Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1987_02_11 Planning Board Minutes MINUTES OF A REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK FEBRUARY 11, 1987, IN THE COURTROOM, TOWN OFFICES 740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD MAMARONECK, NEW YORK CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order by Acting Chairman Bliwise at 8:20 P.M. ROLL CALL Present: Lester M. Bliwise, Acting Chairman Mary Carlson Anton Schramm Patricia Latona Norman L. Cannon Absent: Sanford A. Bell Gaetano Scutaro Also Present: Lee A. Hoffman, Jr., Town Attorney Gary B. Trachtman, Town Engineer Shirley Tolley, CZMC Phyllis Whittner, CZMC Claudia Ng, Environmental Assistant Lawrence A. Lerman, Town Councilman Joseph Jacoby, Public Stenographer from: J & L Reporting Service 180 East Post Road White Plains, New York Jean A. Marra, Recording Secretary SCHEDULING The Acting Chairman stated that the next meeting of the Planning Board will be held on March 11, 1987. 1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES Due to the composition of the Board, action on the minutes of December 10, 1986 and January 14, 1987 was tabled. February 11, 1987 2. CONSIDERATION - PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Salem Drive & Boulder Circle Block 309 Parcels 1799 & 3 Mr. Robert Armour Attorney Hoffman stated that this was an application for Preliminary Subdivision Approval and a proposed resolution has been prepared which he and William Maker are in general agreement with, including some suggestions and changes. For the record, Attorney Hoffman, indicated that even though it does not have to be finalized just yet, a formal resolu- tion of non-significance on SEQR has to been made by the Board and on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this action has previously been determined to be an Unlisted Action with an EAF having been submitted along with additional information that was submitted, and based on review of that, this Board finds that this action is non- significant. At this time, Mr. Maker addressed the Board and spoke with regard to the proposed changes in the resolution and he indicated that there would be no public improvements in this subdivision and certain references thereto could be elimi- nated. Attorney Hoffman noted that he was uncertain if the Town had the power to require the posting of a bond in this matter so he and Mr. Maker have agreed to subr 'ate a paragraph which states that Counsel to the Towr determine if it is necessary, prior to Final Subdivi '1. February 11, 1987 2. CONSIDERATION - PROPOSED RESOLUTION FOR PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Salem Drive & Boulder Circle Block 309 Parcels 1799 & 3 Mr. Robert Armour Attorney Hoffman stated that this was an application for Preliminary Subdivision Approval and a proposed resolution has been prepared which he and William Maker are in general agreement with, including some suggestions and changes. For the record, Attorney Hoffman, indicated that even though it does not have to be finalized just yet, a formal resolu- tion of non-significance on SEQR has to been made by the Board and on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this action has previously been determined to be an Unlisted Action with an EAF having been submitted along with additional information that was submitted, and based on review of that, this Board finds that this action is non- significant. At this time, Mr. Maker addressed the Board and spoke with regard to the proposed changes in the resolution and he indicated that there would be no public improvements in this subdivision and certain references thereto could be elimi- nated. Attorney Hoffman noted that he was uncertain if the Town had the power to require the posting of a bond in this matter so he and Mr. Maker have agreed to substitute a paragraph which states that Counsel to the Town will determine if it is necessary, prior to Final Subdivision Approval. - 2 - February 11, 1987 Mrs. Latona questioned if this situation had ever come up before and Mr. Hoffman said that it hadn't because most subdivisions required new roads and utilities, etc. It was noted by Attorney Hoffman that Boulder Circle was not a Town street and he recommended that a condition be added to the proposed resolution where no certificate of occupancy or building permit be issued for the lot which fronts on Boulder Circle until such time that road was accepted by the Town. Mr. Maker stated that he found this condition very difficult to accept, and just because he was also the attorney for the Fenbrook Subdivision, he stated that one development had nothing to do with the other being approved. The problem would have to be resolved prior to Final Sub- division Approval and, Mr. Hoffman added, Counsel to the Town would research this and condition it upon the Town's acceptance of Boulder Circle. Acting Chairman Bliwise stated that whose obligation it was to dedicate the road should not be the responsibility of the Planning Board and he thought that it would be impossible to give approval in a situation where the Town may not be able to provide access to a home on Boulder Circle. Thereafter, Mr. Schramm moved to approve the Preliminary Subdivision Approval with corrections and conditions as set forth. Mrs. Latona seconded the motion, with Mr. Bliwise voting nay stating that