HomeMy WebLinkAbout2017_05_03 Town Board Meeting Packet Town of Mamaroneck
Town Board Agenda
Wednesday May 3, 2017
THE TOWN BOARD WILL CONVENE-AT 5:00PM, IN CONFERENCE ROOM A TO
DISCUSS
1. Update- Weaver Street Firehouse Project
2. Discussion- Ethics Code Disclosure Form
3. Discussion- Larchmont Library- Use of Village Center
4. Discussion- Leaf Blower Regulations/Town Code Violations
5. New Business
6. Request for Executive Session
8:00pm CALL TO ORDER-Town Court
PRESENTATION - PROPOSED 2017/2018 MAMARONECK SCHOOL DISTRICT BUDGET
SUPERVISOR'S REPORT
CITIZEN COMMENTS
BOARD OF FIRE COMMISSIONERS
1. Fire Claims
2. Authorization- Phase 1- Engineering Services- Weaver Street Project
3. Other Fire Department Business
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK
1. Report of Bids-Contract TA-17-05- Road Resurfacing
2. Approval- Larchmont Library Plan- Management of Village Center
3. Set Public Hearing- Installation of Stop Sign Rockingstone Lane
4. Set Public Hearing- Parking Restriction- Palmer Avenue
5. Amendment- Retainer Agreement- Town's General Counsel
6. Authorization- Energy Performance Contract Audit
7. Consideration of Certiorari
8. Proclamation -Arbor Day Tree City U.S.A. Award
• APPROVAL OF MINUTES-April 19, 2017
REPORTS OF THE COUNCIL
TOWN CLERK'S REPORT
NEXT REGULARLY SCHEDULED MEETING- May 17, 2017
Any physically handicapped person needing special assistance in order to attend the
meeting should contact the Town Administrator's office at 381-7810
TOWN BOARD MEETING-WORKSESSION AGENDA
WEDNESDAY, May 3, 2017
5:OOpm Mamaroneck Town Center -Conference Room A
1. Update- Weaver Street Firehouse Project
(See Attachment)
2. Discussion- Ethics Code Disclosure Form
(No Attachment- the Planning Board Chairman and counsel to the
Planning Board have requested a review of the Ethics disclosure form and
consideration of a change to some broad language. The Town Attorney
will explain this in greater depth at the meeting.)
3. Discussion- Larchmont Library -Use of Village Center
(See Attachment)
4. Discussion Leaf Blower Regulations/Town Code Violations
(See Attachment)
5. New Business
6. Request for Executive Session
Aw WORKSESSION
ITEM 1
c.
' = Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Board of Fire Commissioners
Re: Update Weaver Street Firehouse Project
Authorization- Preparation of Construction Drawings/Bid Documents
Date: April 29, 2017
The Town Fire District previously retained the engineering services of Grigg and Davis
to evaluate the condition of the apparatus floors at the Weaver Street Firehouse. This
was in response to the severe cracking of the concrete floors in the two outer bays. It
was determined that the cause was unsatisfactory design of the reinforcing bars in the
floors. Therefore the determination was made to complete the replacement of the outer
bay concrete floors.
Another component of the firehouse improvement project was to replace the epoxy
finish on the inner apparatus bays from the original building constructed in 1936. As a
precaution it was decided that before expending funds for the new epoxy, the
apparatus bay floors should be evaluated based largely upon their age and the heavier
weight of newer fire apparatus.
Grigg and Davis's findings were that the based upon the weight load of the fire
apparatus it would be necessary to reinforce the existing concrete joist floor with new
steel beams under the original apparatus bays. The estimated cost for the entire
project including engineering fees is $960,075. Attached is a recent report from the
engineer regarding the project.
If acceptable to the Board the next step would be to prepare bid specifications and
construction drawings for the project. Attached is a proposal from Grigg and Davis for
total engineering services for the project. Due to the total cost of the project it would be
necessary to borrow funds which would require a referendum. However in the interest
of time the recommendation to the Board is that authorization be granted for Grigg and
Davis to complete the Construction Document Phase of the scope of their work at a cost
of $63,000. Based upon our findings the need for the project is apparent if we are to
insure the future integrity of the apparatus bay floors.
Therefore we can move forward with the bid documents and the planning of the
referendum simultaneously. Even if the referendum is unsuccessful the District will
have a complete set of construction documents and can consider alternate phasing of
the project if necessary.
OW
lio Printed on Recycled Paper
REQUESTED ACTION OF THE BOARD: APPROVE THE CONSTRUCTION DOCUMENT
PHASE OF THE ENGINEERING PROPOSAL SUBMITTED BY GRIGG AND DAVIS,
AUTHORIZE A TRANSFER OF FUNDS IN THE AMOUNT OF $63,000 AND AUTHORIZE
THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TO EXECUTE AN AGREEMENT WITH GRIGG AND DAVIS
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
GRIGG & DAVIS ENGINEERS, P.C.
21 Crossway - Scarsdale, NY 10583 j Tel. (914) 725-5095 ( Fax (914) 725-7986
E-mail: GDenpineers@optonline.net I URL: www.GDengineers.net
40
BBB..
ACCREDITED
BUSINESS
Town of Mamaroneck
740 West Boston Post Road
Mamaroneck, NY 10543
Attn: S. Altieri, Town Administrator
April 25, 2017
Re: Fire Headquarters, 205 Weaver Street — Larchmont, NY
Letter of Agreement for Structural Engineering Services for the Apparatus Bay Floor
Replacement/Reinforcement
Dear Stephen:
The following Letter of Agreement for Structural Engineering Services is for the Apparatus Bay
Floor Replacement/Reinforcement at the Fire Headquarters, 205 Weaver Street — Larchmont, NY.
Construction Document Phase
1. Attend Project Meetings with Town and prepare Meeting Minutes.
2. Prepare Construction Drawings and Specifications to:
a. replace the Apparatus Bay Floor at the North and South Apparatus Bays, and
b. reinforce the Apparatus Bay Floor at the middle two Apparatus Bays.
The Fee for the Construction Document Phase is: $63,625.00 + Reimb. Exp.
-I-
Bidding Phase
1. Conduct Pre -Bid Meeting and Walk-through with Bidders.
2. Answer Bidder's questions.
3. Review Bids received and prepare Bid Summary.
4. Attend Meeting with Town to review Bids.
5. Issue Bid Results Letter to Bidders.
The Fee for the Bidding Phase is $8,000.00 + Reimb. Exp.
Building Permit Phase
1. Prepare Building Permit Application Forms.
2. Print and sign and seal Drawings.
3. Trip to Building Dept. for IST Submission.
4. Review Building Dept. Plan Review comments and revise Drawings.
5. Prepare revised Building Permit Application Forms.
6. Print and sign and seal revised Drawings.
7. Trip to Building Dept. for 2ND Submission.
The Fee for the Building Permit Phase is:
$3,000.00 + Reimb. Exp.
Construction Administration Phase
1. Obtain Proposals from Testing Laboratories to perform the
Special Inspections, review Proposals received, and
recommend Testing Laboratory to be retained by Client.
2. Attend Project Meetings and prepare Meeting Minutes.
3. Answer Contractor questions and prepare Construction Sketches.
4. Review Shop Drawings.
5. Review Application for Payment Forms
6. Perform Punch List Inspection and prepare Punch List.
7. Perform Final Inspection and prepare Engineer's Certification
Letter.
The Fee for the Construction Administration Phase is:
48,000.00 + Reimb. Exp.
Note: The above Fees shall be adjusted for inflation at the rate of 3.0% per year.
-2-
Reimbursable Expenses
The following Reimbursable Expenses shall be invoiced at cost.
1. First Class Mail, Fedex.
2. Mileage, Tolls, Parking, Public Transportation.
3. Document Reproduction.
4. Bank Fees for Wire Transfers.
Reimbursable Expenses are not included in the Fees provided above and are an additional cost.
Additional Services
The following Additional Services shall be invoiced at the following rates.
1. Structural Engineering Services.
2. Meetings/Field Visits.
3. Respond to e-mail.
4. Additional Drafting Services.
. $180.00/hour
. $180.00/hour
$180.00/hour
$90.00/hour
Revisions to the structural calculations, drawings, or sketches required by changes made by the
Owner are considered Additional Services.
Revisions to the structural calculations, drawings, or sketches required by field conditions
discovered after demolition is completed are considered Additional Services.
Revisions to the structural calculations, drawings, or sketches required to verify the acceptance of
as -built conditions which do not conform to the structural drawings are considered Additional
Services.
Additional Services shall not be provided without written approval from the Client.
Terms
Payments for each Phase are due as follows:
Construction Document Phase
Retainer $21,208.00
50% Complete $21,208.00
100% Complete $21,209.00
Total $63,625.00
Bidding Phase
Retainer $4,000.00
100% Complete $4,000.00
Total $8,000.00
-3-
Building Permit Phase
Retainer
100% Complete
Total
$1,500.00
$1,500.00
$3,000.00
Construction Administration Phase
The $48,000.00 Fee for the Construction Administration Phase shall be billed monthly in
equal payments over the Contractor's anticipated Project duration.
Additional Services:
An Invoice for Additional Services provided shall be prepared once the Additional
Service is completed. Several Invoices for Additional Services may be issued as the
Project progresses.
Reimbursable Expenses
An Invoice for Reimbursable Expenses shall be prepared whenever the accumulated expenses
exceed $100.00, except the Final Invoice.
Should this project be put on Hold or Services be Terminated:
1. The Client should immediately notify the Engineer by telephone and follow up with a written
Hold/Termination Notification Letter, and
2. An Invoice for services performed up to, and including, the date of the Hold/Termination
Notification Letter shall be prepared and sent to the Client. Putting the Project on Hold or
Terminating Services does not relieve the Client of their responsibility to pay for services
performed. Payment, in full, is due within 15 days of the date of the Invoice.
A Payment received more than 15 days after the date of the Invoice is considered a Late Payment.
A Late Payment Fee equal to 5% of the Balance Due will be charged and interest will be charged
at the rate of 1.5% for each month, or portion thereof, that the Payment is not received. Also, if
payment is not received as stipulated work will be suspended until the late payment, including
the Late Payment Fee and all interest, are paid in full.
Payment of all Invoices, plus any penalties and interest incurred, is required before the Engineer's
Certification Letter is released.
If necessary, any Collection Agency fees and Attorney's fees incurred to collect monies due shall
be considered a Reimbursable Expense and shall occur only after a good faith effort to resolve
the dispute is unsuccessful.
Stop Work Order
Should it become necessary for Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C. to issue a "Stop Work Order" the
Client shall hold harmless Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C. from any, and all, damages that occur
as a result of the "Stop Work Order".
-4-
The Client shall emphasize to the Contractor the importance of following the Structural
Drawings. If the Contractor wants to deviate from the Structural Drawings written approval from
the Structural Engineer must be obtained before the work is started. The cost for reviewing any
proposed alternate and any revisions to the Structural Drawings shall be paid for by the
Contractor at the hourly rates specified in Section "Additional Services".
Any non -conforming structural work which remains uncorrected for more than two work days is
cause for issuance of a "Stop Work Order". The cost for additional Field Visits to oversee the
Contractor shall be paid for by the Client and back -charged to the Contractor. The "Stop Work
Order" shall not be withdrawn until the non -conforming structural work has been corrected to the
satisfaction of Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C.
Limitation of Professional Liability
To the fullest extent permitted by law, and notwithstanding any other provisions of this
Agreement, the total liability, in the aggregate, of Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C., its Officers,
Directors, Partners, Employees, Agents, and Consultants, and any of them, to Town of
Mamaroneck and anyone claiming by, through, or under Town of Mamaroneck, for any and all
claims, losses, costs, or damages whatsoever arising out of, resulting from, or in any way related
to this Project or the Agreement from any cause or causes, including but not limited to
negligence, professional errors or omissions, strict liability or breach of contract, or warranty,
express or implied, of Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C., its Officers, Directors, Partners,
Employees, Agents, and Consultants, and any of them, shall not exceed the total compensation
received by Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C. under this Agreement or the total amount of
$1,000,000.00, whichever is greater.
Site Safety at Construction Area Limitation of Liability
Site Safety at the Construction Area is the sole responsibility of the General Contractor. Grigg &
Davis Engineers, P.C. assumes no liability for Site Safety at the Construction Area.
Acceptance
If this Letter of Agreement is acceptable please sign and date where indicated below.
Name
Date
Please return the signed Letter of Agreement with the payment due.
-5-
Thank you for considering Grigg & Davis Engineers, P.C. for this Project and should you have any
questions please give me a call at 914-725-5095.
Regards,
6 - L I zo--
Bond E. Davis III, PE
M
Altieri, Stephen
From: Bond E. Davis, III, PE <gdengineers@optonline.net>
Sent: Friday, April 14, 2017 10:06 AM
To: Altieri, Stephen
Subject: Weaver Street Fire Headquarters - Larchmont, NY
Steve:
I have completed the Structural Engineering Feasibility Study for the new steel beams required to reinforce the Original
Firehouse concrete joist Apparatus Bay Floor. The existing concrete joist floor can be reinforced with W14 x 257 and W8
x 48 rolled steel beams. In order to install the new steel beams the existing W15 x 71.5 and W9 x 38.5 steel beams will
have to be removed. Note: The new steel work is only required under the present Apparatus Bay floor area. The
existing steel framing under the former Apparatus Bay floor area that was converted to Operations Use will remain.
Also, given that the existing steel framing needs to be replaced under the Apparatus Bay floor the Apparatus will not be
permitted to use the Apparatus Bay during the work.
I have revised the Budget Cost for the Project keeping the existing Apparatus Bay concrete joist floor in-place and
replacing the steel framing as discussed above.
Budget Cost $710,825.00
15% Contingency $106,625.00
Total Construction Budget Cost $817,450.00
Engineering Fees, 15% x $817,450.00 $122,625.00
Special Inspections $20,000.00
Total Project Budget Cost $960,075.00
I have previously determined a Total Project Budget Cost of $960,250.00 considering the replacement of the present
Apparatus Bay floor area. One would expect a significant cost savings if the existing Apparatus Bay floor could remain
in-place however the cost of the very, very heavy W14 x 257 steel beams has offset the cost of the replacement of the
Apparatus Bay floor. The reason such a heavy steel beam is required to reinforce the existing concrete joist floor is
because a very stiff steel beam is required to effectively interact with the concrete joist floor and limit the bending and
shear stresses in the concrete joist to allowable values.
Please let me know if the Town of Mamaroneck wishes for Grigg Davis Engineers, P.C. to prepare a Letter of Agreement
for Structural Engineering Services for the Apparatus Bay Floor Repairs at the Weaver Street Fire Headquarters.
