Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1986_05_28 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE ZONING BOARD OF APPEALS OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK MAY 28, 1986, IN THE COURTROOM, TOWN OFFICES, 740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD, MAMARONECK, NEW YORK CALL TO ORDER The Chairman called the meeting to order at 8:15 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Mr. A. William Boraczek, Chairman Mr. Patrick Kelleher Mrs. Elaine Price Mr. J. Rene Simon Mr. Arthur Wexler Also Present: Mr. Lee Hoffman, Town Counsel Mr. William Paonessa, Building Inspector Ms. Jean A. Marra, Recording Secretary APPROVAL OF THE MINUTES The Chairman stated that the minutes of the April 30, 1986 meeting would be approved at the next meeting. SCHEDULING The Chairman stated the next meeting of the Zoning Board of Appeals would be held on June 25, 1986. PROCEDURE The Chairman stated that each Board member was present and he then proceeded to introduce the newest member, Mr. Arthur Wexler, who was welcomed by all. He also announced that this would be his last official meeting as he, himself, was retiring from the Board. May 28, 1986 APPLICATION NO. 7 - CASE 738 - FALB The Chairman stated that this matter would be held over until June. APPLICATION NO. 1 - CASE 726 - HEIN The Recording Secretary explained that a letter was received from the applicant, Mr. Richard Hein, wherein he withdrew his application. APPLICATION NO. 2 - CASE 731 The Chairman read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. M. Klein for modification of Article VI Section 89-31, Subsection B (1) "Construction Requirements for R-20 One Family Residence District" which requires a minimum front yard setback of 40 ft. from both streets to allow the con- struction of a wood deck at front of dwelling having a front yard set back of 32 ft. from Stonewall Lane on the premises located at 23 Stonewall Lane and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 333 Parcel 723 on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. The applicant, Mr. Michael Klein, appeared and presented a proposed change to the plans which were submitted to the Board last month. The Chairman noted that the revised plans indicated a decrease in the size of the proposed deck area. There being no further questions or continents Mrs. Price moved that this be considered a Type II action, requiring no further environmental review. Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved by the Board. Thereafter, on motion by Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the Board unanimously approved the following resolution: - 2 - May 28, 1986 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Michael Klein submitted an application to the Building Inspector to allow the construction of a wooden deck at front of dwelling on a corner lot having a front yard setback of 32 ft., together with plans; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck with particular reference to Article VI Section 89-31, Subsection B (1) "Construction Require- ments for R-20 One Family Residence District" which requires a minimum front yard setback of 40 ft. from both streets on the premises located at 23 Stonewall Lane and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 333 Parcel 723; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Klein have submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the following reasons: 1. That the applicants just moved from the city and the proposed deck would enhance country living for them. 2. The design of the deck would be an attractive addition to the home. WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants the application on the following grounds: (a) That there are special circumstances and conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought, which circumstances and/or conditions have not resulted from any acts of the applicant subsequent to the date of the Zoning Regulations appealed from. (b) That the said circumstances and/or conditions are as follows: - 3 - May 28, 1986 1. That said circumstances or conditions are such that the particular application of the Zoning Ordinance with respect to Article VI Section 89-31 Subsection B (1) "Construction Requirements for an R-20 One Family Residence District" would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance as granted by this Board is a minimum adjustment that will accomplish this purpose. 2. That the proposed addition is a moderate request. 3. That any lighting, which may be installed in conjunction with the deck, be low, subtle and unobtrusive and point in toward the house, away from the property line. 4. That the granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Article VI Section 89-31 Subsection B (1) "Con- struction Requirements for an R-20 One Family Residence District" be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of a wooden deck at front of dwelling on a corner lot having a front yard setback of 32 ft. instead of the required 40 ft. from both streets on the premises located at 23 Stonewall Lane and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 333 Parcel 723 in strict conformance with plans filed with this application, provided that the applicant complies in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance where a variance is granted, the applicant shall obtain a building