HomeMy WebLinkAbout1977_07_27 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF
THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK HELD JULY 27, 1977, IN THE COURT HOUSE,
1201 PALMER AVENUE, TOWN OF MAMARONECK, LARCHMONT, NEW YORK.
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by the Chairman at 8: 15
P.M.
ROLL CALL
Present: Mr. E. Robert Wassman
Mr. Egbert R. Hardesty
Mr. Lawrence G. Bodkin, Jr.
Mr. Peter G. Moore
Absent: Mr. Andrew W. Boraczek
Also present: Mr. William Paonessa, Building Inspector
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
The minutes of the meeting of June 22, 1977 were presented
and on motion duly made and seconded, approved as submitted.
PUBLIC HEARING
The Chairman declared the hearing open and the Secretary
presented for the record the affidavit of publication of
the notice of hearing.
Mr. Wassman asked the Secretary to read the first appli-
cation.
APPLICATION NO. 1 - CASE 463
Application of Mrs. Rose Kiss for modification of Article
VIII Section 89-44 Subsection D "Walls and Fences" which
restricts the height of fences in a Residential District
to 4 ft. so as to allow the construction of 145 lin. ft.
of 6 ft. high stockade fence along a portion of the rear
and side lot lines on the premises located at 15 Lundy
Lane and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 502 Parcel 99 on the grounds of prac-
tical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship.
Mrs. Kiss appeared before the Board and said she wanted
the 6 ft. fence as she was concerned about the neighbor-
hood children because of her dog. Mrs. Kiss said she has
a German shepherd dog and there are so many small child-
ren in the area who could climb over a 4 ft. fence. Mrs.
Kiss's son spoke for his mother and said they also wanted
privacy as the rear yard is only 10 ft. in depth and the
houses are close.
It was pointed out that there was a small retaining wall
on the lot in the rear but it was not on the boundary line
of the applicant's lot and the proposed fence would be
2 ft. away not making it easy for a small child to go
over the fence.
Mr. Paonessa told the Board that Mrs. Kiss had lived
across the street at 4 Lundy Lane and the houses there
were not as close to the neighbors as their new location.
After further discussion the Board voted on the applica-
tion and the result was as follows:
Commissioner Wassman - Nay
Commissioner Hardesty - Aye
Commissioner Bodkin - Nay
Commissioner Moore - Aye
The application was therefore denied and the following
Resolution adopted:
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rose Kiss has submitted an appli-
cation to the Building Inspector to allow the
construction of 145 lin. ft. of 6 ft. high
stockade fence along a portion of the rear and
side lot lines together with plans ; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused
to issue such permit on the grounds that the
plans submitted failed to comply with the Zon-
ing Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck with
particular reference to Article VIII Section
89-44 Subsection D "Walls and Fences" which
restricts the height of fences in a residential
district to 4 ft. on the premises located at
15 Lundy Lane and known on the Tax Assessment
Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 502 Par-
cel 99; and
WHEREAS, Mrs. Rose Kiss has submitted to this
Board an application for a variance on the ground
of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hard-
ship for the following reasons :
1 . The applicant wants to protect
the small children in the neighbor-
hood because she has a German shep-
herd dog and feels the children could
climb over a 4 ft. fence.
2. Because the lot is only 10 ft.
in depth and the houses are close
a 6 ft. fence would give more privacy.
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans,
reviewed the application and has heard all
persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof,
L" 6
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board denied the applica-
tion on the following grounds:
1 . That there were no special cir-
cumstances or conditions applying
to the land for which the variance
is sought, which circumstances or
conditions are peculiar to such land
and which do not apply generally to
land in the district.
2. The facts and circumstances claimed
by the applicant to entitle him to
the variance are not such as would
deprive the applicant of the reason-
able use of the land.
3. That the granting of the variance
would not be in harmony with the gen-
eral purposes and intent of this Ordi-
nance and would be injurious to the
neighborhood and detrimental to the
public welfare.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed
with the Town Clerk in accordance with Section
267 of the Town Law.
The Chairman asked the Secretary to read the next appli-
cation.