Also, please provide the Purchase Order number for this Feasibility Study so that I can issue the Invoice.
If you have any questions please let me know.
Regards,
Bond
AMEND 2017 CAPITAL PROJECT & BUDGET - FIRE H Q BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
CAPITAL PROJECTS FUND (FUND H):
AMEND BUDGET:
EXP H.3410.0400.2017.29 FIRE BUILDING IMPROVEMENTS
REV H.0000.5034.2017.29 TRANSFERS FROM FIRE DISTRICT
FIRE DISTRICT (FUND SF):
AMEND BUDGET:
EXP SF.9900.9950
REV SF.0000.5995
a5/3/2017 TOWN BOARD MEETING
$ 63,000.00
$ 63,000.00
(CAPITAL PROJECT #2017-29)
(Increase project budget with $63, 000 funding to be transferred from Fire District Fund Balance
(Source - unrestricted fund balance)
" Original Capital Project Budget. $ _
• Funding source:
TRANSFER FR FIRE - R.O.B. 5/3117 $ 63,000.00
Ca ital Project—Budget amended & adopted on 5/3/17: $ 63,000.00
TRANSFER TO CAPITAL PROJECT
APPROPRIATED FUND BALANCE
"Increase Fund SF budget with $63,000 of appropriated fund balance (for Capital Project).
$ 63,000.00
$ 63,000.00
WORKSESSION
ITEM 2
L
NO ATTACHMENT
cr
4w
WORKSESSION
ITEM 3
' = Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Use and Management of the Larchmont Village Center
Date: April 29, 2017
This past week the Supervisor and 1 met with the Village Mayor and Library
representatives regarding the ongoing discussion as to whether the Larchmont Library
should assume responsibility for the managing and maintenance of the Village Center.
Currently the Center is maintained by the Village of Larchmont. The Library runs a
large number of programs in the Center. The Village uses the center as a polling place
and extra meeting room for larger meetings of the Planning and Zoning Board. It would
appear that the Library has become the majority user of the Center. On an annual basis
the estimated cost for the operation of the center is $12,000 for cleaning, general
maintenance and utilities.
The proposal being forwarded by the Village and the Library is that the Library would
assume responsibility for all aspects of the Center's operation including scheduling,
maintenance and utilities. The Village of Larchmont would pay for 10% of the operating
costs for the Center which at this time is about $1,200 to cover their use of the building.
The balance of the expense would become a budget item for the library of which the
Town would pay approximately 60% of the cost based upon library card registrations.
Throughout the discussions on this matter the issue for the Town has been recognition
of the fact that the Village does use the facility and that expense for their use should not
be borne by the Town. This matter does require the approval of the Town Board.
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
O•
%4f Printed on Recycled Paper
WORKSESSION
ITEM 4
r
' = Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Fines and Penalties- Leaf Blower Violations and Town Code Violations
Date: April 29, 2017
At the Town Board's last discussion of amending the Noise Ordinance regarding leaf
blower violations, there was a question as to fine schedule for similar violations in other
communities. The Board was also interested in knowing what the Town's fine schedule
is for Town Code violations. Below are the results of a survey of communities regarding
fines for noise/leaf lower violations.
Village of
Mamaroneck
$250 first offense,$500 second and subsequent offenses
within same year,
Village of Larchmont
Fines not to exceed 250
Village of Ardsley
$50 first offense, second and subsequent offenses, not more
than 250
Town of Bedford
Fines not to exceed 250
Village of Bronxville
$250 first offense, $500 second offense within same year,
$1,000 for third and subsequent offenses within same year
Village of Briarcliff
Manor
Fines not to exceed $250
Village of Hastings
50 first offense 200 for offenses thereafter
Village of Scarsdale
75 first offense 150 for offenses thereafter
Village of Dobbs
Ferry
$50 first offense, $250 for offenses thereafter
City of New Rochelle
Fines not to exceed 250
City of Rye
Fines not to exceed 250
Village of Elmsford
Fines can be no less than 100 or greater than 250
In regard to the Town's code violation fines; generally the code calls for a fine not to
exceed $250. 1 have attached for your review the excerpts of each of our codes that
identify the fines for violations. The attachment includes the section of the code and
you will note in the lower left corner of each box the title of the section of the code.
Ae�--
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
4ft
tj Printed on Recycled Paper
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Page 1 of 14
Enter search term...
Ti results for: Fines Scab
C��
Code New Law
Relevance
§ 45-3 Fines designated by Court. fines . ..... ....... .3
The Court shall designate the fines to be paid for offenses which may be satisfied at the Bureau, as
hereinbefore stated, provided that such fines are within the limits established as penalties for such
i
offenses.
Traffic Violations Bureau
§ 147-15 Fines for parking infractions.
fine_..........._ --__ 2
fines, . 3
The above amounts are base fines. All violators who fail to pay the base fine within 3o days of
the ... issued: double the original fine. If paid after 6o days but ...
Parking Lots, Town -Owned j
§ 45-4 Record of violations and fines. fines . .
i
guilt was established in Court or in the Bureau, and also a record of all fines collected and the
dispositions thereof. It shall also perform such other ...
Traffic Violations Bureau
§ 226-4 Recovery of impounded vehicles; fine and storage fee; disposal. fine
upon the payment of the fine, plus the storage fee for ... set forth in § A250 -1 .The fine and
storage fee shall become ... of this chapter, the fine and storage fee shall become ... of this chapter,
said fine and storage fee shall be ... of the aforementioned fine and storage fee. Any surplus ...
Vehicles, Off -Road
By using eCode36o you agree to be legalry bound by the _ If YOU do nota ree to the Terms of Use, please do not use eCode 60.
2 1
httn://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
§ 144-10 Penalty for failure to notify owners of demolition.
A violation of § 144-8 shall be punishable by a fine of $250.
Notification Procedures> Notification of Demolition
fine
§ 52-7 Penalties for offenses. II fine
as follows: for a first offense, by payment of a fine not exceeding $25; for a second or subsequent
offense, by payment of a fine not exceeding $25o or by imprisonment for a term not to exceed 15
days, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
i
Alcoholic Beverages
§ 58-11 Penalties for offenses. fine.
Any person violating this Article shall be subject to a fine and penalty of not less than $5o nor more
I
than $250.
Animals> Removal of Canine Waste
§ 219-8 Penalties for offenses.
The owner or lessee of a vehicle removed pursuant to this article shall be liable for a fine of not
more than $250. That fine shall be in addition to the amounts required to be paid pursuant to §
219-7.
Vehicles and Traffic, Towing of Motor Vehicles
§ 233-5 Penalties for offenses.
Any violation of this chapter shall be considered an offense punishable as follows: For the first
offense, a fine of not less than $25, nor more than $20o. For the second and any subsequent offense,
a fine of not less than $loo nor more than $25o and/or imprisonment of up to 15 days.
Waterfowl
§ 122-6 Penalties for offenses.
By ucing eCode360 you agree to be legally bound by the
Page 2 of 14
31
fine. .
z
I
fine. .................z
fined ............ ... z
fines ..... _ . ...... _ .......t
If you co noc agree to the Term; of Use, pleas de not use eGode36o.
httn://ecode360.com/search/MAO239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
to 3o days in jail or a fine of $500, or both, for a first ... to up to 6o days in jail or fined up to
$i,000, or both. A ... to up to 12o days in jail or fined up to $2,000, or both. As ... of the foregoing
schedule of fines, a fine equal to two times the profit ...
Helicopters and Other Aircraft
§ 231-7 Penalties for offenses. fine. .
fined
conviction thereof, shall be fined in an amount not exceeding ... conviction thereof, shall be finedI fines.
in an amount that is the greater of the fine authorized under § 231-7A or the fine or fines that may
be imposed for a ...
Water> Water Restrictions During Times of Emergency
§ 177-18 Penalties for offenses. fine.. .
i,
of this chapter shall constitute a violation and be punishable by a fine of up to $250 for each such
violation, except that the placing of any ... obtaining said site plan approval shall be a misdemeanor
punishable by a fine not to exceed $i,000 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months ...
i
Site Plan Review
Page 3 of 14
21
§ 178-18 Penalties for offenses.
fine.. .......... 2
of this chapter shall constitute a violation and be punishable by a fine not less than $25o and not
more than $500 for each such violation, except ... site plan approval shall constitute a violation and
be punishable by a fine not less than $50o and not more than $2,500.
Site Plan Review of Residential Development
§ 86-5 Penalties for offenses.
fine__ ........ ____ 3
...as hereinabove defined, shall be subject to a fine for the first offense of not less than $5Oo nor ...
every subsequent offense shall be subject to a fine of not less than $i,000 nor more than $2,500
or ... such charge to be false, shall be subject to a fine of not more than $500.
Discrimination
i
§ 77-17 Penalties for offenses.
By icing eCode;60 you agree to be IegaLy bound by the
fine
If you do not agree to the Terms of Use, pleas do not use eCodr-36oa
.1
httn://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
The violation of any provision of this chapter is hereby declared to be a violation, and any person
violating the same shall be guilty of a violation and shall, on conviction before a Town Justice, be
punished by a fine not exceeding $250 or by imprisonment not exceeding 15 days, or both.
Conservation Areas
§ 100-6 Penalties for offenses.
and a person convicted of said violation shall be deemed a disorderly person and subject to a fine
Of $25 for each offense. Editor's Note: Former Art. III, Pistol Permits, adopted 1-19-1977, which ...
Firearms, Sale and Use
§ 108-6 Penalties for offenses.
by L.L. No. 10-2002 ] Any violation of this chapter shall be a violation punishable by a fine of no less
than $5o nor more than $250. Summonses for violations of this chapter may be issued by ...
Fire Safety Zones
§ 141-8 Penalties for offenses.
any of the provisions of this Article shall be guilty of an offense and shall be p
not more than $250 or by imprisonment for not more than 15 days, or both.
Noise> General Provisions
§ 141-13 Penalties for offenses.
Page 4 of 14
fine.
fine..... .I ............... —1
Any person, firm, association or corporation who violates any provision of this Article shall be guilty
of an offense punishable by a fine of not more than two hundred fifty dollars ($25o.) and/or by
imprisonment for not more than 15 days. Each violation of this Article shall be a separate offense.
Noise > outdoor Power Tools and Gasoline -Powered Blowers
§ 148-9 Penalties for offenses.
fine.
fine.
The violation of any provision of this chapter hereby is declared to be a violation. Upon conviction
for violating any of sections of this chapter, the convicted person shall be punished by a fine not
exceeding $250 or by imprisonment not exceeding 15 days, or both.
B using eCode;eo you agree to be legally bound by the If you do ^ot agree to the Term, of Use, please do not use eCode36o.
Parks and Fields y
httn:Hecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
§ 173-34 Penalties for offenses.
such violation may be punished by a fine not exceeding $1,000 or by ... to exceed 15 days, or by
both such fine and imprisonment. In lieu of or in addition to such fine or imprisonment, or both,
each such ... shall be subject to a separate fine, imprisonment or civil penalty. In ...
Sewers> Enforcement
fine
I
§ 192-9 Penalties for offenses. fine.
[Added 7-17-1996 by L.L. No.14-1996 ] Any person violating any provision of this chapter, for which
no other penalty is provided, shall be guilty of an offense punishable by imprisonment for not more
than one year or by a fine of not more than $500, or both. j
Swimming Pools
§ 226-7 Penalties for offenses.
[Amended 7-17-1996 by L.L. No. 14-1996 ] Any child, operator or parent who shall violate any of the
provisions of this chapter shall, upon conviction thereof, be sentenced to a fine not exceeding $loo
or to imprisonment for any term not exceeding 15 days, or both.
Vehicles, OH -Road
fine
§ 58-9 Penalties for offenses. fine.... ...
a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 days or by a fine of not more than
$1,000, or both. Additional penalties. Violation of §§ ... The penalty for violation as above provided j
shall be in addition to any fine provided for in § 58-9A. Every day or part thereof that such
i
violation ...
Animals > General Provisions
Page 5 of 14
41
.1 1
§ 99-11 Penalties for offenses; additional remedies. fine.. ........... z
issued hereunder, shall, upon conviction thereof, be punished by a fine of not more than $250, or
by imprisonment for not more than 15 days, or both such fine and imprisonment. Each day that a
violation continues shall be deemed a ...
i
i
Filming and Videotaping
I
By using eCode36o you agree to be legal'�y bound by the . If you eo not agree to the Terms of lae= pleash do not use eCode36o.
httn://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Page 6 of 14
§ 100-4 Penalties for offenses. fine 2
misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine of not more
than $500, or both. [Amended 10-20-1954 ] Additional ... The penalty for violation as above provided
shall be in addition to any fine provided for in § 100-4A. Every day or part thereof that such
violation ...
I�
Firearms > Discharge of Firearms
§ 117-7 Penalties for offenses.
�I
fine.. ............. 2
and shall, upon conviction before a Town Justice, be punished by a fine not exceeding $loo or, in
default of payment of such fine, by imprisonment for a term not exceeding 3o days. [Amended 7-17-
1996 by ...
Garage Sales
i
§ 154-11 Penalties for offenses.
fine.. .. ... ......... .2
misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine of not more
than $500, or both. [Amended 10-20-1954 ] Additional ... The penalty for violation as above provided
shall be in addition to any fine provided for in § 154-11A . Every day or part thereof that such
j
violation ...
Peddling and Soliciting
L_ — —
§ 161-5 Penalties for offenses. I fine.. .......
... a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 days or by a fine of not more than
$250, or both. [Amended 10-20-1954 Editor's Note:... The penalty for violation as above provided
shall be in addition to any fine provided for in § 161-5A. Every day or part thereof that such
violation ...
Property Maintenance> Lot Maintenance
§ 198-13 Penalties for offenses.
... an offense punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a fine of not more than
$500, or both. Additional penalties. Violations of § ... The penalty for violation as above provided shall
be in addition to any fine provided for in § 198-13A. Every day or part thereof that such violation ...
Taxicabs
fine
http://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
' Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
§ 55-11 Penalties for offenses.
of this chapter, in addition to the revocation of his or its license, shall be liable to a fine or penalty
of not less than $5o nor more than $250 for each offense. Each day such violation shall ...
Amusement Devices, Mechanical
§ 91-8 Penalties for offenses.
any provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of a violation which shall be punishable by a fine of no
more than $i,000 or imprisonment for a term not to exceed 15 days, or both, and also shall be ...
Emergency Access to Buildings
Page 7 of 14
fine.... ....... _ _ .... _ i
fine.
§ 106-61 Penalties for offenses. ! fine
shall be guilty of a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment for not more than one year or by a
fine of not more than $500, or both. Any abatement hereinbefore provided for shall be in addition
to any ...
