HomeMy WebLinkAbout1992_03_29 Zoning Board of Appeals Minutes MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE
ZONING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK
MARCH 29, 1992, IN THE COURT ROOM, TOWN CENTER
740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD
MAMARONECK, NEW YORK
Present: Joel Negrin, Chairman RECEIVED
Thomas E. Gunther
Patrick E. Kelleher MAY 6 1992
J. Rene Simon PATRICIA A.DICIOCCID
Arthur Wexler JAMARONECK
N.Y.
Also Present: Nancy Rudolph, Counsel
William E. Jakubowski, Building Inspector
Marci Dustin, Public Stenographer
Kazazes & Associates
250 East Hartsdale Avenue
Hartsdale, NY 10530
Bonnie M. Burdick, Recording Secretary
CALL TO ORDER
The meeting was called to order by Chairman Negrin at 8:20 PM.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, the meeting was adjourned
to meet in executive session in Conference Room B. Mrs. Rudolph briefed
the Board on the legal issues involved in the Avelino and Carilli
applications. She explained the alternatives if the Board remains
deadlocked on the Carilli application.
The meeting was reopened at 8:45 PM. Mr. Negrin reminded the Board about
the zoning seminars and congratulated Mr. Gunther upon his reappointment
to the Zoning Board.
APPLICATION NO. 1 - CASE 1077
Application of Carl Carilli, 59 West Garden Road, adjourned from January
29, 1992.
William Widulski, engineer, appeared with Mr. Carilli. He reiterated his
arguments and demonstrated the profile drawings. Mr. Widulski explained
the history of the ownership of the properties and agreed that for
several months there had been ownership under one title.
Neighbors appearing were John O'Neil, 32 Fernwood Road and Sharon
Holmgren, 62 West Garden Road. Alos appearing were Richard Tortorella,
Walter Levy, Philip Strenger and Hayden Smith. Among other things, they
were distressed that no scaled-down drawings had been submitted and
enumerated the size of nearby lots.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the interpretation of
Section 89-58 A by the Building Inspector was sustained by a unanimous
vote.
March 29, 1992
-2-
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the following
resolutions were unanimously adopted.
WHEREAS, Carl Carilli has submitted an application to the Building
Inspector, together with plans, to construct a new dwelling on the
premises located at 59 West Garden Road and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 218 Lot 46; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Section
89-35 A-2; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Carilli submitted an application for a variance to this
Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary
hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof; and
WHEREAS, this Board has previously sustained the Building
Inspector's interpretation of Section 89-58 A that the applicant
does not have as-of-right permission to build a house on this lot.
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds.
1. The lot was purchased in good faith, and has paid taxes as
a separate buildable lot since 1983. The applicant
understood that he had the right to build a house on this
lot.
2. There would be no alternative use of the property other
than the sale of the property to adjacent owners.
3. In an R-6 Zone District, this property has 6800 square
feet, a depth of 136 feet, a front yard setback of 32
feet" and a 44-foot rear yard, each of which is more than
required.
4. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
March 29, 1992
-3-
5. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
6. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that Section
89-35 A-2 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and modified so as to
allow a new dwelling with a frontage of 50.1 feet and a width of 50
feet on the premises located at 59 West Garden Road and known on the
Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 218 Lot 46 in
strict compliance with the plans filed with this application and any
conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the
applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance
and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions shall attach to this
variance:
1. Any building that is erected on Lot 46 shall be what was
represented in the plans submitted to this Board with the
exception that it shall be 1 foot less in height.
2. The Building Inspector shall inspect the excavation prior
to construction of the foundation to ascertain that it is
as deep as is practical.
3. The usual procedures for blasting shall be observed in
accordance with the Fire Prevention Code Sections 27-22
through 27-26.
4. The house shall be limited in height to 27 feet from the
average first-floor height to the highest point of the
roof.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and, in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
APPLICATION NO. 2 - CASE 1085
Application of Gerard Avelino, requesting variances from Sections 89-33
B(1) & B(3) to construct an addition with a front yard of 21.05 ft. where
March 29, 1992
-4-
30.0 ft. is required and a rear yard of 12.05 ft. where 25.0 ft. is
required. This is subject to the Building Inspector's Interpretation of
Definitions, "Lot, Corner", Section 89-3. Further, the addition
increases the extent by which the structure is nonconforming pursuant to
Section 89-57 for a residence in an R-10 Zone District on the premises
located at 124 East Garden Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of
the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 214 Lot 280.
