Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout1936_06_03 Town Board Minutes REGULAR IViEETING OF THE TOWN BOARD TOWN OF MAMARONECK, N. Y. HELD JUNE 33 1936 At the Town Offices, 158 west Boston Post Road, Mamaroneck, N. Y. The meeting was called to order by Supervisor McCulloch at 8: 30 P. M. Present: Supervisor McCulloch Councilmen, Bates, Brennan, Griffin, Meginniss The presence was also noted of Town Clerk Marvin, Town Attorney Delius and Town Engineer Foote. The minutes of the meeting of May 20, 1936, were approved as printed. A report dated May 27, 1936, was received from Public Welfare Officer DeVinne concerning medical claims in the total amount of x¢132.00 supplied to two residents of the Town without the authorization of the Welfare Office, which matter had been referred back to him for further information at the meeting on May 6, 1936. On the basis of his report the Board unanimously denied the claims and referred the matter back to Mr. DeVinne. Mr. Brennan reported on the letter of Mr. Irwin, which had been referred to the Town Engineer on May 6, claiming that the Town had taken part of his land for public improvements without compensation to him. Mr. Brennan stated that the Town Engineer had requested Mr. Irwin to have a re-survey of his property made by his own engineer. The Clerk reported on the letter of Ethel Hirshman, request- ing `some relief" on her taxes, which matter had been referred to him on May 20, 1936. He stated that the total taxes open on Section 8, Block 46, Lot 1, owned by her amounted to $819.19 exclusive of penalties, and that this amount was considerably less than the assessed valuation of the property. The Board unanimously denied her request for relief. Mr. Bates reported that the drain at the northerly end of Knollwood Drive had been completed at approximately two,®thirds of the estimated cost. Mr. Bates reported that as instructed by the Board he had endeavored to ascertain the cost of an easement to relieve the surface water drainage condition complained of by Mr. Alfred Eager of Valley Road and that Mr. Archambault, owner of the property through which the proposed drain might pass, asked 43,000 for the easement, a sum entirely too high in the opinion of Mr. Bates. Mr. Eager was present and stated to the Board that the trouble was due to the action of the Town some years ago in blocking the then existing drain. The Supervisor requested the Town Engineer to submit to the Board a written report as to whose responsibility it was that the present condition exists. He also requested Mr. Foote and Mr. Bates to confer with Mr. Young, owner of property adjoining that of Mr. Archambault, as to what his price would be for an easement through an alternate route. Mr. Griffin reported on welfare matters and called attention to the fact that the case load in the month of May was 385 as against 479 cases in April. Mr. Griffin submitted a report upon real property owned by the Town as recently requested by the Supervisor. The report was received and ordered entered in the minutes as follows: T0: The Supervisor & the Town Board of Mamaroneck, New York REPORT: Of a special committee requested to investigate certain real estate owned by the Town, and advise in relation to the possible sale or disposal of such as might not be needed for the operation of the Town government I have made this inspection, and beg to report as follows: Section 1 Block 14 Lot 14 & 15 Opposite 10 & 16 Villa Road (adjoining 19 Villa -Rd. on the East) Area 50 x 115 Assessed value $2,000.00 Through this property, and along the side line, is a 10 foot pipe easement, to procure which the land was evidently purchased. In my opinion, this land is avail- able for building and it could be sold, subject to this pipe easement, for from $1,200.00 to $11500.00 Section 1 Block 62, Lot 16 & 17 South East corner of Leafy Lane & Murray Ave. Approximate area 35.53 x 100 Back line 49.16 Assessed value $1,000.00 There is a triangular piece belonging to Mrs. Stevens which cuts off the frontage on Murray Avenue, down to 35 feet, which is a disadvantage. The land is covered with rock, has a poor outlet in the rear, and might be sold for about $500.00 Section 2, Block 14, Lot 1 North East corner of Sheldrake & Forest Aves. Approximate area 23 x 57 Assessed value $500.00 i This was originally purchased for a street. There is not sufficient land to sell to anyone but abutting property owner after negotiation: Section 2, Block 16. Lot 12 & 13 On Forest Ave. opposite Sheldrake