Fire Prevention and Building Construction. Building Construction> Enforcement
i
I
§ 147-16 Penalties for offenses.
fined
forth in § 147-15 shall be deemed guilty of an offense and, upon conviction thereof, shall be fined in
an amount not to exceed $15 Each day such violation is committed or permitted to continue shall ...
Parking Lots, Town -Owned
§ 175-16 Penalties for offenses.
... be subject to prosecution therefor in the Town Court and, upon conviction, shall be liable to a fine
not to exceed $250 or imprisonment for a period not to exceed five days, or both. Each week's ...
Signs. General Provisions
fine.
1
I
§ 45-2 Functions. ! fine.. 3
in this chapter, by paying the prescribed fine and, in writing, waiving a hearing in Court, ... of the
Bureau to make such plea and pay such fine in Court. Acceptance of the prescribed fine and power
of attorney by thl+BUM9iiP4hWP be qree to be legally bound by the f you do of agree ro the Tenn. of Use, pleas do not use eCode36o
htti):Hecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Page 8 of 14
Traffic Violations Bureau li
I
§ i-10 Penalties for tampering with Code.
this local law shall be guilty of an offense and shall, upon conviction thereof, be subject to a fine of
not more than $250 or imprisonment for a term of not more than 15 days, or both.
General Provisions> Adoption of Code
§ 45-5 Power of attorney.
... in charge of the Traffic Violations Bureau of said Court, to make such plea and pay the prescribed
fine in Court ....................... (signature) Date:
Traffic Violations Bureau
§ 102-5 Penalties for offenses; removal by town.
Code Enforcement and Land Use Administration shall be considered a violation punishable by a
fine of up to $250. In addition to such other civil relief or criminal penalty as may be permitted by ...
Fire Hydrants
§ 173-18 Written notice.
or any other damage to person or property nor shall such notification relieve the user of any fines,
civil penalties or other liability which may be imposed by this chapter or other applicable law.
Sewers> Toxic Substances Prohibited or Accepted Conditionally
fine.
fine
fine
fines.
§ 207-11 Penalties for offenses. fine.
I
or corporation violating any of the provisions of this chapter shall be guilty of an offense, the fine
for which shall not exceed $1,000. [Amended 7-17-1996 by L.L. No. 14 1996 ]Civil penalty. In ...
Trees
§ 82-16 Penalties for offenses.
By using eCode360 you agree to be legaaliy bound by the
.1 1
fine......._...........__ ..._...2
if you do not agree to the Terns of use, pleas do not use eCode36o.
htt„•//ecnde360_com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than 15 days or by a fine of not more than
$250, or both. Each day during which a violation ... The penalty for violation as above provided shall
be in addition to any fine provided for in § 82-16A . Every day or part thereof that such violation ...
Dances and Dance Halls
§ 106-35 Penalties for offenses.
Any violation of this Part 1 is a misdemeanor and is punishable by a fine of not more than $loo or
imprisonment for not more than one year, or both.... penalties for violations as above provided shall
be in addition to any fine provided for in the preceding Subsection A.
Fire Prevention and Building Construction> Fire Prevention> Penalties
§ 137-6 Penalties for offenses.
... provision of this chapter shall be guilty of an offense and subject to a fine of not less than $5o nor
more than $500 or to imprisonment for a period of not less than one day nor more than six months,
or both such fine and imprisonment, and, in addition, any and all persons who violate any of...
Motels
Page 9 of 14
fine... .... 1.. 1 .. z
fine .. 2
§ 158-10 Penalties for offenses. fine.
of his duty hereunder shall be punishable for each conviction by a fine of not less than $5o nor
more than $500 or by imprisonment, in case of default in payment of the fine, for a period not
exceeding 15 days. Each day the provisions of such ...
Plumbing
LL No. 8-2014 - Residential ParkingSystem amendment
standpoint, to have fines increase if there are ... Is no need to increase the fines for each violation fine.. 3
within a ... carries a fixed, standard fine, if issued on a number of ... the type of violation whose fine Is fines. z
set by section 219- 2.1 (... law shall be punishable by a fine of $5o.00 i Section 4 ...
§ 161-11 Penalties for offenses.
Any person violating any provisions of this Article shall be guilty of an offense punishable by fine or
imprisonment, or both. Any person violating any provisions of this Article shall be subject to a ...
Property Maintenance> Residential and Commercial Properties
By using eCode36o you agree to be legallly bound by the
fine.
If you do iot agree to the Terms of Use, pleas do not use eCode36o.
http://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Page 10 of 14
§ 187-15 Penalties for offenses. fine ?
shall be guilty of a violation punishable by imprisonment for not more than io days or by a fine of
i
not more than $500, or both. Additional penalties. Violation of § 187-13 of this chapter shall ...
I
Streets and Sidewalks
I
§ 58-6 Dogs; penalties for offenses.
control of the dog. A violation of this section shall be an offense and shall be punishable by a fine
of not less than $io nor more than $150 or by imprisonment of not more than 25 days. [Amended ...
Animals> General Provisions
fine.
§ 110-9 Penalties for offenses. I fined
this chapter or fails to comply with any of its requirements shall, upon conviction thereof, be fined
no more than $250 or imprisoned for not more than 15 days, or both. Each day of noncompliance
shall ...
i
I
Flood Damage Prevention
§ 161-3 Abatement; notice to comply.
or objectionable material therefrom at his own expense. In addition to the enforcement of the
fines and penalties provided in § 161-5 of this Article, the Town Clerk may serve written notice
upon ...
Property Maintenance> Lot Maintenance
fines
§ 219-1 Idling restricted, fine
Rules, and Regulations. Anyone who violates this § 219-1 of the Code shall be liable for a fine which
shall not exceed $75. Editor's Note: Former Art. IA, Towing of Illegally Parked Motor ...
I
Vehicles and Traffic> Idling of Motor Vehicles
§ 114-8 Penalties for offenses.
By using eCode360 you agree to be legaliv bour ci by the
fine.. ... _ . 2
It you do -ot agree to the Terms of Use, pleas, cio not use Kode360.
httn-//,r,nHP.160 cnm/search/MA0239?auerv=Fines 4/29/2017
e Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
of the first offense, shall be guilty of a violation punishable by a fine of not less than $50o and not
more than $i,000 and for a second offense ... each subsequent offense, shall be guilty of a violation
punishable by a fine of not less than $i,000 nor more than $2,000 or a term of imprisonment of ...
Wetlands and Watercourses
§ 240-88 Penalties for offenses; other remedies.
... of this chapter shall be guilty of an offense and shall be liable to a fine which shall not exceed $50
or imprisonment for a period not to exceed six months, or by both such fine and imprisonment.
Each week's continued violation shall constitute a ...
Zoning> Administration and Enforcement
fine.
Page 11 of 14
2 1
§ 3-11 Penalties for offenses, j fine. _ t
of occupancy where one is required by this chapter, shall be liable, upon conviction, to a fine of up
to $250 or imprisonment for not more than 15 days, or both, for each offense, and each and ...
Architectural Review, Board of
i
§ 183-19 Penalties for offenses.
container prior to subsequent collection. Any violation of this chapter shall be punishable by a fine
Of up to $250 for each such violation or by imprisonment, for the third and each subsequent
offense ...
Solid Waste
finer' .. .11.1.1.. i
i
§ 219-4 Applicability.
i fines.....
I
In addition to any other penalties or fines imposed for the violation of any law, rule or regulation, the
provisions of this chapter shall ...
Vehicles and Traffic> Towing of Motor Vehicles
I
§ 86-4 Enforcement.
Ifine ...... ..............._............z
of the discriminatory practice, the Counsel to the Town shall promptly seek the imposition of a
fine, as hereinafter provided, for any violation of this chapter and may, at the request of the ...
I
Discrimination Hy using Kode;6o you agree to be legally bound by the If you CO not agree to the ;Tena_ of Use, pleas do not use eCode36o.
http://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines Page 12 of 14
§ 90-8 Penalties for offenses; other remedies.
any provision of this chapter shall be guilty of an offense and, upon conviction thereof, shall be
fined in an amount not exceeding $250 for each violation and/or up to 15 days' imprisonment for
the ...
Electrical Standards
fined
§ 106-55 Penalties for offenses.
fine .. ... ...... .. ..__..._.....1
Use Administration made thereunder shall be guilty of a violation which shall be punishable by a
I
fine of not more than $250 or 15 days in jail, or both. Each day that a violation continues shall be ...
Fire Prevention and Building Construction, Building Construction, Permits and Certificates
I
I
LL No. 2-2016 - Restrict Trucks onflickory Grove\Rockland\sec of Myrtle
I
pursuant to this law. Section 3- Violation: A violation of this local law shall be punishable by a fine fine 1
Of $250. Section 4 — Severability: Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid a ...
§ 106-58.1 Duration and hours for mechanical rock removal.
section shall be guilty of a violation which shall be punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000,
and also shall be liable for the civil penalty ... also shall be guilty of a violation which shall be
punishable by a fine of not more than $1,000, and also shall be liable for the civil penalty ...
Fire Prevention and Building Construction> Building Construction, Excavations
§ 58-7 Licensing of dogs; dog control; fees.
respond within the time allotted for doing so shall result in the dog owner being liable for the fine
set forth in section A250-1 . [Amended 8-17-2011 by L.L. No. 8-2011 ] Any violation of this law ...
Animals,, General Provisions
§ 106-27 Inspection of large underground propane tanks.
a certification which complies with this section shall be guilty of a violation punishable by a fine of
not more than $:j�o, -ft 1pryga day � �rpip w,ighiyiiPleday after the da o n wgicl> �s�cl1 er r,. of
http://ecode360.com/search/1\4AO239?query=Fines
fine
fine
2
1
fine............. _ . _....__ i
do not u>e ecode36o,
4/29/2017
a � Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Fire Prevention and Building Construction> Fire Prevention> Fire Hazards and Safety Measures
LL No. 4-2016 - Amend Restriction ofTruck Traffic to include Rocky Road
iii) of this section. Section 3- Violation: A violation of this local law shall be punishable by a fine of fine
$250. Section 4 — Severability: Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or ...
Page 13 of 14
1
LL No. 4-2014 - Residental ParkingSystem
i
the type of violation whose fine is set by section 219- 2.1(... shall be punishable by a fine of not fine.. 5
less than 25.Oo and ... shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $1oo.00 and ... shall be punishable
by a fine of not less than 200.00 and ... shall be punishable by a fine of not less than $3oo.00 and ...
LL No, 4-2015 - Residental ParkingSystem amendment
L. Except for the type of violation whose fine is set by section 219- 2 M, a violation of this law shall fine .... 3
be punishable by a fine of $50.00. M. It shall be a violation of this law ... Such a violation shall be
punishable by a fine of not less than $30o.00 and not more than ...
§ 17-5 Standards of conduct for employees,
this article, that person shall recommend a form of punishment which may be: i) a reprimand; ii) a
fine not to exceed $ioo; iii) suspension, without pay, for a period not to exceed two months; iv) ...
Ethics> Code of Ethics
§ 26-3.1 Supplemental defense and indemnification,
... indemnify and save harmless its employees in the amount of any costs, attorneys fees, damages,
fines or penalties which may be imposed by reason of an adjudication that any employee, acting
within the ...
Officers and Employees> Defense and Indemnification
§ A250-1 Enumeration of fees,
meter rate $0.75 per hour and at that rate for periods less or greater than one hour § 226-4A Fine,
plus a storage fee for each day or fraction thereof an impounded vehicle is stored by the Police ...
Fee schedule
fine..
fines .. .
fine. ..
By using eCode36o you agree to be legally bound by the If you (10'10C agree to the Tenn,, of bse, pleas do not use eCode36o.
1
.1
htti)://ecode360.com/search/1\4AO239?query=Fines 4/29/2017
Town of Mamaroneck, NY Search: Fines
Page 14 of 14 - •
LL NO. 3-2014 - Handicapped ParkingSpaces
d
original on e'l correct transcript therefrom and of the whole of such original local law, anwa fine
fine paragraph, i above. r Seal) officer designated by local lei la Date: a- IV y I opriate...
POWERED BY GENERAL CODE
Privacy Policy Terms of Service
By using eCode360 YOU agree to be legally bound by the
htti)://ecode360.com/search/MA0239?querv=Fines
If you do not agree to the Terns of use, please do not use eCode360.
4/29/2017
fbw
WORKSESSION
ITEM 5
col
Ot 4'5, + -3
11 4). .
•
440.1116 ..*• .';dN—.
Take the RBI Challenge for the
Reusable Bag Initiative AND SCORE
$200!
The Town of Mamaroneck kicks off it's Reusable Bag Initiative (RBI) by looking for
humorous or serious ways to educate the public about the environmental effects
of lightweight, single-use plastic bags and encourage the habit of using reusable
bags.
Create a video or slideshow about plastic bags
• Video - maximum length 3 minutes
• Slideshow - maximum 10 slides
• Entries are due Thursday, June 1 at 11:59 pm and will be posted on our
website: www.townofmamaroneckny.org
Winners will be chosen by the Sustainability Collaborative and invited to a
televised Town of Mamaroneck Board Meeting to be congratulated.
Prizes:
1st Place - $ 200
2nd Place - $ 100
3rd Place $ 50
Questions: sodiernaPtownofmamaronecknv.org, (914) 381-7816
STATE OF
OPPORTUNITY
County-wide Shared Services
Initiative
Guidance Document
Table of Contents •
Program Overview I
Participants 1
Plan Development and Submission 2
Plan Contents 4
State Support 5
Appendix A 6
•
Program Overview
The FY 2018 State Budget includes a new initiative designed to generate property tax
savings by facilitating operational collaboration between local governments. The County-
wide Shared Services Initiative (the "Initiative")establishes a Shared Services Panel (the
"Panel") in each county, chaired by the Chief Executive Officer of the County. The Panels
will work to help develop, and ultimately approve a County-wide Shared Service Property
Tax Savings Plan (the "Plan"), through intergovernmental cooperation to find new
opportunities to share and coordinate services.
Plans that create actual and demonstrable property tax savings may be eligible for a one-
time match of the net savings resulting from new actions implemented pursuant to the
Plan.
Participants
The Panel Chair and Panel Members are required to participate in the development of
the County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan, as described in the table
below. Panel meetings should comply with the New York State Open Meetings Law.
Panel Participants Composition Duties
Panel Chair(the The county executive, county Responsible for the proper
Chief Executive manager, county administrator creation, development and
Officer (CEO) of the or other chief executive of the submission of the County-
County) county, or, where none, the wide Shared Services
chair of the county legislative Property Tax Savings Plan.
body. The CEO is permitted to
identify and invite the
participation of Optional
Panel Members (see
below).