permit within three months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk. The building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. - 4 - May 28, 1986 APPLICATION NO. 3 - CASE 734 The Chairman read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Brooks for modification of Article XI Section 89-67-B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" which requires that off-street parking shall not be developed within five (5) feet of side lot line to allow the construction of an off-street parking area at the westerly side of dwelling having a side yard set-back of 7 1/2 inches instead of the required minimum side yard of 5 feet on the premises located at 14 Dillon Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 504 Parcel 296 on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. The applicant appeared and stated that his driveway runs along his neighbor's property for 30 feet and he would like to continue it down another 20' to meet the requirements of off-street parking. Mr. Lee Bloom, 22 Myrtle Blvd., appeared in favor of the application and requested that the Board allow more lenient standards in order to accommodate the off-street parking issue. Mrs. Price moved that this be considered a Type II action, requiring no further environmental review. Mr. Simon seconded the motion and it was unanimously approved by the Board. Thereafter, Mr. Simon moved, that the variance be approved. Mrs. Price seconded the motion and the Board unanimously approved the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Herbert Brooks submitted an application to the Building Inspector to allow the construction of an off-street parking area at the westerly side of dwelling, together with plans; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck with particular reference to Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" which requires that off street parking shall not be developed within five (5) feet of side lot line on the premises located at 14 Dillon Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 504 Parcel 296; and - 5 - May 28, 1986 WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Brooks submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the following reasons: 1. That additional parking is needed because of the number of cars in the family. 2. The proposed parking area is necessary in order to conform to the off-street parking requirement. WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants the application on the following grounds: (a) That there are special circumstances and conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought, which circumstances and/or conditions have not resulted from any acts of the applicant subsequent to the date of the Zoning Regulations appealed from. (b) That the said circumstances and/or conditions are as follows: 1. That said circumstances or conditions are such that the particular application of the Zoning Ordinance, with respect to Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities", would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance as granted by this Board is a minimum adjustment that will accomplish this purpose. 2. That the granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and it is - 6 - May 28, 1986 FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of an off-street parking area to the dwelling on the premises located at 14 Dillon Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 504 Parcel 296 in strict conformance with plans filed with this application, provided that the applicant complies in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance where a variance is granted, the applicant shall obtain a building permit within three months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk. The building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit. FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. APPLICATION NO. 4 - CASE 735 The Chairman read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. Edward Holcomb for modification of Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" which requires that off-street parking shall not be developed within five (5) feet of side lot line to allow the construction of an off-street parking facility having a side yard setback of 0 feet from the westerly side property line instead of the required minimum side yard of 5 feet on the premises located at 12 Myrtle Blvd. and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 217 Parcel 342 on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. Chairman Boraczek stated that he is associated with Mr. and Mrs. Holcomb and would step down if requested and Mr. Hoffman suggested that Mr. Boraczek excuse himself if he felt it would interfere to which Mr. Boraczek offered that he felt it would not interfere and proceeded. The applicants, Mr. and Mrs. Holcomb, appeared and stated that the request for an additional parking facility is made in order to comply with the off-street parking requirements and added that they have a shared driveway with their neighbors. - 7 - May 28, 1986 Mr. Boraczek presented a letter which was signed by the residents of 14 Myrtle Blvd. and 10 Myrtle Blvd., wherein it was stated that they had no objection to the enlargement of the driveway and the granting of a variance to the residents of 12 Myrtle Blvd. Mr. Bloom appeared in favor of the application and