Ave. Area 50 x 116 Assessed value $1,000.00 This was originally purchased for a street, and is worth about $1, 000.00 Section 2 Block 16 Lot 42 & 43 On South side of Forest Ave. opposite -x-'740 Area 50 x 102 Assessed value $1, 000.00 This was on finally purchased for a street, and is also worth about 1,000.00 Section 2, Block 26, Lot 25A From center of Brook to East Brookside Drive Approximate area 25 x 50 Assessed value $1,350.00 The brook abuts this property. In 1935, Mrs. Helen Darling, who owns the adjoining property, expressed a desire to purchase it, and it is not saleable unless it could be sold to someone who merely wished to improve the appearance of the property - to make a more pleasant outlook from their own place. The property is too small to erect a building upon it, and the matter of value could only be ascertained through negotiation, and if the Town decided to sell, as good as possible price gotten for it. It is of no real value to the Town. i Section 2 Block 21 Lot 9 At Bridge and Briarcliff Road Assessed value $800.00 The brook winds directly through the center of this property, and it is not saleable, as the land on either side of the brook is not sufficient for building any kind of a structure on it. The land is not cared for in any way, and is rather unsightly. Section 6 Block 4, Lot 5 & 6 Rear of Chatsworth Coal Company' s gas station on Palmer Ave. Approximate area 50 x 140 Assessed value 9$800.00 We recently had an offer of $75o.00 for these two lots and this is part of the land which was talked about for the Humane Society. Also, in addition to this there is a piece, the exact dimensions of which I am unable to get, which adjoins the pumping plant and land sold to the County, and which is included in the parcel which the Humane Society endeavored to procure. Through this plot there are 2 easements - one running along the railroad for Pinebrcok, and the other along one side, for the sewer. A value cannot be placed upon it, as it is a matter of negotiation, to get the best price possible under the circumstances; and further- more, I understand that there is some question in relation to the title referring to both this and lots 5 & 6, although I doubt if it has any merit in fact. The Town does not need these parcels, and if possible, they should be sold. Respectfully submitted, /s/ Edward C. Griffin Mr. Harry Hausknecht, representing the New York Lien Corporation and Community n vestors, Inc. , two buyers of tax liens at the recent sale, 3 se of the fact that eleven tax Board. He stated that because addressed the o 27 1936 lien sales were being held simultaneously in Westchester on May 9 including the one in Mamaroneck, these two companies had pooled their forces; that two inexperienced men had represented them at Mamaroneck and that these two men had through error and inadvertence purchased five liens at a total cost of 9$650 on property already burdened with back taxes. He asked the Town wn Board to release these two companies from their offer . o to purchase these properties on the grounds that otherwise the companies would sustain considerable monetary loss. The properties affected are known as Section 9, Block 47, Lots 1 and 2; Section 9, Block 40, Lot 24; Section 8, Block 78, Lot 2; Section 8, Block 64, Lot 3; Section 8, Block 51, Lots 44B,45B and 46B. on motion by Mr. Griffin, seconded by Mr. Bates, it was unanimously RESGLVED that the request of Mr. Harry Hausknecht, as above set forth, be and it hereby is denied. Fire Chief LeVino addressed the Board to present a letter of the Fire Council dated June 1, 1936, reporting upon the selection by the A Council of a new patrol car as authorized by the Town Boar d on April 1, 1936. The report recommended the acceptance of the bid of the Mack - international Motor Company at x$5, 983. The Fire Chief described to the Board the painstaking efforts the Fire Council made in reaching its con- clusion. He also submitted for the Board' s inspection a copy of the minutes of the Council meeting at which the choice was made; a copy of the snecificationsfor the car; bids of six fire engine manufacturers; results of road tests held at various places with cars of the manufacturers and bidders' blue prints. Mr. Brennan, Chairman of Fire Department matters, stated that he concurred in the recommendation of the Fire Council. an motion by Mr. Griffin, seconded by Mr. Brennan, it was unanimously RESOLVED that the report of the Fire council, as above set forth, be laid over pending a report from the Town