its creation of the B-R District. A. Fostering Mixed-Use Redevelopment Along Commercial Corridors, Such As Myrtle Boulevard 32. First, one of the Town's purposes in amending the B-R District was to encourage "new opportunities to revitalize the Town's existing commercial strips with a mix of commercial and residential uses with moderately scaled buildings that enhance the character of the Town." (See DGEIS, at 95). The Town identified that potential development resulting from the amendment would "have a significant beneficial impact upon the Town of Mamaroneck and Pursuant to Local Law No. 2-2015, residents who are located along Myrtle Boulevard are eligible for a"WS Resident Parking Permit,"which allows vehicles owned or leased by permitted residents to park on certain streets for a period of time longer than vehicles not having the permit. See Local Law Nos. 4- 2014 and 2-2015. 8 w[ould] promote the public policy of maintaining a diverse and vibrant population." (Findings Statement, at 14). The Project, which proposes a mixed-use redevelopment, would foster the Town's goal of"ensur[ing]that the Town offers a variety of locations for residential development, so that a variety of housing types [could] be built and that the Town can better encourage and support the construction of fair and affordable housing to a range of households, incomes, and ages." (DGEIS, at 95). 33. The Town Board recognized that in order to attract the contemplated mixed-use development to the B-R District "more generous" area and bulk standards would be required. (See id., at 5). The Town Board thus included in the B-R District various new bulk and dimensional requirement, such as increasing the allowable height for a building supporting a "residential use or a combination of business and residential use" from a two-story (30-foot) height limit for business uses,to a four-story(44-foot)height limit for mixed-use buildings. (See id, at 5; see also Findings Statement, at 2). 34. With respect to building height and mass, the Town Board found that allowing up to four (4) stories for residential uses in the B-R District would "lead to buildings that, from an urban design perspective, better frame...Myrtle Boulevard" by providing additional floors in buildings for housing. (See DGEIS, at 5). The Town Board also found that an increase in FAR would be necessary to promote mixed use development in the new BR District. In its attempt to provide an FAR that would promote such development, the Town Board increased the FAR to .70 for mixed use buildings in the B-R District,and kept the .50 FAR for strictly commercial uses. (DGEIS, at 18, 39). 35. The Town Board included the Subject Property, which is part of the Myrtle Boulevard area,in this new B-R District. Petitioner's proposed Project,therefore,presents a great 9 opportunity for the Town to provide the type of mixed-use redevelopment the Town sought to encourage when it initially created the B-R District Regulations. (See id., at 5). 36. Again, while in theory the "more generous" bulk and dimensional requirements included in the B-R District would allow buildings, such as the Subject Property, to incorporate housing by adding stories on top of existing first floor business, in practice the regulations fail to provide sufficient flexibility to additional stories. The floor area ratio, lot area and set back requirement do not permit any further development along the Myrtle Boulevard corridor. 37. Thus,by adopting Petitioner's proposed Text Amendment,the Town Board would be advancing its initiative to revitalize the Myrtle Boulevard corridor with mixed-use, transit- oriented development. B. Expanding Opportunities for Affordable Housing within the Town 38. Second,the Town Board created the B-R District in order to"expand opportunities for fair and affordable housing within the Town." (See DGEIS, at 1, 2, 9, 95). To meet this objective,the Town Board requires that all new residential developments in the B-R District must designate ten percent (10%) of such units as affordable housing units. (See Findings Statement, at 2). 39. The proposed Text Amendment directly supports this objective, as it requires at least one-third (1/3) of the nine (9) units built in the Myrtle Boulevard B-R District to comply with the FAH regulations. 40. The Proposed Development would provide three (3) new affordable housing units on the Subject Property, helping both the Town meet this goal. 10 C. Adopting the Text Amendment Would Facilitate These Planning Goals Without Significantly Increasing the Number of Residential Units on Myrtle Boulevard, or Taxing the Town's Existing Resources to Serve Residents Living In the Vicinity of Myrtle Boulevard 41. Petitioner is aware of the Town's duty to ensure that any mixed-use redevelopment does not result in the proliferation of residential units at a rate that would overburden existing resources in the Town, including public parking and schools. While the Town's planning consultants generally estimated that the Myrtle Boulevard neighborhood could accommodate up to twenty(20)residential units (see GEIS, at 41, Table 3.1-6), Petitioner understands that certain site-specific conditions dictate that new residential development in the Myrtle Boulevard neighborhood should be further limited. Primary among the reasons to limit the potential residential density permitted under any new zoning is the limited amount of available parking for residents in the neighborhood. 42. Accordingly, Petitioner proposes to include several provisions in the Text Amendment meant to limit the number of new residential units which could be developed under the Mixed Business-FAH Use. Specifically, the Text Amendment would be limited to only the Myrtle Boulevard BR-Zone, which is comprised of only five (5) properties. The proposed Text Amendment also limits the number of total units in this limited area to nine (9) units. 43. While these provisions in the Text Amendment would limit significantly the number of properties which could take advantage of the proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Use," it would not result in improper"spot zoning."The density and locational restrictions proposed by Petitioner address legitimate planning concerns regarding potential impacts on parking resources, as well as potential demands on other municipal resources such as limiting the number of school- aged children added to the population. 11 44. It is well-established that where, as here, a zoning amendment facilitates a Town's "well-considered"plan for future development, it does not constitute illegal "spot zoning." Hart v. Town Bd. of Town of Huntington, 114 A.D.3d 680, 980 N.Y.S.2d 128, 132 (2d Dep't 2014) (Town's determination to rezone subject property, which would provide a number of affordable units, "was in compliance with the overall policies outlined in the Master Plan, and [did] not constitute impermissible spot zoning"); Taylor v. Incorporated Village of Head of the Harbor, 104 A.D.2d 642, 644 (2d Dep't 1984) (where Town Board shows that the amendment is adopted in compliance with the municipality's Comprehensive Plan, and reflects the "total planning strategy for rational allocation of land use,reflecting consideration of the needs of the community as a whole" it is not considered spot zoning). 45. This is the case even where a zoning amendment applies to only a single property within a municipality. See, e.g., Stone v. Scarpato, 285 A.D.2d 467, 469 (2d Dep't 2001) (court upheld zoning change, stating that Board's action in rezoning was not spot zoning as it was in accord with the comprehensive plan for development of the community); Zeitler v. Village of Farmingdale, 8 A.D.2d 946, 190 N.Y.S.2d 486,488(2d Dep't 1959)("The fact that a single parcel was involved in [the rezoning] . . . does not mean that the [amendment] was not enacted in accordance with a comprehensive plan" or for a legitimate and defensible purpose); Boyles v. Town of Bethlehem, 278 A.D.2d 688, 718 N.Y.S.2d 430, 433 (3d Dep't 2000) (where the court observed that"the size of the parcel alone is not determinative"in a zoning amendment challenge based upon a claim of spot zoning). 46. It is thus well within the Town Board's broad legislative authority to undertake the Zoning Text Amendment. See Goodrich v. Town of Southampton, 39 N.Y.2d 1008, 387 12 N.Y.S.2d 242, 243 (1976) (noting the "strong presumption of validity which attaches to the legislative determinations"of a municipality when enacting zoning ordinances). SEQRA 47. Pursuant to SEQRA, Petitioner is submitting a Full Environmental Assessment Form ("EAF"), with an Attachment, prepared by JMC, dated June 13, 2017. The EAF and Attachment are annexed hereto as Exhibit"E". 48. Although Petitioner fully expects to develop a comprehensive assessment of the Action during the SEQRA process, the EAF outlines the anticipated areas of potential environmental concern, such as parking, visual impacts, and potential social and fiscal benefits for Mamaroneck. Supplemental studies as required by the Lead Agency will certainly be supplied.This information supplements the analysis of potential impacts associated with allowing mixed-use and affordable housing redevelopment on Myrtle Boulevard as set forth in the GEIS. 49. Again, while Petitioner expects to develop a more comprehensive assessment of the areas of environmental concern during the SEQRA process, the Applicant has retained JMC who has already conducted impact assessments specifically on parking and visual impacts. Both of these impact assessments are annexed hereto, as Exhibits"D"and"F", respectively. 50. There is ample parking to accommodate the parking demand for the Project. The Town's Zoning Code requires 1.25 parking spaces per each one bedroom apartment unit. See Town Zoning Code § 240-78(A). This results in twelve(12)required spaces for the Project. The Town Planning Board has the authority to reduce the required off-street parking requirement by 15% since the Property is located within a B-R district. See Town Zoning Code § 240-78(D). With this reduction, the Project would require only eleven(11) spaces. 13 51. Attached as Exhibit "D" hereto is a Parking Study conducted by JMC, which identifies available parking for the Project Site. JMC's Parking Study analyzes the parking availability in the Myrtle Boulevard neighborhood. JMC conducted parking space occupancy surveys from 8:00 AM to 9:00 PM on Monday, April 24, 2017, and Tuesday, April 25, 2017. JMC collected additional parking occupancy data on Wednesday,May 3, 2017 through Saturday, May 6, 2017 (collectively, the "Study Period"). The Study covered all on-street and public parking lots within 500-feet of the Project Site. 52. JMC concluded that, based upon the empirical data contained in the Parking Study, there is ample on-street parking available to accommodate the addition of up to nine (9) new residential units on Myrtle Boulevard. (See Exhibit D, at 4). We respectfully submit that the Parking Study establishes that adopting the Text Amendment,and permitting Petitioner to pursue the Project, would not result in any significant adverse impacts on area parking conditions. 53. Adopting the Text Amendment and approving the Project would also not result in any visual impacts, not already evaluated by the Town Board and previously determined as acceptable for this neighborhood in the GEIS. The Town Board anticipated and "intended [such amendment] to result in buildings that are slightly taller." (See Findings Statement, at 7). Therefore, a four-story building, such as the Project, was an anticipated result of the original adoption of the B-R District zoning. 54. Petitioner understands that the Town may still want to evaluate whether allowing up to three (3) additional stories to be built at the Subject Property will result in any significant adverse visual impacts caused by shadows cast on adjacent buildings. Attached as Exhibit "F" hereto are screenshots from computer simulated shadow study conducted by JMC,which projects the impact of shadows on the rear property ("Shadow Study"). 14 55. In the Shadow Study, JMC simulated shadow conditions for January and September, the two (2) months that would result in the longest shadow on the property to the rear of the Project Site. As established by the JMC Shadow Study,the Project will produce barely any new shadow patterns on adjacent buildings. The design, which sets the three(3)residential stories back from the first story, reduces significantly any potentially shadowing effect. Furthermore, it is important to note that the current view from the rear property is of railroad tracks and the highway. The redevelopment of the Subject Property, which would include a green roof and visually appealing terraces, would improve the existing character and overall aesthetics of the Subject Property. 56. Petitioner and its design team will present JMC's full shadow study to your Board and the public during the formal SEQRA review process. Requested Relief 57. In furtherance of this Action, Petitioner respectfully requests that the Town Board take the following administrative and legislative steps: (a) accept this Petition; (b) designate a Lead Agency to review the entire Action in a coordinated review pursuant to the SEQRA Regulations; (c) refer the Zoning Text Amendment to the Town of Mamaroneck Planning Board and the Westchester County Department of Planning for review and recommendations pursuant to Article XIII of the Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance; (d) schedule, notice and conduct a public hearing on the Action as soon as possible; (e) adopt the Zoning Text Amendment; and (0 permit the Mamaroneck Planning Board to review a Site Plan Application for the Project, authorizing the redevelopment of the Subject Property. 15 WHEREFORE, it is respectfully requested that the instant matter be placed on the next available agenda of the Town Board and be, in all respects, granted. Dated: September 5, 2017 White Plains,New York ZA' i► : STEINMETZ By: D J. Cs'per, Esq. Kate Roberts, Esq. Attorneys for the Petitioner 81 Main Street, Suite 415 White Plains,NY 10601 (914) 682-7800 16 VERIFICATION STATE OF NEW YORK ) s.s.: COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER ) GJOKO SHKRELI, hereby deposes and says that he is the Petitioner in this proceeding, and says that the foregoing Petition is true to his own knowledge, except as to those matters therein stated to be alleged on information and belief and as to those matters he believes them to be true. Gjo Shkreli Sworn to before me this I S th day June,2017 /jr Notary Public KATE ROBERTS Notary Public,State of New York No.02806347122 Qualified in New York County Commission Expires September 6,2020 1'7 Exhibit A DRAFT 6.15.17 PROPOSED ZONING TEXT AMENDMENTS Article V of the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Code regulating Permitted Uses in the Business and Industrial Districts shall be amended as follows: Add a new Subsection"(9)"to Section 240-30(A)(Principal Uses in the B-R District): § 240-30 A. Principal uses. (9) Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use (a) Intent. The intent the Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use is to encourage the introduction of transit-oriented housing, including Fair and Affordable Housing units, along Myrtle Boulevard in the B-R District without overburdening existing municipal resources in the neighborhood, such as public parking. Based upon the evaluation of various planning analyses prepared and/or confirmed by the Village's planning experts,the Town Board has determined that the introduction of up to nine (9)new dwelling units along Myrtle Boulevard will achieve the appropriate balance between the Town's desire to encourage opportunities for new housing on Myrtle Boulevard while not overburdening existing resources in the neighborhood. The Town Board, therefore, desires to permit the introduction of no more than nine (9) dwelling units along Myrtle Boulevard under this use. (b) Permitted uses. A combination of commercial uses on the ground level (including subgrade space), with multifamily dwellings on the upper levels, provided that, at least one-third (1/3) of all multifamily dwelling units on such upper levels comply with the Town's Fair and Affordable Housing regulations contained in Section 240- 28 of this Chapter. (c) Siting Requirement. A site eligible for this use shall have frontage along Myrtle Boulevard within the Town's B-R District. (d) Maximum Permitted Residential Units. No more than a total of nine (9) dwelling units shall be permitted on Myrtle Boulevard under this use. DRAFT 6.15.17 Article VII of the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Code regulating Bulk and Dimensional Requirements shall be amended as follows: Add the following new Subsections to Section 245-45 (B-R District): A. Lot Requirements (2) Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use (a) Minimum lot area: 5,000 square feet. (b) Maximum building coverage: none. B. Minimum Yards (3) Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use (a) Front Yard: 15 feet. In the case of a property fronting Myrtle Boulevard, the Planning Board is authorized the reduce or waive the minimum fifteen-foot front yard requirement, provided that the reduction or waiver of the front yard requirement is for the purpose of maintaining conformity with the front yard setback or "built-to" line of other buildings in close proximity. (b) Side yards.None. (c) Rear yard. None on the first story.All other stories shall be set back at least 20 feet. C. Maximum floor area(as percentage of the lot area) (3) Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use: 250%. In calculating compliance with this requirement,the floor area of any dwelling unit that will comply with the Town's Fair and Affordable Housing regulations contained in Section 240-28 of this Chapter shall not be counted towards the 250%maximum. D. Maximum heights. (3) Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use. (a) In stories: four. (b) In feet: 44. DRAFT 6.15.17 Article X1 ofthe Town of Mamaroneck Zoning code regulating Off-Street Parking and Loading shall be amended as follows: Add the following new use and regulation to 245-78 (Off-street parking requirements): Mixed Business-FAH Use: For first floor commercial use: I space per 200 square feet of floor space For multifamily dwellings on upper floors: same as multifamily dwellings listed above Notwithstanding the above, the required off-street parking facilities and structures required hereunder for a Mixed Business-FAH Use may be satisfied by utilizing a combination of on- street spaces within 500 feet of the subject property and spaces in public parking lots within 500 feet of the subject property, provided that for all spaces required to satisfy the multifamily dwelling parking requirement the property owner can demonstrate to the satisfaction of the Planning Board that said parking spaces are available to the residents of the multifamily dwellings on the subject property 24 hours a day, 7 days a week. Exhibit B ' ~ it k"g1;t aI2N2RONA yn N_mm) 4Q=ZJ, t QAriOn P 1 / I t 4 � _ah � i :4 ' 1 E i 1 co s CD _. .sae. O B6 . i r _ ! 