the resolution should require the dedication of the public road prior to the issuance of a permanent certificate of occupancy. Following further discussion, on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the previous motion and negative decision regarding Preliminary Subdivision Approval be rescinded and that this matter be adjourned to the March meeting in order to provide sufficient time for Counsel to the Town to research the legalities regarding certificates of occupancy being issued prior to the dedication of a public road. - 3 - February 11, 1987 3. CONTINUE PUBLIC HEARING - SITE PLAN APPROVAL MIDLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1375 Boston Post Road Block 411 Parcel 196 The Public Stenographer was present for this meeting and his notes will become a permanent part of this record. On motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing be, and it hereby is, reopened. Attorney Hoffman presented a communication from the new Building Inspector, William Jakubowski, wherein it was stated that if the center of the roof was fully glazed, the building was acceptable under the height requirements. In accordance with Mr. Gary Trachtman's letter of February 5, 1987, revised plans were presented to him by Mr. Victor D'Ortona. Mr. D'Ortona informed the Board that the Traffic Committee had substantially approved the plan with a "No Left Turn" proviso when exiting from the property. There would be much more vehicular traffic with more people coming and going, Mrs. Latona added, to which Mr. Degershein explained that patients and clients would be coming and going during the day but that the traffic study was done for the peak hours. Mr. Donald Mazin announced that he was at the Traffic Committee meeting when the Chief of Police had stated that he had no objection to vehicles making left-hand turns off of Boston Post Road and crossing the double yellow lines in order to gain access to the premises. - 4 - February 11, 1987 Mr. George Forbes appeared and questioned the proposed wall to be constructed on the premises, to which Mr. Trachtman replied that only a curb was shown on the plans; not a wall. There being no one else who wished to be heard, on motion by Mrs. Latona, seconded by Mrs. Carlson, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing be, and it hereby is, declared closed. Some comments and suggestions were given by Mr. Trachtman regarding the proposed resolution and Mr. Hoffman suggested that the posted bond should have an upward limit of $50,000. Thereafter, on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Carlson, the Board unanimously adopted the following Resolution: SITE PLAN APPROVAL MIDLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. WHEREAS, Midland Construction, Inc. has submitted an application for Site Plan Approval for a parcel of land on Boston Post Road, Town of Mamaroneck, New York; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has conducted and completed proceedings pursuant to SDQRA; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has reviewed all of the submissions by, and on behalf of, the applicant, all correspondence from Town officials, the Consulting Engineer to the Town, and the Coastal Z one Management Commission, and a Public Hearing having been held; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that Site Plan Approval is hereby granted to the application submitted by Midland Construction, Inc. , subject to all terms and conditions set forth herein: - 5 - ADDENDUM TO PLANNING BOARD MINUTES OF FRRRUARY 11, 1987 MIDLAND CONSTRUCTION, INC. 1. General Requirements All site work, traffic controls, landscaping, storm water drainage and treatment systems shall be in accordance with and subject to certain revision dates of the plans submitted, as follows: 1) Drawing SP-1, Site Plan, dated 11/25/86; revised 3/6/87. 2) SP-2, Location Map, Sections, Elevations, dated 10/29/86. 3) SP-3, Site Utility, Grading Plan, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 12/29/86; revised 1/27/87. 4) SP-4, Site Details, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E. , dated 11/24/86; revised 1/25/87. 5) SP-5, Landscape Plan and Details, dated 11/25/86. 6) Storm Water Drainage and Treatment System, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Joseph F. Risoli, P.C., dated 12/29/86. 7) SP-6, Erosion Control Plan, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 11/23/86; revised 2/6/87. 8) SP-7, Erosion Control Details, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 11/23/86; revised 1/87;and as modified by the conditions set forth herein. (Revised March 6, 1987) - 5-A - February 11, 1987 1. General Requirements All site work, traffic controls, landscaping, storm water drainage and treatment systems shall be in accordance with and subject to certain revision dates of the plans submitted, as follows: 1) Drawing SP-1, Site Plan, dated 11/25/86. 2) SP-2, Location Map, Sections, Elevations, dated 10/29/86. 3) SP-3, Site Utility, Grading Plan, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 12/29/86. 4) SP-4, Site Details, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 11/24/86. 5) SP-5, Landscape Plan and Details, dated 11/25/86. 6) Storm Water Drainage and Treatment System, Sheet 1 of 1, prepared by Joseph F. Risoli, P.C., dated 12/29/86. 