Attorney as to the procedure to be followed in issuing and selling bonds for the purchase of a new fire patrol car. The Supervisor stated that the Board would take up at its next meeting the matter of making a decision on the application of Ivir. Morris H. Petigor for a change in the zoning of property owned by him, which i matter was the subject of a public hearing held May 26, 1936. Edward Ely Hoxie of Harmon Drive, Mamaroneck, addressed the Board to present a letter dated May 30, 1936, and a sketch of a proposed development of the Petigor property. The matter was laid over for the next meeting to be considered in connection with the Petigor application. The Supervisor recommended that the Board supersede the resolu- tion adopted at its meeting on March 4, 1936, appropriating the stun of $60,000 for materials, supplies and equipment for W. P. A. projects in the Town and providing for the issuance of notes (pending the issuance of bonds) for said purpose, by substituting therefor a resolution appropriat- ing the sum of $20,000 for the same purpose. Councilman Griffin introduced the following resolution: RESOLUTION APPROPRIATING THE SMI OF $20,000 FOR MATERIALS, SUPPLIES AND EQUIPMENT FOR WORKS PROGRESS ADMINISTRATION PROJECTS IN THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK' AND PROVIDING FOR THE ISSUANCE OF NOTES (PENDING THE ISSUANCE OF BONDS) FOR SAID PURPOSE. RESOLVED..BY THE TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF yAivIARONECK, IN THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, NEW YORK, as follows: Section 1. The sum of $20,000 is hereby appropriated to pay the cost of materials, supplies and equipment for public improve- ment work relief projects in the Town of Mamaroneck, consisting of highway, drainage and sidewalk improvements undertaken through or by the authority Of the Works Progress Administration of the Federal Govern- . ment . Section 2. To meet said appropriation pending the issuance of bonds of the Town for said purpose, the Supervisor is hereby authorized to issue temporary notes of the Town of Mamaroneck in an aggregate principal amount not exceeding $20,000, pursuant to Chapter 782 of the Laws of 1933 of the State of New York, as amended. Each of said notes . shall be designated L4Works Project Note`. Section 3. The following matters in connection with said notes are hereby determined: Date: June 4, 1936. It4aturity: December 4, 1936 Denomihation: $20,000 Number: W. P. A. No. 1 Place of Payment; First National Bank of Mount Vernon, Mount Vernon, N. Y. The Supervisor is hereby authorized to determine all matters in connection with said notes the determination of which is not provided for by this or subsequent resolutions, and his signature upon said notes shall be conclusive as to such determinations. Said notes shall be signed by the Supervisor, shall have the corporate seal of the Town affixed thereto and attested by the Town Clerk. The Supervisor is hereby authorized to sell said notes at public or private sale at not less than par the rate obtainable, not exceeding six per centum (6%) P er annum, and to deliver the same to the purchaser upon receipt of the purchase price plus accrued interest from the date of the notes to the date of delivery. Section 4. Said notes shall be in substantially the following form: No. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA STATE OF NEW YORK COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER TOWN OF MAMARONECK WORKS PROJECT NOTE. THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, in the County of Westchester, a- municipal corporation of the State of New York, hereby acknowledges itself in- debted and for value received promises to pay to the bearer of this note or if it be registered to the person in whose name it is registers ,the sum of DOLLARS ($ on the day of , 19 , together with interest thereon from the date hereof at the rate of per centum ( `%) per annum, payable Both principal and interest of this note will be paid in lawful money of the United States of America, at the office of or at the option of the holder, At the request of the holder, this note may be registered on the books of the Town, kept in the office of the Town Clerk, and a certificate of such registry shall be endorsed upon this note by such Town Clerk, after which both principal and interest of this note shall be payable only to the registered holder, his legal representatives, successors, or assigns and shall be transferable only upon presentation to such Town Clerk