(Mr. Simon had recused himself from this application. )
Mark Mustacato, architect, and Donald Mazin, attorney, represented Mr.
Avelino.
Mr. Mustacato had submitted a third plan for this application and
explained the new one has a floor area 10% less than the previous
proposal. The Avelino's personal difficulties were reiterated, and it
was stated that this design meets the needs of the applicants and those
of the neighbors.
Neighbors appearing in opposition were: Allan Wolf, 10 East Brookside
Drive; Jim Miller, 14 East Brookside, Robert Conkling, 130 East Garden
Road; and Michael O'Reilly, 126 East Garden. They continued to question
the practical difficulty.
Mr. Mazin stated that this Board would not be setting a precedent
granting a variance as this applicant was burdened with a corner lot, an
irregularly shaped lot, a shallow lot; and because there is a tremendous
front yard setback on Brookside Drive. He stated that the existing
screening is dense and that several additional trees would be planted for
screening.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Gunther, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency
and solely responsible for determining whether the proposed
action may have a significant impact on the environment;
and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having
no significant impact on the environment as determined
by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore
requiring no further action under SEQRA.
Mr. Kelleher stated, with some indignation, that he would have recused
himself had he felt that he had a conflict of interest.
On motion of Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Negrin, the following
resolutions were passed 4-0-1, Mr. Simon abstaining.
WHEREAS, Mr. J. Avelino has submitted an application to the Building
Inspector, together with plans, to construct an addition; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-33 B (1), 89-44 B and 89-57 on the premises located at 124 East
March 29, 1992
-5-
Garden Road and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 214 Lot 280; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Avelino submitted an application for a variance to this
Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary
hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board herby denies the application on the
following grounds:
1. The practical difficulty shown is insufficient to support
the variance requested.
2. The size of the footprint is too large.
3. The enlarged house would have too great an impact on the
adjacent neighbors.
4. The mass of the proposed house would be too great.
AND, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision, be filed with the
Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
ADJOURNMENT
Mr. Negrin adjourned the meeting at 10:32 PM and reopened it at 10:40 PM.
APPLICATION NO. 3 - CASE 1087
Application of Andrew Gutstein, 8 Addee Circle, adjourned from January
29, 1992.
Madelyn Gray appeared on behalf of her brother. She stated that should
the Gutsteins have children they want to build the proposed deck for
eating as well as outdoor play.
The members felt that the deck was too large for the perceived need.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency
and solely responsible for determining whether the proposed
action may have a significant impact on the environment;
and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having
no significant impact on the environment as determined
by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore
requiring no further action under SEQRA.
March 29, 1992
-6-
On motion of Mr. Kelleher, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the following
resolutions were adopted unanimously.
WHEREAS, Andrew Gutstein has submitted an application to the
Building Inspector, together with plans, to construct a deck; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Section
89-32 B (3) on the premises located at 8 Addee Circle and known on
the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 104 Lot
273; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Gutstein submitted an application for a variance to
this Board on the grounds of practical Difficulty and/or unnecessary
hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board herby denies the application on the
following grounds:
The design does not represent the minimum to relieve the
difficulty as shown.
AND, IT IS FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision, be filed with the
Town Clerk as provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
CASE NO 4 - CASE 1089
The Chairman read the application as follows.
Application of Mr. and Mrs. Dominick Ruggiero requesting variances from
Sections 89-36 B(3) and 89-36 B(2)(a) to construct a rear deck and
kitchen addition with rear yards of 10.0 feet and 13.0 ft. respectively
where 25.0 ft. is required and a side yard of 4.1 ft. where 8.0 ft. is
required for a one-family residence in an R-2F Zone District on the
premises located at 10 Garit Lane and known on the Tax Assessment Map of
the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 402 Parcel 150.