7) Erosion Control Plan and Details, prepared by William E. Morgenroth, P.E., dated 11/23/86; and as modified by the conditions set forth herein. 2. Compliance with SEORA 1. Consistent with social, economic, and other essential considerations of State policy, to the maximum extent practicable from the reasonable alternatives thereto, the action to be carried out or approved is one which minimizes or avoids adverse environmental effects, including the effects disclosed in the relevant Environmental Assessment Form; and B. All practicable means will be taken in carrying out or approving the action to minimize or avoid adverse environmental effects, including effects disclosed in the relevant Environmental Assessment Forms, and addendum thereto, and all special require- ments and modifications set forth herein. - 6 - February 11, 1987 3. Special Requirements A. Water Retention and Drainage 1. The proposed storm water runoff drainage system shall be inspected and maintained as set forth in the plans submitted by the applicant. The by-laws of the office condominium to be constructed shall contain provision for proper maintenance and inspection and shall require that the condominium Board of Managers certify to the Town, on at least a quarterly basis, that the drainage system is operating properly. Inspection, monitoring and sampling ports shall be located either off the paved area of the site or shall be accessible without having to remove pavement. 2. The owner shall enter into an emergency maintenance agreement with the Town to provide, at the option of and without obligation to the Town, emergency maintenance in the event the owner does not properly maintain and inspect this drainage system. These easements and/or agreements shall provide that any expenses incurred by the Town shall be charged back to the particular lot on the next tax assessment. All such easements and agreements shall approved by Counsel to the Town as to form and content prior to the signing of the Site Plan Resolution by the Chairman of the Planning Board. 3. The Town reserves the right to require the retrofitting of an oil separator on the discharge of the proposed filter system if sampling, under normal circum- stances and consistent with the proposed use as a parking lot, shows that oil in the water discharge exceeds fifteen (15) parts per million. B. Erosion & Sedimentation Control — (During Construction) - 7 - February 11, 1987 1. Erosion and sedimentation control plans should be based upon the standards presented in the Westchester County Best Management Practices manual for con- struction-related activities. 2. The control plan shall include a con- struction timetable and an inspection schedule. C. Sanitary Sewerage 1. The sewerage from the proposed building shall be discharged directly to the existing manhole at the northwest corner of the property. D. Traffic 1. There shall be no left-hand turns by any vehicles exiting the site, and the applicant shall post signs on its property to that effect. 2. Curbcuts and other traffic-control devices, including signs, shall be subject to the approval of the New York State Department of Transportation, and such approval shall be provided to the Town prior to the commencement of any construction activities. 3. Any cross - parking easements between the applicant and the property immediately to the north shall be approved by Counsel to the Town as to form and content prior to the signing of the Site Plan Resolution by the Chairman of the Planning Board. E. Provision of As-Built Plans 1. The applicant shall provide the services of a licensed Professional Engineer to certify completion of the work in accor- dance with the approved plans. One (1) Mylar reproducible and four (4) sets of drawings showing the "as-built" con- dition shall be furnished to the Town. The Licensed Architect or Professional Engineer shall certify to the Town that the facilities were installed in accordance with the approved plans. - 8 - February 11, 1987 2. The following notes shall be added to the Site Improvement Plan: a. Approved for Town of Mamaroneck with respect to water supply, sanitary sewerage and storm water drainage only with the following conditions: 1. Center peak, as shown on the building, shall be fully glazed and applicant shall be required to make application to the Building Department for a variance or Special Permit if the center peak is to be maintaind with a regular roofing finish. b. All sidewalks, roadways and curbs disturbed during construction shall be replaced in accordance with the requirements of the New York State Department of Transportation, the Superintendent of the Town Highway Department and subject to approval of both said Superintendent and Consulting Engineer. MALCOLM PIRNIE, INC. Environmental Engineers, Scientists and Planners 2 Corporate Park Drive P.O. Box 751 White Plains, NY 10602 F. Performance Bond/Letter of Credit 1. A performance bond and/or letter of credit shall be furnished to the Town in an amount not to exceed $50,000, and the final amount shall be determined by the Consulting Engineer. 