HomeMy WebLinkAbout1990_10_24 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes (2) //2i) F
f
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK �� IQL /
OCIOBER 24, 1990, COURTROOM, TOWN CENTER J \
\,
740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD
ChairmanMAMARONECK, NEW YORK RECEIVED
Present: Joel Negrin, � C 4 1990
Thomas E. Gunther PATRICIA A.DICIOCCIQ
TOWN CLERK
Patrick B. Kelleher a"MARONEC,K
Arthur Wexler
Absent: J. Rene Simon
Also Present: Leo A. Hoffman, Jr. , Counsel
William E. Jakubowski, Building Inspector
Lisa Parrilla, Public Stenographer
Carbone, Kazazes & Associates
225 Mount Pleasant Avenue
Mamaroneck, NY 10543
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Negrin at 8:23 PM.
APPLICATION NO. 1 - CASE 988
Said application is as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. Paul Martin, 62 Hillcrest Avenue adjourned
from the mooting of September 26, 1990.
Mr. and Mrs. Martin appeared on behalf of the application and provided a
detailed plan of the first floor as requested by the Board at its
previous meeting. The house is on a substandard-sized lot for the
current zoning. Mr. Wexler stated that he was satisfied that the
intended place for the rather large addition was the logical one. He
also stated that no substantial space could be added without requiring a
variance.
Mr. Martin presented information about other encroachments into rear
setbacks granted by this Board. One he cited is at 16 Edgewood Avenue.
This variance was granted in 1987 and allows a 14.5' rear yard setback.
Behind the Martins, at 22 Edgewood Avenue is a detached garage less than
one foot from the rear property line. Mr. Martin stated that should the
variance not be granted the family would have to move, probably out of
the community. He is a counselor with the local school system by which
he has been employed for 20 years. It was Mr. Martin's opinion a move
would cause a hardship to him and to the community.
Mr. Kelleher agreed with Mr. Gunther's opinion that the addition was in
keeping with similar ones granted within the neighborhood and that it was
not an extensive encroachment into the setback. He added that there was
no apparent objection from the neighbors. Mr. Negrin was concerned about
October 24, 1990
-2-
screening from the neighbor closest to the addition, and it was agreed
that a condition to deal with this concern was appropriate.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, ,cconded by Mr. Kelleher, the following
resolutions were adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Martin have submitted an application to
the Building Inspector, together with plans, to build a rP,9r addition
on the premises located at 62 Hillcrest Avenue and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 123 Parcel 418; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-35 B(3) and 89-57; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Martin submitted an application for a variance
to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or
unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application;
and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds:
1. The addition is a minimal one.
2. The encroachment on the rear property is relatively minor.
3. The addition fits the character of other houses on the
block and the one behind the house.
4. Were the lot a standard depth, no variance would be needed.
5. There is no encroachment onto the side yard.
6. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
7. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare; and
October 24, 1990
-2-
screening from the neighbor closest to the addition, and it was agreed
that a condition to deal with this concern was appropriate.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the following
resolutions were adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Paul Martin have submitted an application to
the Building Inspector, together with plans, to build a rear addition
on the premises located at 62 Hillcrest Avenue and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 123 Parcel 418; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-35 B(3) and 89-57; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Martin submitted an application for a variance
to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or
unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application;
and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds:
1. The addition is a minimal one.
2. The encroachment on the rear property is relatively minor.
3. The addition fits the character of other houses on the
block and the one behind the house.
4. Were the lot a standard depth, no variance would be needed.
5. There is no encroachment onto the side yard.
6. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
7. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the general
purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not be
injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to
the public welfare; and
October 24, 1990
-3-
8. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that
Sections 89-35 B(3) and 89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and
modified so as to allow the construction of a rear addition on the
premises located at 62 Hillcrest Avenue and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 123 Parcel 418 in
strict conformance with the plans filed with this application and
any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the
applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance
and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following condition shall attach to the
variance:
The neighbor to the southwest, Hillside Road, shall
maintain the hedge which screens the two houses and replace it
with a comparable one should it be eliminated.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
*****
APPLICATION NO. 2 - CASE 996
Said application is as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. R. Kullen requesting variances to renovate an
existing sunporch and add a second floor. The structure, enlarged as
proposed, will have a front yard setback on two streets of 24.9 feet and
18.5 feet where 30.0 feet is required. The existing setbacks are,
respectively, 23.5 feet and 21.5 feet. Further, the addition would
increase the extent by which the structure is nonconforming pursuant to
Section 89-57, in an R-7.5 Zone District, on the premises located at 61
Maple Hill Drive and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 119 Lot 304.