with a written assignment duly acknowledged or proved. The name of the assignee shall be entered upon this note and such books. This note is issued pursuant to the provision of the following laws of the State of New York, as amended: Chapter 782 of the Laws of 1933 and the General Municipal Law, being Chapter 24 of the Consolidated Laws, and by virtue of a resolution duly adopted by the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck on the day of , 1936, for the purpose of providing funds for highway, drainage and sidewalk improvements in the Town conducted as IV. P. A. work relief projects. The full faith and credit of said Town are hereby irrevocably pledged to the punctual payment of the principal and interest of this note according to its terms. It is hereby certified and recited that all conditions, acts and things required by the Constitution and statutes of the State of New York, to exist, to have happened and to have been performed precedent to and in the issuance of this note exist, have happened and have been performed, and that this note together with all other indebtedness of said Town is within every debt and other limit prescribed by the Con- stitution and laws of said State. IN WITNESS NHEREOF, the Town of Mamaroneck has caused this note to be signed by its Supervisor,and the corporate seal of said Town to be hereunto affixed, and attested by its Town Clerk and, this note to be dated this day of , 1936. (CORPORATE SEAL) Supervisor Attest : Town Clerk Section 5. Any instrument issued pursuant to this resolution shall be a general obligation of the Town of It4amaroneck, and the faith and credit of the Town are hereby pledged to the punctual payment of the principal of and interest on said obligation, and unless otherwise paid or payment provided for, a tax sufficient to provide for the payment thereof shall be levied and collected. Section 6. This resolution shall supersede a resolution of this Board entitled: "Resolution appropriating the sun of 60,000 for materials, supplies and equipment for Works Progress Administration projects in the Town of Mamaroneck, and providing for the issuance of notes (pending the issuance of bonds) for said purpose", adopted on March 4, 1936, except that nothing herein contained shall be construed to impair the validity of any obligation heretofore incurred pursuant to said resolution. Section 7. This resolution shall take effect immediately. On motion of Councilman Griffin, seconded by Councilman Bates, the foregoing resolution was adopted by the following vote: AYES: Supervisor McCulloch Councilman Bates, Brennan, Griffin, Meginniss NAYS: None The Supervisor stated that he had received offers from two banks in Westchester County to purchase the Works Project Note above authorized and requested Mr. Meginniss to open the bids. Mr. Meginniss thereupon opened the two bids which showed as follows: County Trust Company - 12/ interest per annum First National Bank of Mount Vernon - 1% interest per annum plus $11.00 premium. On motion by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Griffin, it was unanimously RESOLVED, that the offer of the First National Bank of Mount Vernon to purchase a x$20,000 Works Project Note of the Town of Mamaroneck dated June 4, 1936, maturing December 4, 1936, at the interest rate of 1% per annum plus a premium of 311.00 be and it hereby is accepted. TheP Supervisor stated that it appeared that the sum of $1y ,000 u would be required to pay for the cost of materials, etc. (not including labor) on the W. P . A. project for the improvement of the Larchmont Gardens Lake, which amount, he said, should be charged against Park Dis- trict No. 1. The Board decided to take up the matter of issuing a certificate in the amount of V$15,000 to pay this cost at the next meet- ing and the Clerk was directed to request the members of the Board of Park Commissioners of Park District No. 1 to be present at that time. The Supervisor stated that it would be possible for the Town to issue bonds to pay the cost of the Town' s share of certain permanent public improvements which have been completed and have not yet been bonded for. Among others, he cited the sum of $44,000 as part of the Town' s share of the improvement of the Boston Post Road and the sum of approximately $30,000 as the cost of extensions made to the Water Dis- tribution System of the Town of Mamaroneck. He added that the County had not yet notified the Town of the amount of the Town' s share of certain further costs in connection