2. Partial drawings shall be permitted when work is accepted as complete and approved by the Consulting Engineer. - 9 - February 11, 1987 4. CONSIDERATION - STATE ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY REVIEW COUGHLIN REALTY CORP. 178 Myrtle Blvd. Block 133 Parcel 627 Attorney Hoffman stated that this application was referred to the CZMC and he suggested that a long form EAF be filed to continue the environmental process review. Mr. Donald Mazin, the attorney for the applicant, said that the Planning Board had determined that this was an Unlisted Action and that they were the Lead Agency. He also stated that the Zoning Board of Appeals was in agreement with that determination. He then requested that a negative declaration on the environment be made and presented a communication from Mr. Fred Kellogg regarding the SEQR proceedings. This matter was also referred to the Traffic Committee, Mr. Mazin stated, and he proceeded to distribute copies of the traffic study to the members of the Board. At this time, Acting Chairman Bliwise and Mr. Schramm questioned the proper procedure of filing papers with the Board having just received the two lengthy documemts. Mr. Hoffman explained the procedures to be followed stating that documents should be submitted fifteen (15) days in advance so they can be reviewed by the Board members prior to the meeting. He added that there was no time limitation running against the Board regarding this matter and that they had to have sufficient time to review the materials in order to make a correct decision concerning the environ- mental impact. He added that to date no long form EAF had been received on this application. Mr. Hoffman stated that he and Mr. Trachtman were in no position to comment on the documents just received this evening. Mr. Mazin continued to explain that a gas station had previously existed on this site and now a new building was being constructed by a local businessman and to adjourn this - 10 - February 11, 1987 would be unfair because there are no adverse environmental impacts. He continued that the Board had documents before it and that he was present to answer any questions they had. Mr. Fred Kellogg said, in recognition of the time element, this letter was intended to be read out loud and they were just trying to vacate things that may just resolve. Mr. Stanely Bierman, representing the Clock Tower Building, stated that basically, it was just Mr. Mazin's opinion that there is no environmental impact and that he would like the Board members to be aware of the serious environmental issues regarding the underground streams which permeate the area as well as the additional gas fumes which would be created by the increased traffic. He added that without a study of the impact of certain conditions, it would be defeating the purpose of the Town's environmental laws. Mr. Bierman then requested that a determination be made that a negative impact statement cannot be issued. Mr. Mazin then stated that a professional consultant did the traffic study and that Mr. Kellogg's letter addressed the underground streams. Attorney Hoffman stated that the 15-day time issue regarding the EAF notification requirement starts to run after the necessary papers have been submitted and the issues are settled such as the effects of an enclosed underground garage on a neighboring building. These issues have to be addressed and more information submitted to the Board before they could undertake a decision as to the significance or non-significance, Mr. Hoffman added, and he then recommended that a long form EAF be filed. Mr. Mazin said if there were impacts, that perhaps they could be mitigated this evening rather than have a costly postponement again. Mr. Bernie Axelrod said he represented the residents of 2 Washington Square and conveyed their concerns over the lack of light and air as well as limited amounts of grass being replaced by blacktop, mortar and cement. He continued that this proposed building would cover two and one-half times - 11 - February 11, 1987 what the Zoning Code permitted and that if this is allowed, what would stop anyone else from doing the same thing. Mr. Alexrod said their concerns were with the environment and the building which is too large and would be harmful to them. The height of the building is 30 feet so no variance was requested for that, Mr. Mazin offered, and the property is located near the NYS Thruway. He added that many of the residents of that building were favorable to the application and that the height requirements were not being exceeded. Mr. Henry Meltzer, the architect for the project, stated they were building at 6,000 square feet more than what would be permitted and that an additional piece of property was being used for parking. The building is being raised up to permit air to flow free and the project is not over-designed for that particular property; it's a small office building on a commercial street, Mr. Meltzer added. He continued by saying that he could not believe this should require an EIS as he has put up much larger buildings which did not require that type of study. In answer to a question by Mrs. Carlson, Mr. Mazin stated that he did not recall being asked for a profile of the rear of the building; he just recalled being asked to submit a smaller building plan. Mrs. Carlson said that she would like to see that done but Mr. Mazin answered that it would be very costly and that they were here this evening to decide significance. Acting Chairman Bliwise explained that all development in today's world takes time and money but that the Board's job was not only to permit development on behalf of both residents and non-residents, but also