1 t1 ✓J V ij k I 5' o I- 0 b r D Z proposed osed plot plan 1 _ _ rgvoeeo alt tion adeum for: as oma .. �.•_... c joko shkrelfrv;aw.,„o t o 3e -� IIYvrtle Blvd.Lar Ivw.t,NY i053e avvd v.. a OP id amu,Ivulbi.neW tI_ ( rw�r ri %: .•.w.», -7,--.7.77-:'-.LE-7....—.7::--•. �_.�.._ } .y gemmola f assoatles4%r5?. ./«cog, _ I...I W I W P.a. 3 .? - •.).,--..,p. ' '---- ---1- iiiIiiiii 1,1,ii : ,_ ,', 2 •-•''‘ — ''''' lin / l's : Pti:14 iNi .'L , , illillirl 1 0,:,Idtvilii A Lritipi i I ,t.,-WiLlidttfli"i SPF,,AL NOTES , .., r,./ N 1 i ---f"--,--,, N"' 1 ,_...2 -„, \ Il - .- _ _ YA D OLLKHEAO ill itY i ii tf , ialimH tat A OP BUYNEAL ‘-rs--- (BEYOND) i a„ , ../..--- __ 1 , `,.• -_-_ z - -- - li ' 7- 1._ J. 1.- ' ''...rt ''''' , Y-•--•-- I ,-•• .,,, .. ilia 11M0 ,_ - , , WO NW 1 litt I int Va, WPM. t ,11:41 t17: iff: i k gin , ENE Min MEE UM I IME ... most, I ---'-- NMI MIX SIMI in III J , -- -- I b• ,7Ze-— '''' r..,-.---.-= i ,I, , 7- '---owr rat" ---• I 1E i 1 -I 1 NW 111111 Mi. II e iii ilia ...Ma 1 1 I ... .. 6 ' 1.11. SEE BER 1111 EN OEM SI ' sus ex Of. hill 741 PI • 1 MR II an . !.c.1 q •-.,— ' .' . '.. i 1 I .'.'' t t• COM MO -14 411c:111 E .4° rims ,g 1 rill 0 ,, a I i , ENE ION On • ipi.., MIN ,/7 j •.,:, RIM NW 1 Lg. ...., 17, lr , i 7 • / L__ nom (_,=1,,,, 1,,, ,'"' :.----.......,...._ • d -, E-..g 0; .,_,, a '--\i k-- ---, DI )--------,T7--- - c I-11-I ,_. - ,.. -1, 1-127:i- PROPOSED t.ciii - . 1 t z : ---,-7-7------,4= , ,. 4:,.." , v ...., .,. ', — • — . .1 S': '0'-' E o kr El nen WA fl.,,IV MYRTLE BLVD. PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION SCALE I/4..1.-0' d STORY THE COUGHLIN GROUP INSURANCE GJOKO SPA 8 SALON EXI5TING APARTMENT BUILDING PROPOSED EAST ELEVATION S LE- IM' - I'—O' 11 IP 3o A-2.2 4 IT -1 Exhibit C 11.111Mill iF ;r! 'W 50.00' 19 22 �j 25 r OMM BILDC. PARKM LOT REMOOK PARKM LOT 9901 T — -------------- EXISTING BASEMENT/FDN. PLAN Sc.LE- 18' - "-I' ---------- A! -. � ������� / � Y �{ /� � @LOLN4i.aov � LSS1�Slr PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 115- - 1 -0- Iry SECOND THIRD t FOURTH FLOOR PLANS SCALE: l�- "-O' A -I 4 STORY K M. 22' W' E. 50.00' 19 22 �j 25 OMM BILDC. PARKM LOT REMOOK PARKM LOT 9901 N. 390'..F 70 lom • MYRTLE BLVD. PROPOSED PLOT PLAN tNEQ ,."Tj— TA - T. MEVOY, LAND SURVEYOR 12 ---------- A! -. � ������� / � Y �{ /� � @LOLN4i.aov � LSS1�Slr PROPOSED FIRST FLOOR PLAN SCALE 115- - 1 -0- Iry SECOND THIRD t FOURTH FLOOR PLANS SCALE: l�- "-O' A -I 4 STORY O PROPOSED NORTH ELEVATION O PROPOSED SOUTH ELEVATION OPROPOSED EAST ELEVATION 3 xa�E pro• . 1._0. ®PROPOSED NEST ELEVATION S LE< 118'. 1--O• A-2 4 5TORT n rmm �l Jillie, I� ou y .`i; }� •SPECIAL NOTES . un i 733i" Eiesc aFzz; a A-2 4 5TORT 11',-11 i 1 1;11ilil 1 1,1 Pliii !!ii 1 ..– ' ''''''" — /5•1 t 1!lit;11 1.411 I ii iiii 10 hi!.I ‘ vo, ..., _. 4TH FLOOR CLC T.z4 Al. t $ ,ow•0%.co,/•ote 0 C I /IV•WV ort••ite o c ii 1111111ln i I Pi Jai iiii;IP-i F.OPOSIT SOW'IA1 W/TF", kl i - 1 , 1,11 ..t, FIN 4TM s5OOR 11 NI 0 0114•0 10-P.(01 1.01 f ,e,.....m..._,,.. ,..., I- ._...,x.c.so.2:::......5.ext.oz I ..,....::: A ;,e -4 i 104 4, ..SRD f I DOR St -1 i I 5 T 1 '51 . i 1 ::1 IMM= illia sco••••••,,,,-,..A.,n, I IT"."'"; I t; 1 - I I i Pe, : ii! i ,..,',::.• 4 4 /ND FI ON T- i .1 0101•10 OS NA ANST I _ in,STIR 1116.OL MDR DIV MI SIM•111,MC.RCM IDIST 8 20.01+4•.1 0 C nine nem- '11-- - 173 EXIST 10!fi,3 -. I $ 151-FlOORCLC .;"-- ----\__I43rriilkylIBIP ' ; IIIIIIIiiir 14-111111167. 11011 , 111k111111Pf iiiii I 1 L • ' ' ' if .1 EXISTING RETAIL SPACE 1 I TN 1ST r,o0P 1 I C Z;1 t LI O ..._ EIT CF-'D 5J a' 11! Niiii iL- 11. , __ LXIS'Nu) EXISTING BASEMENT _ 1 01 !A ' G RO 1 5_ .1-- ,-- ------------- -- ---------------------- PROPOSED PRELIMINARY CROSS SECTION SCALE I/4. •,'-c. to 5Z. 13E, ta -0 ti21 0] ,,,,:„t ig t El i 1k ........ A__3 4 ST(12' Exhibit D 100%Recycled 30%PCW PARKING STUDY PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 176 MYRTLE BOULEVARD TOWN OF MAMARONECK, NEW YORK Prepared for: GLSN Realty Corp. 4 Fairgreen Court Cortlandt Manor, NY 10567 Prepared by: 120 Bedford Road Armonk, NY 10504 JMC Project 17013 Date: June 13, 2017 F:\2017\17013\Parking Study 06-13-2017.docx JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture & Land Surveying. PLLC JMC Site Development Consultants. LLC 120 BEDFORD ROAD ARMONK. NY 10504 914.273.5225 MAIL@1MCPLLC.COM JMCPLLC.COM TABLE OF CONTENTS SECTION DESCRIPTION PAGE I. INTRODUCTION I II. PARKING STUDY I III. FINDINGS & CONCLUSION 4 INTRODUCTION This Parking Study has been prepared to assess existing and potential future conditions in association with the proposed Residential Development located at 176 Myrtle Boulevard in the Town of Mamaroneck, NY. The location of the site is illustrated on Figure PSA-1. The property is currently occupied by a one-story building with a basement which is operated as a spa and salon. Since the existing property does not provide off-street parking, it holds permits for employee parking within existing nearby municipal permit parking lots. Patrons of the existing building utilize the existing metered parking spaces on the nearby streets. The proposed project entails the construction of three additional stories on top of the existing single story spa and salon use. The addition proposes to provide 3 one-bedroom apartments per floor for a total of 9 apartments. 11. PARKING STUDY Per the Town's Zoning Code, the apartment units require 1.25 parking spaces per each one bedroom unit which results in 12 required parking spaces. The Town Planning Board has the authority to reduce the required off-street parking by 15% since the property is located within a B-R district. With this reduction, the project would require I I parking spaces. Due to the close proximity of the train station and existing bus stops, residents of the proposed apartments can easily walk to public transportation stops to travel to work or other locations. Additionally, the Town adopted Local Law No. 4-2014 which states that residents located along Washington Square, New Jefferson Street, the section of North Chatsworth Avenue between Myrtle Boulevard and 35 & 40 North Chatsworth Avenue, and the section of Murray Avenue between Myrtle Boulevard and Leafy Lane are eligible for a "WS Resident Parking Permit". A "WS Resident Parking Permit" is a permit that is issued by the Town of Mamaroneck for a motor vehicle owned or leased by a resident in the above mentioned area that allows that vehicle to be parked on streets mentioned above for a period of time longer than motor vehicles not having 1 such a permit. The law was amended by Local Law No. 2-2015 which states that residents who are located along Myrtle Boulevard are also eligible for a "WS Resident Parking Permit". It should be noted that the law does not include parking along Myrtle Boulevard. There is no time restriction for the on-street parking duration with the "WS Resident Parking Permit". Our office evaluated on-street parking availability within 500 feet of the site to determine if there are surplus spaces which might be utilized for the proposed development. The survey area within an approximate 500 foot walking distance is shown on Figure PSA-I, "Parking Study Area." The figure also depicts permitted on-street parking locations and designated municipal parking lots. Parking occupancy was surveyed from 8:00 AM to 9:00PM on Monday, April 24, 2017 and Tuesday, April 25, 2017. Additionally, the parking occupancy survey was conducted on Wednesday, May 3, 2017 thru Saturday, May 6, 2017 from 8:00AM to 9:00 PM. The parking occupancy survey was conducted in hourly intervals during the survey time periods. The survey data has been provided in Tables P-I thru P-6 which also notes the on-street and municipal lot parking regulations. The parking survey quantifies the parking utilization associated with existing uses in the nearby area. Based on discussions with the Town Clerk's office, there are no permits available for Municipal Lots#3 and 5. Only one permit has been obtained for Municipal Lot#4 leaving 30 permits available for Lot#4. As indicated on Table P-I, vacant spaces available for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 7 to 36 spaces on Monday. Total vacant on-street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 21 to 77 spaces on Monday. Additionally, there are vacancies in the municipal lots. Municipal Lot#3 vacant spaces ranged from 36 to 56 spaces while Municipal Lot#4 vacancies ranged from 21 to 31 spaces during the permitted hours. As shown on Table P-2, vacant spaces for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 9 to 30 spaces on Tuesday. Total vacant on-street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 39 to 57 spaces on Tuesday. Municipal Lot#3 vacant spaces ranged from 33 to 50 spaces while Municipal Lot#4 vacancies ranged from 20 to 31 spaces during the permitted hours. As depicted on Table P-3, vacant spaces available for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 15 to 32 spaces on Wednesday. Total vacant on-street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 41 to 60 spaces on Wednesday. Municipal Lot #3 vacant spaces ranged from 37 to 5 I spaces while Municipal Lot#4 vacancies ranged from 16 to 24 spaces during the permitted hours. Table P-4 indicates that the vacant spaces available for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 12 to 32 spaces on Thursday. Total vacant on- street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 37 to 59 spaces on Thursday. Vacancies in Municipal Lot#3 ranged from 30 to 51 spaces while vacant spaces in Municipal Lot#4 ranged from 21 to 31 spaces during permitted hours. On Friday, vacant spaces for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 9 to 27 spaces on Friday as shown on Table P-5. Total vacant on-street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 33 to 61 spaces on Friday. Municipal Lot#3 vacant spaces ranged from 32 to 60 spaces while Municipal Lot#4 vacancies ranged from 19 to 31 spaces during the permitted hours. As shown in Table P-6, vacant spaces for a WS Resident Parking Permit holder within its designated parking area ranged from 4 to 32 spaces on Saturday. Total vacant on-street parking spaces within the study area ranged from 29 to 58 spaces on Saturday. In Municipal Lot#3, vacant spaces ranged from 45 to 59 spaces. The vacant spaces available to a Municipal Lot#4 permit holder ranged from 14 to 3 I. On Saturday, a Municipal Lot#4 permit holder can park in Lot#4 all hours on Saturday. It appears there may have been vehicles illegally parked in the lot during the day on Saturday since only one permit has been obtained for Lot#4. 3 III. FINDINGS & CONCLUSION Based on our review of the tables, it is our recommendation that the applicant obtain 12 WS Resident Parking Permits, the required number of parking spaces for proposed redevelopment. There is sufficient available parking within the WS Resident Parking Permit area for the majority of the time. The only times were available parking dips below 12 is generally on Monday evening between 7 and 9 PM, Tuesday morning between 9 and 10 AM, Friday morning between 9 and 10 AM, Friday evening between 7 and 9 PM, Saturday morning between 8 and 9 AM, and on Saturday evening at 9 PM'. During these times, there is ample on-street parking spaces available outside the WS Resident Parking permit area on Madison Avenue and Myrtle Boulevard (which allows on-street parking three hours at a time between the hours of 8 AM and 6 PM from Monday to Saturday) to accommodate the parking demand for the proposed residential development. There is also available parking within Municipal Lots #3 & 5 with a parking permit as well as within Municipal Lot#4 with a permit between the hours of 6 PM and 8 AM on weekdays and all times on the weekends. If residents stay home from work for some reason, they can leave their vehicle parked on-street in the designated WS Resident Parking Permit Area during the day. Many residents are not expected to require parking spaces during the weekday midday hours since they will likely drive their cars to their work, except those that work locally or commute via the train. It is our professional opinion that the utilization of the WS Resident Parking Permits and the available on-street parking spaces will provide ample parking to accommodate the parking demand for the proposed residential development, as well as the current uses within the adjacent area. On Monday,there were 10 vacant parking spaces at 7 PM, 7 vacant parking spaces at 8 PM,and 9 vacant spaces at 9 PM in the WS Resident parking area. On Tuesday,there were 9 vacant parking spaces at 9 AM and there were I 1 vacant parking spaces at 10 AM in the WS Resident parking area. On Friday, there were 9 vacant parking spaces at 9 AM, 10 vacant parking spaces at 10 AM, 11 vacant spaces at 7 PM,and 10 vacant parking spaces at 9 PM in the WS Resident parking area. On Saturday,there were 9 vacant parking spaces at 8 AM,4 vacant spaces at 9 AM and there were 11 vacant parking spaces at 9 PM in the WS Resident parking area. 4 -':'•••••-• . •. I ''-_...." • — at, , . 'I',•• 4, - . • I . . • A 1 4, i#:, - • .-, :',.. ... , .. , . . .., _. . .. ., ..„, s,• ,, 4- - ,,i,,,,. .., ...t., .,:,-- :7„. _..-- „ . .,, ,, 4,4 . - ..,'• Nii, `,.4., - ' .* •1:.• ,,,• ,, ;1;'•', :,,. 4'. . . .. . " • ,,-:- • - '-§Y,,,; • ' -,N- '!._ .$'''' .''''.*4`, ':.2 •-fi. I -,,.. . al, .•. 1 , . , - . '• ,,a,**.11 - - '• „,, • iiil ! t .,,,,.......-...... ..•-,"..:...,.„.,... '•liF % . '• •••( ••4, r...• .. , •-- . . i„ - • - :. g t , , i , ,. a I _....„ • • • ,,, •21...,„ , _. .. i '.,..--,- .-,_ - ------ • i • _ •: - - '- -. • • '44‘...."'-'--- -... ' . - -. ''.• , '''! ,.3';' • : ••, i,. '.....--. - - •-'•:14, '''•'4 )•••:Z'`':1.'.0! . ' tk, de • .'".'4•;.:' ..' • •"- - ...- „,g. . ,ttb..., .4 • . ' 's,-.0 -. s'.. ' , 47• , , . ' .-*•% . • / ' ' . ..„., - .,,,,„ .,„, At,i..,..• ,:„., / ... ..., ',11,•A% ,•• . : 1,44 - a Ak 1 • • 74'si, ,, • , . • i,... • --, . . '• ''44-1•... .-... ,..'4. s /N-''' . ..., ...1.. -,4 . • .ise ./e . ..- .*-ki;s , ' ' s si • ..,.. ... y, 46 me 4 , 7-./ ..,-- . ',.,..%.,.. • -`','.. ,'1,' i . . i V* 2' -//'* .1. i s. '• ' - 4 $ --,..,,..4„ ,,,,, 4 , . '!".N.,:,-. , ),...;.. ' • .4. v .4- .. ›..,-,.. / •• •, *It l' '” . .• . • _ , ._ ,• ,. • A ./••. i Ai, , • -.,4 -. • Ili: i,e,,..... .--,,-.,,,i, , .,,, i• / . . . / , , - / . 4. .. '• , . 'w ir , .1 ' r \ . .,, , ' . ,,,,, , .1,• ...._ .eir , ,,,..- . 4.c. •- •- i ' 4N,. • 64, _, -.-4 •• , , Q c i•-N'% I iiiir '.' -. i _.,...,: - *--.... , - . -•,,,,,, \ • '''- '''''•-•>. '4t#410 ri N . .. ,.‘ ..„., • Z .-, ,,e— ,..s. , N •,, '- /•• .• i '• •.•:',''. " ' ;1.1 • . . "•,.1 • '' '• .41•• ,OS47 .' • '' .4'. ' . . ."., ' N • ...: . ,,,,. , . ., . -. k•- : . . trif... .. . 4,,, .. . . • .0, 4.- , - • i... • ,'t .4. ,,,.,„ . ., , • :.1.. . •,. •...,. . , ,. .... , -, 4, , - - - 7 - - / - ' .1 0• 1. ... */-• . ' _ . . r• .t ' • 4. 16"r • 0 • ". 4/ •'• \ -I 416• • , -, ,. .. - :r-1- '''- -. '• ii 44,e * 4. '• ..---t.. . . •- ' '• ‘'' °*,,t ' 14-: ,' 44 ' . I '•, • .f.". - , A -,,- ,- • , N -',. ,,...., ,,,,:1/4-:,....1„.,• ,,, . ., •,,,, j •,, . , • It. k • --•,-. : 4•.r.- ," --14'•" ' Ike 4c ''• . * 'A., **-..' , ' ',- ''-4 '- ' -. a•m . ,e• :' Jf- . ..- ' ',''1 # ' 14...,.i - . ,..''..,,, ,:'•. ;-4r,- . ,' .. J ` 401. 0.f, ..., . / .•-f ..,.. ”,. , : ••,;•..' • f :. . . ,.. ' ,'* .0.•• , ',., ... - • . %• • - .,./ '''4-" 'C' •; Ng,'•-. , •,-,...,„ ?l-. — • :. '4, i. • • .s• i i..:•:1(1‘t ,„ • f... e, • . . '/ IT : i/1"'• ' ,,•, , S . r go 4,, . , • 4. ....,.. . , (4,4'l*.'.. ..t:: - I N. 1•. *N• , • . 1 •• . - , ...i.. • ...,:.‘,...',1-44e 14/1,44.',404, ,. , - ' : f.I , ... , -<•,,e7,. • 4 .s4,.. •••• ' . I 1-'4 .• \ .,, 4. 1. -...- .„. , 1 'Ns.< • -- n 4 ' i 2".-.2'4''• '' ', ' 1.41• 14e* • • -, / ,* ! .. zs*".,‘,.,'e....1'7",s. , . 