Mr. and Mrs. Kullen appeared on behalf of the application. This
application had been before the Board at its previous meeting. The
concern of the Board, Mr. Wexler in particular, at that time had been for
the mass of the second floor part of the addition. In response to this
question, Mr. and Mrs. Kullen present a number of pages of alternative
drawings. They also suggested the addition of the gambrel roof line.
October 24, 1990
-4-
The Kullens have four older children living at home. Mr. and Mrs. Kellen
want to install their new computer in a neutral space on the second floor
as the children do their schoolwork in their bedrooms. Mr. and Mrs.
Kellen want office space for themselves on the second floor, too, as they
both work and study at night and as the children do their homework.
Closet space is need also on the second floor.
The Kullens plan to install as many windows as are legally possible, and
will accede to their closest neighbor on Emerson Street to hire a
professional landscape designer to plan screening. They will also agree
to new planting in the front yard.
On motion of Mr. Wexler , seconded by Mr. Gunther, the following
resolutions were unanimously adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. R. Kellen have submitted an application to the
Building Inspector, together with plans, to renovate an existing
sunporch and add a second floor on the premises located at 61 Maple
Hill Drive and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 119 Parcel 304; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-34 B(1) and 89-57; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Kellen submitted an application for a variance
to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or
unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application;
and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, RF IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds:
1. The house is on a corner lot.
2. The houses on Emerson street are closer to the front
property line than required.
3. This addition is no closer to Maple Hill Drive than
currently.
4. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
5. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
October 24, 1990
-5-
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental to the
public welfare; and
6. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpo^ze; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Section
89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow
the construction of an addition to the second story and renovation
of a sun porch on the premises located at 61 Maple Hill Drive and
known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block
119 Parcel 304 in strict conformance with the plans filed with this
application and any conditions set forth in these resolutions,
provided that the applicants comply in all other respects with the
Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it
is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions shall attach to the
variance:
1. The enclosure of the sunporch shall have a setback on the
two streets of 24.9 feet and 19 feet.
2. The second floor setback from Emerson Place shall be 20.5
feet.
3. The configuration as shown on the plans for the elevation
shall be maintained to give an illusion that the
differential between the two floors is greater than it is.
4. A plan for landscaping shall be approved by this Board
prior to the granting of a Certificate of Occupancy.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
*****
APPLICATION NO. 3 - CASE 999
Said application is as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. N. Arpaia requesting variance to
convert/alter a one family dwelling to a two family occupancy. The
proposed conversion to a two family dwelling is not a use permitted under
October 24, 1990
-6-
Section 89-20 A & B, or pursuant to Section 89-9 which provides iis' s not
specifically permitted are prohibited. Further the parcel at which the
two family use is proposed is 12,300 square feet where 20,000 square feet
is required pursuant to Section 89-33 A (1) and only one legal off-street
parking space (9 feet x 20 feet) is provided to Section 89-66 A, in an R-
10 One Family Residence District, on the premises located at 434 Weaver
Street and know on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as
Block 221 Lot 167.
Mr. Arpaia appeared on behalf of the application. .
The Board indicated that it would not grant the variance. One reason
given was that such a change is under the purview of the Town Board. Mr.
Arpaia withdrew his application.
*****
APPLICATION NO. 4 - CASE 1000
Said application is as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. R. Thomma requesting a variance to retain a
shed. The shed, as under construction is 2.12 feet from the side line
and 2.97 feet from the rear line where 5.0 feet is required from any
property line pursuant to Section 89-34 B (3) (b) for an arrpssory
building, in an R-7.5 Zone District, on the premises located at 1122
Palmer Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 406 Lot 319.
Mr. Thomma appeared on behalf of the application. He stated that storage
was needed for such things as bicycles as his one-car garage was
inadequate. Mr. Thomma stated that his garage and that of his neighbor
are both at the rear of their properties. His yard borders on the
Central School playground. Mr. Thomma stated that the shed acts as a
noise barrier when his family uses its rear deck; outdoor play creates
obtrusive noise from May through October.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency and
solely responsible for determining whether the proposed action may
have a significant impact on the environment; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no
significant impact on the environment as determined by New York
State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further
action under SEQRA.
On motion of Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Gunther, the following
resolutions were unanimously adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. R. Thomma have submitted an application to the
Building Inspector, together with plans, to retain a shed on the
premises located at 1122 Palmer Avenue and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 406 Parcel 319;
and
October 24, 1990
-7-
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Section
89-34 B(3) (b) ; and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Thonu is submitted an application for a variance
to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or
unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application;
and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds:
1. The applicants require additional storage space to make
full use of their property.
2. Both the applicant's garage and that of his neighbor are
closer to the rear property line than the shed.
3. The lot in question is long and narrow. There is no other
appropriate place to install a storage shed.
4. The only "neighbor" effected is the playing field at
Central School.
5. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
6. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare; and
7. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Section
89-34 B(3) (b) of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as
to allow the retention of a storage shed on the premises located at
1122 Palmer Avenue and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town
of Mamaroneck as Block 406 Parcel 319 in strict conformance with the
plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in
these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in all other
respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of
Mamaroneck; and it is
October 24, 1990
-8-
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and, in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
*****
APPLICATION NO. 5 - CASE 1001
Said application was as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. I. Combes requesting a variance to retain a
pool, pool deck and an extended patio. The pool, pool deck and an
extended patio. The pool, pool deck and patio are prohibited as the pool
deck is 7.5 feet from the rear property line where 20.0 feet is required
pursuant to Section 14-48 A(2) . The pool deck is 0.0 feet from the house
where 15.0 feet is required and the pool is 6.15 feet from the accessory
deck where 15.0 feet is required pursuant to Section 14-48 A(1) and the
deck as extended is 34.0 feet from the rear property line where 40.0 feet
is required pursuant to Section 89-31 B(3) , in an R-20 Residence
District, on the premises located at 26 Country Club Drive and known on
the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 229 Lot 66.
Additionally, the pool deck and filter are located over Sewer and Water
Easements and must be removed or special permission obtained to allow
them to remain.
Edmund S. Purves, attorney, presented the application. He stated that
Mr. Combes had bought the property one year ago. At that time, the
applicant discovered that there were two "open" building permits. One,
issued in 1976, was for a pool. Open items included fencing with the
required type of gates and locks. The pool was built too close to the
property line. In 1979 a building permit was issued for an addition. No
Certificate of Occupancy was issued for the addition. Said addition
included a deck which was built larger than was specified in the plans
and which encroached into the rear setback. The property abuts the
Leatherstocking Trail.
Mr. Purves submitted photos and a new survey. He stated that the
addition is really a terrace, not a deck, and that the house is placed on
an oddly-shaped parcel. Mr. Purves contended that the three closest
neighbors approve of the application. One neighbor, Mrs. Manor, wrote
favorably to the Board, and her letter will become a part of the record.
An additional anomaly is the pool filter house which is constructed over
a Town and Westchester Joint Water Works easement. Mr. Purves stated
that he and Mr. Silverberg, Town Counsel, have drafted an easement which
will allow Town or Water Works employees to remove structures at the site
in order to repair, inspect, or replace the pipes and catch basins. The
Town or Water Works would not be responsible for restoration to an
October 24, 1990
-9-
"as-built" condition. Restoration of grass is the only obligation of
said agencies set forth.
Mr. Combes had signed said easement, and it was Mr. Hoffman's opinion
that it represented a reasonable solution to a difficult situation.
Mr. Jakubowski stated that the applicant had removed shrubbery which was
hanging over a gas heater constructed in connection with the pool, had
repaired broken parts of the terrace and had provided a new survey.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency and
solely responsible for determining whether the proposed action may
have a significant impact on the environment; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having no
significant impact on the environment as determined by New York
State or corresponding local law, therefore requiring no further
action under SEQRA.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the following
resolutions were unanimously adopted:
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. I. Combes have submitted an application to the
Building Inspector, together with plans, to retain a pool, pool deck
and extended patio and to seek permission to allow to remain the
pool deck and filter house over sewer and water easements on the
premises located at 26 Country Club Drive and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 229 Parcel 66; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
14-48 A(1) , and 14-38 A(2) and Section 89-31 B(3) and
WHEREAS, Mr. and Mrs. Combes submitted an application for a variance
to this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or
unnecessary hardship for the reasons set forth in such application;
and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, RE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds:
1. The applicants would incur a financial hardship should the
application not be approved.
October 24, 1990
-10-
2. The encroachments and violations were not caused by the
applicant; the hardship was not created hardship.
3. The property is irregularly shaped.
4. The applicant had agreed to grant an easement to the Town
and the Westchester Joint Watt Works including that
portion of his property under the filter house.
5. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
6. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare; and
7. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that
Sections 89-31 B(3) , 14-48 A(1) and 14-48 B(2) of the Zoning
Ordinance be varied and modified so as to allow the retention of a
pool, pool deck, filter and patio on the premises located at 26
Country Club Drive and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town
of Mamaroneck as Block 229 Parcel 66 in strict conformance with the
plans filed with this application and any conditions set forth in
these resolutions, provided that the applicants comely in all other
respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of the Town of
Mamaroneck; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED that the following condition shall attach to this
variance:
The applicant shall grant an easement to the Town of Mamaroneck
and the Westchester Joint Water Works for access to drainage
catch basins and water pipes in form which is satisfactory to
the Counsel to this Board.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and, in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law
*****
October 24, 1990
-11-
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of this Board will be held November 28, 1990.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the meeting was
adjourned at 10:18 PM.
JOEL NEGRIN, Chairman