elaborated on the nice work the Holcombs have done in fixing up the house and haw it has enhanced the entire neighborhood. There being no further questions, Mrs. Price moved that this be considered a Type II action, requiring no further environmental review. Mr. Wexler seconded the motion and the Board accepted it unanimously. Thereafter, Mr. Wexler moved that the application of Mr. and Mrs. Holcomb be approved on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion, and the Board unanimously approved the following resolution: WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Edward Holcomb submitted an application to the Building Inspector to allow the construction of an off-street parking area at the westerly side property line, together with plans; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck with particular reference to Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" which requires that off street parking shall not be developed within five (5) feet of side lot line on the premises located at 12 Myrtle Blvd. and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 217 Parcel 342; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Holcomb submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the following reasons: 1. That additional parking is needed. 2. The proposed location is the only feasible one. 3. The proposed parking area is necessary in order to conform to the off-street parking requirement. WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof, - 8 May 28, 1986 NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants the application on the following grounds: (a) That there are special circumstances and conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought, which circumstances and/or conditions have not resulted from any acts of the applicant subsequent to the date of the Zoning Regulations appealed from. (b) That the said circumstances and/or conditions are as follows: 1. That said circumstances or conditions are such that the particular application of the Zoning Ordinance, with respect to Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities", would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance as granted by this Board is a minimum adjustment that will accomplish this purpose. 2. That the granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Article XI Section 89-67 B "Layout of Off-Street Parking Facilities" be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of an off-street parking area on the westerly side property line of the premises located at 12 Myrtle Blvd. and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 217 Parcel 342 in strict conformance with plans filed with this appli- cation, provided that the applicant complies in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is - 9 - May 28, 1986 FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance where a variance is granted, the applicant shall obtain a building permit within three months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk. The building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. APPLICATION NO. 5 - CASE 736 The Chairman the application as follows: Application of Mr. Raymond Haas for modification of Article VI Section 89-55 B (2) (a) and B (3) "Construction Requirements for R-10 One Family Residence District" which requires a minimum side yard of 10 feet and a minimum rear yard of 25 feet to allow the construction of an addition at northeasterly side of dwelling for a family room and laundry which will maintain existing non-conforming side yard of 7.0 feet and a nonconforming rear yard of 17± feet on the premises located at 26 Rockland Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 222 Parcel 430, on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. The application was presented by Mr. and Mrs. Raymond Haas and their representative, Mr. Frank Rogers of Remodeling Consultants, Architects, 545 Fenimore Road, Mamaroneck, NY. Mr. Hass stated that this request was made in order to make their home more comfortable. The Recording Secretary read a letter from Charles and Barbara Flynn, 28 Rockland Avenue, wherein it was stated that they were happy to support the proposed remodeling and addition for the Haas family. There being no questions, Mrs. Price moved that this be considered a Type II action, requiring no further environmental review. Mr. Simon seconded the motion, and it was unanimously approved by the Board. Thereafter, the Chairman moved that Application #736 be approved. Mr. Kelleher seconded the motion and the Board unanimously adopted the following resolution: - 10 - May 28, 1986 WHEREAS, Mr. Raymond Haas submitted an application to the Building Inspector to allow the construction of an addition at the northeasterly side of dwelling which will maintain existing nonconforming side yard of 7.0 feet and a nonconforming rear yard of 17+ feet, together with plans; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has refused to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Zoning Ordinance of the Town of Mamaroneck with particular reference to Article VI Section 89-55 B (2) (a) and B (3) "Construction Requirements for R-10 One Family Residence District" which requires a minimum side yard 10 feet and a minimum rear yard of 25 feet on the premises located at 26 Rockland Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 222 Parcel 430; and WHEREAS, Mr. Haas submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the following reasons: 1. That the addition of a family room and a laundry room is a needed for everyday living comfort. 