440,-.,.:' I ' ,.:: ..:144%;1/4; , •*. A1,4 4.1,* .•, . - - 1. • \s'. 4. ''....../A . ' , .. , ...-!-- .. Iiii * ' . ..,' ...•• if,. !Pei•-•." A.. . ., les- -4111 - s,.. . .. 4,,. . . . 'as. • 1 - , • v.: .., , ny ..• 1, _...._ PROPOSED RESIDENTIAL DEVELOPMENT 1/0711011- 1,1My11T11.11,EJLEVA1:1, IG,1,•::1 MAMARONE:10,NEW IC/11 0 AY Moe PARKING STUDY AREA • (911)2115775 , R 2712102 DATE @2/21.:17 JMCP123ACT 5013 1111.1,1.LC COM FIGURE PSA-7 SCALE I =120' COPYRIGHT 45 2017 by JMC 4 Pqm FemenAl!se,eari si Ns slermen mess tee rem..mum/,ses A rel ems,se mmee,d e,eAs hem a m mems dmmes m ma,•4 eme',sem.esses e ,,.ss.sic,.. ., .. k-A...r 4AX Plwom, 17015 PARK/NC-AI-PM/rimy', PARE/Il.,e22. JABLE P-I MONDAY PARKING UTILIZATION Vacant Parking Spaces PArkh,g Area Supply 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10200 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 900 PM Madison Avenuex 8 5 B 5 6 7 7 7 6 5 5 3 2 2 (North Side of Roadway) _ , Madison Avenue I 11 4 7 10 7 9 10 11 9 9 7 I 0 I I (South Side of Roadway) , Myrtle Bouelvard 14 II IIla 14 14 13 9 12 (East Side of Roadwa)) Myrtle Boulvnrd 13 8 8 g 8 10 13 13 9 10 10 8 5 3 6 (West Side of Roedwarl — Washmgton Square''" ' I, I 0 I 4 1 I I 1 0 0 I 0 0 0 (West Side of Road War? _ Washington Square • 2 4 5 3 5 4 2 2 3 2 1 Moot Side of Roadway) , 2 North Chatsworth Avenue a" 2 2 1 4 I 1 0 0 0 I I I I (North Side of Roadway) , North Chatsworth Avenue n`' I S 3 4 6 7 6 3 3 3 3 0 3 (South Side of Roadhri New Jefferson Sheet 24 0 d 7 5 11 13 i 3 10 10 9 5 4 t (West Side of(toadrr'x� _ — - New Jefferson Street ' 24 v 4 0 6 13 12 10 E 5 4 4 I I 1) (East Side of Roadr vI _ Mrrmal+ul/,ar 03l' 113 36 41 46 40 45 44 5I 56 49 43 46 42 41 40 (Perm)Loo Mumn/n!Lal 04''' 3/ 21 20 21 19 IS 22 22 26 25 25 26 23 30 31 (I'rtmll Loll Aluninryrl Iwo x5`D6 4 J 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 , Oren)fru) 2 s Total Vacant within Municipal Lots 1.55 61 65 71 68 63 71 77 85 77 76 75 72 73 73 Total 1'acnnt On-Street Parking" 163 66 50 50 62 6E 76 77 68 57 55 4 30 21 30 Total Vacant within WS Resident Parking 112i 117 25 19 13 26 34 36 33 27 20 19 21 10 7 9 Permit Area Notes. (I I JMC performed a parking utilization survey on Monday,April 24,2017. (21 The parking meter regulations are enforced from 8:00 AM to 600 PM front Monday to Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue. 131 The west side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11.00 AM on the first nronday of each month.Parking is pemriaed for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9 IXl AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3.00 AM and 600 AM. (4)The east side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11 00 AM on the second nronday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 200 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is alarm permitted between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6.00 AM. 151 The north side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9 00 AM and 11.00 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 400 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3.00 AM and 600 AM (61 The south side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and I I'W AM on the second thursday of each month Parking is permitted fore maxmnmm of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3.00 AM and 6.00 AM (7)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9 00 AM and 1100 AM on the first tuesday of ex cry month Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 400 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking benveet the hours of 9.00 AM and I I.00 AM on the second tuesday of every month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from to between the hours of 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders (9)The Municipal Lot 03 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only (10)The Municipal Lot 64 is permitted for daytime use from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8100 AM and 6.00 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(178 Myrtle Blvd).All other times including from Monday to Friday between the hours of 6 00 PM and 8 00 AM as well as all times stir Saturday&Sunday.a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot (I 1)The Municipal Lot 05 is for permit parking only. (12)Parking data for the Municipal Lots 3.4,5 is not included. (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area F:\2017\17013\TRAFFI017013-parking-Ut)tIaation_2017.04.alsa\MON.lab TABLE P-2 TUESDAY PARKING UTILIZATION Parking Area Supply Vacant Parking Spaces 8:00 A M 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM Madison Avenue 8 I l 1 4 6 8 7 5 6 4 8 2 0 2 (North Side of Roadway) - _ _ Madison Avenue II ID 6 4 3 7 9 8 0 10 7 3 2 4 6 (South Side of Roadway) - _ Myrtle Bouelvnrd 14 II 13 14 13 10 8 7 10 14 12 Iii 10 13 13 (East Side of Roadway) Myrtle Berulvard 13 II 11 9 6 4 5 5 4 3 2 5 6 8 6 (West Side of Roadwa q Washington Squarer ' 16 0 0 0 1 0 0 I I 0 0 3 0 4 (West Side of Roads[ml Washington Square 21 I 1 1 2 3 3 3 3 4 2 2 2 2 2 (East Side of RoadwayL • - North Chatsworth Avenue °i � 15 G 0 0 I 2 2 I 0 2 0 I 1 0 0 (North Side of Roadwavh North Chatsworth Avenue 'l 17 t 5 7 9 6 7 I I 11 7 g 9 3 3 4 (South Side of RoadrN New Jefferson Street 24 s 0 1 4 6 c 9 10 5 7 9 10 10 9 (West Side of Roadso 1 New Jefferson Street' • 24 4 0 2 1 3 S 6 3 2 I 2 5 3 2 (fast Side of Roadway) _ Municipal 1,8 83' 118 45 38 40 46 40 40 36 35 40 43 46 49 50 33 //'ennil Lou A4umcil.al Lot aJ'' 31 31 28 26 26 26 27 25 19 18 21 20 24 24 23 !Permit 1481 Mumnlxrl Lot 45"' 6 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 J 3 4 !Pwanit Intl _ _ Total Vacant within Municipal Lots 155 00 69 69 75 69 70 64 57 61 67 68 77 77 60 Total Vacant On-Street Parking ia' 163 55 40 39 43 48 52 _ 57 56 53 45 SI 44 43 48 I Total Vacant within WS Resident Parking 117 I) 9 11 17 21 22 30 28 20 20 23 24 IS 21 Permit Area ' Notes- (I)JMC performed a perking utilization survey on Tuesday.April 25.2017. (2)The parking meter regulations are enforced from 8:00 AM to 6:00 PM from Monday to Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue. (3)The west side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11:W AM on the first mondav of each month Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3'.00 AM and 6130 AM (4)The east side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM on the second monday of each month Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Pernm holders. Parking us also permitted between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6 00 AM. (5)The north side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 1100:00 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours front Monday to Friday between the hours of 9110 AM and 2 00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3 00 AM and 600 AM (6)The south side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11•00 AM on the second thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 200 PM escludnrg holidays and except for W'S Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3.00 AM and 000 AM (7)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11:00 AM on the first tuesday of every month.Parking Is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2:00 P151 excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 1100 AM on the second tuesday of every month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from to between the hours of 4.00 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders (9)The Municipal Lot M3 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only. (t 0)The Municipal Lot 84 Is permitted for deyGme use front Monday to Friday between the hours of 8'.00 AM and 6.00 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(178 Myrtle Blvd).All other tunes including front Monday to Friday between the hours of 6:00 PM and 8:00 AM as well as all times on Saturday 3 Sunday.a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot. (11)The Mumctpai Lot M5 is for permit parking only. (12)Parking data for the Municipal Lots 3.4.5 is not included (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area F:\2017\170a3\TRAFFIC\17013-Parking-Utiliealton 1017-04.0ka\TU(S.tab TABLE P-3 WEDNESDAY PARKING 1_TILIZA TION Parking Area Supply Vacant Parking Spaces 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM,11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM_3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM Madison Avenue S S 3 2 S A 7 5 5 S 6 5 6 5 (North Side of Roadway) Madison Avenue 11 11 9 2 0 7 9 8 10 6 6 4 5 1 3 (South Side of Roadway) , Myrtle Bouelvard 14 (2 I0 10 (0 P A 8 9 14 I 1 10 14 8 R (East Side of Roadway) - Myrtle Boulvard (3 13 12 5 6 10 7 5 43 } 4 8 9 IO (West Side of Roadwa) _ , Washington Square':° 16 I I 2 2 3 0 0 4 3 2 2 2 2 2 (West Side of Roadr rs( 4344 I Ij Washington Square t21 2 4 5 { (East Side of Roadway) Nu urth Chatsworth Avenue''''''' I tr i 15 2 3 3 3 2 2 I 4 7 0 3 I 0 1 (North Side of Roadwauxl North Chatsworth Avenue'"'r' 17 6 6 5 6 6 6 4 3 3 3 6 I (South Side of Road 5g - - New Jefferson Street 24 4 7 6 6 7 9 9 (3 11 11 8 (2 (0 8 (Weal Side of Roadrr 1 _ New Jefferson Street' 24 3 3 4 4 6 6 8 3 2 4 2 5 11 3 (East Side of Roadti y) Municipal Lot 13' 118 411 39 37 4/ 42 51 51 40 35 37 4/ 39 40 41 tPrnmit/0,) , A4rrnroipo!Lord 4"' 3/ 29 28 27 27 28 2.8 3/ 18 14 /7 16 19 /9 24 ' !1'rrmrLLo0 - Abaci/wl/,on A5'r'' 6 .i4 4 4 4 r 3 3 2 2 2 2 3 Worm:Lori (tint Vacant within Municipal Lola 155 73 71 68 72 74 R3 85 61 SI 56 59 60 61 68 Total vacant On-Street Parking"'' 163 59 60 45 51 58 59 56 59 56 49 43 59 58 41 • Total)-arm,t within WS Resident Parking Permit 9i ea m 117 IC 24 25 25 28 27 28 31 28 24 19 27 32 IS Nota. (I)!MC performed a parking utilization survey on Wednesday.May i.2017. (2)The parking meter regulations are enforced from 0 00 AM to 600 PM from Monday to Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue. (3)The west side of Washington Square in restricted from perking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM on the first monday of each month Parking is pem,itted for a maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 200 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3 00 AM and 6.00 AM. (4)The east side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11:00 AM on the second monday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday In Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3.00 AM and 6:00 AM (S)The north side of North Chauwnrth Avenue is restricted Froin parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11'00 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3 00 AM and 6.00 AM (6)The south side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11:00 AM on the second thursday of each month Parking is pem,itted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6:00 AM (7)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 1100 AM on the first tuesday of every month.Parking is permmed for a maximus,of 3 haus from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays end except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11.00 AM on the second tuesday of every month Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from to between the hours of 900 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (9)The Municipal Lot#3 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only. (I0)The Municipal Lot 04 is permitted for daytime use from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 6:00 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(178 Myrtle Blvd).All other times including from Monday to Friday between the horns of 600 PM and 8 00 AM as well as all times on Saturday 8:Sunday.a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot. (11)The Municipal Lot 115 is for permit parking only. (12)Parking dam for the Municipal Lou 3.4.5 is not included (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area F:\2017\17013\TRAFFtC\17013-Parking-Utilization 2017-04.xlse\WED.tab TABLE P-4 TIff RSD.4)-P.IRKING 1'TILIZATIO,v 1 Vacant Parking Spaces Parking Area Supply S:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00AM 12:00 PDI' 1:00 PD1 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM X6:00 PM 7:00 PM MOO PM 9:00 PM Madison Avenue 8 6 7 1 6 8 7 R 7 h 3 5 3 4 9 (North Side of Roadway) - Madison Avenue 11 I I 9 4 7 I I 10 11 10 10 7 6 3 4 4 (South Side of Rodway) _ Myrtle Bouelvard 14 I I 12 (I 8 9 8 7 8 7 B 7 11 12 12 (East Side of Roadway) . Myrtle Boulverd 13 I I 10 9 B 7 4 6 0 4 9 4 2 6 6 (West Side of Roadwap , Washington Square 160 I 3 3 3 2 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 (West Side of Roads7a\t Washington Square'ri' 21 I 2 I 4 5 7 2 2 2 2 3 2 I (East Side of Rodway) - North Chatsworth Avma 4lr IIS ' 14 9 2 (North Side of Roadwoyul,. North Chatsworth Avenue " 17 3 4 5 7 4 5 S 6 S 3 2 3 4 (South Side of Roadway New Jefferson Street"" 24 2 00 I 3 7 9 R R A 7 6 5 4 (West Side of Radvot4 _ New Jefferson Street'" 24 0 00 I 3 5 6 8 0 9 Cl 6 3 2 (East Side of Radwvl ASnncilxtl twit i,3'' 110 39 44 32 36 38 44 31 e9 19 46 47 .is 43 46 /Permit l.ie) ,1fuNo/w1 inr 14'i°' 31 11 16 13 16 /6 17 13 29 29 29 29 3n 31 31 (fermi!bot) , 3fu»repel/err/5: 6 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 . 3 3 !Permit toil Total Vacant within Municipal Lots 155 55 64 51 55 57 64 67 BO 80 80 _ 79 79 80 02 Total Vacant On-Street Parkin8'tt' 163 51 55 47 50 59 53 64 58 53 53 40 37 40 39 - Total Vacant within WS Resident Parking 117 (217 22 21 24 24 32 24 26 26 118 18 14 12 Permit Area'+t' oars_ I I t JDMC performed a parking utilization survey on Thursday,May 4,2017. (2)The parking meter regulations are enforced from 8.00 AM to 6.00 PM from Monday to Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue. (31 The west side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11.00 AM on the first monday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9.00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours or 3:00 AM and 6.00 AM. (4)The east side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11.00 AM on the second monday of each month.Parking is permitted fora maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2'.00 PM excludnig holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours of 300 AM and 6.00 AM (5)The north side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11'00 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3.00 AM and 6.00 AM (6)The south stale of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11:00 AM on the second thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 900 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6:00 AM. (7)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9:00 AM and 11.00 AM on the first tuesday of every month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9.00 AM and 200 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 1100 AM on the second tuesday of every month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from to between the hours of 900 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (9)The Municipal Lot 013 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only (10)The Municipal Lot 44 is permitted for daytime use from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8.00 AM and 6.00 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(I78 Myrtle Blvd)All other times including from Monday to Friday between the hours of 6.00 PM and 8.00 AM as well as all limes on Saturday k Sunday,a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot. (11)The MunicIpal Lot 65 is for permit parking only.(12)Parking data for the Municipal Lots 3,4,5 is not included (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area F:\2017\17013\TRAFFIC\17013-parking4Utilisation_2017-04.e1sx\THURS.tab TABLE P-5 FRIDAY PARKING UTILIZATION Vacant Parking Spaces t Parking Area Sappy 8:00 AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 8:00 PM 9:00 PM Madison Avenue (North Side of Roadway) 8 7 4 1 3 7 6 7 4 6 6 r` 4 3 1 Madison Avenue 11 I I 6 3 5 7 9 I I 10 10 0 S 3 2 4 (South Side of Roadway) Myrtle Bouelvard 14 14 13 9 3 I 10 5 7 3 6 R 13 11 12 (East Side of Roadway) Myrtle Boulvard (West Side of Roadwax) 13 12 II I1 2 2 5 2 4 3 3 0 8 6 6 Washington Squarer" ' (6 1 I 1 3 0 3 2 I 0 I 0 0 0 0 (Weal Side of Roadi nil _ _ Washington Square"I' 21 ' 2 I 2 3 3 3 2 2 I 2 1 1 1 (Fast Side of Roadway; North Chatsworth.Avenue'}i' (North Side of Radwat�I, )5 2 I 4 1 I 1 2 2 1 0 I i North Chatsworth Avenue' 17 4 4 4 5 5 4 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 3 (South Side of Rady�y , • New Jefferson Street'" 24 7 I I 5 14 12 13 10 10 7 5 5 5 4 (West Side of Radtyl�g, , New Jefferson Street'r 24 I 0 0 I 4 4 2 3 1 3 2 2 2 I lEast Side of RoadsSvl - Municrpnll.a 43" 118 3' 34 31 35 40 37 38 45 46 44 43 36 60 37 [Print lot) lfunrrrp.d 1,014'''' 31 19 /4 /2 17 IN 18 /3 28 25 25 26 31 31 31 !Permit Loll _ 3lrmicipul Lnt x3' 6 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 2 3 2 2 3 v 3 (Prntut Loll Tntal Vacant within Municipal lois 155 59 51 47 55 61 58 56 75 74 71 71 90 95 93 Total Vacant On-Street Parking'"' 163 61 43 34 33 44 57 50 47 41 40 36 39 35 33 Total Vacant within WS Resident Parking Permit Arearah 11' 17 9 10 20 27 27 25 22 19 17 14 11 13 10 Notes. _ -- 1 II JMC performed a parking utilization some,on Fridac,May 5,2017 121 The parking meter regulations are enforced from 8-00 AM to 6-00 PM from Monday to Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue (3)The west side of Washington Square is restricted from perking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11:00 AM on the first monday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9 00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6.00 AM. (4)The east side of Washington Square is restncted from parking between the hours of 9.00 AM and 11:00 AM on the second monday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3:00 AM and 600 AM. (5)The north side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11.00 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6,00 AM. (6)The south side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11. 