Required Panel Mayors of every city and Participate in development
Members village, and supervisors of of the Plan. Vote on the
every town, within the county. Plan.
Optional Panel One representative from the Participate in development
Members governing body of any school of the Plan. Vote on the
district, board of cooperative Plan.
educational services
(BOCES), and/or special
improvement district in the
county, upon receipt and
acceptance of an invitation to
participate on the Panel from
the Panel Chair(CEO).
Page 1 of 10
The goal of the county-wide planning process is to save property taxpayers money, by
identifying collaborative opportunities for shared services between as many local
governments as possible.
Plan Development and Submission
The following Plan development timeline outlines responsibilities and important dates. It
is intended to help facilitate the creation of the County-wide Shared Services Plan.
Plan Development Timeline
Starting Immediately
Action Explanation
Creation of the Panel
DCEO shall The CEO shall serve as chair of the Panel. In addition to the
convene a Shared CEO,the Panel must consist of the mayor of every city or village
Services Panel within the county, and the supervisor of every town within the
within the county. county.
CEO may invite to Upon invitation by the CEO,the governing body of the invited
participate on the entity may accept the invitation by selecting, by a majority vote, a
Panel: School representative of the governing body to serve on the Panel.
Districts, BOCES,
and/or Special
Improvement
Districts.
No Later Than August 1, 2017
Development of the Initial Plan
CEO shall consult The CEO shall regularly consult with, and take recommendations
with, and take from all the representatives of the shared services Panel as well
recommendations as the representative of each collective bargaining unit of the
from Panel county and the cities, towns, and villages and other optional
representatives. invited panel members.
Page 2 of 10
Submission to the County Legislative Body
❑ CEO shall submit CEO shall submit the plan to the county legislative body. The
the plan to the plan must be accompanied by a certification as to the accuracy
county legislative of the property tax savings. The following certification may be
body. The plan used: By my signature below, I hereby certify that the savings
must be identified and contained herein are true and accurate to the best
accompanied by a of my knowledge and belief'
certification as to Thereafter, the county legislative body shall review the Plan, and
the accuracy of the may,by a majority of its members, issue an advisory report with
property tax recommendations to the CEO.
savings.
No Later Than September 15, 2017
The CEO may Upon receipt of an advisory report from the county legislative
❑ modify the Plan in body,the CEO may modify the Plan.
response to any
advisory report If modified, the CEO shall produce an updated certification as to
issued by the the accuracy of the property tax savings.
county legislative
body.
CEO shall arrange The CEO, the county legislative body, and the Panel shall accept
❑ three or more input and testimony on the Plan from the: public, civic, business,
public hearings to labor, and community leaders. To facilitate such input, a
occur within the minimum of three public hearings shall be held within the county.
county. All such public hearings shall be conducted prior to the
submission of the county-wide shared services property tax
savings plan to a vote of the shared services Panel. Public
notice of all such hearings shall be provided at least one week
prior in the manner prescribed in subdivision 1 of section 104 of
the Public Officers Law. This process should begin as early as
possible, as at least three public hearings must be conducted
prior to the Panel vote.
❑ Panel shall vote A majority vote of the Panel is required for approval of the Plan.
on the Plan Each Panel Member must state in writing the reason for his or
submitted by CEO. her vote. However, prior to the vote each member of the Panel
may remove any proposed action that affects their local
government.Written notice of the removal will be provided to the
CEO prior to the Panel-wide vote.
If the Plan is Approved:
❑ The CEO shall finalize the Plan.
❑ The C€9 shall submit to the Director of the Division of the Budget a certification of
the Plan and its property tax savings plan.
Page 3 of 10
The CEO shall disseminate the Plan to residents of the county in a concise, clear, and
L coherent manner using words with common and everyday meanings.
If the Plan Fails or is not Voted on:
El The CEO shall release, to the public,a report on the proposal, including the vote of
the Panel,the vote of each Panel Member and the reasons for their vote.
The CEO shall then follow the same procedures defined in this section to attempt to
produce an approved county-wide shared services property tax savings plan by the
deadlines required for 2018 (which are the same dates as in 2017).
No Later Than October 15, 2017
The CEO shall Public notice of such public presentation shall be provided at
conduct a public least one week prior in the manner prescribed in subdivision 1 of
presentation of the section 104 of the Public Officers Law.
Plan, if it was
a••roved.
Plan Contents
County-wide Shared Service Property Tax Savings Plans should include, but are not
limited to, shared and coordinated actions that can be implemented during the
subsequent calendar year.
The proposals in the Plan must be among: the county, cities, towns and villages within
the county, as well as any participating school districts, BOCES or special improvement
districts.
The Plan must contain new recurring property tax savings to be achieved through actions
such as, but not limited to, the elimination of duplicative services, shared services, the
reduction of back-office administrative overhead, and the improved coordination of
services.
If the Plan contains a proposed action that by law is otherwise subject to a procedural
requirement such as a public referendum, then the planned action will not be operative
until said procedural requirement occurs.
The Plan must begin with the summary document (APPENDIX A)when it is publicly
disseminated and when it is submitted to the Director of the New York State Division of
the Budget (DOB). There is no prescribed format for the individual proposals contained
within the plan, but they must be in a concise, clear, and coherent manner using words
Page 4 of 10
I
with common and everyday meaning. A certification of the Plan and the property tax
savings set forth therein is required when the final Plan is transmitted by the CEO to
DOB (APPENDIX A, Certification). The Panel Chair may obtain individual certifications
from any local governments within which savings will be attributed from such local
government.
State Support
The Department of State will provide technical assistance to local governments engaged
in this Initiative. Please check regularly at www.dos.ny.gov for updates and assistance
opportunities. In addition, the Department of State has established an email address
(countywidesharedservicesdos.ny.gov) through which questions and requests may be
submitted.
Plans finalized in 2017 may be eligible for a one-time match of the net savings from new
shared service actions implemented and achieved among multiple jurisdictions between
January 1St and December 31st of 2018. Plans finalized in 2018 may be eligible for a one-
time match of such savings achieved between January 1st and December 31st of 2019.
In addition, participation in other grant programs supporting local government
consolidation does not disqualify entities for the match under this initiative.
The Department of State will develop an application for such funding in conjunction with
the Division of the Budget.
Page 5 of 10
� t
f Stait O( County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan
aProa►uwnr
APPENDIX A
Countywide Shared Services Property Tax Savings
Plan Summary
County of
County Contact:
Contact Telephone:
Contact Email:
Partners
Row 1- (total N of)Cities in County
Participating Cities Panel Representative _Vote Cast(Yes or No)*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
Use additional sheets,If necessary.
'The written justification provided by each Panel Representative in support of his or her vote on the Plan Is attached hereto,as Exhibit 1.
Row 2- (total N of)Towns In County
Participating Towns Panel Representative Vote Cast(Yes or No)*
1.
2.
3.
4,
5.
6,
7.
8.
9,
Page 6 of 10
:
J STATY Of County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan
• OPPpRTUNI7Y
APPENDIX A
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
Use additional sheets,If necessary.
'The written justification provided by each Panel Representative in support of his or her vote on the Plan Is attached hereto,as Exhibit 1.
Roth 3— (total o of)Villages In County
Participating Villages Panel Representative Vote Cast(Yes or No)*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
Use additional sheets,If necessary.
'The written Justification provided by each Panel Representative in support of his or her vote on the Plan is attached hereto,as Exhibit 1.
Page 7 of 10
STATE Dr County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan
ersi—I
OP►ORTUHiTt
APPENDIX A
Row 4— (total#of) School Districts,BOCES,and Special Improvement Districts in Coun
Participating School Districts,BOCES,and
Special Improvement Districts Panel Representative Vote Cast(Yes or No)*
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
B.
9.
10. '
11.
12.
13.
14.
15.
16.
17.
20.
Use additional sheets,if necessary.
*The written justification provided by each Panel Representative in support of his or her vote on the Plan is attached hereto,as Exhibit 1.
Row 5
The sum total of property taxes levied in the year 2017 by the
2017 Local Government Property Taxes county,cities,towns,villages,school districts,BOCES,and special
improvement districts within such county.
Page B of 10
• �- SUIT Or County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan
OPPOR7UNtll'
APPENDIX A
Row6
The sum total of property taxes levied in the year 2017 by the
2017 Participating Entities Property county,any cities,towns,villages,school districts,BOCES,and
Taxes special improvements districts identified as participating in the panel
in the rows above.
Row 7
The sum total of net savings in such plan certified as being
Total Anticipated Savings anticipated in calendar year 2018,calendar year 2019,and annually
thereafter.
Row B
The sum total of net savings in such plan certified as being
Anticipated Savings as a Percentage of anticipated in calendar year 2018 as a percentage of the sum total in
Participating Entities Property Taxes Row 6,calendar year 2019 as a percentage of the sum total in Row 6,
and annually thereafter as a percentage of the sum total in Row 6.
Row 9 _ •
Anticipated Savings to the Average The amount of the savings that the average taxpayer in the county
Taxpayer will realize in calendar year 2018,calendar year 2019,and annually
thereafter if the net savings certified in the plan are realized.
Row 10
The percentage amount a homeowner can expect his or her property
Anticipated Costs/Savings to the taxes to increase or decrease in calendar year 2018,calendar year
Average Homeowner 2019,and annually thereafter if the net savings certified in the plan
are realized.
Row 11
The percentage amount a business can expect its property taxes to
Anticipated Costs/Savings to the increase or decrease in calendar year 2018,calendar year 2019,and
Average Business annually thereafter if the net savings certified in the plan are
realized.
Page 9 of 10
TATE Of County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan
OPPORTUNITY
• • 111S'
CERTIFICATION OF PLAN AND PROPERTY TAX SAVINGS TO DIRECTOR OF BUDGET
By my signature below,I hereby certify that the County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan submitted herewith is final,that it was completed in
accordance with the requirements of Part BBB of Chapter 59 of the Laws of 2017,and that the savings identified and contained herein are true and accurate to
the best of my knowledge and belief.
County Chief Executive Officer
(Print Name)
(Signature) (Date)
Page 10 of 10
4
County-Wide Shared Services Initiative
Questions and Answers
PROGRAM OVERVIEW
Q-1: What is the County-wide Shared Services Initiative?
A-1: The Fiscal Year 2018 New York State Budget enacted the County-wide Shared Services Property Tax
Savings Plan Law to require the chief executive officer of each of the 57 counties outside of New York
City to convene a panel of public officials to develop,publicly deliberate and vote upon County-wide
Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plans. The initiative aims to save property taxpayers money by
implementing shared services and other cooperative arrangements between governments(collectively
"shared services").The success of the initiative—and consequent savings to taxpayers—depends upon
robust public participation and engagement.
Q-2: Which counties are required to submit County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plans
(Shared Services Plans)?
A-2: All 57 counties outside of the City of New York are required to prepare Shared Services Plans.
Q-3: Who within each of the 57 counties is required to begin and lead the process for preparing the
Shared Services Plan?
A-3: The"chief executive officer"(CEO)of each county is required to prepare a property tax savings
plan for shared,coordinated and efficient services among the county,cities, towns and villages within
such county. To develop the Plan,the CEO of the county must work with the county legislative body,
chair and convene a Shared Services Panel, consult local collective bargaining units,and engage
community stakeholders and the general public through a series of public hearings. The CEO of the
county is also required to conduct a public presentation of the Plan,and to certify and submit the
approved final Plan and its projected tax savings to the New York State Division of the Budget.
Q-4: What is in a Shared Services Plan?
A-4: A Shared Services Plan should contain actions that when implemented will result in new property
tax savings. Each county is free to identify those shared services actions through which such savings
may be achieved. Here is a non-exhaustive list of actions that each county may choose to include in its
Shared Services Plan: 1)the elimination of duplicative services;2)shared services,such as joint
purchasing, shared highway equipment,shared storage facilities,shared plowing services,and energy
and insurance purchasing cooperatives;3)reduction in back office administrative overhead;and 4)
better coordination of services.
Page 1 of 10
PARTICIPANTS
Q-5: Who is considered the Chief Executive Officer(CEO)of the county under the County-wide Shared
Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law?
A-5: The"chief executive officer" (CEO)is the county executive if there is one,or in the alternative a
county manager or county administrator. Where no such officials exist,the CEO is the chair of the
county legislature or chair of the board of supervisors.
Q-6. Who serves as chair of the County-wide Shared Services Panel?
A-6: The CEO of the county will serve as chair of the Panel.
Q-7: Who are the required members of the County-wide Shared Services Panel(the Panel)?
A-7: The Required Panel Members are the chief executive officer(CEO)of the county,along with all the
mayors of the cities and villages in the county,and the supervisors of the towns in the county. In any city
where the position of city mayor does not exist,the city manager or other chief executive officer of the
city will represent such city on the Panel.
In addition,the CEO is permitted to identify and invite the participation of any school district, board of
cooperative educational services(BOCES),and/or special improvement district as Optional Panel
Members.
Q-8: How are additional stakeholders eligible to participate as members of the Panel?
A-8: The CEO of the county may at his or her sole discretion invite school districts, boards of
cooperative educational services and/or special improvement districts in the county to participate on
the Panel. If invited,the governing body of the entity may, by a majority vote, appoint a representative
of the board to participate on the Panel.The CEO can invite any combination of school districts, BOCES
or special improvement districts to participate as a panel member or may choose not to invite any such
entity.
Q-9:It a school district, BOCES or special improvement district is invited to serve on a Shares Service
Panel,must it do so?
A-9: No,a school district, BOCES or special improvement district can choose to not serve on a Shared
Services Panel.
Q-10:What is meant by"special improvement districts"?
A-10: For purposes of County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law, "special
improvement districts" means districts authorized by Town Law Articles 12, 12-A, 12-C,or 13 or County
Law Articles 5-A,5-B,or 5-D. Such special improvement districts include sewer,drainage,water,water
quality treatment, park, public parking, lighting, snow removal,water supply,sidewalk,a fallout shelter
district or refuse and garbage district,aquatic plant growth control district,ambulance district,
watershed protection improvement district, harbor improvement district, public dock district, beach
erosion control district,hurricane protection,flood and shoreline erosion control districts, and small
watershed protection districts.The vast majority of these special improvement districts do not have a
separate governing body but are part of their respective town/county and would be participating as part
of such town/county.
Page 2 of 10
4
• Q-11: Can fire districts,business improvement districts or other similar entities be included as
optional members on a shared services panel and/or to cast a vote in support of or opposition to a
Shared Services Plan?
