Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1989_03_01 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE (IV ZONING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK MARCH 1, 1989, IN CONFERENCE ROOM A AND THE COURTROOM, TOWN CENTER 740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD MAMARONECK, NEW YORK Present: Joel Negrin, Chairman Thomas E. Gunther Patrick B. Kelleher J. Rene Simon Arthur Wexler Also Present: Lee A. Hoffman, Jr. , Counsel William E. Jakubowski, Building Inspector Marcy Altman, Public Stenographer Carbone, Kazazes & Associates 225 Mount Pleaseant Avenue Mamaroneck, NY 10543 Bonnie M. Burdick, Recording Secretary CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Chairman Negrin at 8:25 PM. APPROVAL OF MINUTES On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Gunther, the minutes for June 22, 1988 were unanimously approved. On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the minutes for August 16, 1988, were unanimously approved. On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the minutes for September 28, 1 988 were unanimously approved by the three members who had been in attendance. On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Gunther, the minutes for October 26, 1988 were unanimously approved. NEXT MEETING The next meeting of the Board will be on March 22, 1989. APPLICATION NO. 1 - CASE 892 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. Peter Sherwood adjourned from the meeting of January 25, 1989. Mr. Negrin stated that Mr. Kelleher and Mr. Simon, who were not at the January meeting, had read the transcript of the meeting and were l'r- March 1, 1989 -2- prepared to participate in the decision. Mr. and Mrs. Sherwood appeared on behalf of their application. Mr. Sherwood restated their reasons for placing the run where it is; it is convenient to the back door; other parts of property have a severe grade; they use other parts of the yard for other purposes; a choke collar might endanger the dog as it could choke; a walking leash would interfere with the dog' s training; it was likely that the dog could jump over were the fence lower than six feet; the concrete slab is necessary as it is likely that the dog would burrow under the fence without it; the run furnishes protection to the dog and to the neighbors. Currently the run is unusable as the Maloneys, whose fence forms part of the enclosure, have taken down their fence. Mr. Sherwood stated that they had moved bushes which had been on the property line to build the run and in reading the Zoning Code he had not realized that a dog run would be considered a structure. He said that they maintain the run meticulously clean. He stated that it was his absolute legal right to use his property for a reasonable purpose. Mr. and Mrs. Joseph Ziluca of 246 Rockingstone Avenue reiterated their concerns about the run which borders their property. Their young children play near the run and could be intimidated by the dog. They find the run is unsightly both from their yard and from their rear windows and that the Sherwoods placed it in the worst possible place, directly adjacent to their sandbox and playground, without consulting their neighbors. They are concerned about runoff from urine and feces. Ily Mr. Gunther asked questions about alternative locations, including closer to the same rear door of the house, and about the environmental effect of the run. On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, the Board adopted the following resolution, 4-0-1, with Mr. Kelleher abstaining: RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no significant impact on the environment as determined by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further action under SEQRA. Mr. Wexler moved to grant the variance with the condition that the run be shortened by 5 feet to avoid the Zilucas' yard and that it be screened by an opaque material. His motion was not seconded. On motion of Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions were adopted 4-1, with Mr. Wexler in opposition: WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Peter Sherwood have submitted an application to the Building Inspector for a building permit, together with plans, to retain a dog run with a six (6) ft. high fence (4 ft. high maximum permitted) , and also to retain a paved area 0 ft. from a property line where 5 ft. is 0 q 0 March 1, 1989 -3- the minimum distance permitted on the premises located at 6 Glen Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 115 Parcel 354; and; WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Section 89-44 D (1) and Section 89-44 A WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Sherwood submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board hereby denies the application on the following grounds: 1. The applicants have not demonstrated practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship as a basis for granting the variance. 2. The problems of removal were created by the applicants. 3. There are several places elsewhere on the property to construct a dog run or provide other facilities for the dog, and there are other doors from the house through which the dog can be walked. 4. The proposed dog run is not the minimum response necessary to solve the applicants' problem. FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. 