0 AM on the second thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxiumum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays end except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3:00 AM and 6.00 AM. 17)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 9.10 AM and 11,00 AM on the first tuesday of every month Parking is permitted fora maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 4.00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and I 1 00 AM on the second tuesday of every month.Parking is permitted fora maximum of 3 hours from to between the hours of 900 AM and 2:00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (9)The Municipal Lot 1(3 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only. (10)The Municipal Lot 64 is permitted for daytime use from Monday to Friday between the hours of 8:00 AM and 600 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(178 Myrtle Blvd).All other times including from Monday to Friday between the hours of 6.00 PM and R.00 AM as well as all times on Saturday&Sunday.a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot. (1 I)The Municipal Lot OS is for permit parking only. (12)Parking data for the Municipal Lots 3,4,5 is not included (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area F:\2017\17013\T1AFFIC\17013-Parxing-UrllitatImh_201744.xhx\F R I.tab TABLE P4 SATURDAY PANNING UTILIZATION Parkin`Area Supply _ Vacant Parking Spices AM 9:00 AM 10:00 AM 11:00 AM 12:00 PM 1:00 PM 2:00 PM 3:00 PM 4:00 PM 5:00 PM 6:00 PM 7:00 PM 5:00 PM 9:00 PM Madison Avenue 8 6 4 ) 8 6 7 B R A 8 7 5 I (North Side of Roadway) Madison Avenue 11 7 4 S 8 5 10 8 in 10 10 9 6 1 6 (South Side of Roadway) _ . Myrtle Bouelsard 14 11 10 S 1 2 5 R n 2 0 10 9 10 1) (East Side of Roadway) - Myrtle Boulvard5 5 6 10 (West Side of Roadwax) I i 10 10 3 2 2 4 4 2 6 _ Washington Squarer." 16 0 0 0 I 0 2 I 0 0 ii 0 0 0 0 I West Side of RoadwA\i Washington Square' 21 I 2 t I 1 6 2 7 3 _ 1 r I (East Side of RoadwaiAa _ North Chatsworth Avenue 15 (, 0 4 2 I I 3 2 4 I I I ) I (North Side of Roadwav�ri - _ - North Chatsworth Avenue' 17 3 2 4 3 5 R 4 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 (South Side of Radwgp New Jefferson Street 24 5 0 1 3 6 9 10 10 9 8 6 3 5 4 (West Side of Roadvri New Jefferson Street' 24 n 0 0 4 I 6 7 3 3 3 2 2 1 1East Side of Roadway) 54mrciprr!Lor x t" 118 44 50 48 49 53 33 50 59 54 52 49 49 32 37 (Permit 1 ot) AlunraJnl lot 114'jdi 31 23 IR 15 18 14 19 20 28 .30 30 .10 31 31 3/ (Permit 100 Al -tial Lar x3' 6 6 4 4 4 4 3, 5 5 3 3 3 4 4 5 !Pont/nil Total Vacant within Stuniripal Lots ISc 74 72 67 71 71 77 75 92 A7 85 82 M 07 93 Total Vacant On-Street Parking"'' 163 43 32 30 33 29 58 55 SIt 45 SI 47 37 35 41 Total Vacant within WS Resident Parking Permit Area'''. 117 0 4 14 14 14 32 27 25 23 18 16 12 13 11 Notes (1)JMC performed a parking indication survey on Saturday,Mav 6.2017 (2)The parking meter regulations are enforced from 8.00 AM to 6'00 PM from Monday in Saturday with a 3 hour time limit on Myrtle Boulevard and Madison Avenue (3)The west side of Washington Square rs restricted from parking between the hours of 0 00 AM and 11:00 AM on the first monday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maximum of 1 hours from Monday t0 Friday between the hours of 9 00 AM and 2:00 PAi excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders. Parking is also permitted between the hours of 300 AM and 6{N)AM (4)The east side of Washington Square is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11 00 AM on the second monday of each month Parking is permitted for a maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9 00 AM and 200 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is also permitted between the hours of 3 00 AM and 6.00 AM (5)The north side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 1100 AM on the first thursday of each month.Parking is permitted fora maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9:00 AM and 200 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3 00 AM and 6.00 AM. (6)The south side of North Chatsworth Avenue is restricted from parking between the hours of 9 00 AM and 11 00 AM on the second thursday of each month.Parking is permitted for a maxmmum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9-00 AM and 2 00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit holders Parking is prohibited between the hours of 3:00 AM end 600 AM (7)The west side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11:00 AM on the first tuesday of even.month Parking is permitted for a maximum of 3 hours from Monday to Friday between the hours of 9 00 AM and 2.00 PM excluding holidays and except for WS Resident Parking Permit Holders. (8)The east side of New Jefferson Street is restricted from parking between the hours of 900 AM and 11 00 AM on the second tuesday of every month Parking is permitted for a maximum of 1 hours from to between the hours of 900 AM and 2(a)PM excluding holidays and except for\VS Resident Parking Permit Holders (9)The Municipal Lot 03 upper and lower levels are for permit parking only. 110)The Municipal Lot 04 is permitted for daytime use from Monday to Friday between the horns of R.00 AM and 6 00 PM by Coughlin Building Tenants Only(178 Myrtle Blvd).All other tunes including from Monday to Friday between the hours of 6.00 PM and A 00 AM as well as all times on Saturday&Sunday,a parking permit from the Town of Mamaroneck is required to park within the lot (I 1)The Municipal Lot 05 is for permit parking only (12)Parking data for the Municipal Lots 3,4,5 is not included (13)Parking is located within the WS Resident Parking Permit Area a:\2017\17013\TRAPf1C\17013-Parking-Uti11tation_2017-04.xhx\SAT.tab Exhibit E • Full Environmental Assessment Form Part I -Project and Setting Instructions for Completing Part 1 Part I is to be completed by the applicant or project sponsor. Responses become part of the application for approval or funding, are subject to public review,and may be subject to further verification. Complete Part 1 based on information currently available. If additional research or investigation would be needed to fully respond to any item,please answer as thoroughly as possible based on current information;indicate whether missing information does not exist, or is not reasonably available to the sponsor;and,when possible.generally describe work or studies which would be necessary to update or fully develop that information. Applicants/sponsors must complete all items in Sections A&B. In Sections C,D&E,most items contain an initial question that must be answered either"Yes"or"No". If the answer to the initial question is"Yes",complete the sub-questions that follow. If the answer to the initial question is"No",proceed to the next question. Section F allows the project sponsor to identify and attach any additional information. Section G requires the name and signature of the project sponsor to verify that the information contained in Part 1 is accurate and complete. A.Project and Sponsor Information. Name of Action or Project: Amendment to Town of Mamaroneck Code Sections 240-30(A),245-45,and 245-78 Project Location(describe,and attach a general location map): The portion of the B-R District fronting Myrtle Boulevard Brief Description of Proposed Action(include purpose or need): See attached project description and impacts narrative. Name of Applicant/Sponsor: Telephone:914-736-9252 GLSN Realty Corp.,Go Mr.Gjoko Shkreli E-Mail: nikkos hreli@9 mail.com Address:4 Fairgreen Court City/PO:Cortlandt Manor State:NY Zip Code:10567 Project Contact(if not same as sponsor;give name and title/role): Telephone:914-273-5225 JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Architecture&Land Surveying,PLLC E-Mail: aguccione@jmcplIc.com jmcpllc.com Address: 120 Bedford Road City/PO: State: Zip Code: Armonk NY 10504 Property Owner (if not same as sponsor): Telephone: E-Mail: Address: City/PO: State: Zip Code: Page 1 of 13 B.Government Approvals • B.Government Approvals,Funding,or Sponsorship. ("Funding"includes grants,loans,tax relief,and any other forms of financial assistance.) Government Entity If l es: Identify Agency and Approval(s) Application Date Required (Actual or projected) a.City Council,Town Board, WIYes0No Zoning Text Amendment 06/13/2017 or Village Board of Trustees b.City,Town or Village ®Yes❑No Recommendation to Town Board TBD Planning Board or Commission c.City Council,Town or ❑Yes®No Village Zoning Board of Appeals d.Other local agencies ❑Yes®No e.County agencies ®Yes❑No Recommendation TBD County Planning Dept. f. Regional agencies ❑Yes®No g.State agencies ❑Yes®No h.Federal agencies ❑Yes®No i. Coastal Resources. i. Is the project site within a Coastal Area,or the waterfront area of a Designated Inland Waterway? ®Yes❑No ii. is the project site located in a community with an approved Local Waterfront Revitalization Program? ®Yes❑No iii. Is the project site within a Coastal Erosion Hazard Area? ❑Yes®No C.Planning and Zoning C.1.Planning and zoning actions. Will administrative or legislative adoption,or amendment of a plan,local law,ordinance,rule or regulation be the OYes❑No only approval(s)which must be granted to enable the proposed action to proceed? • If Yes,complete sections C,F and G. • If No,proceed to question C.2 and complete all remaining sections and questions in Part 1 C.2.Adopted land use plans. a.Do any municipally-adopted (city,town,village or county)comprehensive land use plan(s)include the site mYes❑No where the proposed action would be located? If Yes,does the comprehensive plan include specific recommendations for the site where the proposed action ®Yes❑No would be located? See attached narrative b.Is the site of the proposed action within any local or regional special planning district(for example: Greenway ❑Yes®No Brownfield Opportunity Area(BOA);designated State or Federal heritage area;watershed management plan; or other?) If Yes,identify the plan(s): c. Is the proposed action located wholly or partially within an area listed in an adopted municipal open space plan, ❑Yes®No or an adopted municipal farmland protection plan? If Yes,identify the plan(s): Page 2 of 13 C.3. Zoning a. Is the site of the proposed action located in a municipality with an adopted zoning law or ordinance. ®YesDNo If Yes,what is the zoning classification(s)including any applicable overlay district? B-R"Business-Residential"District b. Is the use permitted or allowed by a special or conditional use permit? ❑Yes0No c.Is a zonine change requested as part of the proposed action? mYesDNo If Yes. i. What is the proposed new zoning for the site? "Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use"as a new use within the B-R District. C.4.Existing community services. a.In what school district is the project site located? Mamaroneck Union Free School District b.What police or other public protection forces serve the project site? Town of Mamaroneck Police Department c.Which fire protection and emergency medical services serve the project site? Town of Mamaroneck Fire Dept.;Larchmont/Town of Mamaroneck Volunteer Ambulance Corps. d.What parks serve the project site? Memorial Park;Flowers Park D.Project Details D.1.Proposed and Potential Development a.What is the general nature of the proposed action(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial,recreational;if mixed. include all components)? h.a.Total acreage of the site of the proposed action? acres b.Total acreage to be physically disturbed? _ acres c.Total acreage(project site and any contiguous properties)owned or controlled by the applicant or project sponsor? _ acres c.Is the proposed action an expansion of an existing project or use? 0 YesQNo i. If Yes,what is the approximate percentage of the proposed expansion and identify the units(e.g.,acres,miles.housing units, square feet)? °o Units: d. Is the proposed action a subdivision,or does it include a subdivision? ❑Yes Do If Yes, i. Purpose or type of subdivision?(e.g.,residential,industrial,commercial;if mixed,specify types) ii. Is a cluster/conservation layout proposed? ❑YesDNo iii.Number of lots proposed? iv Minimum and maximum proposed lot sizes? Minimum Maximum e.Will proposed action be constructed in multiple phases? ❑YesDNo i. If No,anticipated period of construction: months ii. If Yes: • Total number of phases anticipated _ • Anticipated commencement date of phase I (including demolition) _ month year • Anticipated completion date of final phase month year • Generally describe connections or relationships among phases,including any contingencies where progress of one phase may determine timing or duration of future phases: Page 3 of 13 f.Does the project include new residential uses? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,show numbers of units proposed. One Family Two Family Three Family Multiple Family(four or more) Initial Phase At completion of all phases g.Does the proposed action include new non-residential construction(including expansions)? ❑Yes❑No If Yes, i.Total number of structures ii. Dimensions(in feet)of largest proposed structure: height; width; and length iii. Approximate extent of building space to be heated or cooled: square feet h.Does the proposed action include construction or other activities that will result in the impoundment of any ❑Yes❑No liquids,such as creation of a water supply,reservoir,pond,lake,waste lagoon or other storage? If Yes, i. Purpose of the impoundment: _ ii. If a water impoundment,the principal source of the water: 0 Ground water 0 Surface water streams❑Other specify: iii. If other than water,identify the type of impounded/contained liquids and their source. iv. Approximate size of the proposed impoundment. Volume: million gallons;surface area: acres v. Dimensions of the proposed dam or impounding structure: height; length vi. Construction method/materials for the proposed dam or impounding structure(e.g.,earth fill,rock,wood,concrete): D.2. Project Operations a.Does the proposed action include any excavation,mining,or dredging,during construction,operations,or both? ❑Yes❑No (Not including general site preparation,grading or installation of utilities or foundations where all excavated materials will remain onsite) If Yes: i.What is the purpose of the excavation or dredging? ii. How much material(including rock,earth,sediments,etc.)is proposed to be removed from the site? • Volume(specify tons or cubic yards): • Over what duration of time? iii. Describe nature and characteristics of materials to be excavated or dredged,and plans to use.manage or dispose of them. iv. Will there be onsite dewatering or processing of excavated materials? ❑Yes❑No If yes,describe. v. What is the total area to be dredged or excavated? acres vi. What is the maximum area to be worked at any one time? acres vii. What would be the maximum depth of excavation or dredging? feet viii. Will the excavation require blasting? ❑�'� ❑ ix. Summarize site reclamation goals and plan: b.Would the proposed action cause or result in alteration of.increase or decrease in size of,or encroachment ❑l'es❑No into any existing wetland,waterbody,shoreline,beach or adjacent area? If Yes: i. Identify the wetland or waterbody which would be affected(by name,water index number,wetland map number or geographic description): Page 4 of 13 ii. Describe how the proposed action would affect that waterbody or wetland,e.g.excavation,fill,placement of structures,or alteration of channels,banks and shorelines. Indicate extent of activities,alterations and additions in square feet or acres: iii. Will proposed action cause or result in disturbance to bottom sediments? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: iv. Will proposed action cause or result in the destruction or removal of aquatic vegetation? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • acres of aquatic vegetation proposed to be removed: • expected acreage of aquatic vegetation remaining after project completion: • purpose of proposed removal(e.g.beach clearing,invasive species control,boat access): • proposed method of plant removal: • if chemical/herbicide treatment will be used,specify product(s): v. Describe any proposed reclamation/mitigation following disturbance: c.Will the proposed action use,or create a new demand for water? ❑Yes❑No I f Yes: i. Total anticipated water usage/demand per day: gallons/day ii. Will the proposed action obtain water from an existing public water supply? ['Yes ON If Yes: • Name of district or service area: • Does the existing public water supply have capacity to serve the proposal? ❑Yes❑No • Is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No • Do existing lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No iii. Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to supply the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project:__ • Source(s)of supply for the district: iv. Is a new water supply district or service area proposed to be formed to serve the project site? 0 Yes❑No If.Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • Proposed source(s)of supply for new district: -_ v. If a public water supply will not be used,describe plans to provide water supply for the project: vi.If water supply will be from wells(public or private),maximum pumping capacity: gallons/minute. d.Will the proposed action generate liquid wastes? El Yes❑No If Yes: i. Total anticipated liquid waste generation per day: gallons/day ii.Nature of liquid wastes to be generated(e.g.,sanitary wastewater,industrial;if combination,describe all components and approximate volumes or proportions of each): iii. Will the proposed action use any existing public wastewater treatment facilities? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Name of wastewater treatment plant to be used: • Name of district: • Does the existing wastewater treatment plant have capacity to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No • is the project site in the existing district? ❑Yes❑No • Is expansion of the district needed? ❑Yes❑No Page 5 of 13 • Do existing sewer lines serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No • Will line extension within an existing district be necessary to serve the project? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Describe extensions or capacity expansions proposed to serve this project: iv. Will a new wastewater(sewage)treatment district be formed to serve the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: • Applicant/sponsor for new district: • Date application submitted or anticipated: • What is the receiving water for the wastewater discharge? v. If public facilities will not be used,describe plans to provide wastewater treatment for the project,including specifying proposed receiving water(name and classification if surface discharge,or describe subsurface disposal plans): vi. Describe any plans or designs to capture,recycle or reuse liquid waste: e.Will the proposed action disturb more than one acre and create stormwater runoff,either from new point ❑Yes❑No sources(i.e.ditches,pipes.swales,curbs,gutters or other concentrated flows of stormwater)or non-point source(i.e.sheet flow)during construction or post construction? If Yes: i. How much impervious surface will the project create in relation to total size of project parcel? Square feet or acres(impervious surface) Square feet or acres(parcel size) ii. Describe types of new point sources. iii. Where will the stormwater runoff be directed(i.e.on-site stormwater management facility/structures,adjacent properties, groundwater,on-site surface water or off-site surface waters)? • If to surface waters.identify receiving water bodies or wetlands: • Will stormwater runoff flow to adjacent properties? ❑Yes❑No iv. Does proposed plan minimize impervious surfaces,use pervious materials or collect and re-use stormwater? ❑Yes❑No f. Does the proposed action include,or will it use on-site,one or more sources of air emissions,including fuel ❑Yes❑No combustion,waste incineration,or other processes or operations? If Yes,identify: i.Mobile sources during project operations(e.g.,heavy equipment,fleet or delivery vehicles) ii. Stationary sources during construction(e.g.,power generation,structural heating,batch plant,crushers) iii. Stationary sources during operations(e.g.,process emissions,large boilers,electric generation) g.Will any air emission sources named in D.21(above),require a NY State Air Registration,Air Facility Permit, ❑Yes❑No or Federal Clean Air Act Title IV or Title V Permit? If Yes: i. Is the project site located in an Air quality non-attainment area? (Area routinely or periodically fails to meet ❑Yes❑No ambient air quality standards for all or some parts of the year) ii. In addition to emissions as calculated in the application,the project will generate: • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide(CO2) • Tons/year(short tons)of Nitrous Oxide(N,O) • Tons/year(short tons)of Perfluorocarbons(PFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Sulfur Hexafluoride(SF6) • Tons/year(short tons)of Carbon Dioxide equivalent of Hydroflourocarbons(HFCs) • Tons/year(short tons)of Hazardous Air Pollutants(HAPs) Page 6 of 13 V h.Will the proposed action generate or emit methane(including,but not limited to,sewage treatment plants, ❑Yes❑No landfills,composting facilities)? If Yes: i. Estimate methane generation in tons/year(metric): ii.Describe any methane capture,control or elimination measures included in project design(e.g.,combustion to generate heat or electricity,flaring): i.Will the proposed action result in the release of air pollutants from open-air operations or processes,such as ❑Yes❑No quarry or landfill operations? If Yes:Describe operations and nature of emissions(e.g.,diesel exhaust,rock particulates/dust): j.Will the proposed action result in a substantial increase in traffic above present levels or generate substantial ❑YesDNo new demand for transportation facilities or services? If Yes: i. When is the peak traffic expected(Check all that apply): 0 Morning 0 Evening ['Weekend ❑Randomly between hours of to ii. For commercial activities only,projected number of semi-trailer truck trips/day: iii. Parking spaces: Existing Proposed Net increase/decrease iv. Does the proposed action include any shared use parking? ❑Yes❑No v. If the proposed action includes any modification of existing roads,creation of new roads or change in existing access,describe: vi. Are public/private transportation service(s)or facilities available within 1/2 mile of the proposed site? ❑Yes❑No vii Will the proposed action include access to public transportation or accommodations for use of hybrid,electric ❑Yes❑No or other alternative fueled vehicles? viii.Will the proposed action include plans for pedestrian or bicycle accommodations for connections to existing ❑Yes❑No pedestrian or bicycle routes? k.Will the proposed action(for commercial or industrial projects only)generate new or additional demand ❑Yes❑No for energy? If Yes: i. Estimate annual electricity demand during operation of the proposed action: ii. Anticipated sources/suppliers of electricity for the project(e.g.,on-site combustion,on-site renewable,via grid/local utility,or other): iii. Will the proposed action require a new,or an upgrade to,an existing substation? ❑Yes❑No 1.Hours of operation. Answer all items which apply. i. During Construction: ii. During Operations: • Monday-Friday: • Monday-Friday: • Saturday: • Saturday: • Sunday: • Sunday: • Holidays:— • Holidays: Page 7 of 13 m.Will the proposed action produce noise that will exceed existing ambient noise levels during construction, ❑Yes❑No operation,or both? If yes: i. Provide details including sources,time of day and duration: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a noise barrier or screen? ❑Yes❑No Describe: n.. Will the proposed action have outdoor lighting? ❑Yes❑No If yes: i. Describe source(s),location(s),height of fixture(s),direction/aim,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: ii. Will proposed action remove existing natural barriers that could act as a light barrier or screen? ❑Yes❑No Describe: o. Does the proposed action have the potential to produce odors for more than one hour per day? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe possible sources,potential frequency and duration of odor emissions,and proximity to nearest occupied structures: p.Will the proposed action include any bulk storage of petroleum(combined capacity of over 1,100 gallons) ❑Yes❑No or chemical products 185 gallons in above ground storage or any amount in underground storage? If Yes: i. Product(s)to be stored ii. Volume(s) per unit time (e.g.,month,year) iii. Generally describe proposed storage facilities: q.Will the proposed action(commercial,industrial and recreational projects only)use pesticides(i.e.,herbicides, ❑Yes ❑No insecticides)during construction or operation? If Yes: i. Describe proposed treatment(s): ii. Will the proposed action use Integrated Pest Management Practices? 0 Yes ❑No r.Will the proposed action(commercial or industrial projects only)involve or require the management or disposal 0 Yes ❑No of solid waste(excluding hazardous materials)? If Yes: i. Describe any solid waste(s)to be generated during construction or operation of the facility: • Construction: tons per (unit of time) • Operation : tons per (unit of time) ii. Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of materials to avoid disposal as solid waste: • Construction: • Operation: iii. Proposed disposal methods/facilities for solid waste generated on-site: • Construction: • Operation: Page 8 of 13 s.Does the proposed action include construction or modification of a solid waste management facility? ❑Yes❑ No If Yes: i. Type of management or handling of waste proposed for the site(e.g.,recycling or transfer station,composting,landfill,or other disposal activities): ii. Anticipated rate of disposal/processing: • Tons/month,if transfer or other non-combustion/thermal treatment,or • Tons/hour,if combustion or thermal treatment iii. If landfill,anticipated site life: years t.Will proposed action at the site involve the commercial generation,treatment,storage,or disposal of hazardous ❑Yes❑No waste? If Yes: i. Name(s)of all hazardous wastes or constituents to be generated,handled or managed at facility: ii. Generally describe processes or activities involving hazardous wastes or constituents: iii.Specify amount to be handled or generated tons/month iv.Describe any proposals for on-site minimization,recycling or reuse of hazardous constituents: v. Will any hazardous wastes be disposed at an existing offsite hazardous waste facility? ❑Yes❑No If Yes:provide name and location of facility: If No:describe proposed management of any hazardous wastes which will not be sent to a hazardous waste facility: E.Site and Setting of Proposed Action E.1.Land uses on and surrounding the project site a.Existing land uses. i. Check all uses that occur on,adjoining and near the project site. ❑ Urban ❑ Industrial ❑ Commercial ❑ Residential(suburban) ❑Rural(non-farm) ❑ Forest 0 Agriculture D Aquatic 0 Other(specify): ii. If mix of uses,generally describe: b.Land uses and covertypes on the project site. Land use or Current Acreage After Change Covertype Acreage Project Completion (Acres+/-) • Roads,buildings,and other paved or impervious surfaces • Forested • Meadows,grasslands or brushlands(non- agricultural,including abandoned agricultural) • Agricultural (includes active orchards,field,greenhouse etc.) • Surface water features (lakes,ponds,streams,rivers,etc.) • Wetlands(freshwater or tidal) • Non-vegetated(bare rock,earth or fill) • Other Describe: Page 9 of 13 c.is the project site presently used by members of the community for public recreation? ❑Yes❑No i. If Yes:explain: d.Are there any facilities serving children,the elderly,people with disabilities(e.g.,schools,hospitals,licensed ❑Yes❑No day care centers,or group homes)within 1500 feet of the project site? If Yes, i. Identify Facilities: e.Does the project site contain an existing dam? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i. Dimensions of the dam and impoundment: • Dam height: feet • Dam length: feet • Surface area: acres • Volume impounded: gallons OR acre-feet ii. Dam's existing hazard classification: iii. Provide date and summarize results of last inspection: f.Has the project site ever been used as a municipal,commercial or industrial solid waste management facility, ❑Yes❑No or does the project site adjoin property which is now,or was at one time,used as a solid waste management facility? If Yes: i. Has the facility been formally closed? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,cite sources/documentation: ii. Describe the location of the project site relative to the boundaries of the solid waste management facility: iii. Describe any development constraints due to the prior solid waste activities: g.Have hazardous wastes been generated,treated and/or disposed of at the site,or does the project site adjoin ❑Yes❑No property which is now or was at one time used to commercially treat,store and/or dispose of hazardous waste? If Yes: i. Describe waste(s)handled and waste management activities,including approximate time when activities occurred: h. Potential contamination history. Has there been a reported spill at the proposed project site,or have any ❑Yes❑No remedial actions been conducted at or adjacent to the proposed site? If Yes: 1. Is any portion of the site listed on the NYSDEC Spills Incidents database or Environmental Site ❑Yes❑No Remediation database? Check all that apply: ❑ Yes—Spills Incidents database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Yes—Environmental Site Remediation database Provide DEC ID number(s): ❑ Neither database ii. If site has been subject of RCRA corrective activities,describe control measures: iii. Is the project within 2000 feet of any site in the NYSDEC Environmental Site Remediation database? ❑Yes❑No If yes,provide DEC ID number(s): iv. If yes to(i),(ii)or(iii)above,describe current status of site(s): Page 10 of 13 w v. Is the project site subject to an institutional control limiting property uses? ❑Yes❑No • If yes,DEC site ID number: • Describe the type of institutional control(e.g.,deed restriction or easement): • Describe any use limitations: • Describe any engineering controls: • Will the project affect the institutional or engineering controls in place? ❑Yes❑No • Explain: E.2. Natural Resources On or Near Project Site a.What is the average depth to bedrock on the project site? feet b.Are there bedrock outcroppings on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,what proportion of the site is comprised of bedrock outcroppings? c.Predominant soil type(s)present on project site: d.What is the average depth to the water table on the project site? Average: feet e.Drainage status of project site soils:❑ Well Drained: %of site ❑ Moderately Well Drained: %of site ❑ Poorly Drained %of site f.Approximate proportion of proposed action site with slopes: 0 0-10%: _ %of site 0 10-15%: %of site 0 15%or greater: %of site g.Are there any unique geologic features on the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes,describe: h.Surface water features. i. Does any portion of the project site contain wetlands or other waterbodies(including streams,rivers. ❑Yes❑No ponds or lakes)? ii. Do any wetlands or other waterbodies adjoin the project site? ❑Yes❑No If Yes to either i or ii,continue. If No,skip to E.2.i. iii. Are any of the wetlands or waterbodies within or adjoining the project site regulated by any federal, ❑Yes❑No state or local agency? iv. For each identified regulated wetland and waterbody on the project site,provide the following information: • Streams: Name _ Classification • Lakes or Ponds: Name Classification • Wetlands: Name Approximate Size • Wetland No.(if regulated by DEC) v Are any of the above water bodies listed in the most recent compilation of NYS water quality-impaired ❑Yes❑No waterbodies? If yes,name of impaired water body/bodies and basis for listing as impaired: i.Is the project site in a designated Floodway? ❑Yes❑No j.Is the project site in the 100 year Floodplain? ❑Yes❑No k.Is the project site in the 500 year Floodplain? ❑Yes❑No 1.Is the project site located over,or immediately adjoining,a primary,principal or sole source aquifer? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i.Name of aquifer: Page 11 of 13 m. Identify the predominant wildlife species that occupy or use the project site: n.Does the project site contain a designated significant natural community? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i. Describe the habitat/community(composition,function,and basis for designation): ii. Source(s)of description or evaluation: iii. Extent of community/habitat: • Currently: acres • Following completion of project as proposed: acres • Gain or loss(indicate+or-): acres o.Does project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by the federal government or NYS as 0 Yes❑No endangered or threatened,or does it contain any areas identified as habitat for an endangered or threatened species? p. Does the project site contain any species of plant or animal that is listed by NYS as rare,or as a species of ❑Yes❑No special concern? q.Is the project site or adjoining area currently used for hunting,trapping,fishing or shell fishing? ❑Yes❑No If yes,give a brief description of how the proposed action may affect that use: E.3. Designated Public Resources On or Near Project Site a. Is the project site,or any portion of it. located in a designated agricultural district certified pursuant to ❑Yes❑No Agriculture and Markets Law,Article 25-AA,Section 303 and 304? If Yes, provide county plus district name/number: b.Are agricultural lands consisting of highly productive soils present? ❑Yes❑No i. If Yes:acreage(s)on project site? ii. Source(s)of soil rating(s): c. Does the project site contain all or part of,or is it substantially contiguous to,a registered National ❑Yes❑No Natural Landmark? If Yes: 1. Nature of the natural landmark: ❑Biological Community ❑ Geological Feature ii. Provide brief description of landmark,including values behind designation and approximate size/extent: d.Is the project site located in or does it adjoin a state listed Critical Environmental Area? ❑Yes❑No If Yes: i. CEA name: ii. Basis for designation: iii. Designating agency and date: Page 12 of 13 e.Does the project site contain,or is it substantially contiguous to,a building,archaeological site.or district 0 Yes0 No which is listed on,or has been nominated by the NYS Board of Historic Preservation for inclusion on.the State or National Register of Historic Places? If Yes: i.Nature of historiciarchacological resource: ❑Archaeological Site ❑Historic Building or District ii.Name: iii. Brief description of attributes on which listing is based: f.Is the project site,or any portion of it,located in or adjacent to an area designated as sensitive for Dyes Qvo archaeological sites on the NY State Historic Preservation Office(SHPO)archaeological site inventory? g.Have additional archaeological or historic site(s)or resources been identified on the project site? ❑Yes:No If Yes: i.Describe possible resource(s): ii. Basis for identification: h.is the project site within fives miles of any officially designated and publicly accessible federal.state,or local Yes[No scenic or aesthetic resource? If Yes: i. Identify resource: I ii.Nature of,or basis for,designation(e.g.,established highway overlook,state or local park.state historic trail or scenic byway, etc.): iii. Distance between project and resource: - _miles. i. Is the project site located within a designated river corridor under the Wild,Scenic and Recreational Rivers ❑YesDNo Program 6 NYCRR 666? If Yes: i. Identify the name of the river and its designation: ii.Is the activity consistent with development restrictions contained in 6NYCRR Part 666? ❑YesDNo F.Additional Information Attach any additional information which may be needed to clarify your project. if you have identified any adverse impacts which could be associated with your proposal,please describe those impacts plus any measures which you propose to avoid or minimize them. C. Verification I certify that the information provided is true to the best of my knowledge. JMC Planning Engineering Landscape Applicant/Sponsor N• e Archit- re&La.•Surve •,PLLC,A•ent Date 06/13/2017 /WI Signature 1 • 1 Title Project Manger Robert B.Peake,A P PRINT FORM Page 13 of 13 F:120171170131Full EAF For Zoning Petition 06-14-2017.pdf Long Environmental Assessment Form Attachment Project Description and Impact Narrative Project Description For the full narrative of the intent of the proposed action, please refer to the Petition of Gjoko Shkreli/176 Myrtle Boulevard, dated June XX, 2017, submitted to the Town Board herewith ("Petition"). In sum: 1. The Petition seeks an amendment to the Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance creating a "Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use" in the Myrtle Boulevard section of the Town's B-R District. The proposed use is a combination of commercial uses on the ground level (including subgrade space), with multifamily dwellings on the upper levels. The text amendment would permit the addition of no more than nine (9) new residential units to be developed along Myrtle Boulevard, of which at least one-third (1/3) must comply with the Town's Fair and Affordable Housing ("FAH") regulations. 2. As currently written, the bulk and dimensional requirements of the B-R District do not practically permit the development of any new residential units along Myrtle Boulevard. This is primarily due to the 70% floor area ratio limit for buildings supporting "a combination of business and residential use[s]." The B-R District regulations also require a minimum lot area of 10,000 square feet. Of the five (5) lots included in the B-R District on Myrtle Boulevard, none of these five (5) lots meet the 10,000-square foot minimum lot area requirement. The Proposed text amendment would also modify certain lot setback and parking requirements for the Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use. 3. The proposed text amendment would address these bulk and dimensional restrictions on new residential developments along Myrtle Boulevard, without significantly increasing the demand on existing community resources, such as available parking spaces. Petitioner's proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Use" would increase the allowable floor area ratio to 250% for buildings along Myrtle Boulevard supporting a mix of business and multi-family uses, provided that at least one-third (1/3) of the residential units built comply with the Town's FAH Regulations. 4. In order to protect against the proliferation of residential development on Myrtle Boulevard, the text amendment contains language limiting the applicability of the "Mixed Business-FAH Use" such that no more than nine (9) residential units would be permitted to be developed under this proposed use. 1 Impacts Narrative a. Land Use The proposed "Mixed Business-FAH Residential Use" would be consistent with the existing permitted uses in the B-R District along Myrtle Boulevard. Myrtle Boulevard was recently rezoned into the new B-R District. The Town Board included both commercial and multi- family housing, or a combination thereof, as principally permitted uses in the B-R District. The purpose of the B-R District rezoning was to encourage "new development [that] has the opportunity to create a mixed-use environment including residential with moderately scaled buildings that enhance the character of the Town." In addition, the Town Board sought to "expand opportunities for affordable housing within the community." At the time, it was determined that the addition of up to twenty (20) residential units would be appropriate in this area. As currently written, the bulk and dimensional requirements of the B-R District do not practically permit the development of any new residential units along Myrtle Boulevard, primarily due to the 70%floor area ratio limit for buildings containing a combination of business and residential uses. Thus, the intent of the B-R District to create commercial and residential mixed-use is not practically realized. The proposed text amendment would address these bulk and dimensional restrictions on new mixed-use commercial-residential development along Myrtle Boulevard. The text amendment would also facilitate the Town's planning initiative to bring affordable housing to a portion of the Town that has been determined to be suitable for such use. The proposed use is consistent with transit-oriented residential development because Myrtle Avenue is well-served by public transit, including Westchester County Bee Line bus routes, and is within walking distance of the Larchmont Metro North Train Station. b. A separate Parking Study has been prepared, and concludes that the utilization of the WS Resident Parking Permits and the available on-street parking spaces will provide ample parking to accommodate the parking demand for the proposed residential development, as well as the current uses within the adjacent area. The Parking Study is attached as Part 3 of this EAF. c. A separate Shadow Study has been prepared, which illustrates the proposed residential development will have no significant shadowing impacts on the surrounding properties. The Shadow Study is attached as Part 3 of this EAF. 920I7\I7013\full eaf attachment 05-24-2017.docx 2 Exhibit F ' �^� Pr ir- - ------, ivt. =. . 7. --e-s... • ,. r ... v_..„.7_1___; ' •—• -.7Z& Ilits.N --o._-f....if._.4-:, . ... --.,_ -.-. • • -- ,.1',i*., . • . ' . . /1' 1„ • . - . -. - .,, ....,- , , r _.., 4 ''''' :••••••.;a4r ,..A t• i -,...,- :,- - ,'.. ...' a ' ;t.ar 1.•, , , Pt, : lk ... . 6)."7 pi VOA., s, C011_11. 11111til'il°111111 ' . - . - . i „.. .-•., .,,,-,.• .1:101.4444:9°440:k I / 1, ”' , l',-tel 1; I • N.r °04 jr- e'ir- it — -- ' 1. - '' 4 - i -7- -Or, 44( - .•• ,. .,.... .. . . $ A. aii. ..-, • - - . 'ff. '. 10°I2' '1-'..,-• " , , 14 fi,c0f1 1,ilt,,, - ilk 4-/ f - 'Ir. 3FIV -s' , . , • % V**-Ir.gtiort.- 0, ....,..0- €7 ., • - . • „ . ... . 1'. ••9411 .-`',N. . . . I -' •is.,_.,: w , 41"/I1 -•24. Co . * , -•,_ ' 4 N. ,.., . ., 4% lik. 1.. .• January 8AMli. ,•,-,.. o- . 1 _ .., frVir 111111111141N:4 .. 4e42- ...., 4.-,- , 4 ..." /614,feeirl A. a- .... 4. ../ Qt" A. -.. ,z. 4 •••' ",' • - • ip 42-4: ny • ry py ..A _ .. ,f 1 1016. tt tit '.. / 14‘14,Va • tOtirt" .ieft:..i.41'‘il)04000111, VIP , .- 40 4 Ilst )4) ..,- . • • AA - #0.,,,,, ,A 1 ' . IrAlte.' ',. - 41(11 . ...„. . -.40.6' 4.00.e; . .... , t • 4 4' Ili . . , , ,,," '"1 . it -- ' .0v,.„. . I.' A ,4g 110`tel.W ,. . . •JI il' , .1*, ' • !'', .-'I"7 ' ,.._.1 ' •' .. — _ _: ---- -- • (,,,' 44'• ,r, ,,,,,i .•••ti • .., 1°`i 'IP ,, , , , •‘? ,• .; :.. f.,,. r.(,,, iv,- '. i I _ . ... - to 4-, . .. , .• , II 1 • 2 flo 114 'MI. . rill.4. ' ttA , •••• . 1 131 N..'..•:.*'17.'''', , -4.,.. = i c n: ii, ---,minium ,..., , . , . '''',.., lir , • .. .' , ,., . .. . . ... ' .. --• ' • ,. " .. . . _ . ' '... ..., i 404. ,I,.,:::,,''''-' --, , .• ,,-. 0 .... 0 0#‘4it'''4. ' ,; ize...,...,,, . ..t. 44 4 ....f.,.., . it••• ,:..Z •Z`„z. 4 41. it*147•' • 4%)If%—44:t.A.441..4:1 ; . ,,, ,,,i7.,t,..,t,,,,,i,4,,,,,,,,,._:_,,,6-p,,o,ia,•;.,a'r.,i,..ar,..,,',,,,:..; 40 r, Ir.?, n, - • //4ier -.. • . ..,. . . .(' , '-'''-,:-5:,,,if:1,-:',,-..• ..•-.,,,,,.%,:•,•„;;;;• , '1' .=,, 4," '•• -'' ,•1 Vaa . ,0 ' i 4 a.1 ta, ti • - ••"' '- `A.P. ill tt. ...r ii'... . °S4 .. ... ,. . . • # ' . . ... ..../../.../... 041 •,.. .. . . , • . .., j!ti.,..,,,,,,,,,.:,:,,, .••••I .,...,...,:i.:.1..ii,:::::•'.'-'2.,':,',.-',---..''.''.:'',..r.,-.:,„.,.,..-..-,::-...,...-.:: .''' ''''''''''''' lelit' '''' -''-'1' , . -•51t. t.,•-• t..1 .' . - • • •••-..' '''..1 ,..,1•,#' • . . ,„...,..,, . 0, JR. ,,. . _um . . , .. , . -- '' - ,I. ...i'' ..'::;•. 4- ••, ' 1, , :„. ....„ ' 0 . , . . . . ,':,,,-...,-,-..-„[....-...., ••. .„-:,,........;.‘,.:.••,.-i,,,. ,......-„,,.•,-.,. . • - ?: Ahr . ' . ,,z.,,iiii401 , A.1,... • ': •,,-..::::,.,.,..., .... ,„.. .. ,....-,•,.,..;••„,,,,...•.:-,..,...-„--:.:.-....:.,..:--,,,,:,- .-..:_'....c...,,,..... ..,,,-.,:„.::::.,'.,1,,. .._ _,,__: --_ •-------,. ,,,..,.., .. „ 4.. ..,,,,,..,,..„.„.:„.„. ,,..,-.,..,..„.,,,,,.,1•.'f-..,...,,-.2.7,4,-..,„•-,,,,.,,-.......„,:,.„-:-.,,,...,,,,,,:....-... .-..-....'...--. -1',.,_iti \( ' , , si`i ,.:,-,',i-t:',•,',12,ir•'-'.'il'''.',:',',`i .--:',..•'_--,-„ ', ,,•• .. • . 1 'f. ' • -4.. , 4' ,.. . I' , • _,, i, • ... • •, ' IS , . i._..„ . . II . . ,,,...,'3.4.....„.. ' til ' , • ' -." /IL'.4.4544tt.z. , ICC'..- :•,,,: `-s-, '`.1""*,,,..4.,.600°.‘il.1, ••_,` 1111- -- ,,k,„:,...."."'-'A,`,.-....i.:,',", •''"---- r ,• t% 1444:44. .akit lit ,q., -L,'V r f lir • 4e 4:ed 4. v.514 O 107 a r ,, \\ + ,I y ell _. gip` " /, y X tl,14 \ 1 ir o t,, r • • e le to ()1) f VI . , *,,11W ri c ii014 I4 'OS ii 01 Al 1 AJ: *411Yr ro - r 17* vill i t «Y j -: '�, µ"ms< d10 e c Y i•' r,' y �, --,.,,,,,.s.,...:LID,, V /mown"1sw liiik tli .1 • 1 ' `' t. it 111 .\\::,..,,,..„, ,„,...,...,4,..., •, . It , ,.., 0/,(7. • :„,- '• -,-r 1\ ... . --"AllOt ' 0 f" — •-,--......, - ',21_!,, I i .• .0! !N\ , . .... iiiii„" --- ... ‘41411 7_ , ir. .. / /' :Ai - ..,,,, _ ,. • . - ag.1:.._. 21:..... ,. -:t...iN, " ' ! I C.(Y. - -• , b.-' ... „ . • / 1.... ',-:: _7' . r 0 . if _ ..,..itia... • ,_,-e-,,-''' -.9 l .- • . . .a i / . .. . . ... , a '1'it PLO _ .,...: 6)*It P40 °I? .__. i M 41/ .".."." as " ..''• . , . • ' 441 °(0 °It .,-. . . . . :. . . i --...,,,,. .. ' -„i- %:..-,-.r ...., ail F I , .. •,,,Z. 41. , Oh , olt . .,.. •,,-: • -4 • L, , \ , ._.,,.: i, .- . . - 4,,".".'...7';',,,,,I.:;, 4 . i - . „ .. ...-. ..-T , ,, ..- -.: -..„0..s_ go ,Afr - l'°° . 4...v.'1,,,,0*.-4..,i.. J's'it.''',':-A"-'..-4K,-.- IA - 34,...,,.14itry i 31117 ' 341* • f _ I 1 . , I ,./ ‘..,.. i . , . . R !al i - ..• , i... , • •e . , '10 1'•., f .... ..- I .,. ..'S •.-'°- -...t .., 'S, z) %.1011 . • \ it - , I ,• - ie I , , . - s.-A, • \ \ i it.,,,, so, .•, .... • :% - $ . •, , Clow 1110' \ "746'' . _.,.. ..... '' .. - "- • - k _,i);‘ 40 " ., • z, 140 1 . , A - I. . ,•, -:_ir \ iv; lik' :'. ',"• ,, - . •;;;;TI.', '"0 . . ....r.,,, , ...,, ,:.r,.14,k, SeptemberTAM ,''•-• -- - -- ---------' i , ,., - ." ,.,.400 SITE'DE:ELCJ*1 t i7 ft I IP 4 000000°00a- A. �w 0( 0 fir 4jto �0 0 a nj6.1„ y / ,I t ' pO gilliPlfr O l \ OP' Y.1 *k` ilif 1:1 �� i jer ��4-� i ,‘ illi 'ill1 • 4111111' �► a ; 'l , . 11::41,-;:i° � ���4 0 1,. �. ,r f i r�, ,t r ' 1. + � t 1 : *. 't 4111 ', sik ';''‘'' n 44 _ .L,/, ., . ., , s ', 1 , ,.r • aY at vok ist "'`°', it • � . • IIII:"'%".'"*"fth.."'"""..S%'%...*.,................................................................._Ira°" -141411111* �. 41, ,,.. t 011 9in cr , lir i f i elk' 4 �•✓v O O ..4.0 , ' 4,41:e • • 1 it - , ' O oi,ep, . ..,:ti,ilje/ 1' 1..,,,) Y.ixwlill i f�;' )11 101° f •• , • 0 .54i° i *,•'$• 4# • ,1A 1 .0 41 4 r4` T 0 1 ; r } r � Yy • ...i , 1 c o.. ,s,„) I • ';4 ,,‘ ,,, , ,,, .;, 4, . . - , ,..., , 4 N • _ . 1 1` I e p. tr �. •� it WI ii GO N41111‘ E WORKSESSION ITEM 2 • . y o Town of Mamaroneck W 0� Town Center 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353 FOUNDED 1661 • > > TEL: 914/381-7810 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FAX: 914/381-7809 townadministrator @townofmamaroneck.org Memorandum To: Supervisor &Town Board Re: Consideration —Special Permit Requirement-Cambium Date: September 15, 2017 This matter was last discussed at the July 13, 2017 Town Board Meeting. However, no final decision was made. Contact was going to be made with the Chairman of the Architectural Review Board for further discussion. This week I had a meeting with the developers of the Cambium on several different issues and the matter of the façade came up. I indicated to the Cambium developer that I would place this matter on the Town Board September 19th worksession for further discussion and possibly a final decision. Stephen V.Altieri Town Administrator Town of Mamaroneck .t Town Center 740 West Boston Post Road,Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353 TEL:914/381-7810 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FAX:914/381-7809 townadministtator @townofmamaroneck.org Memorandum To: Supervisor&Town Board Re: Consideration—Special Permit Requirement-Cambium Exterior Façade Date: July 13,2017 Section 6D of the Special Permit approval for the Cambium (see attached) references the façade of the commercial component of the project which is the New York Sports Club building. Before the facade is renovated by the developer, the proposed plan was to be referred to the Planning Board and Board of Architectural Review for advisory opinions to the Town Board.The Town Board would make the final decision as to the design of the facade. Attached are the advisory opinions of both the Planning Board and the Board of Architectural Review. The developer has proposed merely changing the façade of the building to match the color of the stucco finish to the color of the Cambium building. At the time the special permit was originally considered,the developer,at that time,submitted a rendering(which is attached). As you can see in this rendering,the façade change Indudes more detail and incorporates awnings and architectural arches to match the arched window design In the Cambium building. It is therefore,up to the Town Board how it wishes to proceed with this matter. Stephen V.Altteri Town Administrator . t 0 er 18,2006 r 6)Residential Building. 1'. a. SecurtlyMeltorParidng: I. If the Knox Box system is established by the Fire 0_ •= , • as standard for multi-family structures,the Applicant shall, ,:: Knox Box at the Byron Place lobby and at the Maxwell Avenue ga •: entrance for the use of the Fire Department and Ambulance Service. IL The building shall have a private,on-site -. •= the front lobby.The concierge shall be reachable via a central buzzer = Aunt door is not open N. The on-site concierge shall be responsible for.1 • . visitors to parking spaces within the building's garage whenever ail• (; = visitor parking spaces to be constructed on Byron Place ere •• :•.` The Applicant shall not discontinue the on-sde concierge without the . i .:.. of the Town Board. See 10)b.lit below. b. On-site Recreation:The proposed building shall have a •• u unity lounge and bicycle racks for residents.There shad be a landscaped.-• • and ac flokning activity rooms on the second floor for residents'use. -, : •: , terraces shad be located on the seventh floor. c. Green Roof:The proposed building shall have a green roof. -, roof shall cover no more than 60 percent of the total roof.The Applicant has .,.h . that the green roof is expected to provide water quality benefits and wN reduce , , : of stormwater runoff from the site.Nevertheless,the peen roof was not •• -•pert of the stonrrwater management system for purposes of•-. . -_ ,•F•.--development runoff.In the event the green roof fads'cr has a lessened- • to control stormwater rr- runoff,the buddng s owmedmanaagerfagent shall std adhere , the requirements stated above in No.6,Stonnw ater Management As a .. .., , of final approval,the plans submitted for any building permit shall Include .-. , .- documents conoeming the green roof,its construction,and its lend:.