A-11: No,the statute only authorizes a county,cities,towns,villages,school districts,boards of
cooperative educational services and special improvement districts(such as lighting,sewer,water,
sanitation,districts etc.)to serve on a shared services panel and to cast votes for or against a Plan.
Q-12:Can members of the public,representatives of civic,cultural or business organizations,or
representatives of collective bargaining units be appointed to serve on a shared services panel and/or
to cast a vote in support of or to opposition to a Shared Services Plan?
A-12:No.Only the county CEO,mayors of villages and cities,town supervisors and representatives of
invited school districts, boards of cooperative extension and special improvement districts may serve on
a shared services panel and cast votes in support of or opposition to a Shared Services Plan.
Q-13:If a city,town or village is in more than one county,on which county shared services panel
should such municipality participate?
A-13: Each city,town,or village shall serve on at least one shared services panel and if located within
two counties, may serve on both county shared services panels.The mayor of such city or village, and
the supervisor of such town,shall provide written notice to the CEO in each such county stating which
shared services panel it will join or that it will participate in both shared services panels.
Q-14: If a school district,board of cooperative educational services or special improvement district is
located in more than one county,may such entity participate in more than one county shared services
panel?
A-14:Yes. A school district, board of cooperative educational services or special improvement district
may serve on any shared services panel in any county it is located in if it is invited to serve by the CEO of
such county.
Page 3 of 10
PLAN DEVELOPMENT&PROCESS
Q-15:Are local collective bargaining units involved in the County-wide Shared Services Property Tax
Savings Plan development process?
A-15: Yes.The County-Wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law requires the CEO of the
county to"regularly consult with,and take recommendations from,all the representatives of the Shared
Services Panel,as well as with and from the representatives of each collective bargaining unit of the
county and the cities,towns,and villages as well as from the representative of each collective bargaining
unit of any participating school district,board of cooperative educational services and special
improvement district."
Q-16:What is required for the County CEO to"regularly consult with"panel members and collective
bargaining units?
A-16: There are no statutorily specified steps that direct how this consultation is to take place with
collective bargaining units. It is thus for each CEO to determine the manner for such consultations,but
the process should be in good faith,reasonable,effective and efficient.
Q-17: What is required for the County CEO to"take"recommendations from panel members and
collective bargaining units?
A-17: It is intended that the chief executive officer consider recommendations received from members,
but all recommendations do not necessarily have to be included in the Shared Services Plan.
Q-18: Is there a process to hear and take input from the public?
A-18: The CEO,who is the Panel Chair,must hold a minimum of three public hearings to solicit input
from citizens,civic, business,labor,and community leaders.
Q-19: Will there be public notice of the public hearings?
A-19: Public notice of the time and place of each hearing must be provided at least one week prior to
the hearing's date. In accordance with Section 104(1)of the Public Officers Law(Open Meetings Law),
such notice must be given or electronically transmitted to the news media and it must be conspicuously
posted in one or more designated public locations in the county.
Q-20:Are the public hearings subject to the Open Meetings Law?
A-20:The Open Meetings Law is applicable to any convening of a public body for the purpose of
conducting public business(Public Officers Law section 102,defining a "meeting").A public hearing held
as part of such a meeting must adhere to the provisions of the Open Meetings Law.
Q-21:What is the role of a county legislative body regarding a Shared Services Plan?
A-21:The CEO is to submit a draft Shared Services Plan accompanied by a certification as the accuracy of
the Plan and the savings set forth therein to the county legislative body(county legislature or board of
supervisors) no later than August 1, 2017.The county legislative body shall "review and consider the
county-wide Shared Services Plan"and may by majority vote issue an"advisory report" making
recommendations as deemed necessary. The chief executive officer of the county may modify the
Shared Services Plan based upon such recommendations prior to the submission of the Plan to the
Shared Services Panel.
Page 4 of 10
Q-22: Is it the obligation of the CEO of the county to certify the proposed savings in the Plan? If so,
how would they do this?
A-22: It is the responsibility of the CEO to provide an initial certification for the savings outlined in the
draft Plan when the Plan is submitted to the county legislative body. If changes are made to the Plan by
the CEO in response to modifications recommended by the county legislative body,the CEO must then
produce an updated certification as to the accuracy of the savings contained in the Plan.Additionally,
the final Panel-approved Plan must be transmitted to DOB by the CEO and be accompanied by a final
certification of the plan and its property tax savings,which requires certification of both completion of
the Plan and of the property tax savings contained therein.
The certifications of Plan savings should be based on the estimated new savings that are expected to
accrue from implementation of the individual proposals that are contained within and comprise the
Plan.Such new savings will be assessed based on the current cost of providing the services individually,
and then comparing that amount to the service delivery cost of the consolidated or shared proposal.
Unless a county charter,administrative code or local law provides otherwise,the certification is to be
made by an official of such county or by a professional working on behalf of the county,such as an
outside accountant or auditor,as selected for such purpose by the CEO.This may include, but is not
limited to, a county treasurer,county budget director,county auditor,county comptroller or the chief
executive officer of such county.
Q-23: When does the Panel vote on the Shared Services Plan?
A-23: The Panel must take action to finally approve,modify or disapprove the Shared Services Plan by
September 15,2017.
Q-24: Is the Panel meeting to vote on the Shared Services Plan subject to the Open Meetings Law?
A-24: Yes.The requirements of the Open Meetings Law should be applied to any meeting of the Panel
where business is conducted or a vote is taken. A majority of the Panel members will be necessary to
achieve a quorum and conduct business, pursuant to General Construction Law section 41.
Q-25: Does the public have the right to attend a meeting of the Shared Services Panel?
A-25: Yes. Shared Services Panel meetings are governed by the Open Meetings Law and are open to the
public.
Q-26:Does the press have a right to attend meetings of the Shared Services Panel and the public
hearings?
A-26: Yes. The Open Meetings Law mandates that the press must receive notice and reasonable access
to public meetings,which would including meetings and hearings of the Shared Services Panel.
Q-27:Can a member of the Panel remove an action from the proposed Plan?
A-27: Yes, before final vote by the Shared Services Panel,each Panel Member has an opportunity to
remove from the Shared Services Plan any action that affects the unit of government they represent.
Written notice of removal must be submitted to the CEO. Notwithstanding panel approval,a
recertification of the Plan and Plan Tax Savings reflecting such removal must be completed before the
Plan can be finalized and transmitted to New York State Director of the Division of the Budget (DOB).
Page 5 of 10
Q-28:If a Panel member has an action removed from the Shared Services Plan,does that remove the
action for all Panel members?
A-28: No.A Panel member may opt out of any action that would impact their county, city,town,village,
school district, BOCES or special improvement district.However, insofar as such action includes multiple
other units of local government,the action can still go forward for such other Panel members who have
not opted out.
Q-29: Can a member of the Panel designate an alternate or"proxy"to vote in his/her place?
A-29: There is no provision in the law authorizing a Panel member to designate an alternate to vote on
his or her behalf. The Panel Member is the person authorized to vote on the Shared Services Plan,and
is the person authorized to remove actions impacting his or her jurisdiction from the proposed Plan
prior to the Panel vote on the Plan.
Q-30: Can a non-member of the Panel engage in discussion with the CEO of the county and other
Panel Members in regard to the development and review of the Shared Services Plan?
A-30:Yes.There is no prohibition on the ability of a CEO and Panel Members to discuss or delegating
work on the development and proposed contents of the Plan with non-members,such as a city manager
or other local official.
Q-31: What happens if the Shared Services Plan is not approved or acted upon by September 15,
2017?
A-31: The CEO must release a report to the public on why the Shared Services Plan was not approved or
acted upon within the County.The report must include the vote of the Panel,and the written
justification that each Panel Member provided to the CEO for the Member's vote must be attached to
the report. If the Plan is not acted upon or approved by the deadlines required in 2017,then the same
procedures must be followed to produce an approved Shared Services Plan by the required deadlines in
2018.
Q-32: When will the public be informed about the results of the Panel work and the Shared Services
Plan?
A-32: If the Plan is approved by September 15,2017,then the CEO shall publicly disseminate it and hold
a public presentation on it by October 15,2017. Public notice of the time and place of the Plan's
presentation must be provided at least one week prior to the date of the presentation. In accordance
with Section 104(1)of the Public Officers Law(Open Meetings Law),such notice must be given or
electronically transmitted to the news media and it must be conspicuously posted in one or more
designated public locations in the county.
Q-33: Who is responsible for submission of the Shared Services Plan to the DOB?
A-33: It is the responsibility of the CEO(the Panel Chair)of each county to submit the Plan and
certification of its property tax savings to DOB by September 15,2017.
Q-34: What if the county CEO's certified tax savings proves to be incorrect after actual amounts are
known in subsequent years? Are there any legal grounds for the CEO to be found to have committed
a violation of the law that might lead to a sanction against him or her?
A-34: No. The certification of the Shared Services Plan and tax savings requires the good faith effort of
the County CEO.The certification is a good faith projection based upon information then available to the
CEO,and should be understood as such.
Page 6 of 10
CONTENTS OF SHARED SERVICES PLAN
Q-35:What type of actions must be in a Shared Savings Plan?
A-35:The statute requires a Shared Savings Plan to contain "new recurring property tax savings through
actions such as, but not limited to,the elimination of duplicative services;shared services such as joint
purchasing,shared highway equipment,shared storage facilities,shared plowing services,and energy
and insurance purchasing cooperatives;reduction in back office administrative overhead;and better
coordination of services."
STATE SUPPORT
Q-36: Can the local officials on the Panel utilize funding assistance provided through the Department
of State's local government efficiency programs to implement actions developed in the Shared
Services Plan?
A-36: Yes,those funds that have been awarded to a local government can be used for implementation
of actions identified in the Plans.
Q-37:How will a Shared Services Plan receive matching funds for savings that are earned from the
implementation of a Shared Services Plan?
A-37:The Department of State will develop an application,approved by the State Budget Director,to
receive the matching fund,which will be made available on the Department of State website.As part of
the application for this funding the local governments that are participating in the Shared Services Plan
shall propose the allocation of such state matching funds among the parties to the Plan.
ADDITIONAL QUESTIONS AND ANSWERS(ADDED APRIL 28,2017)
Q-38:How should the"Anticipated Savings to the Average Taxpayer"be calculated for inclusion in the
Plan?
A-38:The County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law requires the Plan to report on
"the amount of the savings that the average taxpayer will realize in calendar year 2018,calendar year
2019, and annually thereafter if the net savings are realized."
This can be calculated by dividing the"Total Anticipated Savings,"as reported in the Plan, by the number
of property tax payers in the county.
Q-39: How should the"Anticipated Costs/Savings to the Average Homeowner"be calculated for
inclusion in the Plan?
A-39:The County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law requires the Plan to report on
"the percentage amount a homeowner can expect his or her property taxes to increase or decrease in
calendar year 2018,calendar year 2019,and annually thereafter if the net savings certified in the plan
are realized."
This can be calculated by estimating the percentage that property taxes are expected to increase for all
local governments participating in the Plan, using reasonable assumptions that could be described later
in the Plan, and reducing these percentages by the "Anticipated Savings as a Percentage of Participating
Entities Property Taxes."
Page 7 of 10
For Example:
2018 2019 Annually Thereafter
Expected Property Tax Increase/ 1.5% 1.7% 1.6%
Decrease to Homeowners Without Actions
Anticipated Savings as a Percentage of 1 0% 1.2% 1.4%
Participating Entities Property Taxes
Expected Property Tax Increase/ 0.5% 0.5% 0.2%
Decrease to Homeowners With Actions
Q-40:How should the"Anticipated Costs/Savings to the Average Business" be calculated for inclusion
in the Plan?
A-40:The County-wide Shared Services Property Tax Savings Plan Law requires the Plan to report on
"the percentage amount a business can expect its property taxes to increase or decrease in calendar
year 2018,calendar year 2019,and annually thereafter if the net savings certified in the plan are
realized."
This can be calculated by estimating the percentage that property taxes are expected to increase for all
local governments participating in the Plan, using reasonable assumptions that could be described later
in the Plan,and reducing these percentages by the"Anticipated Savings as a Percentage of Participating
Entities Property Taxes."
For Example:
2018 2019 Annually Thereafter
Expected Property Tax Increase/ 1 6% 1.8% 1.5%
Decrease to Businesses Without Actions
Anticipated Savings as a Percentage of 0.9% 1.1% 1.2%
Participating Entities Property Taxes _
Expected Property Tax Increase/
0.7% 0.7% . 0.3%
Decrease to Businesses With Actions
Q-41: Can a Shared Services Plan include actions that do not save property taxes,but reduce other
costs and bring new efficiencies to the residents of the county?For instance,can a Shared Services
Plan include the creation of a utility purchasing program that will reduce utility costs for residential
and/or business customers,even though the property tax is not impacted?
A-41:A Shared Services Plan may include actions that do not directly reduce the property tax.For
instance,a Shared Services Plan can include the creation of a utility purchasing program organized by
one or more governments that is available to residents in the county either directly or through an opt in
by a municipality. However,such a program will not be eligible for the state matching funds because it
does not reduce property taxes.
If a Shared Services Plan provides for a reduction in government utility bills,either as part of a broader
program that offers savings to residential and/or business customers or savings just to governments,
that action can both be included in a Shared Services Plan and to the extent it reduces governmental
utility bills, it may be eligible for the state matching grants.
Page 8 of 10
1
•
Q-42: Must a Shared Services Plan lead to an actual reduction in property taxes,or can a Shared
Services Plan include among its actions one or more actions that prevent taxes from rising more than
they otherwise would have but for the shared services actions?
A-42: The goal of a Shared Services Plan is to reduce property taxes. However,if an action in a Shared
Services Plan prevents an increase in property taxes that otherwise would have occurred but for the
shared services action,such action(s)can be included in a Shared Services Plan. A Shared Services Plan
must conclusively demonstrate with the best available information that the Shared Services Plan will
lead to a reduction in property taxes or a reduction in the growth of property taxes.
Q-43: The Shared Services Law states that"each member of the panel may,prior to the panel-wide
vote,cause to be removed from the plan any proposed action that affects the unit of local
government represented by the respective member." Can such an action be made on the
individual's own authority,or only by vote of the board the panel member represents?
A-43: The Shared Services Law empowers the panel member,individually,to cause removal of a
proposed action affecting the unit of government he or she represents by providing written notice to
the county CEO prior to the Panel's vote on the Plan.
Q-44:The Shared Services law includes deadlines for reimbursement eligibility. Are there deadlines
for implementation of the Shared Services Plan?
