Loading...
HomeMy WebLinkAbout2016_12_14 Planning Board Minutes THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING OF THE PLANNING BOARD OF THE TOWN OF MAMARONECK, DECEMBER 14,2016 HELD IN CONFERENCE ROOM C OF THE TOWN CENTER 740 WEST BOSTON POST ROAD, MAMARONECK, NEW YORK Roll Call. Present: Ralph M. Engel, Chairman, Elizabeth Cooney, Edmund Papazian, George Roniger, Ira Block, Eileen Weingarten, Donald J. Kravet,Alternate, Also Present: Lisa Hochman, Counsel to Planning Board,Anthony Oliveri P.E., Consulting Engineer, Elizabeth Paul, Environmental Consultant,Jaine Elkind-Eney,Town Board Liaison,John Landi, Building Inspector Absent/Excused: Ron Mandel. CALL TO ORDER The meeting was called to order at 7:30P.M. Mr. Engle introduced Mr. Landi to the Board. MINUTES Motion:To approve the Minutes of the November 9th Planning Board meeting with technical corrections Action:Approved Moved by Ira Block,Seconded by Elizabeth Cooney. Vote: Motion carried by vote (summary:Yes=7). Yes: Edmund Papazian, Eileen Weingarten, Elizabeth Cooney, George Roniger, Ira Block, Ralph M. Engel, Chairman, Donald Kravet,Alternate. 2. 1275 Boston Post Road PETCO Public Hearing Mr. Landi stated that there are no violations and the dumpster problem has been corrected. Joseph DiSalvo,the applicant's lawyer, stated they are seeking approval of the extension of the Special use permit for the occasional limited veterinary services and grooming and training services of small animals. 1 Isiaha Wing,the manager of the store was introduced. Ms. Brill stated that the application was properly noticed for a public hearing. Motion:To open the public hearing Action:Approved Moved by Eileen Weingarten, Seconded by Elizabeth Cooney. The Board discussed the renewal of the Special use permit. Mr. Engel asked the definition of small animals and Mr. Wing answered mice, reptiles, are considered small animals. He continued that they do not sell dogs or cats but host occasional adoptions of cats and dogs on site. A weight limit was discussed and ultimately rejected as the special use permit is for the grooming of small animals and the occasional limited veterinary services. There were no public questions or comments. Mr. Engel stated the dumpster has not been covered or the gate closed on many occasions and wants a condition carried forward enforcing maintenance. Motion:To close the public hearing Action:Approved Moved by Ira Block, Seconded by George Roniger. Motion: To approve the Special Use Permit to expire October 8, 2018 Action:Approved Moved by Elizabeth Cooney, Seconded by Ira Block. Vote: Motion carried by unanimous vote (summary:Yes=6). Yes: Edmund Papazian, Eileen Weingarten, Elizabeth Cooney, George Roniger, Ira Block, Ralph M. Engel, Chairman. 3. 12 Stonewall Lane - Residential Site Plan - Consideration Mr. Landi stated the stop work order has been lifted and all violations cleared. 2 Ed Parker,the applicant's architect, and Michael Stein, the applicant's engineer, addressed the Board Mr. Stein stated that the Town's consulting engineer has not reviewed the plan yet and Mr. Oliveri responded that he proposed some comments last time and they were mostly technical. Mr. Engel stated everything is to be complete before opening the public hearing, and also requested keys to the gate be given to the Building Inspector so staff and the Board are able to inspect the property at any time. Mr. Parker stated that approval of house is from the Town,with approval of only the pool and pool house from Scarsdale. Mr. Oliveri stated that the pool and future pool house is shown on the site plan but if either changes as a result of the Scarsdale approval,the applicant will have to come back before the Town Planning Board. The applicant agreed. Mr. Oliveri further stated that he looks at the site and plan as a whole including portions of the property in both the Town and Scarsdale. Ms. Weingarten asked that lot disturbance and coverage be shown on the plan. Jonathan Sacks stated he is representing the Tow Fire Department and requested that they also receive keys to the gate, the applicant agreed. Motion:To set a public hearing for January 11, 2017 Action:Approved Moved by George Roniger, Seconded by Eileen Weingarten. 4. 33 Marbourne Drive Residential Site Plan Liam Winters the applicant's architect, and Benedict Salanitro the applicant's engineer addressed the Board. Ms. Brill stated that the application was duly noticed for a public hearing. Mr. Salanitro stated that they have received Coastal Zone Management Commission approval and addressed all comments. Mr. Engel stated there was no revised plan and the rules stated they must be received 14 days before the meeting for the Boards' review. Mr. Winters responded by stating that the plan is the same as previously submitted. Mr. Oliveri stated that he received an email from Mr. Salanitro, and is in the process of reviewing it. Mr. Salanitro apologized, as he thought the documents were forwarded to the Planning Board. The Board discussed the fence height and its placement at the top of the slope. 