2. The proposed addition is located to have access to the dining room and kitchen. WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof, NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby grants the application on the following grounds: (a) That there are special circumstances and conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought, which circumstances and/or conditions have not resulted from any acts of the applicant subsequent to the date of the Zoning Regulations appealed from. (b) That the said circumstances and/or conditions are as follows: - 11 - May 28, 1986 1. That said circumstances or conditions are such that the particular application of the Zoning Ordinance with respect to Article VI Section 89-55 Subsection B (2) (a) and B (3) "Construction Requirements for an R-10 One Family Residence District" would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance as granted by this Board is a minimum adjustment that will accomplish this purpose. 2. That the granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Article VI Section 89-55 B (2) (a) and B (3) "Con- struction Requirements for an R-10 One Family Residence District" be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of an addition at northwesterly side of dwelling which will maintain existing nonconforming side yard of 7.0 feet instead of the required minimum of 10 feet and a minimum rear yard of 17+ feet instead of the required minimum of 25 feet, on the premises located at 26 Rockland Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 222 Parcel 430 in strict conformance with plans filed with this application, provided that the applicant complies in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that in accordance with the Rules and Regulations of the Zoning Ordinance where a variance is granted, the applicant shall obtain a building permit within three months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk. The building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. - 12 - • May 28, 1986 APPLICATION NO. 6 - CASE NO. 737 The Chairman read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. Cotturone for modification of Article VI Section 89-33 Subsection B (3) "Con- struction Requirements for R-10 One Family Residence District" which requires a minimum rear yard of 25 feet to allow the construction of a second story addition at northerly side of dwelling which will maintain existing nonconforming rear yard setback of 9.85 feet on the premises located at 415 Weaver Street and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 107 Parcel 719, on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. Mr. and Mrs. Cotturone and their attorney, Joseph Notaro, 100 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, New York, and Edward B. Rallantyne, 200 Mamaroneck Avenue, White Plains, New York, their architect, appeared in favor of the application. Mr. Notaro indicated that the proposed addition did not diminish the rear yard set back; it was only for a second-story addition to build a master bedroom and bath over the existing kitchen and dining room. Mrs. Cotturone offered that the addition is needed in order to accommodate her family when they come to visit because the existing home has only one bathroom and two bedrooms. Mrs. Price concerned herself with the configuration of the window placement and Mrs. Cotturone related that the plans only called for one window in the back. The Chairman read a letter from Herbert and Susan Levitt, 280 Murray Avenue, Larchmont, wherein it was requested that their names be removed from a petition they signed because the proposed addition would directly affect their backyard view and increase the proximity of the two homes. Mr. Boraczek proceeded to read another communication from Nanda Cotturone which was accompanied by a petition in favor of the application and signed by the residents of: 430 Weaver Street, 434 Weaver Street, 425 Wever Street, 435 Weaver Street, 296 Murray Avenue, 294 Murray Avenue, 292 Murray Avenue, 288 Murray Avenue, 411 Weaver Street, and 280 Murray Avenue. - 13 - May 28, 1986 Mr. Notaro stated that the Cotturones also have termite damage and requested permission to remove the existing building wall in the kitchen and extend it slightly when it is replaced. The Chairman announced that there were two more letters in opposition to the zoning variance. The first communication, from Steven J. and Pamela H. Rago, wherein it was stated that their rear property line is only 9.85 feet from the Cotturones rear westerly wall and that construction of the addition would dominiate their backyard and sharply reduce privacy and alter the character of the neighborhood by diminishing the amount of openness now available to them. Mr. Boraczek presented the next communication in opposition from Richard Beninati, 272 Murray Avenue, wherein it was stated that the granting of a variance would further close in the properties and diminish privacy, air and light space in an area which is already very closed in. Mrs. Levitt, 280 Murray Avenue, appeared in opposition to the application and stated her property was lower than the Cotturones and feared for losing her privacy