A-44:There are no deadlines for the implementation of actions called for in the Plan. However,the law
applies specific timeframes for implementation regarding the eligibility for match funding. Each county
with a Shared Services Plan that is finalized in 2017 may be eligible for a one-time match of the net
savings from new shared service actions implemented and achieved among multiple jurisdictions
between January 1st and December 31st of 2018. Each county with a Shared Services Plan that is
finalized in 2018 may be eligible for a one-time match of such savings achieved between January 1st and
December 31st of 2019.
Q-45: Can a town authorize someone other than its supervisor to serve as its panel member? For
example,we have two town supervisors who are ill in our county. Can the deputy supervisor or other
board member serve on the panel in the place of the supervisor?
A-45: Under the Shared Services Law,the town supervisor is the town's chief executive officer who is
expressly authorized to serve on the Shared Services Panel established in the county where the town is
located. A deputy supervisor in a town can serve on the Shared Services Panel established in the county
where the town is located, in accordance with Section 42 of the Town Law,which permits the deputy
supervisor to act:1)during the absence of the supervisor,or 2)inability of the supervisor to act,or 3)
while the office of supervisor is vacant. A case-by-case determination of applicable facts must be used
to determine whether a town supervisor is absent or unable to act to trigger the deputy supervisor's
power under Section 42 of the Town Law. Public Officers Law,Article 3,section 30,provides an
enumerated list of ways the office of town supervisor can be deemed vacant.
Under circumstances when a supervisor's absence, inability to act,or office vacancy exists,Section 42
empowers the deputy supervisor with authority not only to"preside,when present,at the meetings of
the town board",but also to"perform all of the duties of the supervisor under[the Town Law]or any
other law[such as the Shared Services Law]". The deputy supervisor's power to act in the place of the
town supervisor under Section 42 has some exceptions that are not applicable here.
Page 9 of 10
Q-46:Notwithstanding sections 5d,6f and 9 of the county-wide shared services property tax savings
plan law,is implementation of the Panel-approved plan binding on the municipalities and their
elected boards? In other words,does implementation still require a vote of the individual elected
boards,or does this legislation transfer authority over shared services from the elected boards to the
Panel?
A-46:All applicable legal prerequisites to implementation of any action or component of an action
contained within a final,approved Shared Services Plan must be satisfied in order for that action or
component of an action to properly take effect.
Q-47:If a panel member objects to a"proposed action"is that whole action dead?As an example-in
a particular county,there may be seven separate jurisdictions with different plowing services. If the
Panel proposes that they share plowing services and,prior to the Panel vote,one town decides to
remove its jurisdiction's participation in the action—may the proposed action be voted on by the
Panel for the remaining six jurisdictions?
A-47: One proposed Plan action,such as shared plow services affecting seven jurisdictions,is not
defeated in its entirety if a Panel Member that represents one of the seven affected jurisdictions decides
to remove their jurisdiction from participating prior to the vote. In such instance,the components of the
action affecting that Panel Members jurisdiction would be removed.The Panel Members for the
remaining six affected jurisdictions could still decide to move forward with the action as among their six
jurisdictions. If the proposed action is ultimately contained in the Plan approved by the Panel,the affect,
if any,on the certified savings would have to be reflected on the final certification of the approved Plan.
Q-48:If an action called for in a Plan requires a referendum prior to implementation,is a referendum
required? If so,is the required referendum on the entire Plan or just those actions that would
normally be subject to a referendum? Should Plans calling for actions requiring referenda prior to
implementation describe those necessary steps?
A-48: The plan should include a summary description,and next steps required for implementation of
planned actions. If a referendum is required by the Constitution or State law, it should be noted along
with the process for its completion,and will need to be completed before the action is implemented.
Only the action that is required by law to be subject to a referendum would need to be included in the
scope of the referendum.
Page 10 of 10
4
4/27/2017
.E
MAMARONECK SCHOOLS
rg
2011-2012 last budget prior to tax cap
$125,323,550 $135,103,791 1.26%
$109,077,949 5120,566,415 1.68%
5,077 5,537 1.5%
842 840 0.0%
$24,685 $24,400
I
4/27/2017
Elementary
-Dos Lammas dual language program
Technology
Capstone
Lower 5" grade class size at Chatsworth.Murray and Central
Full day kindergar ter
HMX
Futt educational team structure restored from previous cats
After school clubs
-Modified teams restored from previous cuts
-Music composition
Capstone
MHS
Robotics
Computer Science
•Design sequence
•Culinary Arts sequence
AP English Language and Composition
Expanded Senior internships
Distract Wide
-Expanded co-teach model �^
'�u•T.��e Ms.
Dedicated elementary and seconder school technology:carnes
Enhanced Internet connectivityar't`ter
1:1 Technology imUative "
46
In the first five years of the State's tax levy cap,
the District has budgeted below the cap
In three of those five years, the tax levy has been
appreciably below the allowable limit
If the District had budgeted to the tax levy cap in
all of those years, this year's allowable tax levy
increase would have been $122.5 million or $1.7
million higher than that proposed in the
Superintendent's Recommended Budget
2
• 4/27/2017
Enrollment
2012- 2016- 2017-
2012 2016 2017 2018 2017 2017 2018
Mamaroneck 5075 5323 5446 5527 7.30% 2.30% 150°
Rye Neck 1492 1579 1632 9.40% 3.40%
IIIIIINIIIIII_■_�
Bronx,,ille 1569 1678 1648 5.00% -1.80%
Hastings on
Hudson 1567 1573 1625 1635 3.70% 3.30% 0.60°
a
a
Pelham 2857 2823 2887 2872 1.10% 2.30% -0.50
•
.��
Byram Hills 2647 2467 2391 a
-9.70% 3.10•/.
Sources.BOCES Cleanng$euse Data
and West
MAMARnNE( K S(_ )10oLs
5,446 SWIM
5.324 Students -. -
5,153 Students
5,135 Students
5.075 Students
•
S?d 55/ 524055
12-'11 ,1 _..
3
4/27/2017
Recommended Budget Summary
201611 2011-18 difference '1,chougc
. I:•l I Ii,t I i•',i •-11
Idx Levy 117 913.364 120.566-415
' --:'a>rc' 'j Final 16-17 As 013/21/17 it; difference x.change
ASSesSrnent* 8.793.365171 9.07b 607.120 263 241.84L
!us tate 13.41 13 28 (0 12i-, ..
Student School Student College and Financial Community
Achievement Climate Engagement Career Sustainability Engagement
Readiness
t- Maintains favorable class size guidelines to meet the individual learning needs of
each student.
Provides funding to Partner with Yale University's Center for Emotional Intelligence
to pilot a elementary social and emotional intelligence framework.
• Expands high school elective pathway course sequence within design.engineering, -culinary arts.and computer science.
Provides hands-on science curriculum resources and professional development
expenditures to develop and implement Next Generation Science Standards.
Adds classroom library resources to support District Literacy Stretch Goal.
Provides additional staffing resources to address enrollment demand for the high
school Original Science Research Program.
• Adds funding to purchase District word study program.
• Supports District Authentic Interaction Stretch Goal adding funds to organize inter-
school elementary collaborative academic projects.
Adds funding to expand collaboration with Sheldrake Environmental Center.
4
• 4/27/2017
CHATS 129 6 131 6 115 5 122 5 114 S 107 4
CENT 85 4 85 4 74 3 69 4 79 3 77 3
405 108 5 116 5 97 5 126 6 104 5 111 5
MUR 117 6 142 7 99 4 138 6 120 5 123 5
139 21 474 22 315 17 475 21 417 18 428 17
tl
Avg. K 20.9 1st 21.5 26d 22.6 3rd 22.6 4th 23.2 516 25.2
class
1124
Elementary Enrollment Projections by
•
Section
11 2018 2211-\114
_ Grade (e tral Chatsworth Mamaroneck Murray Cowie la+cl (cleat Chatsworth_61.65 bl. E_knnN,r
K 6 5 20 K 4 4 5 IN
1 6 - 1 21 1 4 5 20
2 6 6 22 2 4 6 5 1. 21
3 5 5 II 1 4 6 5 6 21
4 5 6 21 4 3 3 5 4 I"
5 5 S IB5 4 0 6 21
Ungraded S 6 1..prld I
Total 2 33 37 32 125 Total 24 11 35 12 124
Mu Spaces 3 33 41 35 143 Maranon 11 11 42 11 141
2010-211211 2020.21121
Grady incl (coral C haowenh MAO Mull. Demme) (i.adc I.cscl Ccra.al ('hatsworth 11x\5 Mora, Ekmrtan
1. 1 6 5 6 21 k: 4 6 5 6 21
I 4 6 5 5 20 I 4 65 6 21
2 1 5 5 5 I\ 2 4 6 5 5 211
1 4 5 6 6 21 1 3 _ - - IF
4 3 5 5 6 19 4 4 5 6 6 21
5 1 4 4 4 I65 6•
I9
lryaded I — I ogra.kd I
Total Si 36 32 III Total 21 ¶2 34 126
131.14,046 11 33 42 15 141 Maaknan 11 11 12 15 141
5
• 4/27/2017
7114.411:',r
i P3t:i
jl".4L r
if5kk
Budget Override Under the Cap/Contingent Budget €3.
't*
• Maintain and expand academic and • Limit ability to maintain and
extracurricular programs support academic and _;.y
• Sustain professional development extracurricular programs v-.
and effective supervision • Erode program quality,standards,
• Prioritize key personnel additions, and depth of student learning
program enhancement and • Make pervasive cuts to personnel
enrichment and reductions of services and .:
• Innovation,investment,and programs tf
continuous improvement • Reduce/degrade educational
• Exemplary programs and learning opportunities
experiences • Decrease ability to attract families
and recruit top-notch staff
im:
.4.1441
2.25%Tax Under the Contingent
Levy Cap 1.04% Budget
Tax Levy —_.•'
Change over 1617 1944,628 521,702 -708.423
budget •
Reduction to
recommended 0 -i420.926 2,653,051'
budget 4174:1-
.erz
6
4/27/2017
Next Steps - Upcoming Budget Sessions
Tuesday,May 2, 2017 Budget Hearing
Tuesday,May 16, 2017 Community Budget Vote
7
-___:...__
_. .
,,,__._.. __
,_„___. _____,
iii,
2017-2018 Proposed Mamaroneck School District Budget at a Glance
Invest, Improve, Innovate
School Budget Vote - Tuesday, May 16th, 2017
at your local elementary school, 7 am — 9 pm
(For more info, visit the'17-'18 Budget Section of the District website—www.mamkschools.org.)
Investing in Excellence
A high-performing school district with a broad range of individualized programs, authentic learning
experiences, inquiry-based instruction, and equity of opportunity for rigorous academic coursework
• Unwavering focus on quality teaching, including nationally recognized literacy practices, engaging
STEAM (science, technology, engineering, art & math) initiatives, and regionally acclaimed music, fine
arts & performing arts programs
• System-wide focus on social-emotional learning and the whole child -- inner-resilience and mindfulness
• Vibrant professional community, with effective teacher supervision, feedback model & continuous
professional growth opportunities
• Enduring commitment to foster bilingualism and multiculturalism through dual language/world
language programs and foreign exchanges
• Extensive and accomplished athletic teams
• Web of community partnerships (Mamaroneck Schools Foundation, Sheldrake Environmental Center,
STEM Alliance) that enliven, enrich, and add value to teaching and learning
Improving & Innovating
In Mamaroneck, we continually strive to better our practices, implementing new, emerging ways to improve
teaching and learning and produce results. The 2017-2018 Proposed Budget continues to support our district's
multi-year aspirational "Stretch Goals." Building on the robust network infrastructure that we've constructed
in recent years, technology continues to enhance learning in the most innovative ways. In addition to
maintaining current class size guidelines in our neighborhood schools, budget highlights include:
• Partnership with Yale University's Center for Emotional Intelligence to pilot an elementary social and
emotional intelligence framework
• Cost-effective restructuring of Student Support Services to include an Assistant Superintendent to
assure adequate supervision and professional development of the 100+ employees supporting
students in Pre-K–Grade 12
• Targeted instruction, counseling, monitoring and advocacy to prevent risk of academic failure
• Addition of a full-time psychologist and academic liaison at Mamaroneck High School to support re-
design of our APPLE program and new initiatives to meet the needs of at-risk high school students
• Continued support for a wide array of diverse elective experiences and expansion of high school
elective pathway course sequences in design, engineering, culinary arts, computer science
• Hands-on science curriculum resources and professional development around Next Generation Science
Standards
• Classroom library resources to support the District Literacy Stretch Goal that all children read on grade
level by third grade
• Additional staffing resources to address enrollment trends, including addition of staff at MHS and
Chatsworth, and maintenance of two contingency positions to address further growth
• Inter-school elementary collaborative academic projects to support District Stretch Goal of fostering
community connectedness through authentic interactions
• Introduction of elementary robotics program in conjunction with the Mamaroneck Schools Foundation;
further develop Grades 2-12 computer science instruction
• Funding to expand collaboration with Sheldrake
A Six -Year View: Enrollment Increases; Per-Pupil Expenses Flat
In six years (from 2012-2018), total district enrollment will have grown by a projected 462 students, yet our
per-pupil expenditures have remained relatively flat. By creating efficiencies -- such as shared staff across
schools and targeted staff reductions -- and finding new ways of doing things, we have been able to limit the
District's annual tax levy growth. We remained under the State's tax levy cap for the first five years of this
period. This has been a challenge, given that employee contractual obligations (salaries and/or benefits,
including healthcare and State-mandated retirement system contributions) have historically risen at a rate
that far exceeds the allowable tax levy increase. Our proposed budget includes an increase of more than $2
million in projected employee health benefit contributions, following several years of significant savings from
moving to a self-paid healthcare plan. Despite these challenges, we have greatly enhanced the overall student
experience. Among the additions are a District Dual Language elementary program (moving closer to our goal
of a fully-developed K-5 program), integrated elementary and middle school capstone projects, and continued
expansion/modernization of course offerings at all levels.
Proposed 2.25%Tax Levy Increase Requires 60% Voter Approval
Despite rising enrollment during the five years the tax levy cap has been in place and increased contractual
obligations, our district consistently put forth budgets that were under the allowable levy limit. In contrast to
many area districts, we have not made a practice of increasing our tax levy as much as the cap would allow.
Our approach has saved taxpayers a total of nearly$14 million dollars of additional lax levy. This year we are
asking voters to approve a budget with a tax levy that goes over the cap. Although the budget-to-budget
increase is 1.46%, the resulting tax levy increase is 2.25%. When a school district proposes a budget that will
result in a tax levy increase that exceeds the cap,the State requires a 60%Yes vote for budget approval.