0 Mr. Sherwood admonished the Board that if the dog caused any injury or damage, it would "share the hazard of the responsibility" for the dog. J AJ YA ADJOURNMENT Mr. Negrin adjourned the meeting at 9:43 so that the Board could move to the Courtroom which had become vacant. March 1, 1989 -4- CALL TO ORDER ttor Mr. Negrin reopened the meeting at 9:50. APPLICATION NO. 2 - CASE 893 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. Richard Warren requesting a variance from Section 89-33B 2(a) & (b) to reduce the side yard from 10 ft. required to 6.07 ft. and the total side yard width from 25.0 ft. required to 12.13 ft. for the proposed two story rear addition; and, further requesting a variance from Section 89-33B 2(a) to retain an existing enclosed porch having a side yard of 6.06 ft. where 10.0 ft. is required. The existing enclosed porch and proposed addition will increase the extent, pursuant to Section 89-57, by which the existing structure fails to meet the side yard requirements in an R-10 Zone District on the Tax Assessment Map as Block 222 Parcel 393 . Mr. and Mrs. Warren and Mr. Bremer, of Remodeling Consultants, appeared on behalf of the application. Mr. Warren stated that it is necessary to make an addition to the house's second story as the Warrens are separated from their young children by the current configuration of the house. At the time the porch was enclosed, no Certificate of Occupancy was given. Mr. Bremer demonstrated alternate plans for the construction which `► would not work for various reasons including the need in some possible plans to remove a 100 year old oak tree. Letters of approval from adjoining neighbors had been submitted at the previous meeting and had been made a part of the record. Mrs. Haas, the neighbor most affected, was at the meeting and stated that she and her husband favored the plans. On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Gunther, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no significant impact on the environment as determined by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further action under SEQRA. On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions were unanimously adopted: WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Richard Warren have submitted an application to the Building Inspector, together with plans to construct a two story rear addition and to retain an enclosed porch on the premises located at 1 Carroll Place and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 222 Parcel 393 ; and March 1, 1989 -5- WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections 89-33 B 2 (a) and (b) and 89-57; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Warren submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought on the following grounds: 1. The further encroachment into the side yard has little impact as the side yard adjoins woods. 4110 2. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the practical difficulty detailed in the application considering the unusual circumstances of the property and the physical shape of the house. 3 . This proposed construction does not increase the footprint of the house. 4. Alternative solutions were thoroughly explored by the architect before this proposal was submitted. 5. Using this plan rather than others considered will save a 100 year old oak tree. 6. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and 7. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance granted by this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is C March 1, 1989 -6- ftipr FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Sections 89-33 B (a) and (b) and 89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of a two story rear addition and to allow to remain an enclosed porch on the premises located at 1 Carroll Place and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 222 Parcel 393 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. **** APPLICATION NO. 3 - CASE 894 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Presidential Housing Associates requesting a variance for Section 14-32 A(2) of the Building Code to retain one sign 10' x 24' and two signs 5' x 12' , where 4' x 6' is the maximum size allowed in a Residential District, on the premises located at 35 North Chatsworth Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 134. Said signs were previously granted by the Town Board on April 6, 1988 under the prior Sign Ordinance for a six month period. Appearing on behalf of the application were Joel Sachs, attorney, and Robert Siegel and Beth Young of Presidential Housing. They stated that many of the apartments have not been sold. They have learned that at least 70% of prospective buyers have responded to the signs rather than other ads. It is necessary to have signs of the size requested because of the large size of the building and the distance from the neighboring streets and Thruway ramps. The smaller signs will face North Chatsworth Avenue and Jefferson Street; the larger one, facing Madison Avenue, will be moved from the face of the building to the top of the structure housing the dumpsters. r March 1, 1989 -7- On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, the Board unanimously RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no significant impact on the environment as determined by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further action under SEQRA. On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the following resolutions were unanimously adopted: WHEREAS, Presidential Housing Associates have submitted an application to the Building Inspector, together with plans to retain one sign 10'x 24' and two signs 5' x 12' ; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Building Code with particular reference to Section 14-32A (2) on the premises located at 35 North Chatsworth Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 134; and WHEREAS, Presidential Housing Associates submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought on the following grounds: 1. The Town Board previously granted a variance for the same signs under the predecessor sign ordinance. 2. The signs are a strong marketing tool in selling the apartments in the building 3. Many of the apartments have not been sold and additional time for display is needed. 4. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of the Building Code and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and ® 5. The strict application of the Building Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance granted March 1, 1989 -8- by this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions shall attach to Stow this variance: 1. The display of the signs shall be limited to one year. 2. The time period shall begin when the signs are erected. 