-.,1!. d. Architectural Features: L in its letter of December 14,2006(attached),the = of Architectural Review(BAR)approved graphic and sample - 7. • :presented by the Applicant The drawings and their dates are listed :1, : letter.Any significant change from the proposed visual • - -••n,materials selection, facade details,color palette,conceptual landscape -n,or other extodor features or details shown to and approved by the =■• - shell require an amendment to the Special Permit;see Section 10.. ,Blow for action. IL Before renovating the facade of the commercial.. •. - of the project, the Applicant shall submit its plans to the Town =•_ . which shad refer such plans to the Planning Board and the MR for�. Town Board shall not approve such plans until the - - -r of the Town T Board's receipt of such advisory opinions-from .. � • e Planning Board and the BAR or the 60th day following the date that , _ ; -- = is recehred by the secretary of the Planning Board and the Direct, of Building Code Enforcement and Land Use Administration! 7)Emergency Access and Fine Safety. • a. Emergency access shall be as shown on drawings cited a•, , regarding site layout • f' b. plan,site grading and tiityplan,aandd emergency access . • =the movements for the building. Byron entry y designed to e..• ..: : of Mamaroneck Fire Department ladder truck 19.The entry.1 =y shall be constructed to a standard highway(1-20)loading,to a.-.-• i ••_ = Mamaroneck Fire Department ladder truck 19. c. The parking garage levels shall have a mechanical venl la, system meeting building codes. d. The Applicant shall install an additional hydrant close to the •Iameae connection on, connection the Maxwell Avenue side of the building.An additional fire • . shall provided on the Byron of building, .r r the existing hydrant • e. Fire Department access shall be provided along the full ea =nd west frontages of the building(Maxwell Avenue and Byron Place.) f. The Applicant shall comply with the The protection and life features set forth in the meeting report dated August 8,2006 prepared by Dlvn- Tung,Schwabe. 8)Construction. I a. Construction activities far the proposed project are planned l, occur in three primary phases(Le.site preparation/e ; - and enclosure; interior fit outs and finishes),over a period of approximate 2 months. b. The hours of construction will comply with all relevant T. ,f Mamaroneck ordinances. C. The Applicant shall exercise best practices to keep cone, •• equipment in good 11 • 1 .f yp .1 Town of Mamaroneck Tow.Center 740 West Boston past Road,Mamaroneck.NY 10543-33 19 914—381-7830 Board of Architectural Review To the Town Board, I have visited the site(13-19 Madison Avenue)and reviewed the submission dated 3/9/17. In my opinion,the proposed architectural treatment is adequate and acceptable to me. I do have concerns about the signage,particularly the oval shaped logos,and would think that given that the signage will be removed as part of the facade renovation,this would be an opportunity to improve the signage if only to eliminate the logos which I believe don't comply with our signage code. I understand that the Board of Amhitec to al Review has requested that the applicant resubmit with the signage applied to the elevations. I think this is necessary. Let me know if I can be of further assistance. Sincerely Edward Z.Jacobson Board of Architectural Review,Chairman Altierl,Stephen • om: Lisa Hochman<lisahochmanlawegmalLcom> Ste: Thursday,July 13,2017 10:01 AM To: Attierl,Stephen Seligson,Nancy Subject 13-19 Madison Avenue Facade Steve and Nancy, Last night the Planning Hoard reviewed the proposed request to alter the facade of the shopping center adjacent to the Cambium. The majority of board members present expressed their objection to the proposed change. They wish to retain the agreement for the facade required at the time of the original special permit approval because they believe it would be more harmonious with the surrounding built environment. One board member stated that he has no objection to the current aesthetics. Pease feel free to contact me with any questions. Lisa Lisa A.Hochman Lisa Hochman Law Telephone: 914-315-6777 r .his Electronic Mail transmission and any accompanying documents contain information belonging to the sender which are confidential and legally privileged. This information is intended only for the use of the individual or entity to whom this transmission was sent as indicated above. If you are not the intended recipient,any disclosure,copying,distribution,or action taken in reliance on the contents of the information contained in this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you have received this transmission in error,please reply to the sender at(914)315-6777 or lisahochmanlaw iglom. 1 I . 1.11 i. =T'l . 0 : ",.. , t E ., , 1 el 1 I 1 eq 1 :li i I s _ - ,ilui , , , . ;___l®;® 2:2;:1 _ ii 1 I - I - _mil®'® ® :_: LI : n p;;: �� 'ur n■Eas I I Eil _..- c 71 I :e I e. 0 _I I = i m :::1 _=I® ®j®I:_e 1 el ® ®I® EEii ® ®I rrl -" . y y ® I ttttttttRa _ _I®' I I II- :71 l = _I . I ::I ® ® ; I�,q .= I ® n " 1 1 u��u I�.I u _I i ._ Ittttt�tEI ffl� i Q ®I® ® `Ii®'®I'HE EH rEil IM NU ffl!E.ffl Mil fflffl !_,mi ' ::dmi,ffliim L:: 1!: Eli MIME= i-'El ''''ll MI'ffll'El'""It .rtitititt�l II iglu ..■ ..: ::e,l® ®'®�:::-I !® ll® e ® ®I® ee--''�_a :eel II II..I ..■ II i ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! i ' ! ! 3 ! ! ! ! ! ! 1 .. 1r c .... Cep 3 a s SULLIVAN �....:,,.•B�„ Byron Place Byre.ph„neea;.t. {•w,.G B?ATIONS- h ” 1` Group. ~m I�Mmwf atLrell EAST AND ST I. Mavau .w..Trt.a. w•••.4 New Ye* ( ( i . I ii 9 Eli11;1W I 1 il—a----- --------- i ma 1 :::: Hi:111771,, N NH :ii** li ffik . - !it•NINI I 9 MI iii,MO:iii iiilliq ' MI fflffl ffl!in. fflp © ... `_ QZ IT! , i°?111---- r m t. D ' fflffl* IN 11 ffl' -• al 1 =It ¢ �' (e Ill: ffl ffl* :a I: ffll El . :; I- _ : . . i ICI fflffl i Eii.2 EiE: Li,Mil aai_ I r ! 1 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !I 1 p i 9 : SULLIVAN mow.,;u"°' Byron Plate ;mania BUADING ELEVATI ""` Amhdecturallmum 1.i.17.:11 no+s. Associates NDRTNMIDSOIJI}I �.r—twy�— fNawxMUl.a1f .Ia R.[. .r�wYd I.K.k(..q....= pqW Mard.nmk.Haw VIA 001 v .u,... .. MI .rw SUMO MI WI } HOLW/13S 1Sd3 l rg r III a f: 711 ROMP 9 r ;,a pp t YP,,.. mr.Jo I i , `tag:. Eilli _ it 1 WORKSESSION ITEM 3 • Financing Alternatives for LMC-TV Facility Consolidation September 11, 2017 Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I Executive Summary > LMC-TV has two options for consolidating operations into one location, either the Old Hook & Ladder Firehouse owned by the Village of Mamaroneck or the Town of Mamaroneck's Town Center > Under both alternatives, LMC-TV as tenant would pay for upgrading and customizing its new space, but the proposed lease for the Firehouse offers the potential for recovering a portion of the upfront investment ➢ The Firehouse alternative is more expensive and cannot be financed solely from the PEG Equipment Fund, as can the Town Center alternative > The Firehouse alternative requires funding from the Unrestricted Fund and the Village of Mamaroneck; NYS grants might be available as well > LMC-TV Board prefers the Firehouse for its central location on Mamaroneck Avenue, which affords greater public access and visibility > The fundamental decision is whether the additional upfront cost for the Firehouse is worth the advantages of its highly visible location. ➢ The location of LMC-TV's next home will ultimately be decided by the tri- municipal Board of Control, which controls distributions to LMC-TV Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 1 Key Terms ➢ Board of Control ("BOC") — body established by the three municipalities (Villages of Larchmont and Mamaroneck and Town of Mamaroneck) to negotiate with cable companies to receive and distribute franchise fees and the ability to make universal availability of public, educational and government ("PEG") programming. The BOC is composed of one voting representative from each municipality. ➢ PEG Equipment Fund — Holds grants from cable companies that are restricted to support PEG programming to purchases, renovation or construction of access equipment and related needs. ➢ Unrestricted Fund —Holds undistributed franchise fees. Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 2 How Much Will It Cost and How Much Is Available > Upfront cost for upgrading and moving into the Firehouse adds up to nearly $2.4 million, or $1.6 million more than moving into the Town Center. > PEG Equipment Fund is too small to fully fund the Firehouse option. Firehouse Town Center (in$000's) Capital Expenses Renovate main floor and top floor 1,385 519 Cost of renovating basement level 150 Additional soft costs 20% 307 ?? Contingency 10% 154 ?? Additional cost of moving 257 257 Temporary space at Town Center 125 - Total Facility and Moving Costs 2,378 777 + Resources- PEG Equipment Fund Capital Balance, 12/31/17 1,312 1,312 Surplus/(Shortfall), as of 12/31/17 (1,066) <535 Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 3 • Historical Financial Summary — BOC Unrestricted Fund > Over the eight years from 2010 through 2017, franchise fees from Cablevision and Verizon have exceeded expenses by more than $2.0 million > However, annual distributions of$350,000 have added up to $2.8 million, eating into the Unrestricted Fund by nearly $800,000 > The current rate of annual distributions is not sustainable Actual Estimated 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 (in thousands of dollars) Unrestricted Fund Total Revenues 735 806 799 806 858 866 893 910 Expenses LMC-TV 500 500 500 515 530 580 605 657 BOC Expenses 29 31 29 42 32 34 32 32 Total Expenses 529 531 529 557 562 615 637 690 Operating Surplus 206 275 270 249 296 251 256 220 Cash to Municipalities (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) (350) Net Cash Flow (144) (75) (80) (101) (54) (99) (94) (130) Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 4 Historical Summary — PEG Equipment and Unrestricted Funds > Over the eight years from 2010 through 2017, fees from Cablevision and Verizon to the PEG Equipment Fund have exceeded spending by almost $700,000. > On a combined basis, total fund balances fell by $100,000, from nearly $1.8 million to $1.7 million. • Unrestricted Fund surplus was cut by$800,000 • PEG Equipment Fund surplus increased by$700,000 Actual Estimated 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 Unrestricted Fund Net Cash Flow (144) (75) (80) (101) (54) (99) (94) (130) PEG Equipment Fund Franchise Fee 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 130 Spending (20) (95) (55) (41) (2) (93) (41) (9) Net Cash Flow 110 35 75 89 128 37 89 121 Total Fund Balances-Before Firehouse Funding Unrestricted 1,156 1,011 936 856 755 700 601 507 377 PEG Equipment 628 738 772 848 937 1,065 1,102 1,191 1,312 Total 1,783 1,749 1,709 1,704 1,692 1,766 1,704 1,698 1,689 Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 5 Projected Financial Summary > The investment in the Firehouse would require cutting back distributions to the three municipalities, as shown below. Estimated Projections 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Unrestricted Fund Operating Surplus 220 218 215 212 209 205 Cash(to)/from Municipalities (350) - - (150) (150) (150) Net Cash Flow (130) 218 215 62 59 55 PEG Equipment Fund Franchise Fee 130 130 130 130 130 130 Spending (9) (117) (117) (117) (117) (117) Net Cash Flow 121 13 13 13 13 13 Total Fund Balances-Before Firehouse Funding Unrestricted 377 595 810 872 931 986 PEG Equipment 1,312 1,325 1,339 1,352 1,366 1,379 Total 1,689 1,920 2,149 2,224 2,296 2,365 Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 6 Funding of Firehouse Investment > The Firehouse option would require funding from the PEG Equipment Fund, the Unrestricted Fund, and from the Village of Mamaroneck, as shown below. Estimated Projections 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022 Total Fund Balances-Before Firehouse Funding Unrestricted 377 595 810 872 931 986 PEG Equipment 1,312 1,325 1,339 1,352 1,366 1,379 Total 1,689 1,920 2,149 2,224 2,296 2,365 VOM Firehouse Move Capital Cost (2,378) Sources of Funds: PEG Equipment Fund 1,300 Unrestricted Fund 578 Village of Mamaroneck 500 Total 2,378 Total Fund Balances-After Firehouse Funding Unrestricted 377 17 232 294 353 408 PEG Equipment 1,312 25 39 52 66 79 Total 1,689 42 271 346 419 487 Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 7 Financing Summary > Renovation and move to Firehouse would require: • The PEG Equipment Fund to pay for $1.3 million in capital expenses; • Board of Control to retain almost $600,000 in the Unrestricted Fund that could otherwise be distributed, assuming no grants are awarded; • An investment by VOM of$500,000 for upgrading the building. > If the Village of Mamaroneck is awarded a grant for upgrading the Firehouse, the three municipalities would potentially share in the proceeds > The Unrestricted Fund could potentially recover its investment in upgrading the Firehouse • The Board of Control will have the option to purchase the Firehouse at a price set to the value of the Firehouse before LMC-TV's upgrades; • If the BOC does not exercise its option, it will still potentially share in the proceeds upon a sale of the Firehouse by VOM Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 8 VOM-LMC-TV Lease — Key Financial Terms > Base Rent will be set at $46,200 per year for ten years with option to renew for another ten years at market value > LMC-TV will have option to purchase Firehouse at set price, as follows: LMC-TV's Option to Purchase Year Base Price Value Escalation Purchase Price 1 1,100,000 2.0% 1,122,000 2 1,122,000 2.0% 1,144,440 3 1,144,440 2.0% 1,167,329 4 1,173,051 2.5% 1,196,512 5 1,202,377 2.5% 1,226,425 6 1,232,437 2.5% 1,257,085 7 1,269,410 3.0% 1,294,798 8 1,307,492 3.0% 1,333,642 9 1,346,717 3.0% 1,373,651 10 1,393,852 3.5% 1,421,729 > The Base Price reflects the appraised value of the Firehouse, plus the upfront investment, and would be reduced by grants received by the VOM Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 9 VOM Board Perspective > LMC-TV has enhanced public access and participation in local government, school and community activities > Local public access programming is a valuable resource for the community and should be financially supported by local governments > LMC-TV would be an even more valuable asset by consolidating its operations into a highly visible, central location such as the Firehouse > The VOM central business district would be strengthened and revitalized with the location of LMC-TV in the Firehouse > The proposed lease provides LMC-TV a long-term home and the option to establish a permanent presence by purchasing the Firehouse at a set price > The proposed lease provides a reasonable return to taxpayers on the Firehouse, directly through the financial terms of the lease, and indirectly through the revitalization of a key segment of the central business district Prepared by Leon Potok, VOM Trustee I 10 WORKSESSION ITEM 4 c c o 9 Z Town of Mamaroneck w 4,1 m Town Center 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810 FAX: 914/381-7809 townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org Memorandum To: Supervisor and Town Board Re: Authorization- Leasing of Electric Vehicles Date: September 15, 2017 In the last couple of years,the Town has been evaluating opportunities to introduce electric vehicles into our operating fleet. Until now, other than the environmental benefits of an electric vehicle,the economics of electric vehicles has not been in our favor. As a municipal government our fuel costs range from$1.00 to$1.25 less than fuel costs on the open market. In addition the costs of standard gasoline powered vehicles has been substantially lower than the cost of an electric vehicle. For instance the manufacturer's standard retail price for an electric vehicle has ranged from $30,000 for a Ford or Nissan model, to $43,000 for the BMW i43. The cost for a comparable gasoline powered Ford Focus is approximately$16,000 to $20,000 However Sustainable Westchester has been able to negotiate on behalf of municipalities in Westchester County an attractive arrangement for either the leasing or purchase of an electric powered Nissan Leaf. We have evaluated a vehicle purchase versus the leasing of the vehicle. The vehicle which normally is priced at about$30,000 can be purchased for$22,000. The dealer takes advantage of the New York State Incentive and Federal Tax Credit and passes it along to the purchaser of the vehicle. Another alternative and the one recommended to the Town Board is to enter into a commercial open ended lease of the vehicles. Nissan Motors working in conjunction with Mike Albert Fleet Solutions of Cincinnati, Ohio is able to lease the Nissan Leaf for $199 per month by applying the same credits and incentives applied to a vehicle purchase. There is no up-front down payment and no mileage limitation. Attached is an outline of the proposal. The lease period is open from 12 to 60 months. The Town can terminate the lease any time after twelve months. Our thinking however is to lease the vehicle for at least three years to fully evaluate its benefits. At the end of the lease period the vehicle can be returned to Mike Albert Fleet Solutions or the Town may purchase the vehicle for the residual value of$6,125. If the vehicle is returned to the lessor,the lessor resells the vehicle. If the resale price of the vehicle is higher than the residual value the proceeds above the residual value are returned to the Town. Alternatively, if the resale value is lower than the residual value, the Town pays the difference to the lessor. This is potentially a risk for the Town however there is no initial down payment expense and our operating costs for the vehicle will be very low since there will be no fuel costs other than the electricity used to re-charge the vehicle. 