Projected Tax Rate Decrease
Based upon the Town's latest assessments, the tax rate is projected to decrease by 0.94%from 2016-2017.
Thus, your school taxes will likely go up only if your home assessment is going up; if your home assessment is
going up less than 1 %or going down, then your school taxes are expected to go down.
Other#s:
2017-2018 Proposed Budget: $135,103,791
Budget-to-Budget increase: 1.46%from 2016-2017
Proposed Tax Levy Increase: 2.25%from 2016-2017 Budget (Allowable Tax Levy Increase Based on the Cap:
1.04%)
For voting requirements, absentee ballots and more detailed budget information,
visit the'17-'18 Budget Section of the District website--www.mamkschools.org
WORKSESSION
ITEM 6
c
FIRE COMMISSION
ITEM 1
4w
Town of Mamaroneck
From: Tony Siligato - Town Comptroller
Re: Fire Claims
Date: May 3, 2017
The following Town of Mamaroneck Fire Department claims have been certified by Chief Paul Tortorella
and submitted to the Comptroller's Office for payment:
VENDOR
AAA Emergency Supply Co.
AAA Emergency Supply Co.
AT & T Mobility
Amazon
Amazon
ASAP
ASAP
Brady, Melissa
Cablevision
CIT
Chatsworth Cleaners
Con Edison
Minerva VA Cleaners
New England Uniform, LLC.
New England Uniform, LLC.
Ready Refresh
SiteOne Landscaping Supply
Sound Shore Pest Control
Sound Shore Chiefs Association
Tony's Nursery Inc.
TCD Cellular Communications
UniFirst Corporation
UniFirst Corporation
United Overhead Door Corp.
Verizon
Villa Maria Pizza
Villa Maria Pizza
Villa Maria Pizza
Westch Joint Water Works
Westch Joint Water Works
Westech Elevator Services, Inc.
DESCRIPTION
AMOUNT
Regulator repair, New Truck equipment / tools, Air Pak repair
$
Big Easy glo/easy wedge kit, Stainless Steel hydrant marker, Recharge press.
1,423.35
gauge
Wireless Service for 3/12/17 - 4/11/17
$
896.00
Trash bags, Mr. Clean, CLR-4PRO Calcium
$
$
362.34
Waterproofing with PTEF, Klein Tools, GOJO, Style N Craft
$
157.49
Pager repair - shipping cost 4/14/17
$
252.96
Shipping costs 12/28/16
$
35.59
Fee for Training Course - Active Shooter
$
24.06
Cable Services 4/23-5/22/17
$
25.00
Xerox Copier contract service 4/21/17
$
212.70
Uniform Cleaning 3/13, 3/28/17
$
261.56
Fire HQ Gas Svc 3/2-3/31/17
$
51.74
Patch up to 36 sq inc/coat
$
940.95
Shirts, jackets, lapels, badges
$
20.00
Chief Badge, Hat white w/flame visor
$
1,306.00
Rental of Water Coolers at FD HQ 3/19 - 4/18/17
$
170.00
Landscaping supply
$
114.96
Exterminating Services 3/23, 1/24/17
$
42.35
Yearly Dues for Jan 2017- Dec 2017
$
130.00
Propane Exchange
300.00
Autism Awareness Magnets
$
$
29.00
Cleaning supplies for building 3/17, 3/31, 4/7/17
$
76.00
Cleaning supplies for building 4/14, 4/21/17
$
164.10
Repair on overhead door 4/14/17
$
169.20
Fire HQ service 4/10-5/9/17
$
297.00
Food for Explorer Drill 4/5/17
$
240.09
Food for Explorer Drill 12/4/16, 1/4/17, Special 12/30/16, 1/8/17, Fast 12/29/16
$
64.37
Food for Dept. Drill 4/18/17
$
428.82
205 Weaver St. Charges 2/25 -3/25/17
$
144.59
Water charges 3/31 - 6/30/17
$
138.19
Maintenance for month of April 2017
100.00
$
175.00
Total: $ 8,753.41
FIRE COMMISSION
ITEM 2
(W
NO ATTACHMENT
tv
c.
FIRE COMMISSION
ITEM 3
r�
L
�l
' . * TOWN OF MAMARONECK FIRE DEPARTMENT
OFFICE OF THE
CHIEF VITualf71/ Headquarters
C205 WEAVER STREET
WEAVER LARCH MONT,NEW YORK 10538
834-2100 EMERGENCY
834-2101-NON EMERGENCY
��~
1"1"
1�/'LJ 834-2438 CHIEFS OFFICE
STREET 834-0922-FAX
Loot.12,00\ WWW.TMFD.ORG
To: Board of Fire Commissioners
From: Chief Paul Tortorella
Date: May 1, 2017
Re: Fire Report for the Month of April 2017
The following report outlines response to calls made during the month of April 2017. It summarizes the
nature, the number of personnel responding and the total time spent.
I have also attached a report showing a further breakdown of these alarms.
Alarm Type Number
Generals 26
Minors 20
Stills 1
Out of Town (Mutual Aid) 3
EMS 35
Drills 4
TOTAL 89
Total number of personnel responding: 605
Total time working: 37 hours and 21 minutes
Respectfully Submitted,
Chief Paul Tortorella
•
Incident Type Count Report
Date Ranee; From 4/1/2017 To 4/30/2017
Selected Station(s): All
Incident
Tyne Description Count
Station: EMS
321 -EMS call,excluding vehicle accident with injury 35 41.18°o
Total-Rescue& Emergency Medical Service Incidents 35 100.00%
Total for Station 35 41.18%
Station: HO
111 -Building fire 1 1.18%
Total-Fires 1 2.08%
322F-Vehicle accident with injuries 4 4.71%
324F-Motor vehicle accident with no injuries 1 1.18%
Total-Rescue&Emergency Medical Service Incidents 5 10.42%
410-Flammable gas or liquid condition,other 1 1.18%
412-Gas leak(natural gas or LPG) 3 3.53%
413 -Oil or other combustible liquid spill 1 1.18%
441 -Heat from short circuit(wiring),defective/wom 1 1.18%
444-Power line down 2 2.35%
445-Arcing,shorted electrical equipment 1 1.18%
Total-Hazardous Conditions(No fire) 9 18.75%
511 -Lock-out 1 1.18%
512-Ring or jewelry removal 1 1.18%
520-Water problem,other 2 2.35%
531 -Smoke or odor removal 4 4.71%
551 -Assist police or other governmental agency 1 1.18%
Total-Service Call 9 18.75%
622-No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 1 1.18%
Total-Good Intent Call 1 2.08%
700-False alarm or false call,other 3 3.53%
732-Extinguishing system activation due to malfunction 1 1.18%
735-Alarm system sounded due to malfunction 2 2.35%
736-CO detector activation due to malfunction 2 2.35%
740-Unintentional transmission of alarm,other 1 1.18%
743-Smoke detector activation,no fire-unintentional 8 9.41%
744-Detector activation,no fire-unintentional 1 1.18%
745-Alarm system sounded,no fire-unintentional 4 4.71%
746-Carbon monoxide detector activation,no CO 1 1.18%
Total-Fals Alarm& False Call 23 47.92%
Total for Station 48 56.47%
Station: STIL
611 -Dispatched&cancelled en route 1 1.18%
622-No incident found on arrival at dispatch address 1 1.18%
Total-Good Intent Call 2 100.00%
Total for Station 2 2.35%
Page I of 2 Printed 05/01/2017 19:03:27
Incident
T\nc Descriotion Count
85 100.00%
Page 2 of 2 Printed 05/01/2017 19:04:02
r
Y lib
205 Weaver Street Town of
Larchmont,New York 10538
Mamaroneck
Fire De •ailment
Memo
Ta Board of Fre Gxrimiseionets
From: Paul D. Tortorella,Chief of Department
Date: 5/1/2017
Re: 1 st Quarter Report 2017
Attached please find the Service Awards Report for the first Quarter 2017 as certified by Fire Council.
It is my pleasure to report that 13 members have already met their yearly obligations to the program.
Respectfully submitted,
Paul D. Tortorella
1
Town of Mamaroneck Fire Dept (223) Date Range: From 01/0112017 to 03/3112017
Length of Service Awards Report Printed on: 5/1/2017
Fire Calls Rescue Calls
i 0 ro i Total
iv O �
_� - › _-� >1 F v a c. ( 5- o E. - 6 a- o, Points
�o o d s. o d s. 0 n = Q _ co 3 Awarded
am a AN am § �N fD 2 • I t0 y ' c
Last name, First MI a- a a a
-"[ ± - .. _
Acocella, Michael J- 5 2.67 0 0 0.00 0 25.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 25.00
Astarita,Salvatore - 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Broderick,Thomas - 63 33.69 25 0 0.00 0 25.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 57.00
------- ----- -- --------
Burrell, Doug - 35 18.72 25 0 0.00 0 23.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 54.00
Carr-Smith, Brian D- 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Christian, Gregory T- 3 1.60 0 1 0.74 0 0.00 2.00 ! 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 4.00
Cioffi, Frank J- 12 6.42 0 0 0.00 0 18.001 2.00 ! 2.00 0.00 i 0.00 i 0.00 0.00 22.00
Collins, Brendan P- 3 1.60 0 0 0.00 0 25.00 1.00 ' 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 15.00 0.00 42.00
Commender, David G- 57 30.48 25 1 0.74 0 23.00 3.00 2.00 ! 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 55.00
Conlan, Matthew - 18 9.63 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 8.00
i
Davis, Gregory - 10 5.35 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
•
I
Page 1 of 4
-
FireCalfs Rescue Calls
I
cn o m 1 I Total
0 m o� o - i . O (1 i Points
=- m� * 13 m o_ =4) m o n 2 -. I N g N zI 1 I Awarded
� fi' m R m a a m � . m �n m N Q I .= " RI
Last name, First MI a a-- a a a a
i
Duell, Harald • 24 12.83 25 0 0.00 0 2.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 0.00 ---� 0.00 35.00
Duggan, Marc A- 3 1.60 0 0 0.00 0 10.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 11.00
Dyer, John - 28 14.97 25 2 1.48 0 6.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 2.00 0.00 39.00
Galarza, Joseph - 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 5.00 0.00 5.00
k ---- - -4----- - ------i-- . -
Gamba, Robert - 0 0.00 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Giordano, Joseph - 34 18.18 25 1 0.74 0 22.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 55.00
Goldberg, Noah D- 76 40.64 25 1 0.74 0 25.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 59.00
Gross,Timothy - 5 2.67 0 1 0.74 0 4.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 7.00
Hibbard, Gregory V- 78 41.71 25 0 0.00 0 25.00 2.00 2.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 56.00
+ ---- - - - - ,-.
Hughes, Shaun - 101 54.01 25 1 0.74 0 25.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 5.00 2.00 0.00 63.00
---
Liverzani, Michael A- 52 27.81 25 0 0.00 0 13.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 39.00
Mancino,Angelo - 2 1.07 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00
Murray, Daniel - 57 30.48 25 1 0.74 0 2.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 36.00
Nabatchian,Camron - 14 7.49 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 1.00 1 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 1 1.00
Page 2 of 4 .
Fire Calls Rescue Calls
,
q 1:1
m Total
0 r) E g p Points
Awarded
Last name, First MI a a- a. a a-
_ ._______1___________ __I___________ ___ _.
Nabi, Jeffrey D- 21 11.23 25 2 1.48 0 8.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 38.00
Oviedo, Omar -, 30 16.04 25 0 0.00 0 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 30.00
Pallett, Chris - 33 17.65 25 2 1.48 0 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 6.00 1.00 0.00 36.00
_____L
Payne, Brian - 43 22.99 25 0 0.00 0 9.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 36.00
r--
Pierce,John F-I 102 54.55 25 0 0.00 0 25.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 0.00 60.00
-
Rapp,Alex - 45 24.06 25 0 0.00 0 23.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 51.00
_ _
_ _______ _„ ,..._
Russo. Joseph A- 175 93.58 25 5 3.70 0 25.00 3.00 3.00 0.00 4.00 2.00 1 0.00 62.00
----,
Ryan. Sean P- 14 7.49 0 0 0.00 0 16.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 23.00
__, - _ _ _ ____.
Sacks, Jonathan - 1 78 41.71 25 1 0.74 0 4.00 3.00 0.00 0.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 37.00
_ ___ _ _ ---------------
Sian°,Andrew - 27 14.44 25 0 0.00 0 10.00 2.00 1.00 0.00 2.00 0.00 0.00 40.00
________ _ ______________.
Thaule. Robert C - 11 5.88 0 0 0.00 0 0.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 1.00 0.00 0.00 6.00
Tortorella, Paul - - 70 37.43 25 1 0.74 0 25.00 2.00 3.00 0.00 1.00 1.00 0.00 57.00
__ __________
Vacchio, Dean - 71 37.97 25 2 1.48 0 24.00 3.00 1.00 0.00 5.00 2.00 0.00 60.00
__
Vacchio, Jason - 85 45.45 25 3 2.22 0 24.00 3.00 2.00 0.00 7.00 1.00 0.00 62.00
Page 3 of 4
Fire Calls Rescue Calls I
0 —1 p m Total
_ N Points
D >-0 D� > D73 D. � N N 0 _ y O01
W. N f .T1 .K f9 f N , = a Q
m o m m oala . A s r (i a� m o, c) n — Q °a .—_f rn j Awarded
Last name, First MI Q. a a a a. a
Wilson,Alan M- 16 8.56 0 0 0.00 0 9.00 2.00 ! 3.00 0.00 ' 0.00 0.00 i 0.00 ' 14.00
1
Number of Fire Incidents in Period: 187 Number of Rescue Incidents in Period: 135 Maximum Points Allowed:
Maximum Percentage Required for Points: 10.00% Maximum Percentage Required for Points:0.00% Drill-20.00
Number of Fire Incidents Required for Points: 19 Number of Rescue Incidents Required for Points:0 Class-25.00
Maximum Fire Points Allowed: 25.00 Maximum Rescue Points Allowed:0.00 Standby-20.00
Meeting-20.00
If applicable: If applicable: Office-25.00
Minimum Percentage Required for Points: 10.00 Minimum Percentage Required for Points:0.00% Misc.- 10.00
Number of Fire Incidents Required for Points: 19 Number of Rescue Incidents Required for Points:0 Military-50.00
Minimum Fire Points Allowed: 25.00 Minimum Rescue Points Allowed: 0.00 Disability-50.00
Page 4 of 4
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 1
4w
Town of Mamaroneck, NY
Town • . Agenda• •
To: Town Administrator
Stephen Altied
From: Lou Martirano, Superintendent of Highvieysv.