to follow the various requirements of the law and to investigate and protect the good of the community at large. "If it takes a traffic study or an impact study or an engineering report to protect the good and welfare of the other residents of the community, it cannot be ignored because it is the Board's duty to satisfy all residents," Mr. Bliwise stressed. - 12 - February 11, 1987 "If it takes a traffic study or an impact study or an engineering report to protect the good and welfare of the other residents of the community, it cannot be ignored because it is the Board's duty to satisfy all residents," Mr. Bliwise stressed. "The documents that were submitted this evening have to be reviewed by the Board members as well as Counsel to the Town and the Consulting Engineer," announced Mr. Bliwise. Mr. Mazin inquired if a hearing on the environmental issues could be held at the same time a Public Hearing was held and Mr. Hoffman explained that a Public Hearing could not be scheduled until after the Zoning Board of Appeals ruled on the variances and that the Zoning Board could not act until the Planning Board made the determination of the environ- mental study. Acting Chairman Bliwise apologized for the delay and said there was nothing that could be done except perhaps to build a smaller building because all of this is a result of the concerns raised and the impact it would have on the neighbors. Mr. Bliwise stated that Mr. Trachtman would be available to work with the applicant's engineer but at the present time, there wasn't much else that could be done. Mr. Coughlin reiterated what had transpired to date regarding his application and concluded by saying that he would have his engineer work with Mr. Trachtman. Attorney Hoffman stated that he did not think a DEIS would be necessary and that Mr. Trachtman was not in a position at the present time to determine if a DEIS was needed. Mr. Hoffman said it is hoped that at the next Planning Board meeting, the environmental issues will be in a position to be addressed and the applicant could then go before the ZBA on the variances and if the variances were approved, the applicant would come back to the Planning Board. - 13 - February 11, 1987 Reading from the minutes of the January 14th Planning Board meeting, Mr. Schramm indicated that all of the material which was requested still has not be submitted. Mrs. Latona asked if Mr. Mazin understood what the Board was requesting of his client, to which Mr. Mazin replied in the affirmative and added that he expects a determination at the next meeting. Mr. Trachtman then stated that a long form EAF was necessary for an Unlisted Action and also that he did not receive the short form EAF but Mr. Mazin stressed that it was filed when the plans were submitted. Following the recommendation of both Mr. Hoffman and Mr. Trachtman, and on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this Board hereby requests the applicant, Coughlin Realty Corp., to furnish a long form EAF in order for the SEQR process to be considered as complete. * * * * * 5. RECEIPT OF CZ M REPORT - PUBLIC HEARING PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISION APPROVAL Mr. & Mrs. Mark Rocconi 1 Gaillard Place Block 504 Parcel 252 The Public Stenographer was present for this application and his notes will become a permanent part of this record. On motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously - 14 - February 11, 1987 RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing be, and it hereby is, declared open. Mr. Mark Rocconi, of 3 Gaillard Place, presented his application for Preliminary Subdivision Approval. Attorney Hoffman stated that before the Zoning Board, was the issue regarding a proposed house with an existing lot not meeting the zoning requirements but with the parcel of land in New Rochelle being included, it would be oversized; Town Law 280a had to do with no public street frontage. When asked if the Zoning variance was approved, Mr. Rocconi said it was deferred because the issue regarding the portion of New Rochelle property had to be resolved. There was some discussion regarding Mr. Rocconi dedicating his portion of the land at Gaillard Place to the Town and Mr. Rocconi said that he had no objection as long as the road remained private and not subject to the Town's parking restrictions. Following this, on motion by Mrs. Carlson, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that Counsel to Town is hereby directed to draft a proposed resolution for Preliminary Subdivision Approval pursuant to the recommendations of the Consulting Engineer to the Town. * * * * * - 15 - February 11, 1987 6. PUBLIC HEARING - SPECIAL PERMIT WINGED FOOT GOLF CLUB Fenimore Road Block 347 Parcel 1 The Public Stenographer was present for this application and his notes will become a permanent part of this record. On motion by Mrs. Latona, seconded by Mrs. Carlson, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing be, and it hereby is, declared open. Attorney Hoffman presented a letter from Mr. Vincent Monte- Sano wherein it stated that he had concerns regarding the building remaining an open shed and that noise be kept to a minimum and also that no equipment which created a loud noise when started up be stored in the shed. Mr. Robert Elonzi, the General Manager of Winged Foot, appeared in support of the application to