3 . The signs may be moved vertically or horizontally, but they will remain on the elevation where they are originally installed. 4. The larger sign shall be painted hunter green on the back. FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Section 14-33A (2) of the Building Code be varied and modified so as to allow the display of one sign 10' x 24' and two signs 5' x 24' on the premises located at 35 North Chatsworth Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 134 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this application, any conditions set forth in these resolutions and with the letter sent to Presidential Housing Associates by the Town Administrator annexed to these minutes, provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is `gar FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Code. ***•** APPLICATION NO. 4 - CASE 895 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. and Mrs. K. MacArtney requesting a variance from Section 89-34 B (2) (a) & (b) to reduce the side yard from 10.0 ft. required to 8.9 ft. and the total side yards from 10 ft. required to 12.65 ft. for the proposed construction of a rear addition which will increase the extent by which the existing structure fails to meet the side yard requirements pursuant to Section 89-57, in an R-7.5 Zone District, on the premises located at 163 Murray Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 118 Parcel 401. `rr.• March 1, 1989 -9- Mr. and Mrs. Kenneth MacArtney appeared on behalf of their application accompanied by Lawrence Gordon, their architect. Mr. McArtney stated that the proposed addition was small - 33 square feet and that it did not extend beyond the side wall of the kitchen. The construction would make their kitchen more usable - currently the refrigerator is in the back hall - and improve the traffic flow. The addition will preserve the design of the house. Mr. MacArtney stated that their neighbors have said that they have no problems with the proposal. On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Gunther, the Board unanimously RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no significant impact on the environment as determined by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further action under SEQRA. On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions were unanimously adopted: WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. K. MacArtney have submitted an application to the Building Inspector, together with plans to construct a rear addition on the premises located at 163 Murray Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 118 Parcel 401; and `` WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections 89-34 B (2) (a) and (b) and 89-57; and WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. MacArtney submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought on the following grounds: 1. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the exceptional practical difficulty detailed in the application. March 1, 1989 -10- 2. The proposed addition does not extend the side or l rear yards, just "squares off" the vacant corner. ow 3. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and 4. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance granted by this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Sections 89-34 B (2) (a) and (b) and 89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow the construction of a rear addition on the premises located at 163 Murray Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 118 Parcel 401 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is I ' FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. ate. *_. APPLICATION NO. 5 - CASE 896 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. Peter Denyssenko requesting a variance from Section 89-35 B(3) (B) to reduce the side and rear yards from 5.0 ft. required to 3.25 ft. and 3.75 ft. respectively to retain a rear storage shed, in an R-6 Zone District, on the premises located at 95 Laurel Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 124 Parcel 465. Mr. and Mrs. Denyssenko appeared on behalf of the application. At the start of their presentation it was discovered that the variance AL March 1, 1989 -11- required was greater than the variance described in the notice and, r�r therefore, the proposal could not be heard. The Board urged the Denyssenkos to obtain a survey so that measurements would be correct and asked that they submit a better plan distinguishing more clearly between the side yard and back yard. ADJOURNMENT Mr. Negrin declared a brief adjournment at 11:15 PM. RECALL TO ORDER The meeting was reopened at 11: 18 PM. APPLICATION NO. 6 - CASE 897 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. Hans Kuhn requesting a variance to allow a subdivision of property, the resulting lot having a side yard total of 16.6 ft. where 18.0 ft. is required pursuant to Section 89-35 B (2) (b) in an R-6 Zone district on the premises located at 12 & 14 Copley Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 409 Parcel 113. Anthony Antonozzi, attorney, appeared on behalf of the application. He ® explained that the two houses had been constructed on a single parcel in 1954 and were both owned by one owner. He would like to sever and sell Lot #1. The variance requested is 1.4 feet for each lot. This subdivision had been granted, subject to the granting of a variance by the Zoning Board, by the Planning Board which declared itself the Lead Agency. On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Gunther, the following resolutions were unanimously granted: WHEREAS, Hans Kuhn has submitted an application to the Building Inspector, together with plans to subdivide property, the resulting lot having a side yard total of 16.6 ft. where 18.0 ft. is required; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Section 89-35 B (2) (b) on the premises located at 12 and 14 Copley Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 409 Parcel 113 ; and March 1, 1989 -12- WHEREAS, Mr. Kuhn submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or Nws" unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought on the following grounds: 1. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the practical difficulty detailed in the application; the proposed property line is mid way between the houses at their closest point; . 2. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and 3 . The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town Code would deprive the applicants of the Nur reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance granted by this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Section 89-35 B (3) (b) of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow the subdivision of property on the premises located at 12 and 14 Copley Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 409 Parcel 113 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck, and the provisions of the subdivision approval previously granted by the Town of Mamaroneck Planning Board and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and it is March 1, 1989 -13- FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. ``. a**y APPLICATION NO. 7 - CASE 898 The Recording Secretary read the application as follows: Application of Mr. & Mrs. M. Snyder requesting a variance from Section 89-33 B (2) (a) to reduce the side yard from 10.0 ft. required to 9.32 ft. to retain a rear screened porch which will increase the extent by which the existing structure fails to meet the side yard requirements pursuant to Section 89-57, in an R-10 Zone District, on the premises located at 361 Weaver Street and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 112 Parcel 367. Mrs. Snyder appeared on behalf of the application and stated that her husband had been dead for several years. She stated that the porch has been in place since 1952 and that she was not aware of its nonconformity until recently applying for a mortgage. The side yard in question borders on an unbuildable lot. Mrs. Snyder stated that she was requesting a very minor variance - .68 feet. On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no significant 411, impact on the environment as determined by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further action under SEQRA. On motion of Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions were unanimously adopted: WHEREAS, Maureen Snyder has submitted an application to the Building Inspector, together with plans to retain a screen porch; and WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections 89-33 B (2) (a) and 89-57 on the premises located at 361 Weaver Street and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 112 Parcel 367 ; and WHEREAS, Mrs. Snyder submitted an application for a variance to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and March 1, 1989 -14- WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application and has heard all persons interested in this application after publication of a notice thereof; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is sought on the following grounds: 1. There is no house near the side property line. 2. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the practical difficulty detailed in the application. 3. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the public welfare; and 4. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of the land and/or building and that the variance granted by this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is 0111110 FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Sections 89-33 B (2) (a) and 89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow to remain a rear deck on the premises located at 361 Weaver Street and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 112 Parcel 367 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance, the building permit shall be void if construction is not started within six months and completed within two years of the date of said permit; and it is FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law. 0 March 1, 1989 -15- ADJOURNMENT On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the meeting was 11111, adjourned at 11:31 PM. onnie M. Burdick 4464 • March 1, 1989 Addendum April 5, 1989 Mr. Robert A. Siegel Presidential Housing Associates 201 East 42nd Street 26th Floor New York, NY 10017 Dear Mr. Siegel, Pursuant to Section 14-37 of Chapter 14 of the Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck, the Zoning Board has granted a sign variance to Presidential Housing relating to the installation of advertising signs as described in Section 14-32 (a) (2) of the Building Code. The variance is granted under the following conditions: 1. The sign to be installed on the Madison Avenue side of the building may be of a maximum dimension of 10' x 24' . 2. The sign to be installed on the Jefferson Street side of the building will be of a maximum dimension of 5' x 12' . 3. The sign to be installed on the Chatsworth Avenue of the building will be of a maximum dimension of 5' x 12' . 4. The aforementioned signs may only remain installed on the building for a period of one year from the actual date of installation. Presidential Housing is to notify the Town Building Department of the date the signs will be installed. 5. As described at the public hearing, the signs will utilize a color scheme of cream colors and dark green lettering. 6. The signs may be installed in either a vertical or horizontal direction. March 1, 1989 Addendum L Presidential Housing 4/5/89 -2- 7. The 10' x 24' sign shall be placed on or above the wall enclosing the trash area, facing Madison Avenue, as proposed. 8. So that the signage does not interfere with new occupants of the Carlton House, each of the 5' x 12' signs may be relocated on the side of the building described in conditions 2 and 3 above. Such 5' x 12' signs may not be relocated from their original locations to an alternate side of the building. By copy of this letter, the Town Building Department will be the 4110 reviewing agent for the erection and maintenance of the signs. Very truly yours, Stephen V. Altieri Town Administrator SVA/bmb cc William Jakubowski