Mr. and Mrs. Ruggiero appeared on behalf of their application. They
stated that their yard is unusable and that the deck is positioned in
such a way as to preserve trees. The kitchen is awkward and out-of-date.
The members were concerned about the large size of the deck expressing
that it is not the minimum necessary to relieve the practical difficulty.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Gunther, with the consent of the
applicants, this application was adjourned until the next meeting.
March 29, 1992
-7-
APPLICATION NO. 5 - CASE 1090
The Secretary read the application as follows:
Application of Carlo Petrazzi requesting variances from Section 89-35
B(2) (a&b) to construct a second floor closet with a side yard of 6.2 ft.
where 8.0 ft. is required and with a total side yard of 15.2 ft. where
18.0 ft. is required. Further, the closet will increase the extent by
which the structure is nonconforming pursuant to Section 89-57 for a
residence in an R-6 Zone on the premises located at 135 Harmon Drive and
known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 215
Lot 409.
Sal Petrazzi appeared on behalf of his father. He stated that the house
was a small one with inadequate closets. An extension had been started
which does not extend beyond the footprint.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Simon, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency
and solely responsible for determining whether the proposed
action may have a significant impact on the environment;
and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having
no significant impact on the environment as determined
by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore
requiring no further action under SEQRA.
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions
were unanimously adopted.
WHEREAS, Carlo Petrazzi has submitted an application to the Building
Inspector, together with plans, to construct a second floor closet
on the premises located at 135 Harmon Drive and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 215 Lot 409; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-35 B(2) (a&b) and 89-57; and
WHEREAS, Mr. Petrazzi submitted an application for a variance to
this Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary
hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
March 29, 1992
-8-
sought on the following grounds.
1. There is little closet space in the bedrooms,and the size
and layout of the house does not allow any other addition.
2. The proposed side yard is not less than the existing side
yard.
3. The footprint is not increased, and the addition is of
minimal size.
4. The appearance of the house is improved by the addition.
5. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
6. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
7. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that
Sections 89-35 B(2)(a&b) and 89-57 of the Zoning Ordinance be varied
and modified so as to allow a second floor closet with a side yard
of 6.2 feet and a total side yard of 15.2 feet on the premises
located at 135 Harmon Drive and known on the Tax Assessment Map of
the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 215 Lot 409 in strict compliance
with the plans filed with this application and any conditions set
forth in these resolutions, provided that the applicants comply in
all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance and Building Code of
the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and, in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
APPLICATION NO. 6 - CASE 1091
The Secretary read the application as follows:
Application of Mr. and Mrs. Maurice Goldfarb requesting variances from
Sections 89-31 B(3), 89-31 B (3)(b), 14-48 A (1) and 14-48 A(2) to obtain
a Certificate of Occupancy for the pool, pool equipment, fence, deck and
March 29, 1992
-9-
solarium. The solarium has a rear yard of 39.1 ft. where 40.0 ft. is
required, and the pool deck is 4.0 ft. from the wood deck, 0.0 ft. from
the solarium, and 11.0 ft. from the side yard where 15.0 ft. is
required. The pool deck is 4.0 ft. from a rear lot line where 20.0 ft.
is required, and the pool filter equipment is 0.1 ft. from a rear lot
line where 5.0 ft. is required for a residence in an R-20 Zone District
on the premises located at 21 Fairway Drive and known on the Tax
Assessment Map as Block 333 Lot 2212.
Andreas Sardelli of Colonial Pools appeared.
Mr. Jakubowski stated that he had a problem. Mr. Goldfarb's neighbor,
Dr. Druker of Jenny Close, had submitted to the Town a survey which
indicates that Mr. Goldfarb's fence and pool deck obtrudes 38.01 feet
into Dr. Druker's yard. Mr. Jakubowski suggested that this matter needed
to be resolved before the variance could be decided.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Simon, this matter was
adjourned with the consent of the agent of the applicant.
APPLICATION NO. 7 - CASE 1092
The Secretary read the application as follows:
Application of Dr. Denise Hyams requesting variances of Sections 89-66 A
and 89-67 B to maintain a professional office without two parking spaces
in addition to the one required for a one-family residence which cannot
be developed within 25.0 ft. of the front line in an R-2F Zone District
on the premises located at 27 Blossom Terrace and known on the Tax
Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 403 Lot 360.