Date: April 20, 2017
Meeting Date: May 3, 2017
Subject: AWARD OF CONTRACT TA -17-05 for ROAD RESURFACING AND
RELATED WORK
Three (3) bids were received and opened today for the above contract.
ELQ Industries of New Rochelle, NY submitted the lowest bid at $989,670. PCI Industries of
Mt. Vernon submitted a bid of $1,088,010 and Montesano Brothers rounded out the bidding with
a highest bid of $1,284,930. Inter -County Paving picked up the bid document but failed to
submit a bid. Comparatively, year 2016 contract cost value for this work equals $1,093,966.
Capital Account H.5110.0400.2017.04 has approved funds of $833,685 with an additional
$118,771 in CHIPs for budget year 2017.
Town -wide work amounts to $728,011. Paving work for WJWW amounts to $88,548 and work
funded by the Bonnie Briar Civic Association amounts to $139,281. Therefore, sufficient funds
are available to perform the contract work.
ELQ Industries has previously performed this type of work for the town and has completed the
work to the full satisfaction of the town.
Action You Would Like the Town Board to Take;
Highway Department recommends award.
TOWN OF MAMARONECK
Highway Department
CONTRACT NO. TA -17.05
LOCATION VARIOUS TOWN -WIDE STREETS CAPITAL PROJECT
DESCRIPTION RESURFACING AND RELTED WORK OF VARIOUS STREETS 2017 BUDGET AMOUNT'
BIDDING DATE Apr. 20, 2017 TIME 11:00 a.m. CHIPs AMOUNT
H.5110.0400.2017.04
$833,6815.00
$118,771.00
Name of Bidder
-1-
ELQ INDUSTRIES, INC
-2-
PCI INDUSTRIES, INC
-3-
MONTESANO BROS CO
Previous
Contract
Unit Costs
No.
Items
Quantity Unit
Unit Cost Total
Unit Cost Total
Unit Cost Total
unit cost
Total
1
ASPHALT CONCRETE TOP TYPE 6F3
6,300 TON
$107.00 $674,100.00
$119.00 $749,700.00
$111.00 $699,300.00
$120,00
$706,000.00
2
ASPHALT CONCRETE WEARING COURSE
300 TON
$107.00 $32,100.00
$150.00 $45,000.00
$167.00 $50,100.00
$120.00
$36,000.00
3
RESET MANHOLE CASTINGS
120 EA
$510.00 $61,200.00
$100.00 $12,000.00
$800.00 $96,000.00
$400:00
$48,000.00
4
RESET CATCH BASIN CASTINGS
70 EA
$625.00 $43,750.00
$100.00 $7,000.00
$820.00 $57,400.00
$1;400:00
$98,000.00
5
ROAD MILLING. KEY CUTS
15,000 SY
$3.50 $52,500.00
$7.00 $105,000.00
$7.50 $112,500.00
$:58
$6&400.00
6
RESET WATER VALVES (Allowance)
70 125.00
$125.00 $8,750.00
$125.00 $8,750.00
$125.00 $8,750.00
1125.00
$8,750.00
7
RESET GAS VALVE BOX
non -pay LS
8
RESET EXISTING STONE CURB
600 LF
$18.00 $10,800.00
$48.00 $28,800.00
$64.00 $38,400.00
$15.00
$9,000.00
9
INSTALL NEW CURB
1860 LF
$45.50 $84,630.00
$60.00 $111,600.00
$88.00 $163,680.00
$29.00
$53,940.00
10
INSTALL CONCRETE NEW SIDEWALK
1680 SF
$13.00 $21,840.00
$12.00 $20,160.00
$35.00 $58,800.00
$9.45
$15,876.00
12
IMAINTENANCE & PROTECTION OF TRAFFIC
non -pay LS
$0.00 $0.00
$50.00 $0.00
$45.00 $0.00
$60:00
$0.00
CONTRACTOR'S TOTAL
$989,670.00
$1,088,010.00
$1,284,930.00
$1,0931966.00
SECTION 1- TOWN WIDE*
SECTION 11- BONNIE WAY (W
SECTION 111- BONNIE BRIAR CIVIC ASSOC.
$728,011.50
$88,548.00
$139,281.00
$828,701.20
$100,088.50
$159,220.30
$988,396.50
$111,433.00
$185,100.50
Altieri, Stephen
From: Martirano, Lou
Sent: Tuesday, May 02,2017 10:52 AM
To: Altieri, Stephen
Subject: FW: 2017 TOWN PAVING UST
1. BYRON LANE 2017 Road paving list as per Contract TA17-05.
2. CLOVER STREET
3. COLONIAL AVENUE Xra'tkou'
4. COLONIAL LANE Louis Martirano,CPII
Superintendent of Highways
5. DANTE STREET 740 West Boston Post Road
6. DAYMON TERRACE Town of Mamaroneck,NY 10543
7. DIMITRI PLACE (914)381-7834--(914)381-8473 fax
8. EAST GARDEN ROADe, p `TO4`
9. EDGEWOOD AVENUE
10. ELLSWORTH ROAD r` °
11. FOREST AVENUE •.a,.o�o�a.�• Ms��'w w:.
HIGHWAY DEPT 6.44,; ),
12. HILLCREST AVENUE
13. HOMER AVENUE
14. JUDSON STREET
15. MAPLE HILL DRIVE
16. ORSINI DRIVE
17. SENATE PLACE
18. STONEYSIDE DRIVE
19. WEST GARDEN ROAD
Private Roads- BBCA:
BONNIE BRIAR LANE (partial town)
HIGHLAND ROAD
OAKDALE ROAD
REBEAU DRIVE
ROXBOROUGH ROAD
STRATFORD ROAD
1
4w
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 2
NO ATTACHMENT
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 3
to
' Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Set Public Hearing -Installation of Stop Sign
Rockingstone and Forest Avenues
Date: April 29, 2017
TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
The Traffic Committee at its meeting on April 26 considered a recommendation of staff
to install a Stop Sign at the corner of the dead end section of Rockingstone Avenue
where it intersects with Forest Avenue. Recently there was an accident at this location
and there have been three recorded accidents in the last 18 months. A common cause
of these accidents as researched by the Police Department were vehicles exiting
Rockingstone onto Forest without stopping.
On other side of this page is proposed legislation for the installation of the Stop Sign. If
the Board wishes to consider this matter further, a public hearing is required. A
recommended date for the public hearing is May 17, 2017.
A�_
Stephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
4W
itm4i Printed on Recycled Paper
Local Law No. - 2017
This local law shall be known as the "Stop Sign at the intersection of Rockingstone Avenue and
Forest Avenue" Law.
BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck
Section 1— Purpose:
For safety reasons, the Town Board finds that there should be a stop sign stopping eastbound
traffic on Rockingstone Avenue where Rockingstone Avenue intersects with Forest Avenue.
Section 2 — Regulation of Traffic on Rockingstone Avenue:
Vehicles traveling east on Rockingstone Avenue shall be required to come to a full stop at the
point where Rockingstone Avenue intersects Forest Avenue.
Section 3 — Sign(s) to be Erected and Painting to be Done:
An appropriate sign or signs shall be erected on and/or above, and/or striping shall be painted
on the surface of Rockingstone Avenue indicating where a full stop is required by this law.
Section 4 — Severability:
Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court of
competent jurisdiction, such declaration of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any
other provisions of this Local Law, which may be implemented without the invalid or
unconstitutional provisions.
Section 5 — Effective Date:
This Local Law shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.
TB mtg May 3, 2017
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 4
to
' = Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Parking Restriction at 1299 Palmer Avenue
Date: April 29, 2017
The Traffic Committee at its meeting on April 26 considered a request from the
residents of 1299 Palmer Avenue to establish no parking zones near the driveways and
entry way for the multi -family building. Cars parked right up to the edge of the
driveways create a visual obstruction, making it hazardous for vehicles exiting the
building onto Palmer Avenue. There are no parking signs at this location now however
these signs were not installed by the Town and a search of the Town Code reveals no
existing legislation for a parking restriction. The Police Department has reviewed the
request and confirmed the best locations to install the "No Parking" zones.
On other side of this page is proposed legislation for to establish the "No Parking"
zones at 1299 Palmer Avenue. If the Board wishes to consider this matter further, a
public hearing is required. A recommended date for the public hearing is May 17, 2017.
G
tephen V. Altieri
Town Administrator
%s Printed on Recycled Paper
Local Law No. — 2017
This local law shall be known as the "Restriction on Parking on Sections of the North Side
of Palmer Avenue in the vicinity of 1299 Palmer Avenue" Law.
BE IT ENACTED by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck
Section 1— Purpose:
The Town Board finds that there is a need to eliminate some of parking spaces in front of
the multi -family building known as 1299 Palmer Avenue, Larchmont, NY. This local law does that.
Section 2 — Regulation of Parking on two sections of Palmer Avenue:
(A) No motor vehicle shall be parked on the section of the north side of Palmer Avenue
which begins at the boundary line between the Town of Mamaroneck and the Village
of Larchmont and extends seventy (70) feet east from that point of beginning.
(B) No motor vehicle shall be parked on the section of the north side of Palmer Avenue
which begins at the point that is one hundred fifty (150) feet east from the boundary
line between the Town of Mamaroneck and the Village of Larchmont and extends one
hundred seventy-five (175) feet east from that point of beginning.
Section 3 — Sign(s) to be Erected and Painting to be Done:
An appropriate sign or signs shall be erected on and/or above, and/or striping shall be
painted on the surface of Palmer Avenue indicating where parking is prohibited by this law.
Section 4 — Severability:
Should any provision of this Local Law be declared invalid or unconstitutional by any court
of competent jurisdiction, such declaration of unconstitutionality or invalidity shall not affect any
other provisions of this Local Law, which may be implemented without the invalid or
unconstitutional provisions.
Section — Effective Date:
This Local Law shall become effective upon filing with the Secretary of State.
Tb mtg May 03, 2017
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 5
4w
' _ = Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofrnamaroneck.org
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Amendment -Retainer Agreement- Town's General Counsel
Date: April 29, 2017
Following up on our previous discussion of this matter, I am recommending an
amendment to the retainer agreement between the Town and the Town's General
Counsel William Maker. The last review and amendment to the retainer agreement was
in March of 2013.
Currently the agreement provides for an annual retainer of $90,000. Included within the
scope of work is providing one full day in the Town office to work with staff and for the
review and drafting of contracts, resolutions, legislation and other legal documents. In
addition, the Town Attorney must attend all meetings of the Town Board. There are also
certain categories of litigation included within the retainer agreement.
The proposal is to increase the base retainer to $98,000. The scope of work would be
amended to provide that the Town Attorney would be in the Town Office one additional
half day per month. There would be no changes to the hourly rates that apply to work
and litigation not included in the base retainer
Mr. Maker continues to provide excellent legal services to the Town and his ability to
work with the staff has been invaluable for providing counsel to them on contracts,
legislation and certain proceedings.
REQUESTED ACTION: THAT THE TOWN BOARD APPROVE THE CHANGES TO THE
RETAINER AGREEMENT AS OUTLINED AND THAT I BE AUTHORIZED TO EXECUTE AN
AMENDED RETAINER.
4tephenV. Altieri
Town Administrator
%* Printed on Recycled Paper
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 6
ce
Town of Mamaroneck
Town Center
740 West Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, NY 10543-3353
OFFICE OF THE TOWN ADMINISTRATOR
Memorandum
To: Supervisor and Town Board
Re: Authorization- Audit of Energy Performance Contract
Date: April 29, 2017
TEL: 914/381-7810
FAX: 914/381-7809
townadministrator@townofmamaroneck.org
The energy performance contract with Honeywell Systems set certain benchmarks for
energy and operational savings for energy improvements provided to the Town. Those
improvements included new LED street lighting and energy improvements at the
Hommocks Ice Rink, Town Center and Weaver Street Firehouse.
Each year Honeywell is required to provide a report outlining the performance of their
contract to determine if they have met the original benchmarks. This past fall
Honeywell submitted their first annual report on energy performance as required under
the contract. This is a new venture for the Town and while we have realized energy
savings, it seems prudent to have an outside firm experienced in energy performance
contracts to assist the Town by auditing Honeywell's performance.
A firm particularly familiar with this type of audit is Celtic Energy Inc. of Glastonbury,
CT. Another firm ECG was also evaluated for this work. Celtic Energy however is more
familiar with Honeywell's contract format. Celtic's original proposal was to conduct the
audit at a cost of $10,500. However after further discussions, they have reduced their
fee to $7,910 for the same scope of work. If we wish to use their services for
subsequent audits, we can extend the contract at a revised fee that would increase by
4%.
REQUESTED ACTION: THAT THE TOWN BOARD APPROVE A CONTRACT BETWEEN
CELTIC ENERGY AND THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK TO CONDUCT AN AUDIT OF THE
TOWN'S ENERGY PERFORMANCE CONTRACT WITH HONEYWELL SYSTEMS AT A
COST OF $7,910
4D --
Sri
Town Administrator
iia Printed on Recycled Paper
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 7
ATTACHMENT NOT
AVAILABLE
AFFAIRS OF THE TOWN
ITEM 8
PROCLAMATION
ARBOR DAY TREE CITY U.S.A. AWARD
WHEREAS, Friday, April 28, 2017 is recognized by the Town of
Mamaroneck as Arbor Day, a special day set aside for the
celebration and planting of trees; and
WHEREAS, Two thousand seventeen marks the 25th year the Town of
Mamaroneck has been recognized as a "Tree City U.S.A.",
one of only 43 communities in New York State to have
attained the 25 year distinction named by the National Arbor
Day Foundation. The Town of Mamaroneck has taken its
tree-care responsibilities seriously with an effective
community forestry program for a long time; and
WHEREAS, Trees make a world of difference in our communities. Trees
have long been recognized for the beauty and value they
lend to homes, neighborhoods, parks and business areas. At
the same time, those trees conserve energy, help clean the
air, protect rivers and streams, and provide a home for
wildlife in our towns and cities.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that I, Nancy Seligson, Supervisor, and the
members of the Town Council of the Town of Mamaroneck urge all citizens to
participate in programs and activities designed to furthering the establishment of
trees in our community and I hereby proclaim that the Town of Mamaroneck has
— for the 25th year — been recognized as a "Tree City USA."
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, I have hereunto set my hand and caused the seal of
the Town of Mamaroneck to be affixed this 28th day of April 2017.
c Se igson, upervisor
6� yl
Ernest C. Odierna, Councilman Abby Kati C uncilwoman
9C(AA .0 LttuA c()
Jain Elkind Eney, Counci o n Thomas Murphy, Coun man
r7-PA
Attested to by: \ tina Battalia, Town Clerk