APPLICATION NO. 2 - CASE 464
Application of Mr. and Mrs. Marvin Friedman for modifi-
cation of Article VI Section 89-34 Subsection B (3) "Con-
struction Requirements for One Family Residence District
R-7. 5" which requires a minimum rear yard of 25 ft. so
as to allow the construction of a raised wooden deck
at the rear of the dwelling having a rear yard of 15
ft. on the premises located at 43 Vine Road and known
on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as
Block 111 Parcel 263 on the grounds of practical diffi-
culty and/or unnecessary hardship.
The Chairman asked Mr. Friedman to state his hardship
and practical difficulty and the applicant said they
wanted to provide a protected play area for their two
children where they could be watched. Mr. Friedman said
the visibility in the front near the driveway was very
poor but his wife could watch the children in the rear
from the kitchen.
Mrs. Friedman said because of the topography of the lot
the back yard was the safest place for the children to
play. Mr. Friedman said that the purpose of extending
the deck was to accommodate the access to the area and
that there were sufficient trees in the rear of the pro-
perty to provide screening. It was pointed out that
tSL )
the house is presently non-conforming and the proposed
deck will extend the variance 2'8".
After further discussion a vote was taken on the appli-
cation and the result was as follows:
Commissioner Wassman - Aye
Commissioner Hardesty - Aye
Commissioner Bodkin - Aye
Commissioner Moore - Aye
The application was therefore approved and the follow-
ing Resolution adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Marvin Friedman have sub-
mitted an application to the Building Inspec-
tor to allow the construction of a raised wooden
deck having a rear yard of 15 ft. together with
plans; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused
to issue such permit on the grounds that the
plans submitted failed to comply with Article
VI Section 89-34 Subsection B (3) "Construction
Requirements for One Family .Residence District
R-7. 5" which requires a rear yard of 25 ft.
on the premises located at 43 Vine Road and
known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town
of Mamaroneck as Block 111 Parcel 263; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Marvin Friedman have sub-
mitted an application to this Board for a vari-
ance on the ground of practical difficulty and/
or unnecessary hardship for the following rea-
sons :
1 . The proposed deck would provide
a protected play area where the chil-
dren can be watched.
2. The proposed deck will maximize
the use of the applicant's present
limited back yard.
3. The present house layout does
not permit the construction of the
deck in any other location.
4. The proposed deck will allow ac-
cess through the already existing
sliding doors of the sun porch.
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans,
reviewed the application and has heard all per-
sons interested in this application after pub-
lication of a notice thereof,
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board granted the applica-
tion on the following grounds :
(a) That there are special circumstances
and conditions applying to the land
and/or building for which a variance
is sought, which circumstances and/or
conditions have not resulted from any
acts of the applicant subsequent to
the date of the Zoning Regulations
appealed from.
(b) That the said circumstances and/
or conditions are as follows :
1 . The proposed deck will
provide a protected play
area for the applicant's
children.
2. Because of the topography
of the lot the deck cannot
be located in any other
area.
3. The proposed deck will
increase the non-conformity
by 2'8".
4. That said circumstances
or conditions are such that
the particular application
of the Ordinance with res-
pect to Article VI Section
89-34 Subsection B (3) "Con-
struction Requirements for
One Family Residence Dis-
trict R-7. 5" would deprive
the applicant of the reason-
able use of the land and/
or building and that the
variance as granted by this
Board is a minimal adjust-
ment that will accomplish
this purpose.
5. That the granting of
the variance is in harmony
with the general purposes
and intent of the Ordinance
and will not be injurious
to the neighborhood or other-
wise detrimental to the
public welfare; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby
granted and that Article VI Section 89-34 Sub-
section B (3) "Construction Requirements for
One Family Residence District R-7. 5" be varied
and modified so as to allow the construction
of a raised wooden deck at the rear of the
dwelling having a rear yard of 15 ft. on the
premises located at 43 Vine Road and known
on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mama-
roneck as Block 111 Parcel 263 in strict con-
formance with plans filed with this applica-
tion provided that the applicant complies in
all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance
and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the
Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance
where a variance is granted the applicant shall
obtain a building permit within three months
of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk. The building permit shall be void if
construction is not started within six months
and completed within two years of the date
of said permit.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed
with the Town Clerk as provided in Section
267 of the Town Law.
ADJOURNMENT
There being no further business to come before this meet-
ing it was adjourned at 9:15 P.M.
J
4----/c-e-1--A--
Rita A. Johnso , Secretary
( 4s ;1$