if the addition were allowed as well as feeling very closed in and Mr. Steven J. Rago, 274 Murray Avenue, appeared and stated he was vehemently opposed to the granting of any variance. Mr. Ballantyne then explained the proposed addition and window placement to Mrs. Levitt and Mr. Rago, and Mrs. Levitt offered that now she was not adamantly opposed to it since it has been explained but added that she just might feel a little more closed in. Mr. Rago voiced that the addition of height up to the peak of the roof would add significant bulk to the house and he would face a 2 and 1/2 story wall. He added that the exisiing shrubbery was his and some of it had to be removed so that it could not be relied on to act as a screen. Mr. Rago then requested the Chairman to repeat what letters were received in favor of the application as well as those in opposition together with the addresses and Mr. Boraczek complied with this request. Mrs. Price asked how this addition would affect Mr. Rago's view to which he replied that there was open space now but if the addition were allowed, it would look like a billboard and be all closed in. - 14 - May 28, 1986 Mr. Wexler added that the addition would unify the house and if a smaller addition were added, it might not be as nice looking but Mr. Rago stood on what he said. Mrs. Levitt told the Board that she really was against it because she does spend a considerable amount of time in her home. Mr. Hoffman submitted that Mr. Rago made an issue of the height of the proposed addition but that his house actually stands higher than the Cotturones. Mr. Kelleher stated that if a variance were granted, it would not change the application and added that if the variance was denied, the Cotturones could still go to the building department and obtain a building permit. Mr. Wexler explained that this particular area is a very unique part of town in that it has tight spaces which adds to the neighborhood's character. It was his opinion that the addition would enhance the appearance of the house. Mr. Boraczek asked Mr. Wexler and Mr. Simon, as architects, their thoughts on how it could possibly affect the neighbors and Mr. Wexler stated that if you're looking to solve a problem, the solution that was presented would be better than what is allowed zoning-wise and Mr. Simon stated that he was in complete agreement. Mr. Kelleher added that if the applicants were denied the application and diverted to another plan, the neighbors could be faced with something less pleasing when it was finally built but added that you had to respect the feelings of those objecting to it. Mrs. Price stated that she thought the plans were done well and added that there should not be a problem because of the window placement. She stated, however, that she would like to reserve decision in order to view the subject property again for further clarification. Mr. Wexler said that he viewed the property and in his opinion the only one that he saw who could possibly be affected by it would be Mrs. Levitt. Mr. Rago stated that he would appreciate it if Mr. Wexler thought of himself as a resident, not as an architect, and then determine how these plans would affect the character of the neighborhood and how the neighbors would feel about it. - 15 - : 1 May 28, 1986 Mr. Wexler said that the case was presented as a practical difficulty and unnecessary hardship and that the final product is very important insofar as the family's comfort is concerned. Mr. Notaro offered that there is case law which states that expansion of a family constitutes a practical difficulty. Mr. Boraczek suggested that the architect make up an "as-of-right" sketch showing what can be done legally and what exactly is being applied for in order to appease those concerned but Mr. Notaro did not know what lot depth was needed in order to erect an addition without having to be granted a variance. The Building Inspector, Mr. William Paonessa, stated that if the property legally met the front, rear and side yard setback requirements, a variance was not needed. (At this time Mr. and Mrs. Cotturone conferred with their attorney.) Mrs. Price moved that this be considered a Type II action, requiring no further environmental review. Mr. Simon seconded this motion, and the Board accepted it unanimously. Mr. Wexler moved that the proposed application of Mr. and Mrs. Cotturone to add a master bedroom and bath be approved on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship. Mr. Simon seconded the motion with Mr. Kelleher voting nay, Mrs. Price abstaining, and Mr. Boraczek voting nay. Mr. Hoffman stated that at this point there was a no action as it required three votes to approve or deny an application. Mr. Boraczek explained that this case would be post- poned until next month in order to give Mrs. Price an opportunity to view the subject premises once more and at that time, it will be voted on again. At this time, Mr. Lester Bloom appeared and thanked Mr. Boraczek for the fine job that he did and for the many years of effort, frustration, devotion and energy that he devoted to the Zoning Board of Appeals of The Town of Mamaroneck. - 16 - May 28, 1986 ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, the Chairman moved to adjourn, Mr. Kelleher seconded this motion, and the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 10:15 P.M. Jean A. Marra Recording Secretary - 17 -