with the improvement of the Boston Post Road. He asked the Board to consider whether the Town should issue bonds now for the known costs and issue bonds later when the additional costs have been ascertained, or whether the Town should wait until later and issue all of the bonds at one time. The Board decided to lay the matter over until the next meeting. The Town Attorney reported that the Town had not yet acquired title to certain lands taken by the Town in connection with the con- struction of County road No. 67-2 ( Palmer Avenue Extension) . He said u _ _ 125 that at the time of the construction of this road the Town had obtained consents from the reputed owners of the property to enter thereon for the purpose of constructing the road; that subsequently evidence had been produced indicating that the reputed owners might not be the owners in fact and that probably condemnation proceedings would have to be resorted to before the Town could obtain a clear title to the property. Prior to any condemnation proceedings, however, he said, the Town should make an offer to the reputed owners in an effort to purchase the property without resorting to litigation. He said that at the time of the con- - struction of the road the Town had obtained appraisals of the property from competent real estate appraisers. The Supervisor thereupon appointed a special committee con- sisting of Mr. Griffin, Chairman, Mr. ffie g examine the appraisals heretofore obtained by the Town and to recommend to the Town 3oard what price the Town should offer to the reputed owners, all in accordance with the provisions of Section 321-J of the Highway Law. The report of the Town Clerk_ for the month of May was received and filed. The report of the Public ,Xelfare office for the month of May was received and filed. The report of the Building Inspector for the month of May was received and filed. The report of the Westchester County Health Department for the month of May was received and filed. A letter dated June 1, 1936, was received from Mrs. Thomas Russell of Larchmont concerning the proposed re-zoning of the Petigor property. The letter was laid over for consideration at the next meet- ing in connection with the consideration of the Petigor matter. A letter dated May 25, 1936, was received from H. W. Geers requesting the Town Board to reduce the penalties and interest on tax liens held by the Town on his property. After consideration the Board unanimously denied his request. A letter was received from Mrs. J. G. Grossman of Rockingstone Avenue, calling attention to an alleged traffic hazard existing at the intersection of Glen Road and N. Chatsworth A�enue. The matter was re- ferred to the Police Commission. A letter dated May 28, 1936, was received from Wrii. E. Schrameck, President of the Larchmont Gardens Association, stating that the Associa- tion had conferred with representativesof the Maple Hill Association and had decided that an amount of about $53,000 "would appear to be fair and equitable as the measure of relief due the Maple Hill Section and the amount to be assessed against the entire Town on account of Maple Hill Improvements „1 and #2". The letter was ordered filed and the Clerk was directed to notify the Larchmont Gardens Association when a public hearing is held on the Maple Hill assessment matter. A petition dated May 27, 1936, was received from Norman ivlcGlashan, owner of property at the northeast corner of Murray Avenue and Leafy Lane, submitting for the consideration of the Board a plan for five attached dwellings to be constructed on the premises. The matter - was ordered laid over until the neat meeting. A letter dated May 19, 1936, was received from Lucius N. Littauer, treasurer of the Premium Point Company, requesting that the ^n to protect the Premium Point special watchmen maintained by the company p Section be deputized as special officers of the Town of Mamaroneck. The matter was referred to the Police Commission. The Clerk stated that he had received an oral request from Mrs. Bertha u1. Van Sickle, President of the Larchmont-Mamaroneck Humane Society, Inc. , that the agents of the Society engaged in seizing um- licensed dogs be deputized as special police officers of the Town. The matter was referred to the Police Commission. A letter dated PSay 23, 1936, was -received from_ Oliver SJlaggard of 20 Hillside Road, Larchmont , concerning a maple tree in front of his property, which matter had been considered by the Town Board last fall. PIr. Brennan reported that