1LPage. to Printed on Recycled Paper If the Town were to lease the vehicle in a standard close end lease the monthly costs provided by the lessor would be $300 per month with a required down payment and a mileage limitation. In discussing this opportunity with our Fleet Manager, the consensus is that the lease arrangement is the preferred method of introducing electric vehicles into the fleet. Electric vehicles in fleet operations is relatively new. It is uncertain what the operating costs or resale value of this type of vehicle will be in the long term. Should the vehicles turn out not to be inappropriate for our fleet, the Town terminates the lease and returns the vehicle to the lessor. If the vehicle is found to be of value, we have the option of purchasing the vehicle for a relatively low cost. The City of New Rochelle currently leases electric vehicles and is considering adding additional electric vehicles under this program. The Village of Tarrytown is also investigating this electric vehicle lease program. The proposal is to lease two Nissan Leafs. One vehicle would be assigned to parking enforcement and will replace an eight cylinder engine Ford Crown Victoria and the second assigned to building inspection replacing a six cylinder engine Dodge Charger. Both of the vehicles to be replaced are gasoline. For the balance of 2017 the costs of the leased vehicles$398/ month would be drawn from the budget of the sustainability collaborative. For 2018 the Town would evaluate alternatives for budgeting the lease payments. REQUESTED ACTION BY THE TOWN BOARD: AUTHORIZE THE LEASING OF TWO NISSAN LEAFS AT A TOTAL PRICE OF$398 PER MONTH FROM MIKE ALBERT FLEET SOLUTIONS OF CINCINNATI, OHIO AND AUTHORIZE THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TO ENTER INTO A LEASE AGREEMENT WITH MIKE ALBERT FLEET SOLUTIONS SUBJEC TO FINAL APPROVAL OF THE FORM OF AGREEMENT BY THE TOWN ATTORNEY Stephen V. Altieri Town Administrator 21Page Altieri, Stephen From: Pinto, Michael Sent: Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:49 AM To: Altieri, Stephen Subject: FW: Mike Albert Fleet Solutions - Nissan Leaf Financing Attachments: 2017 Nissan LEAF S Hatchback EV_MAFS Lease Quote_07AUG2017.pdf Steve, From leasing company. Let me know what you think. PS: have we heard from Larchmont on garbage truck spec. Thanks Mike From:Shadoin, Nate [mailto:Nate.Shadoin @mikealbert.com] Sent:Wednesday, September 06, 2017 11:44 AM To: Pinto, Michael<MPinto @TownofMamaroneckNY.org> Subject: Mike Albert Fleet Solutions- Nissan Leaf Financing Mike: Nice speaking with you today about our ability to monetize the federal tax credit for EV's in the form of a lease. Some pertinent details on how we can engage with the Town of Mamaroneck: • Combine all incentives— o Nissan on'17 Leaf models-$10k o NY incentive-$1700 o Federal Tax Pass Thru-$3750 • Open or Closed end lease options—12 to 60 months • We purchase the vehicle from Nissan of New Rochelle and lease to you. I'm attaching an example of an open end lease we did for another municipality. We can structure the lease however you want and they will all include the incentives and credits I outlined above. Please let me know if you have any questions. NS INATE SHADOIN Business Development Manager nate.shadoin @mikealbert.com Office 513-554-2947 Mobile 859-444-7646 10340 Evendale Drive • Cincinnati • Ohio • 45241 IAMIKE ALBERT FLEET SOLUTIONS [111 f IMPORTANT CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: This document, and any documents accompanying this transmission,contains confidential,legally protected information and is intended only for the person or entity to which it is addressed. If you are not the intended recipient, any disclosure,copying, distribution or the taking of any action in reliance on the contents of this transmission is strictly prohibited. If you receive this transmission in error,please contact the sender and delete or destroy the material/information. 1 c WORKSESSION ITEM 5 c c. c WORKSESSION ITEM 6 c c o Town of Mamaroneck Housing Choice Voucher Program rn •cour+om1ne1 • EQUAL MOUSING OPPOR1 UNIT Y Section 8 Housing Public Notice of 2017 HCV Waiting List Opening Posted October 6, 2017 PUBLIC NOTICE NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that the Town of Mamaroneck Housing Choice Voucher Program(HCV)will accept pre- applications for federal housing assistance from November 8,2017 at 12:01 am through November 14, 2017 at 11:59 pm EST. Applications will ONLY be accepted online at https://www.waitlistcheck.com/NY1041-1562. No paper applications will be accepted. The Town of Mamaroneck has no preferences, nor is there a residency preference, however applicants deemed eligible for housing assistance who receive a voucher are required to move to and live in Westchester County for at least one year prior to requesting to move to another jurisdiction. The Housing Choice Voucher Program provides assistance to cover the portion of rent that exceeds 3o%of an eligible family's monthly income. Any income-eligible individual or family may submit a pre-application. Maximum 2017 Income Limits for Westchester County by household size are as follows. These income limits are subject to change: 1 person: $39,000 2 person: $44,600 3 person: $50,150 4 person: $55,700 5 person: $60,200 6 person: $64,650 7 person: $69,100 8 person: $73,550 Pre-applications will be accepted ONLINE ONLY. Applicants may use a personal computer, laptop,tablet, smartphone to apply. Computer and Internet access may be found at your local library, senior center or community center. No paper applications will be available. Only online applications will be considered. Reasonable Accommodation: If you are a person with a disability and require a reasonable accommodation in order to submit an application, please contact the Town of Mamaroneck Section 8 office in writing only, post marked no later than November 1, 2017. Mail your information to town of Mamaroneck PHA,74o W. Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543 and make sure to include your phone number. For more information on the Housing Choice Voucher Program, please visit our website at http://www.townofmamaroneck.org/431/Housing-Choice-Voucher-Program c WORKSESSION ITEM 7 c FIRE COMMISSION ITEM 1 Town of Mamaroneck From: Tony Siligato-Town Comptroller Re: Fire Claims Date: September 20,2017 The following Town of Mamaroneck Fire Department claims have been certified by Chief Paul Tortorella and submitted to the Comptroller's Office for payment: VENDOR DESCRIPTION AMOUNT AAA Emergency Supply Co. Fire Extinguisher inspection $ 49.00 AT&T Mobility Wireless Service 7/12/17-8/11/17 $ 363.24 Atlantic Westchester Inc. Maintenance on Day Room AC Condenser 8/11/17 $ 1,522.32 Amazon.Com Laptop case,Micro Case,Tape Wiz 4,TPI HXG-2d Sensit Combustible&Ajax $ 1,086.07 Brewer Hardware Screw hook,tape,zinc corner iron $ 38.26 Brewer Hardware Putty knife,drywall patch,sand paper $ 29.91 CIT Finance LLC Xerox Copier contract 8/22/17 $ 277.89 Cablevision Cable services for 8/23/17-9/22/17 $ 212.70 Con Edison Fire HQ Gas service 7/28-8/28/17 $ 154.05 Chatsworth Cleaners Uniform Cleaning 7/6,7/27,8/3,8/4/17 $ 119.72 FireCompanies.Com Quarterly Website Maintenance 9/1-11/30/17 $ 209.97 Grainger Building supplies-trash bags&bleach $ 39.49 Grainger Building supplies-trash bags $ 42.80 Hi-Tech Fire&Safety Inc. LTO-Tail&Pant Outer Shell 6.6 oz Pioneer $ 2,791.53 Iron Compass OnScene Explorer software subscription 9/2017-8/2018 $ 1,950.00 New England Uniform Belltops,flame visor,full black rolled edge $ 190.00 New England Uniform White shirts,American flags $ 152.50 Ready Refresh Rental for Water Coolers at FD HQ 7/19-8/18/17 $ 114.96 SG Fire Protection Kitchen hood cleaning $ 350.00 Sound Shore Pest Control Exterminating Services 8/23/17 $ 65.00 Tony's Nursery Inc. 3 propane tanks,grass seed,top soil,pro straw,black cedar mulch $ 417.71 Town of Mam'k Fire Dept. Commercial Audio Mixer Matrix $ 639.49 Town of Mam'k Fire Dept. Food for Monthly Drill August 2017 $ 107.54 UniFirst Corporation Cleaning supplies for building 8/18,8/25,9/1/17 $ 230.10 Verizon Fire HQ service 8/10-9/9/17 $ 239.38 Villa Maria Pizza Food for Fast Drill 8/24/17, for New Member Drill 9/6/17 $ 151.93 West Cty Volunteer Fireman's Ass 2017 Yearly Dues for TMFD $ 15.00 WJWW 205 Weaver ST Charges 7/25-8/25/17 $ 136.91 Westech Elevator Services Maintenance for September 2017 $ 175.00 $ - Total: $ 11,872.47 c FIRE COMMISSION ITEM 2 c. 40 AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN ITEM 1 c a'Io �'o Town of Mamaroneck _ "I Town Center •FOUNDED 1661• 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353 TEL: 914/381-7810 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR FAX: 914/381-7809 townadministrator @townofmamaroneck.org Memorandum To: Supervisor &Town Board Re: Set Public Hearing—No Parking Zone 1298 Palmer Avenue Date: September 15, 2017 The Traffic Committee, at its meeting of September 12, 2017, considered a request from the owner of the property at 1298 Palmer Avenue to establish a no parking zone adjacent to the entrance to the driveway to the property. The property owner indicated that oftentimes cars park on the east side of Palmer Avenue immediately adjacent to the entrance to the driveway. This creates a serious visual obstruction that is a problem when the property owner is attempting to exit the property. The Traffic Committee, after reviewing this matter, is recommending to the Town Board that an 18 foot no parking zone be established on the south side of Palmer Avenue adjacent to the east side of the driveway at 1298 Palmer Avenue. ACTION REQUESTED BY THE TOWN BOARD:THAT A PUBLIC HEARING BE SET FOR WEDNESDAY, OCTOBER 4 TO HOLD A PUBLIC HEARING TO CONSIDER THE ESTABLISHMENT OF A NO PARKING ZONE ON PALMER AVENUE. ff::vP--A-- Stephen V.Altieri Town Administrator Local Law No. -2017 This local law shall be known as the "Restriction on Parking on a Section of the South Side of Palmer Avenue in the vicinity of 1298 Palmer Avenue" Law. BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck Section 1 -Purpose: The Town Board finds that there is a need to eliminate some of parking spaces in the vicinity of 1298 Palmer Avenue in order to improve safety for ingress and egress into and out of that property. This local law does that. Section 2-Regulation of Parking on two sections of Palmer Avenue: No motor vehicle shall be parked on the section of the south side of Palmer Avenue that extends eighteen (18) feet east from the eastern side of the driveway for 1298 Palmer Avenue at the point where that driveway meets Palmer Avenue. Section 3-Sign(s)to be Erected and Painting to be Done: An appropriate sign or signs shall be erected on and/or above, and/or striping shall be painted on the surface of Palmer Avenue indicating where parking is prohibited by this law. Section 4-Severability: Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of competent jurisdiction, such declaration of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any other provisions of this Local Law, which may be implemented without the invalid or unconstitutional provisions. Section-Effective Date: This Local Law shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State. September 15,2017 AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN ITEM 2 Documents Under Worksession # 2 AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN ITEM 3 O O Town of Mamaroneck W Town Center 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810 FAX: 914/381-7809 townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org Memorandum To: Supervisor and Town Board Re:Authorization-Transfer of Funds Natural Gas Main Repairs-Senior Center Building Date: September 15, 2017 On Friday, September 8, 2017 a strong smell of gas was noted in the senior center. As a result of a further investigation, natural gas leaks were discovered in the building. Con Edison was contacted immediately and they shut gas service to the building. There is currently no hot water service and the stove in the kitchen cannot be used. Subsequently gas leaks were also discovered in the street connection between the gas service line and Con Edison's gas main. Con Edison completed those repairs the day the leak was discovered. The center has however been able to continue almost full operations even without gas service to the building. Since senior meals are brought to the building hot and are placed in steam tables there has been no interruption to the meal program. The vendor supplying the meals has assumed responsibility for cleaning and sterilizing the pans and utensils used to serve the meals. Attached is the outline of the work to be completed in order to repair the external and internal gas lines at the center. In addition to the cost outlined, Con Edison has advised the Town and its contractor that the new gas line must be run through the exterior wall outside of the building adjacent to the gas meter rather than installed underground under the foundation. As a result the costs are as follows: Original Proposal $10,700 Core Drilling of foundation 500 Contingency 1.800 Total $ 13,000 If after testing the integrity of the gas lines leading to the second floor it is determined that replacement is necessary, the contingency would be used for that expense. REQUESTED ACTION BY THE TOWN BOARD: AUTHORIZE A TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF$13,000 FROM THE TOWNWIDE FUND BALANCE INTO THE BUILDING AND GROUNDS REPAIR ACCOUNT FOR THE TOWN SENIO CENTER AS OUTLINED IN THE ATTACHED TRANSFER SCHEDULE. Stephen V. Altieri Town Administrator tio Printed on Recycled Paper https://1 stchoiceplumbing.freshbooks.com/showInvoice?invoiceid=1... 1st Choice Plumbing -" 312 Prospect ave M joL., amaroneck NY 10543 Of Mamaroneck Invoice# 0000482 Mike Invoice Date September 12,2017 740 West Boston Post Road Balance Due(USD) $10,700.00 Mamaroneck NY 10543 Task Time Entry Notes Rate Hours Line Total General Supply and install new gas piping from gas 6,200.00 1 6,200.00 meter(front of building)to boiler room as needed. Excavate front walkway asphalt to install underground piping to new extension of building to enter crawl space to travel to boiler room. Check integrity of gas lines to 2nd floor apartment. Change out if needed. distribute gas piping to 4 appliances trough out building . perform integrity test as per NYS Plumbing Code . General Saw cut asphalt as needed from gas meter to 4,500.00 1 4,500.00 front walkway concrete pad, Cut away 24inches of concrete pad to install gas riser, Remove all rock and asphalt to dump,restore all asphalt to grade. steel fence to be installed by others. Note ***THIS AN ESTIMATE*** 0.00 1 0.00 Item Description Unit Cost Quantity Line Total 1288 Boston Post Gas piping . 0.00 1 0.00 Road.(VFW) Total 10,700.00 Amount Paid 0.00 Balance Due(USD) $10,700.00 Terms 1 year warranty on materials and labor 1 of 1 9/12/2017 12:38 PM BUDGET AMENDMENT - INCREASE 2017 GENERAL TOWNWIDE FUND BUDGET 0 9/20/2017 TOWN BOARD MEETING GENERAL TOWNWIDE (FUND A): INCREASE BUDGET: A.0000.5995 APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE $ 13,000.00 A.6772.4012 BUILDINGS &GROUNDS REPAIRS/MAINT $ 13,000.00 * REPRESENTS ANTICIPATED USAGE OF GENERAL TOWNWIDE FUND UNRESERVED FUND BALANCE TO FUND THE EMERGENCY REPAIRS FOR GAS LINE AT THE SENIOR CENTER. ORIGINAL BUDGET-A.6772.4012 $ 7,500.00 BUDGET AMENDMENT-R.O.B.09/20/2017 $ 13,000.00 REVISED BUDGET AS AMENDED 09/20/2017 $ 20,500.00 AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN ITEM 4 Documents Under Worksession #4 40 AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN ITEM 5 F 4 O 0 nn Town of Mamaroneck e Town Center t " 740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck,NY 10543-3353 OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810 FAX: 914/381-7809 townadmmistrator@townofmamaroneck.org TO: Stephen Altieri, Town Administrator Nancy Seligson, Town Supervisor Town Board Members FROM: Connie Green O'Donnell, Assistant Town Administrator DATE: September 14, 2017 SUBJECT: Authorization to Appoint a Skilled Laborer Authorization is requested to appoint Robert Pugliese to the full-time position of Skilled Laborer in the Highway Department at an annual salary of$56,461. The effective date will be no later than October 9, 2017. The position has been vacant since June 21st due to a promotion in the Highway Department. Since the 2017 budget reflects this position being paid at a higher step in the CSEA Salary Schedule and the position has remained open, there will be a savings. Mr. Pugliese is a resident of New Rochelle and is currently employed as a laborer for a local union located in Queens. His duties consist of preparing job sites for construction work, working with concrete patching sidewalks and curbs, transporting construction materials, landscaping, controlling traffic, operating heavy machinery, equipment and tools, as well as performing related tasks at construction sites. Based upon his having performed masonry work and his experience operating heavy machinery and equipment, Lou Martirano is recommending that Mr. Pugliese be appointed to the position. It is anticipated he will be a good fit in the Highway Department based on his enthusiasm and positive attitude that he displayed during the interviewing process. ACTION REQUESTED: That the Town Board approve the appointment of Robert Pugliese to the position of Skilled Laborer at an annual salary of$56,461, effective no later than October 9, 2017. il' Printed on Recycled Paper