Dr. Hyams had gotten permission in May 1991 from this Board to maintain a
professional office with parking for two cars in a widened driveway.
Following the hearing, Dr. Hyams' neighbors asked that she request
permission for parking 2 cars in front of her house as they felt that
such an arrangement would be safer for the neighborhood children. Dr.
Hyams stated that her garage is used for housing her car and that she
sees few patients at home as she works full-time outside of the house.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Simon, it was unanimously
RESOLVED, that the Zoning Board of Appeals is the Lead Agency
and solely responsible for determining whether the proposed
action may have a significant impact on the environment;
and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this is a Type II Action having
no significant impact on the environment as determined
by New York State or corresponding local law, therefore
requiring no further action under SEQRA.
March 29, 1992
-10-
On motion of Mr. Wexler, seconded by Mr. Simon, the following resolutions
were adopted.
WHEREAS, Dr. Denise Hyams has submitted an application to the
Building Inspector, together with plans, to maintain a professional
office without two parking spaces on the premises located at 27
Blossom Terrace and known on the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of
Mamaroneck as Block 403 Lot 360; and
WHEREAS, the Building Inspector has declined to issue such permit on
the grounds that the plans submitted failed to comply with the Town
of Mamaroneck Zoning Ordinance with particular reference to Sections
89-66A and 89-67B; and
WHEREAS, Dr. Hyams submitted an application for a variance to this
Board on the grounds of practical difficulty and/or unnecessary
hardship for the reasons set forth in such application; and
WHEREAS, this Board has examined the plans, reviewed the application
and has heard all persons interested in this application after
publication of a notice thereof;
NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT
RESOLVED, that this Board finds that there are special circumstances
and/or conditions applying to the land for which the variance is
sought on the following grounds.
1. The office is used minimally.
2. The parking will occur generally at times when fewer cars
are parked on the street.
3. The parking at this property is similar to parking at
adjacent properties.
4. The variance granted is the minimum to alleviate the
practical difficulty detailed in the application.
5. The granting of the variance is in harmony with the
general purposes and intent of this Ordinance and will not
be injurious to the neighborhood or otherwise detrimental
to the public welfare.
6. The strict application of the Zoning Ordinance and Town
Code would deprive the applicants of the reasonable use of
the land and/or building and that the variance granted by
this Board will accomplish this purpose; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that a variance is hereby granted and that
Sections 89-66 A and 89-67 B of the Zoning Ordinance be varied and
modified so as to allow a professional office without two parking
spaces on the premises located at 27 Blossom Terrace and known on
the Tax Assessment Map of the Town of Mamaroneck as Block 403 Lot
360 in strict compliance with the plans filed with this application
March 29, 1992
-11-
and any conditions set forth in these resolutions, provided that the
applicants comply in all other respects with the Zoning Ordinance
and Building Code of the Town of Mamaroneck; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the following conditions shall be attached to
this variance:
1. This variance is limited to Dr. Hyams' use of a home
office.
2. Dr. Hyams shall continue to maintain and use her own
garage for parking her car.
3. Dr. Hyams shall apply for and receive a Certificate of
Occupancy within 30 days of this meeting.
FURTHER RESOLVED, that the applicant shall obtain a building permit
within six months of the filing of this Resolution with the Town
Clerk and, in accordance with Section 89-73 of the Zoning Ordinance,
the building permit shall be void if construction is not started
within six months and completed within two years of the date of said
permit; and it is
FURTHER RESOLVED, that this decision be filed with the Town Clerk as
provided in Section 267 of the Town Law.
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the minutes the meeting
of January 29, 1992 were approved.
On motion of Mr. Gunther, seconded by Mr. Kelleher, the minutes of
February 26, 1992 were approved.
NEXT MEETING
The next meeting of the ZBA shall be April 29, 1992.
ADJOURNMENT
On motion of Mr. Simon, seconded by Mr. Wexler, the meeting was adjourned
at 12:30 AM.
Bonnie M. Burdick