Highway Foreman Pilerola had already investigated this matter and expects to replace the tree in the near future. A letter dated Play 29, 1936, was received from John 'CV. Hooley, of Larchmont, concerning tax arrears on his property known as Section 7, Block 16, Lot 6D. The matter was referred to the Town Attorney. An estimate dated I,4ay 28, 1936, in the sum of 4712.38 was re- ceived from the `''lestchester Joint Water Works, No. 1, of the cost of installation of 450 feet of 6 inch water main and one fire hydrant on Senate Place from Daymon Terrace. On motion by Mr. Bates, seconded by Mr. Griffin, it was unanimously RESOLVED, MHEREAS, an estimate dated May 26, 1936, in the amount of $712.38 has been received from the Westchester Joint Water Works, No. 1 of the cost of installation of 450 feet of 6-inch water main and one fire hydrant on Senate Place from Daymon Terrace; NOW, THEREFORE, BEIT RESOLVED, that the IVestchester Joint 'Water Norks, No. 1 be and it hereby is authorized, empowered and directed to install for the Town of Pilamaroneck and to charge to the Town of Plamaroneck the actual — cost thereof as ascertained and approved by the Board of Trustees of the Westchester Joint Water Works , No. 1 the main as above described. A letter dated June 1, 1936, was received from Edward A. Keeler, I the public broker,insurance placement o , to the effect that to increase to liability insurance limits on the automobile owned by Mr. Alexander Finson, of the Town Welfare Office from the limits at present carried by Mr. Finson' s policy to the limits desired by the Town, namely*, $50100,000, would result in an additional premium charge of $11.11. The Clerk was directed to notify Mr. Finson not to use his own automobile on Town business, in order that the Town may avoid the expense of paying the additional premium charge. The Town Attorney reported on the certiorari action instituted by Nicholas Leone, owner of property at the southwest corner of Fernwood Road. and West Brookside Drive, to review the determination of the Board r building permit for the of Appeals of the Town of Mamaroneck denying a b g y stated that he had applied ert He scat II erection of a dwelling on this property. to the Supreme Court for a stay on the grounds that Mr. Leone had not paid the court costs amounting, together with interest, to about $400 arising out of a previous action involving the same piece of property, for which sum the town holds a judgment. The request for a stay was denied by the court, he stated, and it is therefore suggested by the Board of Appeals, he added, that the Town have the Sheriff execute the judgment against the property, the cost of such execution to be about 5100. I The Board unanimously approved of the recommendation of the Board of Ap eals that the Sheriff be directed to execute this judgment. P I The Town Attorney= reported that he had examined the requests of Annie K. Dillon and Joseph Aversano for permission to pay taxes prior to the year 1916 without interest and recommended approval thereof. On motion by Mr. Meginniss, seconded by Mr. Griffin, it was unanimously RESOLVED, iVHEAEAS the Town Attorney reports that he has examined certain applications for permission to pay taxes for years prior to 1916 without interest, the liens on which ; taxes are held by the Town; and VHEREAS the Town Attorney and the Assessor recommend approval of these applications; and YMEREAS the Town Board in other and similar cases has granted permission to property owners to pay taxes for years prior to 1916 without interest, NO'iil, THEREFORE, BE IT - RESOLVED that the Receiver of Taxes and Assessments be and he hereby is authorized to accept payment of taxes set forth below at the face amount of the liens held by the Town without interest, provided payment in each case be made within thirty days, to wit: year of Property Year of Owner Sec. Blk. Lot Tax Sale Total Annie K. Dillon 5 14 4A, 5A 1914-15 1916 $6.56 Joseph Aversano 8 64 33 1890 1891 1.29 1895 1896 1.21 1896 1897 2. 