erect a shed for the storage of equipment and he addressed Mr. Trachtman's letter of February 3rd by stating that the construction area would be completely surrounded by hay bales so as to prevent any debris from entering the pond. Other improvements have been made over the past couple of years, Mrs. Latona noted, and questioned if there was an over-all plan for the future of the golf club. Mr. Elonzi stated that their insurance carriers were requesting that certain things be done but he was unaware if a permit would be required for any of them. Mrs. Carlson inquired if Winged Foot could comply with the request in the letter that was received from Mr. Monte-Sano, and Mr. Elonzi answered probably 99% of the time, yes. At this time, on motion by Mrs. Latona, seconded by Mr. Cannon, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the Public Hearing be, and it hereby is, declared closed. - 16 - February 11, 1987 Following some further discussion, on motion by Mr. Cannon, seconded by Mrs. Carlson, with Mr. Schramm abstaining, the Board adopted the following Resolution: WINGED FOOT GOLF CLUB Special Permit WHEREAS, Winged Foot Golf Club has submitted an application for a Special Permit Use for a machine shed at the rear of a garage located on the applicant's premises; and WHEREAS, a Public Hearing having been held on February 11, 1987; and WHEREAS, the Planning Board has considered the application for a Special Permit, the plans submitted by the applicant, the report of the Coastal Zone Management Commission and the Engineer to the Town, and having heard interested members of the public, BE IT RESOLVED, that this Board makes findings of fact as follows: 1. The proposed use, as limited by the conditions set forth herein, is in general harmony with the surrounding area and shall not adversely impact upon the adjacent properties due to the traffic generated by said use or the access of traffic from said use onto or off of adjoining streets. 2. The operations in connection with the Special Permit will not be more objectionable to nearby properties by reason of noise, fumes, vibrations, flashing of lights, or other aspects than would be the operations of any other permitted use not requiring a Special Permit. 3. The proposed Special Permit Use will be in harmony with the general health, safety and welfare of the surrounding area by the nature of its particular location (property of applicant to north, west and south, and residential area - Bruce Road - to the east, a minimum of 87 feet to the rear property line of residences on Bruce Road) . It will not adversely impact upon surrounding properties or surrounding property values. - 17 - February 11, 1987 4. There are no existing violations of the Zoning Ordinance on the property which is the subject of this application; and BE IT FURTHER RESOLVED, that this Board approves the application of Winged Foot Golf Club for a Special Permit to construct a machine shed, subject to the following terms and conditions: 1. The machine shed shall be constructed in accordance with the plans submitted and reviewed by the Building Inspector and the Consulting Engineer. 2. The applicant shall comply with all conditions recommended by the Engineer and Coastal Zone Management Commission relating to minimizing erosion during construction, to wit: A. Hay bales shall be installed so as to prevent excavated materials from entering the pond during construction. 7. CONSIDERATION - PRELIMINARY SUBDIVISON APPLICATION MR. LOUIS GOLDSTEIN 10 Burton Road Block 407 Parcel 335 The applicant's attorney, Mr. George Forbes, appeared and requested that Subdivision Approval be granted. Attorney Hoffman stated that this matter was before the Zoning Board and that they are the Lead Agency and also that they declared this as a Type II Action. Mr. Hoffman then indicated that the Zoning Board had granted the street-line frontage variance for this application. Mrs. Carlson questioned the fact that the property exceeded the lot requirements and Mr. Hoffman explained that the applicant was short on the street frontage requirements. - 18 - February 11, 1987 Mr. Forbes requested that Preliminary Subdivision Approval be waived and that Final Subdivision Approval be granted. Acting Chairman Bliwise inquired if the application was complete, to which Mr. Trachtman stated that there were a couple of things he had questions on and Mr. Hoffman then suggested that the applicant's architect or engineer get in touch with Mr. Trachtman. Thereafter, on motion by Mrs. Carlson, seconded by Mr. Cannon, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that this matter be scheduled for a Public Hearing on March 11, 1987, for Final Subdivision Approval. At this time, Attorney Hoffman spoke about the proposed 50 day deadline for filing plans with the Planning Board and also requested permission to refer an application to CZ MC prior to the next Planning Board meeting and on motion by Mr. Schramm, seconded by Mrs. Latona, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the Strauss application to the Planning Board be, and it hereby is, referred to the Coastal Zone Management Commission as a mandatory referral. ADJOURNMENT There being no further business to come before the Board, on motion by Mrs. Latona, seconded by Mr. Cannon, the meeting was unanimously adjourned at 11:47 P.M. Jean A. Marra Recording Secretary - 19 -