3 The most effected neighbor was present, and stated they are also installing a fence, it was suggested that they get together and discuss the fencing. Mr. Oliveri stated that once the style and height of the fence is decided on it must be shown on the site plan. The easements were discussed, and Mr. Engle wants the private easement to be approved and recorded. Ms. Cooney stated that it could be conditioned. The Town easements were discussed and Mr. Engel stated that the easement is to be approved and recorded. Ms. Cooney stated that it could be a condition of approval. The Board discussed the driveway entrance and asked whether the tree on Town property would be removed. Mr. Salanitro stated that the original plan showed tree removal and Town Board approval is required to remove a tree. Both Mr. Oliveri and Ms. Paul stated the tree is unlikely to survive the installation of the driveway. The width of the curb cut was discussed and Ms. Weingarten voiced concern because the neighboring property also has a wide driveway close to the property line. She asked for both driveways to be shown on the revised plan showing the grass between properties. Motion:To open the public hearing Action:Approved Moved by Elizabeth Cooney, Seconded by George Roniger. Jeffery Sadowski, of 35 Marbourne Drive, stated he is concerned about the corner of the property near his driveway and wants to be assured that it remains open for visibility purposes when entering and existing his property. He further stated that the stream must be maintained as presently there is garbage and leaves in it. He also stated general concerns about construction. Mr. Engle stated that a condition regarding stream maintenance could be set. Mr. Oliveri stated that a house on the lot might deter landscapers from dumping in the stream. The Board discussed construction fencing,the limit of disturbance and the fact that there will be no blasting because drilled piles are planned. Jonathan Sacks, of 27 Marbourne Drive, stated Saxon Woods is also a neighbor, and that all other neighbors bordering it have stone walls. He also stated that the proposed development meets zoning requirements but is out of character with the neighborhood because other houses have garages. He further stated that the steep slope with a cantilevered deck will create difficulty for emergency access because it would create a barrier. He further pointed out that the driveway has no setback. He concluded by urging the Planning Board to look at the effect on the character of the neighborhood. The Board discussed fire department access. 4 Ms. Paul stated the property does not adjoin Saxon Woods. Mr. Salanitro stated that the channel is dry and fed by storm water runoff. Ms. Weingarten stated concerns about the close proximity to the neighbor's wide driveway. Public hearing was adjourned to January 11, 2017. 5. 12 Mohegan Road - Residential Site Plan - Consideration Mr. Engel stated the filing is incomplete and Mr. Marsh,the applicant, asked for clarification. The applicant was requested to return with a landscape plan, a site plan showing neighboring properties,the zoning calculations on the site plan and all other requirements delineated in Chapter 178. The Board agreed that it is necessary to revise the checklist. Mr. Salanitro,the applicant's engineer, addressed the Board and stated as follows:the house is to be demolished,there will be a decrease in impervious coverage and there will be rock and tree removal. Some of the existing impervious surfaces will be removed. Current impervious surfaces are 4200 square feet and proposed will be 3700 square feet. They are proposing to remove some of the rock under the house to get half a basement. There will be no blasting. Ten test probes were done and it was determined that the rock is shallow. The wall on the neighbor's property will be continued in the rear of the property. Mr. Engel stated that the construction fence is an issue as the Board and staff must be able to access the property at any time. The Board discussed the right of way and Mr. Engel stated that he does not understand why it is needed. Mr. Marsh responded that he is not building over the restricted area and will attempt to legally remove the right of way. Mr. Block stated that until noticed, the public is not likely to voice its views and he recommended, scheduling a public hearing. Motion: To set the public hearing for January 11, 2017 Action:Approved Moved by Edmund Papazian, Seconded by Ira Block. NEW BUSINESS Mr. Landi and Mr. Oliveri stated there should be a meeting of staff and the chairman to work out the check list and application so everything will be complete. 5 Mr. Block stated the checklist is a minimum required,everting in the statue is also required. It was suggested that staff, consultants and the chairman meet monthly before any application goes before the Board for consideration. TREE LAW Ms. Elkind-Eney stated the proposed changes to the tree law is being discussed by the Town Board, Presently Ms. Paul is the only one that can approve tree removal within a certain criteria. Mr. Roniger stated that the letter to the neighbors has to be clearer at o how to appeal tree removal. 6. SEQRA REVIEW Ms. Hochman explained before any action can be taken SEQRA must be determined. Both she and Ms. Paul will look earlier in the process to determine SEQRA and required information earlier. ADJOURNMENT Meeting adjourned at 9:52P.M. Minutes prepared by Francine M. Brill Planning Board Secretary 6