00 1697 1898 2.02 1899 1900 1.40 1900 1901 1.55 1901 1902 1.20 1903 1904 1.35 A petition dated June 1, 1936, was received from Assessor Smith requesting the correction of the assessment rolls for 1934, taxes of 1935, and 1935, taxes of 1936, in respect to certain lots in Section 8, Block 27. On motion by Mr. Griffin, seconded by Mr. Brennan, it was unanimously _ RESOLVED, WHEREAS the Assessor has presented a petition dated June 1, 1936, for the correction of the assessment roll for the years 1934 and 1935, taxes of 1935 and 1936, respectively pursuant to the provisions of Section 33 p Y: p of Chapter 105 of the Laws of 1916, as amended, ]down as the Westchester County Tax Act; and MHEREAS after due consideration this Board finds it desirable to grant said petition for the correction of said assessment rolls; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the assessment roils for the years 1934 and 1935, taxes of 1935 and 1936 respectively, which show property now appearing on the rolls as follows: Assessed Value Sec. Blk. Lot Owner Land Improvement Total g 27 152,3 Mary E. Hinckley $2250 $8000 $10,250 8 27 4 if it to 750 750 5 et it n 750 750 6 t 750 750 9 t n it 750 750 - 10 ft n H 750 750 11 it tt 750 750 1213 r 750 750 9 $7, 500 $8000 $15,500 be corrected as follows, in accordance with the provisions of Subdivision 5 of said Section 33: Assessed Value Sec. Blk. Lot Owner Land Improvements Total 8 27 1,213 Mary E. Hinckley X3, 500 $8,000 $11,500 4, 9A 8 27 5s6 Dorinda Hinckley 11500 1, 500 8 27 9B, 10 Leonard Hinckley 2,5001 25500 11,12,13 7, 500 :8, 000 $15,500 The Town Attorney reported that a letter dated April 21, 1936, had been received from the New Rochelle Trust Company, as Trustee, con- cernin g tax liens bought by the Town in 1927 on property known as Section 2, Block 29, Lots 1, 2 and 3. The letter stated that the liens had been bought from the Town by the Bonded Municipal Corporation and that on March 25, 1936, the New Rochelle Trust Company purchased these liens by assignment from the Bonded Municipal Corporation at a total cost of 95138.42 including interest and cost of assignments. Thereafter, the letter con- tinued, a search was made of the Town of Mamaroneck tax records which showed that on April 29, 1931 a check was tendered in payment of the tax in question and entry made in the cash book to that effect. was returned from the bank for some reason. On July 29, 1931, another check was tendered to pay this tax, among others, and an entry was made in the cash book as of that date "which shows beyond a doubt that the 1927 sale was included". The letter requested that the above mentioned tax be cancelled and that the Trust Company be refunded the sum of $138.42 or a credit for that amount allowed on the 1935 tax against this property. Accompanying the letter was a report from the Receiver of Taxes dated May 29, 1936, stating that the taxes in question had been paid. The Town Attorney recommended approval of the request. On motion duly made and seconded it was unanimously RESOLVED, 'NHEREAS satisfactory evidence has been presented to this Board that the tax of 1926, sale of 1927, on Section 2, Block 29, Lots 1, 2 and 3 has been paid; RESOLVED that the tax liens for the taxes of 1926, sale of 1927, on Section 2, Block 29, Lots 11 2 and 3, in the total amount of $59.04, which liens are held by the New Rochelle Trust Company, be and they hereby are ordered cancelled; and be it FURTHER RESOLVED that the sum of °, 138.42 representing $59.04 the face amount of the liens and $79.38 the amount of interest and costs paid by the New Rochelle Trust Company in ;purchasing said liens, be refunded to said Trust Company, provided said Trust Company pay at the same time the 1935 taxes on this property. The Supervisor reported on the matter of the complaints of A. E. ,Vullschleger concerning the garbage dump of the Village of Larchmont, which matter ha-d been referred to him at the meeting on May 6, 1936. He suggested that the Board pass a resolution offering to cooperate with the Village of Larchmont, in the matter of an incinerator. On motion by Mr. Griffin, seconded by Mr. Bates, it was unanimously RESOLVED, ,i;HEREAS the Town Board of the Town of Mamaroneck has learned from the newspapers that the Village of Larchmont is considering the construction of a garbage incinerator; NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED that the Town Board hereby declares that it will be pleased to learn of the details of this proposal and to co- operate with the Village of Larchmont in any proposition for a garbage incinerator. The Town Attorney reported that he had been informed by Silas S. Clark former special collector of delinquent taxes, con- cerning tax liens in respect to taxes for the year 1927, sale of 1925, on Section 1, Block 29, Lots 27, 28, 29, 30 and 32A, which it was alleged constituted a double assessment. After discussion the matter was laid over until the next meeting. At 10: 50 P. N. the Board unanimously resolved to adjourn. Town Clerk